diff options
author | Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> | 2007-10-11 19:01:43 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> | 2007-10-11 19:01:43 +0000 |
commit | 35156bae494b16fdaa0dca827dd7b9a4f93eba72 (patch) | |
tree | 7ce7cadbca4d574c9df20de8bd352b070d66f151 /gdb/dbxread.c | |
parent | 3d47173c81a093abb29c3f18c753a80bfd734864 (diff) | |
download | gdb-35156bae494b16fdaa0dca827dd7b9a4f93eba72.zip gdb-35156bae494b16fdaa0dca827dd7b9a4f93eba72.tar.gz gdb-35156bae494b16fdaa0dca827dd7b9a4f93eba72.tar.bz2 |
* dbxread.c (process_one_symbol): Remove VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK
checks.
* config/arm/embed.mt, config/arm/linux.mt, config/arm/wince.mt: Do
not set DEPRECATED_TM_FILE.
* config/arm/tm-arm.h: Delete file.
* gdbint.texinfo (Target Conditionals): Remove VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/dbxread.c')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/dbxread.c | 38 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/dbxread.c b/gdb/dbxread.c index 95f8cd8..d472d3e 100644 --- a/gdb/dbxread.c +++ b/gdb/dbxread.c @@ -2794,38 +2794,19 @@ process_one_symbol (int type, int desc, CORE_ADDR valu, char *name, if (desc != new->depth) lbrac_mismatch_complaint (symnum); - /* Some compilers put the variable decls inside of an - LBRAC/RBRAC block. This macro should be nonzero if this is - true. DESC is N_DESC from the N_RBRAC symbol. GCC_P is true - if we've detected the GCC_COMPILED_SYMBOL or the - GCC2_COMPILED_SYMBOL. */ -#if !defined (VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK) -#define VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK(desc, gcc_p) 0 -#endif - - /* Can only use new->locals as local symbols here if we're in - GCC or on a machine that puts them before the lbrack. */ - if (!VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation)) + if (local_symbols != NULL) { - if (local_symbols != NULL) - { - /* GCC development snapshots from March to December of - 2000 would output N_LSYM entries after N_LBRAC - entries. As a consequence, these symbols are simply - discarded. Complain if this is the case. Note that - there are some compilers which legitimately put local - symbols within an LBRAC/RBRAC block; this complaint - might also help sort out problems in which - VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK is incorrectly defined. */ - complaint (&symfile_complaints, _("\ + /* GCC development snapshots from March to December of + 2000 would output N_LSYM entries after N_LBRAC + entries. As a consequence, these symbols are simply + discarded. Complain if this is the case. */ + complaint (&symfile_complaints, _("\ misplaced N_LBRAC entry; discarding local symbols which have \ no enclosing block")); - } - local_symbols = new->locals; } + local_symbols = new->locals; - if (context_stack_depth - > !VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation)) + if (context_stack_depth > 1) { /* This is not the outermost LBRAC...RBRAC pair in the function, its local symbols preceded it, and are the ones @@ -2858,9 +2839,6 @@ no enclosing block")); within_function = 0; } - if (VARIABLES_INSIDE_BLOCK (desc, processing_gcc_compilation)) - /* Now pop locals of block just finished. */ - local_symbols = new->locals; break; case N_FN: |