diff options
author | Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com> | 2022-06-30 19:57:34 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@embecosm.com> | 2022-06-30 19:57:34 +0100 |
commit | 89555e4ec2195b7b10203befa23ff5e62fba406d (patch) | |
tree | 2c7b5303e39d5f76fe5e3f6e1548958d4e9cb448 /gdb/cli | |
parent | 0b1505c82dc5bb593608bb72c1db0496088f2d25 (diff) | |
download | gdb-89555e4ec2195b7b10203befa23ff5e62fba406d.zip gdb-89555e4ec2195b7b10203befa23ff5e62fba406d.tar.gz gdb-89555e4ec2195b7b10203befa23ff5e62fba406d.tar.bz2 |
GDB: Add `NUMBER' completion to `set' integer commands
Fix a completion consistency issue with `set' commands accepting integer
values and the special `unlimited' keyword:
(gdb) complete print -elements
print -elements NUMBER
print -elements unlimited
(gdb)
vs:
(gdb) complete set print elements
set print elements unlimited
(gdb)
(there is a space entered at the end of both commands, not shown here)
which also means if you strike <Tab> with `set print elements ' input,
it will, annoyingly, complete to `set print elements unlimited' right
away rather than showing a choice between `NUMBER' and `unlimited'.
Add `NUMBER' then as an available completion for such `set' commands:
(gdb) complete set print elements
set print elements NUMBER
set print elements unlimited
(gdb)
Adjust the testsuite accordingly. Also document the feature in the
Completion section of the manual in addition to the Command Options
section already there.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/cli')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/cli/cli-decode.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c b/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c index a152834..fde554c 100644 --- a/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c +++ b/gdb/cli/cli-decode.c @@ -989,6 +989,8 @@ integer_unlimited_completer (struct cmd_list_element *ignore, NULL, }; + if (*text == '\0') + tracker.add_completion (make_unique_xstrdup ("NUMBER")); complete_on_enum (tracker, keywords, text, word); } |