* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't complain about

	unresolved debugging relocs in dynamic applications.
	* elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-sparc.c (sparc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
	* elf64-x86-64.c (elf64_x86_64_relocate_section): Likewise.

8 files changed, 39 insertions, 29 deletions

diff --git a/bfd/ChangeLog b/bfd/ChangeLog
index 126085f..3dc0f25 100644
--- a/bfd/ChangeLog
+++ b/bfd/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2002-07-11  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
+
+	* elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_relocate_section): Don't complain about
+	unresolved debugging relocs in dynamic applications.
+	* elf32-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
+	* elf32-sparc.c (elf32_sparc_relocate_section): Likewise.
+	* elf64-ppc.c (ppc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
+	* elf64-s390.c (elf_s390_relocate_section): Likewise.
+	* elf64-sparc.c (sparc64_elf_relocate_section): Likewise.
+	* elf64-x86-64.c (elf64_x86_64_relocate_section): Likewise.
+
 2002-07-10  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>
 
 	* elf64-ppc.c (ONES): Define.
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-i386.c b/bfd/elf32-i386.c
index 1e886a5..f8b64d5 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-i386.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-i386.c
@@ -2737,14 +2737,11 @@ elf_i386_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
 	  break;
 	}
 
-      /* FIXME: Why do we allow debugging sections to escape this error?
-	 More importantly, why do we not emit dynamic relocs for
-	 R_386_32 above in debugging sections (which are ! SEC_ALLOC)?
-	 If we had emitted the dynamic reloc, we could remove the
-	 fudge here.  */
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	(*_bfd_error_handler)
 	  (_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-s390.c b/bfd/elf32-s390.c
index d6d7ada..5879995 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-s390.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-s390.c
@@ -1971,9 +1971,11 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
 	  break;
 	}
 
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	(*_bfd_error_handler)
 	  (_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),
diff --git a/bfd/elf32-sparc.c b/bfd/elf32-sparc.c
index 3a78f5f..38200dc 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-sparc.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-sparc.c
@@ -1561,10 +1561,11 @@ elf32_sparc_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
 	  break;
 	}
 
-      /* ??? Copied from elf32-i386.c, debugging section check and all.  */
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	(*_bfd_error_handler)
 	  (_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
index 4312620..9ed037f 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-ppc.c
@@ -5907,13 +5907,11 @@ ppc64_elf_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
 	  break;
 	}
 
-      /* FIXME: Why do we allow debugging sections to escape this error?
-	 More importantly, why do we not emit dynamic relocs above in
-	 debugging sections (which are ! SEC_ALLOC)?  If we had
-	 emitted the dynamic reloc, we could remove the fudge here.  */
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	{
 	  (*_bfd_error_handler)
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-s390.c b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
index c4e4f68..6e7b5d9 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-s390.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-s390.c
@@ -1935,9 +1935,11 @@ elf_s390_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
           break;
         }
 
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	(*_bfd_error_handler)
 	  (_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-sparc.c b/bfd/elf64-sparc.c
index 7dd51f7..def93c4 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-sparc.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-sparc.c
@@ -2568,9 +2568,11 @@ sparc64_elf_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
 	  break;
 	}
 
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	(*_bfd_error_handler)
 	  (_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),
diff --git a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
index 8b4276f..8016bd5 100644
--- a/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
+++ b/bfd/elf64-x86-64.c
@@ -1938,14 +1938,11 @@ elf64_x86_64_relocate_section (output_bfd, info, input_bfd, input_section,
 	  break;
 	}
 
-      /* FIXME: Why do we allow debugging sections to escape this error?
-	 More importantly, why do we not emit dynamic relocs for
-	 R_386_32 above in debugging sections (which are ! SEC_ALLOC)?
-	 If we had emitted the dynamic reloc, we could remove the
-	 fudge here.  */
+      /* Dynamic relocs are not propagated for SEC_DEBUGGING sections
+	 because such sections are not SEC_ALLOC and thus ld.so will
+	 not process them.  */
       if (unresolved_reloc
-	  && !(info->shared
-	       && (input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
+	  && !((input_section->flags & SEC_DEBUGGING) != 0
 	       && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_DEF_DYNAMIC) != 0))
 	(*_bfd_error_handler)
 	  (_("%s(%s+0x%lx): unresolvable relocation against symbol `%s'"),