diff options
author | Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> | 2013-12-19 19:26:27 +0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> | 2014-01-07 08:17:39 +0400 |
commit | 34b27950541eaf717bd02b31d460bab2edfbbbe6 (patch) | |
tree | ba0ea5512f7d26347e3b2c6554115f993b2803b2 /COPYING | |
parent | 079e459161edae487c667a7f976a6462957389ef (diff) | |
download | gdb-34b27950541eaf717bd02b31d460bab2edfbbbe6.zip gdb-34b27950541eaf717bd02b31d460bab2edfbbbe6.tar.gz gdb-34b27950541eaf717bd02b31d460bab2edfbbbe6.tar.bz2 |
rewrite ada_val_print_ref to reduce if/else block nesting depth
The logic as currently implemented in this function was a little
difficult to follow, due to the nested of if/else conditions,
but most of the time, the "else" block was very simple. So this
patch re-organizes the code to use fewer levels of nesting by
using return statements, and writing the code as a sequence of
"if something simple, then handle it and return" blocks.
While touching this code, this patch changes the cryptic "???"
printed when trying to print a reference pointing to an undefined
type. This should only ever happen if the debugging information
was corrupted or improperly read. But in case that happens, we now
print "<ref to undefined type>" instead. This is more in line
with how we print other conditions such as optimized out pieces,
or synthetic pointers.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* ada-valprint.c (ada_val_print_ref): Rewrite by mostly
re-organizing the code. Change the "???" message printed
when target type is a TYPE_CODE_UNDEF into
"<ref to undefined type>".
Diffstat (limited to 'COPYING')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions