* gas/all/gas.exp: No longer expect difference of forward

        references to fail.
        * gas/all/x930509.s: Fix testcase to match how the expect code was
        written.

2 files changed, 91 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
index a83f430..58ab7f9 100644
--- a/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gas/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,5 +1,15 @@
+Thu Jan 13 11:59:22 1994  Jeffrey A. Law  (law@snake.cs.utah.edu)
+
+	* gas/all/gas.exp: No longer expect difference of forward
+	references to fail.
+	* gas/all/x930509.s: Fix testcase to match how the expect code was
+	written.
+
 Wed Jan 12 13:41:10 1994  Jeffrey A. Law  (law@snake.cs.utah.edu)
 
+	* gas/hppa/reloc/reloc.exp: Fix typo in last change.  Latest test
+	for cross-subspace call bugs is no longer expected to fail.
+
 	* gas/hppa/more.parse/procbug.s: Add test for another bug relating
 	to having a function's label follow the .PROC directive.
 
diff --git a/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp b/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b95323b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/all/gas.exp
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#
+# These tests should be valid on all targets.
+#
+
+# I think currently all targets fail this one when listings are enabled.
+gas_test "p2425.s" ""   "" "pcrel values in assignment"
+
+# p1480.s uses a ".space" directive which for most assemblers means
+# "allocate some space".  On the PA it means "switch into this space".
+#
+# Therefore this test (as it is currently written) is completely bogus
+# for any PA target.  Do not bother trying to run it and just claim
+# it fails.
+if [istarget hppa*-*-*] then {
+    setup_xfail *-*-*
+    fail "simplifiable double subtraction"
+    setup_xfail *-*-*
+    fail "simplifiable double subtraction, with listings"
+} else {
+    setup_xfail *-*-*
+    gas_test "p1480.s" ""   "" "simplifiable double subtraction"
+    setup_xfail *-*-*
+    gas_test "p1480.s" "-a" "" "simplifiable double subtraction, with listings"
+}
+
+gas_test "float.s" ""   "" "simple FP constants"
+
+gas_test_error "diff1.s" "" "difference of two undefined symbols"
+
+proc do_comment {} {
+    set testname "comment.s: comments in listings"
+    set x1 0
+    set x2 0
+    set x3 0
+    set white {[ \t]*}
+    gas_start "comment.s" "-al"
+    while 1 {
+# Apparently CRLF is received when using ptys for subprocesses; hence the
+# \r\n for line 3.
+	expect {
+	    -re "^ +1\[ \t\]+# This\[^\n\]*\n"		{ set x1 1 }
+	    -re "^ +2\[ \t\]+# correctly\[^\n\]*\n"	{ set x2 1 }
+	    -re "^ +3\[ \t\]+/. C comments too. ./\r\n" { set x3 1 }
+	    -re "\[^\n\]*\n"				{ }
+	    timeout				{ error "timeout\n"; break }
+	    eof					{ break }
+	}
+    }
+    gas_finish
+    if [all_ones $x1 $x2 $x3] then { pass $testname } else { fail $testname }
+}
+
+do_comment
+
+#
+# Test x930509a -- correct assembly of differences involving forward
+# references.
+#
+
+proc do_930509a {} {
+    set testname "difference between forward references"
+    set x 0
+    gas_start "x930509.s" "-al"
+    while 1 {
+# We need to accomodate both byte orders here.
+# If ".long" means an 8-byte value on some target someday, this test will have
+# to be fixed.
+	expect {
+	    -re "^ +1 .... 00000000" { fail $testname; set x 1 }
+	    -re "^ +1 .... 04000000" { pass $testname; set x 1 }
+	    -re "^ +1 .... 00000004" { pass $testname; set x 1 }
+	    -re "\[^\n\]*\n" { }
+	    timeout { error "timeout\n"; break }
+	    eof { break }
+	}
+    }
+    gas_finish
+    if !$x then { fail $testname }
+}
+
+do_930509a