aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/common
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2017-04-19 13:12:23 +0100
committerPedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>2017-04-19 13:12:23 +0100
commit9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c (patch)
tree2f32099a2ea3e9427249d6911529c6b3b4c6d332 /gdb/common
parent26fcd539dd38a27259d8179152d617118f016706 (diff)
downloadgdb-9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c.zip
gdb-9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c.tar.gz
gdb-9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c.tar.bz2
Make inferior::detaching a bool, and introduce scoped_restore::release()
I left making inferior::detaching a bool to a separate patch, because doing that makes a make_cleanup_restore_integer call in infrun.c:prepare_for_detach no longer compile (passing a 'bool *' when an 'int *' is expected). Since we want to get rid of cleanups anyway, I looked at converting that to a scoped_restore. However, prepare_for_detach wants to discard the cleanup on success, and scoped_restore doesn't have an equivalent for that. So I added one -- I called it "release()" because it seems like a natural fit in the way standard components call similarly-spirited methods, and, it's also what the proposal for a generic scope guard calls it too, AFAICS: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4189.pdf I've added some scoped_guard unit tests, while at it. gdb/ChangeLog: 2017-04-19 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> * Makefile.in (SUBDIR_UNITTESTS_SRCS): Add unittests/scoped_restore-selftests.c. (SUBDIR_UNITTESTS_OBS): Add scoped_restore-selftests.o. * common/scoped_restore.h (scoped_restore_base): Make "class". (scoped_restore_base::release): New public method. (scoped_restore_base::scoped_restore_base): New protected ctor. (scoped_restore_base::m_saved_var): New protected field. (scoped_restore_tmpl::scoped_restore_tmpl(T*)): Initialize the scoped_restore_base base class instead of m_saved_var directly. (scoped_restore_tmpl::scoped_restore_tmpl(T*, T2)): Likewise. (scoped_restore_tmpl::scoped_restore_tmpl(const scoped_restore_tmpl<T>&)): Likewise. (scoped_restore_tmpl::~scoped_restore_tmpl): Use the saved_var method. (scoped_restore_tmpl::saved_var): New method. (scoped_restore_tmpl::m_saved_var): Delete. * inferior.h (inferior::detaching): Now a bool. * infrun.c (prepare_for_detach): Use a scoped_restore instead of a cleanup. * unittests/scoped_restore-selftests.c: New file.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/common')
-rw-r--r--gdb/common/scoped_restore.h36
1 files changed, 26 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/common/scoped_restore.h b/gdb/common/scoped_restore.h
index ae7a49f..e7dbca9 100644
--- a/gdb/common/scoped_restore.h
+++ b/gdb/common/scoped_restore.h
@@ -21,8 +21,23 @@
#define SCOPED_RESTORE_H
/* Base class for scoped_restore_tmpl. */
-struct scoped_restore_base
+class scoped_restore_base
{
+public:
+ /* This informs the (scoped_restore_tmpl<T>) dtor that you no longer
+ want the original value restored. */
+ void release () const
+ { m_saved_var = NULL; }
+
+protected:
+ scoped_restore_base (void *saved_var)
+ : m_saved_var (saved_var)
+ {}
+
+ /* The type-erased saved variable. This is here so that clients can
+ call release() on a "scoped_restore" local, which is a typedef to
+ a scoped_restore_base. See below. */
+ mutable void *m_saved_var;
};
/* A convenience typedef. Users of make_scoped_restore declare the
@@ -40,7 +55,7 @@ class scoped_restore_tmpl : public scoped_restore_base
of *VAR. *VAR will be restored when this scoped_restore object
is destroyed. */
scoped_restore_tmpl (T *var)
- : m_saved_var (var),
+ : scoped_restore_base (var),
m_saved_value (*var)
{
}
@@ -52,14 +67,14 @@ class scoped_restore_tmpl : public scoped_restore_base
E.g.: T='base'; T2='derived'. */
template <typename T2>
scoped_restore_tmpl (T *var, T2 value)
- : m_saved_var (var),
+ : scoped_restore_base (var),
m_saved_value (*var)
{
*var = value;
}
scoped_restore_tmpl (const scoped_restore_tmpl<T> &other)
- : m_saved_var (other.m_saved_var),
+ : scoped_restore_base {other.m_saved_var},
m_saved_value (other.m_saved_value)
{
other.m_saved_var = NULL;
@@ -67,18 +82,19 @@ class scoped_restore_tmpl : public scoped_restore_base
~scoped_restore_tmpl ()
{
- if (m_saved_var != NULL)
- *m_saved_var = m_saved_value;
+ if (saved_var () != NULL)
+ *saved_var () = m_saved_value;
}
- private:
+private:
+ /* Return a pointer to the saved variable with its type
+ restored. */
+ T *saved_var ()
+ { return static_cast<T *> (m_saved_var); }
/* No need for this. It is intentionally not defined anywhere. */
scoped_restore_tmpl &operator= (const scoped_restore_tmpl &);
- /* The saved variable. */
- mutable T *m_saved_var;
-
/* The saved value. */
const T m_saved_value;
};