diff options
author | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2020-03-15 15:15:56 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2020-03-15 15:15:56 +0100 |
commit | 6b9374f1e07cb250736815ff8db263199416adc6 (patch) | |
tree | b775b0b57d8e63a3310dfba1afd8648c16cfbd8d /bfd/vms-alpha.c | |
parent | eaeaf44cfdc9a4096a0dd52fa0606f29d4bfd48e (diff) | |
download | gdb-6b9374f1e07cb250736815ff8db263199416adc6.zip gdb-6b9374f1e07cb250736815ff8db263199416adc6.tar.gz gdb-6b9374f1e07cb250736815ff8db263199416adc6.tar.bz2 |
[gdb/testsuite] Fix solib-list.exp test-case for exec with debug-info
Since commit a2fedca99c "Implement 'set/show exec-file-mismatch'.", I see the
following regression on openSUSE Leap 15.1:
...
FAIL: gdb.server/solib-list.exp: non-stop 0: target remote \
(got interactive prompt)
FAIL: gdb.server/solib-list.exp: non-stop 1: target remote \
(got interactive prompt)
...
The first FAIL in more detail:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.server/solib-list.exp: non-stop 0: file binfile
target remote localhost:2346
Remote debugging using localhost:2346
warning: Mismatch between current exec-file /data/gdb_versions/devel/build/\
gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.server/solib-list/solib-list
and automatically determined exec-file /lib64/ld-2.26.so
exec-file-mismatch handling is currently "ask"
Load new symbol table from "/lib64/ld-2.26.so"? (y or n) n
warning: loading /lib64/ld-2.26.so Not confirmed.
Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target...
warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. \
Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead.
Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target...
Reading symbols from target:/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2...
Reading /lib64/ld-2.26.so-2.26-lp151.18.7.x86_64.debug from remote target...
Reading /lib64/.debug/ld-2.26.so-2.26-lp151.18.7.x86_64.debug from remote \
target...
Reading /data/gdb_versions/devel/install/lib64/debug//lib64/\
ld-2.26.so-2.26-lp151.18.7.x86_64.debug from remote target...
Reading /data/gdb_versions/devel/install/lib64/debug/lib64/\
/ld-2.26.so-2.26-lp151.18.7.x86_64.debug from remote target...
Reading target:/data/gdb_versions/devel/install/lib64/debug/lib64/\
/ld-2.26.so-2.26-lp151.18.7.x86_64.debug from remote target...
(No debugging symbols found in target:/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2)
0x00007ffff7dd7ea0 in ?? ()
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.server/solib-list.exp: non-stop 0: target remote (got \
interactive prompt)
...
The commit introduces the "Load new symbol table from" question, and
gdb_test_multiple defaults to answering "no" and reporting the
"got interactive prompt" FAIL.
This FAIL is not seen on f.i. debian 10.2. The difference originates from the
fact that the solib-list executable has debug-info in the openSUSE case, while
it doesn't in the debian case.
We can prevent the failure on openSUSE by stripping the executable from
debug-info:
...
+ exec strip --strip-debug ${binfile}
...
The difference in behaviour is a bug or improvement opportunity in the
exec-file-mismatch, filed as PR25475.
This patch fixes the FAIL by handling the question in the test-case.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Tested on x86_64-linux with the gdbserver part of the patch introducing the
test-case reverted to ensure that this still FAILs.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2020-03-15 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* gdb.server/solib-list.exp: Handle
'Load new symbol table from "/lib64/ld-2.26.so"? (y or n)'.
Diffstat (limited to 'bfd/vms-alpha.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions