aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2022-11-09 12:54:55 +0000
committerAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2023-02-06 11:02:48 +0000
commit980dbf36225150bf2558e5eda5f8c374adfe1323 (patch)
tree471e36b6b1860e4b475d490e63b53bfb203d28d0
parentd4a8b80189c3fdb9d041583e576315a7306a2279 (diff)
downloadgdb-980dbf36225150bf2558e5eda5f8c374adfe1323.zip
gdb-980dbf36225150bf2558e5eda5f8c374adfe1323.tar.gz
gdb-980dbf36225150bf2558e5eda5f8c374adfe1323.tar.bz2
gdb: error if 'thread' or 'task' keywords are overused
When creating a breakpoint or watchpoint, the 'thread' and 'task' keywords can be used to create a thread or task specific breakpoint or watchpoint. Currently, a thread or task specific breakpoint can only apply for a single thread or task, if multiple threads or tasks are specified when creating the breakpoint (or watchpoint), then the last specified id will be used. The exception to the above is that when the 'thread' keyword is used during the creation of a watchpoint, GDB will give an error if 'thread' is given more than once. In this commit I propose making this behaviour consistent, if the 'thread' or 'task' keywords are used more than once when creating either a breakpoint or watchpoint, then GDB will give an error. I haven't updated the manual, we don't explicitly say that these keywords can be repeated, and (to me), given the keyword takes a single id, I don't think it makes much sense to repeat the keyword. As such, I see this more as adding a missing error to GDB, rather than making some big change. However, I have added an entry to the NEWS file as I guess it is possible that some people might hit this new error with an existing (I claim, badly written) GDB script. I've added some new tests to check for the new error. Just one test needed updating, gdb.linespec/keywords.exp, this test did use the 'thread' keyword twice, and expected the breakpoint to be created. Looking at what this test was for though, it was checking the use of '-force-condition', and I don't think that being able to repeat 'thread' was actually a critical part of this test. As such, I've updated this test to expect the error when 'thread' is repeated.
-rw-r--r--gdb/NEWS14
-rw-r--r--gdb/breakpoint.c9
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks.exp4
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.linespec/keywords.exp10
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp4
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads2.exp3
6 files changed, 42 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
index 882ea4c..1567cbe 100644
--- a/gdb/NEWS
+++ b/gdb/NEWS
@@ -30,6 +30,20 @@
This support requires that GDB be built with Python scripting
enabled.
+* For the break command, multiple uses of the 'thread' or 'task'
+ keywords will now give an error instead of just using the thread or
+ task id from the last instance of the keyword. E.g.:
+ break foo thread 1 thread 2
+ will now give an error rather than using 'thread 2'.
+
+* For the watch command, multiple uses of the 'task' keyword will now
+ give an error instead of just using the task id from the last
+ instance of the keyword. E.g.:
+ watch my_var task 1 task 2
+ will now give an error rather than using 'task 2'. The 'thread'
+ keyword already gave an error when used multiple times with the
+ watch command, this remains unchanged.
+
* New commands
maintenance print record-instruction [ N ]
diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index e25c588..8bc6274 100644
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -8797,6 +8797,9 @@ find_condition_and_thread (const char *tok, CORE_ADDR pc,
const char *tmptok;
struct thread_info *thr;
+ if (*thread != -1)
+ error(_("You can specify only one thread."));
+
tok = end_tok + 1;
thr = parse_thread_id (tok, &tmptok);
if (tok == tmptok)
@@ -8808,6 +8811,9 @@ find_condition_and_thread (const char *tok, CORE_ADDR pc,
{
char *tmptok;
+ if (*task != 0)
+ error(_("You can specify only one task."));
+
tok = end_tok + 1;
*task = strtol (tok, &tmptok, 0);
if (tok == tmptok)
@@ -10090,6 +10096,9 @@ watch_command_1 (const char *arg, int accessflag, int from_tty,
{
char *tmp;
+ if (task != 0)
+ error(_("You can specify only one task."));
+
task = strtol (value_start, &tmp, 0);
if (tmp == value_start)
error (_("Junk after task keyword."));
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks.exp
index a9b58f2..3eea04b 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/tasks.exp
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ gdb_test "info tasks" \
"\r\n"] \
"info tasks before inserting breakpoint"
+# Check that multiple uses of the 'task' keyword will give an error.
+gdb_test "break break_me task 1 task 3" "You can specify only one task\\."
+gdb_test "watch j task 1 task 3" "You can specify only one task\\."
+
# Insert a breakpoint that should stop only if task 1 stops. Since
# task 1 never calls break_me, this shouldn't actually ever trigger.
# The fact that this breakpoint is created _before_ the next one
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.linespec/keywords.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.linespec/keywords.exp
index bff6424..dc66e32 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.linespec/keywords.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.linespec/keywords.exp
@@ -80,8 +80,14 @@ foreach prefix {"" "thread 1 "} {
foreach suffix {"" " " " thread 1"} {
foreach cond {"" " if 1"} {
with_test_prefix "prefix: '$prefix', suffix: '$suffix', cond: '$cond'" {
- gdb_breakpoint "main ${prefix}-force-condition${suffix}${cond}"\
- "message"
+
+ if { [regexp thread $prefix] && [regexp thread $suffix] } {
+ gdb_test "break main ${prefix}-force-condition${suffix}${cond}" \
+ "You can specify only one thread\\."
+ } else {
+ gdb_breakpoint "main ${prefix}-force-condition${suffix}${cond}"\
+ "message"
+ }
}
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
index f440574..cecf946 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/thread-specific-bp.exp
@@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ proc check_thread_specific_breakpoint {non_stop} {
return -1
}
+ # Check that multiple uses of 'thread' keyword give an error.
+ gdb_test "break main thread $start_thre thread $main_thre" \
+ "You can specify only one thread\\."
+
# Set a thread-specific breakpoint at "main". This can't ever
# be hit, but that's OK.
gdb_breakpoint "main thread $start_thre"
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads2.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads2.exp
index 09858ae..a1398d6 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads2.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/watchthreads2.exp
@@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ if { $nr_started == $NR_THREADS } {
return -1
}
+# Check that multiple uses of the 'thread' keyword will give an error.
+gdb_test "watch x thread 1 thread 2" "You can specify only one thread\\."
+
# Watch X, it will be modified by all threads.
# We want this watchpoint to be set *after* all threads are running.
gdb_test "watch x" "Hardware watchpoint 3: x"