diff options
author | Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> | 2020-11-06 13:40:22 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> | 2020-11-06 20:58:06 +0000 |
commit | 86775fab42c7d6646722ee0404c4987b769a9dfe (patch) | |
tree | e72b1d594451834908de34b212001eca4f499f42 /gdb/expprint.c | |
parent | a1945bd4520d2964e7d022b9171bf6bb58d8e90a (diff) | |
download | gdb-86775fab42c7d6646722ee0404c4987b769a9dfe.zip gdb-86775fab42c7d6646722ee0404c4987b769a9dfe.tar.gz gdb-86775fab42c7d6646722ee0404c4987b769a9dfe.tar.bz2 |
gdb: fix debug expression dumping of function call expressions
In commit:
commit 6d81691950f8c4be4a49a85a672255c140e82468
CommitDate: Sat Sep 19 09:44:58 2020 +0100
gdb/fortran: Move Fortran expression handling into f-lang.c
A bug was introduced that broke GDB's ability to perform debug dumps
of expressions containing function calls. For example this would no
longer work:
(gdb) set debug expression 1
(gdb) print call_me (&val)
Dump of expression @ 0x4eced60, before conversion to prefix form:
Language c, 12 elements, 16 bytes each.
Index Opcode Hex Value String Value
0 OP_VAR_VALUE 40 (...............
1 OP_M2_STRING 79862864 P...............
2 unknown opcode: 224 79862240 ................
3 OP_VAR_VALUE 40 (...............
4 OP_VAR_VALUE 40 (...............
5 OP_RUST_ARRAY 79861600 `...............
6 UNOP_PREDECREMENT 79861312 @...............
7 OP_VAR_VALUE 40 (...............
8 UNOP_ADDR 61 =...............
9 OP_FUNCALL 46 ................
10 BINOP_ADD 1 ................
11 OP_FUNCALL 46 ................
Dump of expression @ 0x4eced60, after conversion to prefix form:
Expression: `call_me (&main::val, VAL(Aborted (core dumped)
The situation was even worse for Fortran function calls, or array
indexes, which both make use of the same expression opcode.
The problem was that in a couple of places the index into the
expression array was handled incorrectly causing GDB to interpret
elements incorrectly. These issues are fixed in this commit.
There are already some tests to check GDB when 'set debug expression
1' is set, these can be found in gdb.*/debug-expr.exp. Unfortunately
the cases above were not covered.
In this commit I have cleaned up all of the debug-expr.exp files a
little, there was a helper function that had clearly been copied into
each file, this is now moved into lib/gdb.exp.
I've added a gdb.fortran/debug-expr.exp test file, and extended
gdb.base/debug-expr.exp to cover the function call case.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* expprint.c (print_subexp_funcall): Increment expression position
after reading argument count.
* f-lang.c (print_subexp_f): Skip over opcode before calling
common function.
(dump_subexp_body_f): Likewise.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.base/debug-expr.c: Add extra function to allow for an
additional test.
* gdb.base/debug-expr.exp (test_debug_expr): Delete, replace calls
to this proc with gdb_test_debug_expr. Add an extra test.
* gdb.cp/debug-expr.exp (test_debug_expr): Delete, replace calls
to this proc with gdb_test_debug_expr, give the tests names
* gdb.dlang/debug-expr.exp (test_debug_expr): Delete, replace
calls to this proc with gdb_test_debug_expr, give the tests names
* gdb.fortran/debug-expr.exp: New file.
* gdb.fortran/debug-expr.f90: New file.
* lib/gdb.exp (gdb_test_debug_expr): New proc.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/expprint.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/expprint.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/expprint.c b/gdb/expprint.c index f4668aa..29e6237 100644 --- a/gdb/expprint.c +++ b/gdb/expprint.c @@ -60,8 +60,8 @@ void print_subexp_funcall (struct expression *exp, int *pos, struct ui_file *stream) { - (*pos) += 2; unsigned nargs = longest_to_int (exp->elts[*pos].longconst); + (*pos) += 2; print_subexp (exp, pos, stream, PREC_SUFFIX); fputs_filtered (" (", stream); for (unsigned tem = 0; tem < nargs; tem++) |