aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/bfd/ChangeLog
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>2021-06-11 11:30:47 +0100
committerAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>2021-06-22 10:03:02 +0100
commit80dc83fd0e70f4d522a534bc601df5e05b81d564 (patch)
tree9b7a8d2a695cfa2860762d293ecad18ac9e4614e /bfd/ChangeLog
parent46b8b3d6f87c0c65d908e3f6c83532d7286868b9 (diff)
downloadgdb-80dc83fd0e70f4d522a534bc601df5e05b81d564.zip
gdb-80dc83fd0e70f4d522a534bc601df5e05b81d564.tar.gz
gdb-80dc83fd0e70f4d522a534bc601df5e05b81d564.tar.bz2
gdb/remote: handle target dying just before a stepi
I randomly hit a situation where gdbserver crashed immediately before I issued a 'stepi' to GDB, it turns out that this causes GDB itself to crash. What happens is that as part of the stepi we try to insert some breakpoints into the inferior, so from insert_breakpoints we figure out what we want to insert, then, eventually, try to send some packets to the remote to get the breakpoints inserted. It is only at this point that GDB realises that the target has gone away. This causes GDB to then enter this call stack: unpush_and_perror remote_unpush_target generic_mourn_inferior breakpoint_init_inferior delete_breakpoint update_global_location_list So, we realise the target is gone and so delete the breakpoints associated with that target. GDB then throws a TARGET_CLOSE_ERROR from unpush_and_error. This error is caught in insert_breakpoints where we then try to print a nice error saying something like: Cannot insert breakpoint %d: some error text here... To fill in the '%d' we try to read properties of the breakpoint object. Which was deleted due to the delete_breakpoint call above. And so GDB dies... My proposal in this commit is that, should we catch a TARGET_CLOSE_ERROR in insert_breakpoints, then we just rethrow the error. This will cause the main event loop to print something like: Remote connection closed Which I think is fine, I don't think the user will care much which particular breakpoint GDB was operating on when the connection closed, just knowing that the connection closed should be enough I think. I initially added a test to 'gdb.server/server-kill.exp' for this issue, however, my first attempt was not good enough, the test was passing even without my fix. Turns out that the server-kill.exp test actually kills the PID of the inferior, not the PID of the server. This means that gdbserver is actually able to send a packet to GDB saying that the inferior has exited prior to gdbserver itself shutting down. This extra information was enough to prevent the bug I was seeing manifest. So, I have extended server-kill.exp to run all of the tests twice, the first time we still kill the inferior. On the second run we hard kill the gdbserver itself, this prevents the server from sending anything to GDB before it exits. My new test is only expected to fail in this second mode of operation (killing gdbserver itself), and without my fix, that is what I see. gdb/ChangeLog: * breakpoint.c (insert_bp_location): If we catch a TARGET_CLOSE_ERROR just rethrow it, the breakpoints might have been deleted. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.server/server-kill.exp: Introduce global kill_pid_of, and make use of this in prepare to select which pid we should kill. Run all the tests twice with a different kill_pid_of value. (prepare): Make use of kill_pid_of. (test_stepi): New proc.
Diffstat (limited to 'bfd/ChangeLog')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions