diff options
| author | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2019-12-03 13:31:21 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> | 2019-12-10 08:56:39 -0700 |
| commit | 6c71eb7d70c3678f595cd8e66d78c9da5bd3ef4e (patch) | |
| tree | 771eb800267f5ffe7370e3b30962495fe68848d6 /gdb/ChangeLog | |
| parent | 0a0a05217640d96938b4cd58c9ce01ef5026e15a (diff) | |
| download | gdb-6c71eb7d70c3678f595cd8e66d78c9da5bd3ef4e.zip gdb-6c71eb7d70c3678f595cd8e66d78c9da5bd3ef4e.tar.gz gdb-6c71eb7d70c3678f595cd8e66d78c9da5bd3ef4e.tar.bz2 | |
Normalize Ada ptype to use a single "?"
Sometimes -- notably with unchecked unions -- the Ada "ptype" code
will print a "?" or "??" to indicate something unknown. The choice of
what was printed was somewhat arbitrary, and in one case, Ada would
print an empty string rather than "?".
This patch normalizes the Ada code to use "?" rather than an empty
string or "??". My reasoning here is that a single question mark is
enough to convey unknown-ness.
gdb/ChangeLog
2019-12-10 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* ada-typeprint.c (print_choices): Use a single "?".
(print_variant_part): Print "?" if the discriminant name
is not known.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-12-10 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* gdb.ada/unchecked_union.exp: New file.
* gdb.ada/unchecked_union/pck.adb: New file.
* gdb.ada/unchecked_union/pck.ads: New file.
* gdb.ada/unchecked_union/unchecked_union.adb: New file.
* gdb-utils.exp (string_to_regexp): Also quote "?".
Change-Id: I3403040780a155ffa2c44c8e6a04ba86bc810e29
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/ChangeLog')
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/ChangeLog | 6 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 98a6285..ac58517 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2019-12-10 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> + + * ada-typeprint.c (print_choices): Use a single "?". + (print_variant_part): Print "?" if the discriminant name + is not known. + 2019-12-10 George Barrett <bob@bob131.so> Fix scripted probe breakpoints. |