aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/frame.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2013-11-22 13:46:43 +0000
committerPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2013-11-22 13:46:43 +0000
commitc8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a (patch)
treeefaa53faf061be67e4ea1946c1a2e174cbaa4ac1 /gdb/frame.c
parent1bd122facc6a755159f136024d64472e074f904c (diff)
downloadgdb-c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a.zip
gdb-c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a.tar.gz
gdb-c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a.tar.bz2
Revert "Make use of the frame stash to detect wider stack cycles."
This reverts commit f5b0ed3c8ce42b0dd6b6caa0b3d7b7e734311afe.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/frame.c')
-rw-r--r--gdb/frame.c151
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
index f77ce75..535a5a6 100644
--- a/gdb/frame.c
+++ b/gdb/frame.c
@@ -188,31 +188,23 @@ frame_stash_create (void)
NULL);
}
-/* Internal function to add a frame to the frame_stash hash table.
- Returns false if a frame with the same ID was already stashed, true
- otherwise. */
+/* Internal function to add a frame to the frame_stash hash table. Do
+ not store frames below 0 as they may not have any addresses to
+ calculate a hash. */
-static int
+static void
frame_stash_add (struct frame_info *frame)
{
- struct frame_info **slot;
-
- /* Do not try to stash the sentinel frame. */
- gdb_assert (frame->level >= 0);
-
- slot = (struct frame_info **) htab_find_slot (frame_stash,
- frame,
- INSERT);
-
- /* If we already have a frame in the stack with the same id, we
- either have a stack cycle (corrupted stack?), or some bug
- elsewhere in GDB. In any case, ignore the duplicate and return
- an indication to the caller. */
- if (*slot != NULL)
- return 0;
+ /* Do not stash frames below level 0. */
+ if (frame->level >= 0)
+ {
+ struct frame_info **slot;
- *slot = frame;
- return 1;
+ slot = (struct frame_info **) htab_find_slot (frame_stash,
+ frame,
+ INSERT);
+ *slot = frame;
+ }
}
/* Internal function to search the frame stash for an entry with the
@@ -397,34 +389,6 @@ skip_artificial_frames (struct frame_info *frame)
return frame;
}
-/* Compute the frame's uniq ID that can be used to, later, re-find the
- frame. */
-
-static void
-compute_frame_id (struct frame_info *fi)
-{
- gdb_assert (!fi->this_id.p);
-
- if (frame_debug)
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "{ compute_frame_id (fi=%d) ",
- fi->level);
- /* Find the unwinder. */
- if (fi->unwind == NULL)
- frame_unwind_find_by_frame (fi, &fi->prologue_cache);
- /* Find THIS frame's ID. */
- /* Default to outermost if no ID is found. */
- fi->this_id.value = outer_frame_id;
- fi->unwind->this_id (fi, &fi->prologue_cache, &fi->this_id.value);
- gdb_assert (frame_id_p (fi->this_id.value));
- fi->this_id.p = 1;
- if (frame_debug)
- {
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> ");
- fprint_frame_id (gdb_stdlog, fi->this_id.value);
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " }\n");
- }
-}
-
/* Return a frame uniq ID that can be used to, later, re-find the
frame. */
@@ -434,7 +398,29 @@ get_frame_id (struct frame_info *fi)
if (fi == NULL)
return null_frame_id;
- gdb_assert (fi->this_id.p);
+ if (!fi->this_id.p)
+ {
+ if (frame_debug)
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "{ get_frame_id (fi=%d) ",
+ fi->level);
+ /* Find the unwinder. */
+ if (fi->unwind == NULL)
+ frame_unwind_find_by_frame (fi, &fi->prologue_cache);
+ /* Find THIS frame's ID. */
+ /* Default to outermost if no ID is found. */
+ fi->this_id.value = outer_frame_id;
+ fi->unwind->this_id (fi, &fi->prologue_cache, &fi->this_id.value);
+ gdb_assert (frame_id_p (fi->this_id.value));
+ fi->this_id.p = 1;
+ if (frame_debug)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> ");
+ fprint_frame_id (gdb_stdlog, fi->this_id.value);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " }\n");
+ }
+ frame_stash_add (fi);
+ }
+
return fi->this_id.value;
}
@@ -1669,42 +1655,6 @@ frame_register_unwind_location (struct frame_info *this_frame, int regnum,
}
}
-/* Get the previous raw frame, and check that it is not identical to
- same other frame frame already in the chain. If it is, there is
- most likely a stack cycle, so we discard it, and mark THIS_FRAME as
- outermost, with UNWIND_SAME_ID stop reason. Unlike the other
- validity tests, that compare THIS_FRAME and the next frame, we do
- this right after creating the previous frame, to avoid ever ending
- up with two frames with the same id in the frame chain. */
-
-static struct frame_info *
-get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (struct frame_info *this_frame)
-{
- struct frame_info *prev_frame;
-
- prev_frame = get_prev_frame_raw (this_frame);
- if (prev_frame == NULL)
- return NULL;
-
- compute_frame_id (prev_frame);
- if (frame_stash_add (prev_frame))
- return prev_frame;
-
- /* Another frame with the same id was already in the stash. We just
- detected a cycle. */
- if (frame_debug)
- {
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> ");
- fprint_frame (gdb_stdlog, NULL);
- fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " // this frame has same ID }\n");
- }
- this_frame->stop_reason = UNWIND_SAME_ID;
- /* Unlink. */
- prev_frame->next = NULL;
- this_frame->prev = NULL;
- return NULL;
-}
-
/* Return a "struct frame_info" corresponding to the frame that called
THIS_FRAME. Returns NULL if there is no such frame.
@@ -1716,6 +1666,7 @@ get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame)
{
struct frame_id this_id;
struct gdbarch *gdbarch;
+ struct frame_info *prev_frame;
gdb_assert (this_frame != NULL);
gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
@@ -1758,7 +1709,7 @@ get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame)
until we have unwound all the way down to the previous non-inline
frame. */
if (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME)
- return get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (this_frame);
+ return get_prev_frame_raw (this_frame);
/* Check that this frame is unwindable. If it isn't, don't try to
unwind to the prev frame. */
@@ -1864,7 +1815,31 @@ get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame)
}
}
- return get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (this_frame);
+ prev_frame = get_prev_frame_raw (this_frame);
+
+ /* Check that this and the prev frame are not identical. If they
+ are, there is most likely a stack cycle. Unlike the tests above,
+ we do this right after creating the prev frame, to avoid ever
+ ending up with two frames with the same id in the frame
+ chain. */
+ if (prev_frame != NULL
+ && frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (prev_frame),
+ get_frame_id (this_frame)))
+ {
+ if (frame_debug)
+ {
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> ");
+ fprint_frame (gdb_stdlog, NULL);
+ fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " // this frame has same ID }\n");
+ }
+ this_frame->stop_reason = UNWIND_SAME_ID;
+ /* Unlink. */
+ prev_frame->next = NULL;
+ this_frame->prev = NULL;
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return prev_frame;
}
/* Construct a new "struct frame_info" and link it previous to