diff options
author | Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> | 2021-10-27 10:07:56 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2022-06-15 09:44:54 +0100 |
commit | f0c2e3e020d350b410e1bbe4ed636f2ea228d555 (patch) | |
tree | e27ca17e48a702c63330b2c6e4852d7a594284d8 /gdb/disasm.c | |
parent | 8a0b60471a75ce81b8ea067f6e87457b3ed0c7a3 (diff) | |
download | gdb-f0c2e3e020d350b410e1bbe4ed636f2ea228d555.zip gdb-f0c2e3e020d350b410e1bbe4ed636f2ea228d555.tar.gz gdb-f0c2e3e020d350b410e1bbe4ed636f2ea228d555.tar.bz2 |
gdb: add new base class to gdb_disassembler
The motivation for this change is an upcoming Python disassembler API
that I would like to add. As part of that change I need to create a
new disassembler like class that contains a disassemble_info and a
gdbarch. The management of these two objects is identical to how we
manage these objects within gdb_disassembler, so it might be tempting
for my new class to inherit from gdb_disassembler.
The problem however, is that gdb_disassembler has a tight connection
between its constructor, and its print_insn method. In the
constructor the ui_file* that is passed in is replaced with a member
variable string_file*, and then in print_insn, the contents of the
member variable string_file are printed to the original ui_file*.
What this means is that the gdb_disassembler class has a tight
coupling between its constructor and print_insn; the class just isn't
intended to be used in a situation where print_insn is not going to be
called, which is how my (upcoming) sub-class would need to operate.
My solution then, is to separate out the management of the
disassemble_info and gdbarch into a new gdb_disassemble_info class,
and make this class a parent of gdb_disassembler.
In arm-tdep.c and mips-tdep.c, where we used to cast the
disassemble_info->application_data to a gdb_disassembler, we can now
cast to a gdb_disassemble_info as we only need to access the gdbarch
information.
Now, my new Python disassembler sub-class will still want to print
things to an output stream, and so we will want access to the
dis_asm_fprintf functionality for printing.
However, rather than move this printing code into the
gdb_disassemble_info base class, I have added yet another level of
hierarchy, a gdb_printing_disassembler, thus the class structure is
now:
struct gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_printing_disassembler : public gdb_disassemble_info {};
struct gdb_disassembler : public gdb_printing_disassembler {};
In a later commit my new Python disassembler will inherit from
gdb_printing_disassembler.
The reason for adding the additional layer to the class hierarchy is
that in yet another commit I intend to rewrite the function
gdb_buffered_insn_length, and to do this I will be creating yet more
disassembler like classes, however, these will not print anything,
thus I will add a gdb_non_printing_disassembler class that also
inherits from gdb_disassemble_info. Knowing that that change is
coming, I've gone with the above class hierarchy now.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/disasm.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/disasm.c | 58 |
1 files changed, 38 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/disasm.c b/gdb/disasm.c index f2df5ef..6ac8438 100644 --- a/gdb/disasm.c +++ b/gdb/disasm.c @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_print_address (bfd_vma addr, /* Format disassembler output to STREAM. */ int -gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...) +gdb_printing_disassembler::fprintf_func (void *stream, + const char *format, ...) { va_list args; @@ -180,9 +181,9 @@ gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_fprintf (void *stream, const char *format, ...) /* See disasm.h. */ int -gdb_disassembler::dis_asm_styled_fprintf (void *stream, - enum disassembler_style style, - const char *format, ...) +gdb_printing_disassembler::fprintf_styled_func (void *stream, + enum disassembler_style style, + const char *format, ...) { va_list args; @@ -797,26 +798,41 @@ get_all_disassembler_options (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) gdb_disassembler::gdb_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *file, - di_read_memory_ftype read_memory_func) - : m_gdbarch (gdbarch), + read_memory_ftype func) + : gdb_printing_disassembler (gdbarch, &m_buffer, func, + dis_asm_memory_error, dis_asm_print_address), m_buffer (!use_ext_lang_colorization_p && disassembler_styling && file->can_emit_style_escape ()), m_dest (file) +{ /* Nothing. */ } + +/* See disasm.h. */ + +gdb_disassemble_info::gdb_disassemble_info + (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct ui_file *stream, + read_memory_ftype read_memory_func, memory_error_ftype memory_error_func, + print_address_ftype print_address_func, fprintf_ftype fprintf_func, + fprintf_styled_ftype fprintf_styled_func) + : m_gdbarch (gdbarch) { - init_disassemble_info (&m_di, &m_buffer, dis_asm_fprintf, - dis_asm_styled_fprintf); + gdb_assert (fprintf_func != nullptr); + gdb_assert (fprintf_styled_func != nullptr); + init_disassemble_info (&m_di, stream, fprintf_func, + fprintf_styled_func); m_di.flavour = bfd_target_unknown_flavour; - m_di.memory_error_func = dis_asm_memory_error; - m_di.print_address_func = dis_asm_print_address; - /* NOTE: cagney/2003-04-28: The original code, from the old Insight - disassembler had a local optimization here. By default it would - access the executable file, instead of the target memory (there - was a growing list of exceptions though). Unfortunately, the - heuristic was flawed. Commands like "disassemble &variable" - didn't work as they relied on the access going to the target. - Further, it has been superseeded by trust-read-only-sections - (although that should be superseeded by target_trust..._p()). */ - m_di.read_memory_func = read_memory_func; + + /* The memory_error_func, print_address_func, and read_memory_func are + all initialized to a default (non-nullptr) value by the call to + init_disassemble_info above. If the user is overriding these fields + (by passing non-nullptr values) then do that now, otherwise, leave + these fields as the defaults. */ + if (memory_error_func != nullptr) + m_di.memory_error_func = memory_error_func; + if (print_address_func != nullptr) + m_di.print_address_func = print_address_func; + if (read_memory_func != nullptr) + m_di.read_memory_func = read_memory_func; + m_di.arch = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)->arch; m_di.mach = gdbarch_bfd_arch_info (gdbarch)->mach; m_di.endian = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch); @@ -828,7 +844,9 @@ gdb_disassembler::gdb_disassembler (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, disassemble_init_for_target (&m_di); } -gdb_disassembler::~gdb_disassembler () +/* See disasm.h. */ + +gdb_disassemble_info::~gdb_disassemble_info () { disassemble_free_target (&m_di); } |