diff options
author | Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> | 2020-03-04 17:42:40 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> | 2020-07-22 12:32:24 -0700 |
commit | ea57e509a23223556c5aede50da8a2aa23a95912 (patch) | |
tree | dcef4a7e243bcbd6f2391501726a8f0c01f2b3c4 /bfd/opncls.c | |
parent | 32fa152e3bfcf021ce49767be547fae5129d922b (diff) | |
download | gdb-ea57e509a23223556c5aede50da8a2aa23a95912.zip gdb-ea57e509a23223556c5aede50da8a2aa23a95912.tar.gz gdb-ea57e509a23223556c5aede50da8a2aa23a95912.tar.bz2 |
Remove hack for GDB which sets the section size to 0
This commit removes a hack for GDB which was introduced in 2007.
See:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-08/msg00044.html
That hack mostly allowed GDB's handling of core files to continue to
work without any changes to GDB.
The problem with setting the section size to zero is that GDB won't
know how big that section is/was. Often, this doesn't matter because
the data in question are found in the exec file. But it can happen
that the section describes memory that had been allocated, but never
written to. In this instance, the contents of that memory region are
not written to the core file. Also, since the region in question was
dynamically allocated, it won't appear in the exec file. We don't
want these regions to appear as inaccessible to GDB (since they *were*
accessible when the process was live), so it's important that GDB know
the size of the region.
I've made changes to GDB which correctly handles this case. When
attempting to access memory, GDB will first consider core file data
for which both SEC_ALLOC and SEC_HAS_CONTENTS is set. Next, if that
fails, GDB will attempt to find the data in the exec file. Finally,
if that also fails, GDB will attempt to access memory in the sections
which are flagged as SEC_ALLOC, but not SEC_HAS_CONTENTS.
bfd/ChangeLog:
* elf.c (_bfd_elf_make_section_from_phdr): Remove hack for GDB.
Diffstat (limited to 'bfd/opncls.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions