diff options
author | Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> | 2013-11-22 13:46:43 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> | 2013-11-22 13:46:43 +0000 |
commit | c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a (patch) | |
tree | efaa53faf061be67e4ea1946c1a2e174cbaa4ac1 /gdb/frame.c | |
parent | 1bd122facc6a755159f136024d64472e074f904c (diff) | |
download | gdb-c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a.zip gdb-c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a.tar.gz gdb-c8381c86b4d54d2362ebcdcdd88c352aa62c207a.tar.bz2 |
Revert "Make use of the frame stash to detect wider stack cycles."
This reverts commit f5b0ed3c8ce42b0dd6b6caa0b3d7b7e734311afe.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/frame.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/frame.c | 151 |
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 88 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c index f77ce75..535a5a6 100644 --- a/gdb/frame.c +++ b/gdb/frame.c @@ -188,31 +188,23 @@ frame_stash_create (void) NULL); } -/* Internal function to add a frame to the frame_stash hash table. - Returns false if a frame with the same ID was already stashed, true - otherwise. */ +/* Internal function to add a frame to the frame_stash hash table. Do + not store frames below 0 as they may not have any addresses to + calculate a hash. */ -static int +static void frame_stash_add (struct frame_info *frame) { - struct frame_info **slot; - - /* Do not try to stash the sentinel frame. */ - gdb_assert (frame->level >= 0); - - slot = (struct frame_info **) htab_find_slot (frame_stash, - frame, - INSERT); - - /* If we already have a frame in the stack with the same id, we - either have a stack cycle (corrupted stack?), or some bug - elsewhere in GDB. In any case, ignore the duplicate and return - an indication to the caller. */ - if (*slot != NULL) - return 0; + /* Do not stash frames below level 0. */ + if (frame->level >= 0) + { + struct frame_info **slot; - *slot = frame; - return 1; + slot = (struct frame_info **) htab_find_slot (frame_stash, + frame, + INSERT); + *slot = frame; + } } /* Internal function to search the frame stash for an entry with the @@ -397,34 +389,6 @@ skip_artificial_frames (struct frame_info *frame) return frame; } -/* Compute the frame's uniq ID that can be used to, later, re-find the - frame. */ - -static void -compute_frame_id (struct frame_info *fi) -{ - gdb_assert (!fi->this_id.p); - - if (frame_debug) - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "{ compute_frame_id (fi=%d) ", - fi->level); - /* Find the unwinder. */ - if (fi->unwind == NULL) - frame_unwind_find_by_frame (fi, &fi->prologue_cache); - /* Find THIS frame's ID. */ - /* Default to outermost if no ID is found. */ - fi->this_id.value = outer_frame_id; - fi->unwind->this_id (fi, &fi->prologue_cache, &fi->this_id.value); - gdb_assert (frame_id_p (fi->this_id.value)); - fi->this_id.p = 1; - if (frame_debug) - { - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> "); - fprint_frame_id (gdb_stdlog, fi->this_id.value); - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " }\n"); - } -} - /* Return a frame uniq ID that can be used to, later, re-find the frame. */ @@ -434,7 +398,29 @@ get_frame_id (struct frame_info *fi) if (fi == NULL) return null_frame_id; - gdb_assert (fi->this_id.p); + if (!fi->this_id.p) + { + if (frame_debug) + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "{ get_frame_id (fi=%d) ", + fi->level); + /* Find the unwinder. */ + if (fi->unwind == NULL) + frame_unwind_find_by_frame (fi, &fi->prologue_cache); + /* Find THIS frame's ID. */ + /* Default to outermost if no ID is found. */ + fi->this_id.value = outer_frame_id; + fi->unwind->this_id (fi, &fi->prologue_cache, &fi->this_id.value); + gdb_assert (frame_id_p (fi->this_id.value)); + fi->this_id.p = 1; + if (frame_debug) + { + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> "); + fprint_frame_id (gdb_stdlog, fi->this_id.value); + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " }\n"); + } + frame_stash_add (fi); + } + return fi->this_id.value; } @@ -1669,42 +1655,6 @@ frame_register_unwind_location (struct frame_info *this_frame, int regnum, } } -/* Get the previous raw frame, and check that it is not identical to - same other frame frame already in the chain. If it is, there is - most likely a stack cycle, so we discard it, and mark THIS_FRAME as - outermost, with UNWIND_SAME_ID stop reason. Unlike the other - validity tests, that compare THIS_FRAME and the next frame, we do - this right after creating the previous frame, to avoid ever ending - up with two frames with the same id in the frame chain. */ - -static struct frame_info * -get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (struct frame_info *this_frame) -{ - struct frame_info *prev_frame; - - prev_frame = get_prev_frame_raw (this_frame); - if (prev_frame == NULL) - return NULL; - - compute_frame_id (prev_frame); - if (frame_stash_add (prev_frame)) - return prev_frame; - - /* Another frame with the same id was already in the stash. We just - detected a cycle. */ - if (frame_debug) - { - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> "); - fprint_frame (gdb_stdlog, NULL); - fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " // this frame has same ID }\n"); - } - this_frame->stop_reason = UNWIND_SAME_ID; - /* Unlink. */ - prev_frame->next = NULL; - this_frame->prev = NULL; - return NULL; -} - /* Return a "struct frame_info" corresponding to the frame that called THIS_FRAME. Returns NULL if there is no such frame. @@ -1716,6 +1666,7 @@ get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame) { struct frame_id this_id; struct gdbarch *gdbarch; + struct frame_info *prev_frame; gdb_assert (this_frame != NULL); gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame); @@ -1758,7 +1709,7 @@ get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame) until we have unwound all the way down to the previous non-inline frame. */ if (get_frame_type (this_frame) == INLINE_FRAME) - return get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (this_frame); + return get_prev_frame_raw (this_frame); /* Check that this frame is unwindable. If it isn't, don't try to unwind to the prev frame. */ @@ -1864,7 +1815,31 @@ get_prev_frame_1 (struct frame_info *this_frame) } } - return get_prev_frame_if_no_cycle (this_frame); + prev_frame = get_prev_frame_raw (this_frame); + + /* Check that this and the prev frame are not identical. If they + are, there is most likely a stack cycle. Unlike the tests above, + we do this right after creating the prev frame, to avoid ever + ending up with two frames with the same id in the frame + chain. */ + if (prev_frame != NULL + && frame_id_eq (get_frame_id (prev_frame), + get_frame_id (this_frame))) + { + if (frame_debug) + { + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, "-> "); + fprint_frame (gdb_stdlog, NULL); + fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog, " // this frame has same ID }\n"); + } + this_frame->stop_reason = UNWIND_SAME_ID; + /* Unlink. */ + prev_frame->next = NULL; + this_frame->prev = NULL; + return NULL; + } + + return prev_frame; } /* Construct a new "struct frame_info" and link it previous to |