When relaxing, update size of symbols.

When performing linker relaxation, reduce the size of symbols that span
the deleted bytes.  This ensures that, for example, function symbols
will have the correct size.

bfd/ChangeLog:

	* elf32-avr.c (elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes): During linker
	relaxation, reduce the size of symbols that span the deleted
	bytes.

ld/ChangeLog:

	* testsuite/ld-avr/relax-02.d: Update to check size of symbols has
	changed.
	* testsuite/ld-avr/relax-03.d: Likewise.

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/bfd/elf32-avr.c b/bfd/elf32-avr.c
index 8498d29..5aa3cf6 100644
--- a/bfd/elf32-avr.c
+++ b/bfd/elf32-avr.c
@@ -1881,10 +1881,22 @@ elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes (bfd *abfd,
       isymend = isym + symtab_hdr->sh_info;
       for (; isym < isymend; isym++)
 	{
-	  if (isym->st_shndx == sec_shndx
-	      && isym->st_value > addr
-	      && isym->st_value <= toaddr)
-	    isym->st_value -= count;
+	  if (isym->st_shndx == sec_shndx)
+            {
+	      if (isym->st_value > addr
+                  && isym->st_value <= toaddr)
+                isym->st_value -= count;
+
+              if (isym->st_value <= addr
+                  && isym->st_value + isym->st_size > addr)
+                {
+                  /* If this assert fires then we have a symbol that ends
+                     part way through an instruction.  Does that make
+                     sense?  */
+                  BFD_ASSERT (isym->st_value + isym->st_size >= addr + count);
+                  isym->st_size -= count;
+                }
+            }
 	}
     }
 
@@ -1898,11 +1910,22 @@ elf32_avr_relax_delete_bytes (bfd *abfd,
       struct elf_link_hash_entry *sym_hash = *sym_hashes;
       if ((sym_hash->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defined
            || sym_hash->root.type == bfd_link_hash_defweak)
-          && sym_hash->root.u.def.section == sec
-          && sym_hash->root.u.def.value > addr
-          && sym_hash->root.u.def.value <= toaddr)
+          && sym_hash->root.u.def.section == sec)
         {
-          sym_hash->root.u.def.value -= count;
+          if (sym_hash->root.u.def.value > addr
+              && sym_hash->root.u.def.value <= toaddr)
+            sym_hash->root.u.def.value -= count;
+
+          if (sym_hash->root.u.def.value <= addr
+              && (sym_hash->root.u.def.value + sym_hash->size > addr))
+            {
+              /* If this assert fires then we have a symbol that ends
+                 part way through an instruction.  Does that make
+                 sense?  */
+              BFD_ASSERT (sym_hash->root.u.def.value + sym_hash->size
+                          >= addr + count);
+              sym_hash->size -= count;
+            }
         }
     }