aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>2003-06-25 06:40:27 +0000
committerAlan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>2003-06-25 06:40:27 +0000
commit1049f94e8e1a9eae86a694d2dca94a6194f763b1 (patch)
tree40fbf4dbcdbd98d6784861ab18ce46a36b3308c8 /bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
parent59861b363a480a4e802ef0433bf31153b57a2e3a (diff)
downloadgdb-1049f94e8e1a9eae86a694d2dca94a6194f763b1.zip
gdb-1049f94e8e1a9eae86a694d2dca94a6194f763b1.tar.gz
gdb-1049f94e8e1a9eae86a694d2dca94a6194f763b1.tar.bz2
Correct spelling of "relocatable".
Diffstat (limited to 'bfd/cpu-ns32k.c')
-rw-r--r--bfd/cpu-ns32k.c18
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c b/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
index 1fe67d9..1a12b16 100644
--- a/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
+++ b/bfd/cpu-ns32k.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/* BFD support for the ns32k architecture.
- Copyright 1990, 1991, 1994, 1995, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002
+ Copyright 1990, 1991, 1994, 1995, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Almost totally rewritten by Ian Dall from initial work
by Andrew Cagney.
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
return bfd_reloc_ok;
}
- /* If we are not producing relocateable output, return an error if
+ /* If we are not producing relocatable output, return an error if
the symbol is not defined. An undefined weak symbol is
considered to have a value of zero (SVR4 ABI, p. 4-27). */
if (symbol->section == &bfd_und_section
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
include the position of the location; for example, m88kbcs,
or ELF. For those targets, pcrel_offset is TRUE.
- If we are producing relocateable output, then we must ensure
+ If we are producing relocatable output, then we must ensure
that this reloc will be correctly computed when the final
relocation is done. If pcrel_offset is FALSE we want to wind
up with the negative of the location within the section,
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
we do not want to adjust the existing addend at all.
FIXME: This seems logical to me, but for the case of
- producing relocateable output it is not what the code
+ producing relocatable output it is not what the code
actually does. I don't want to change it, because it seems
far too likely that something will break. */
relocation -=
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
should not have any tests that depend upon the flavour. It's
seem like entirely the wrong place for such a thing. The
second obvious point is that the current code ignores the
- reloc addend when producing relocateable output for COFF.
+ reloc addend when producing relocatable output for COFF.
That's peculiar. In fact, I really have no idea what the
point of the line you want to remove is.
@@ -315,10 +315,10 @@ do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
(coff-i386 does subtract the old value, to be compatible with
existing coff-i386 targets, like SCO).
- So everything works fine when not producing relocateable
- output. When we are producing relocateable output, logically
+ So everything works fine when not producing relocatable
+ output. When we are producing relocatable output, logically
we should do exactly what we do when not producing
- relocateable output. Therefore, your patch is correct. In
+ relocatable output. Therefore, your patch is correct. In
fact, it should probably always just set reloc_entry->addend
to 0 for all cases, since it is, in fact, going to add the
value into the object file. This won't hurt the COFF code,
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ do_ns32k_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd,
to other formats (the thing to check for would be whether
any formats both use the addend and set partial_inplace).
- When I wanted to make coff-i386 produce relocateable output,
+ When I wanted to make coff-i386 produce relocatable output,
I ran into the problem that you are running into: I wanted
to remove that line. Rather than risk it, I made the
coff-i386 relocs use a special function; it's coff_i386_reloc