aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>2002-05-31 01:36:16 +0000
committerAndrew Cagney <cagney@redhat.com>2002-05-31 01:36:16 +0000
commitcbb09e6a75d8ff227a8ec6e57e43e5680bc1e4b6 (patch)
tree8a7adcaf22d04a1955fefacb90886f524d5c9972
parentdeec17343ce91f1274e438996bbcf19f17c1c3ac (diff)
downloadgdb-cbb09e6a75d8ff227a8ec6e57e43e5680bc1e4b6.zip
gdb-cbb09e6a75d8ff227a8ec6e57e43e5680bc1e4b6.tar.gz
gdb-cbb09e6a75d8ff227a8ec6e57e43e5680bc1e4b6.tar.bz2
* gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Rename ``Obsoleting any code''
to ``Obsoleting code''. Revise.
-rw-r--r--gdb/doc/ChangeLog5
-rw-r--r--gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo51
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
index 577ddb1..b701715 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/doc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2002-05-30 Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
+
+ * gdbint.texinfo (Releasing GDB): Rename ``Obsoleting any code''
+ to ``Obsoleting code''. Revise.
+
2002-05-17 Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
* gdb.texinfo (C Preprocessor Macros): New chapter.
diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
index 4f76f5f..a875874 100644
--- a/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
+++ b/gdb/doc/gdbint.texinfo
@@ -5158,41 +5158,50 @@ This means that changes such as adding a new architectures or (within
reason) support for a new host are considered acceptable.}
-@section Obsolete any code
+@section Obsoleting code
Before anything else, poke the other developers (and around the source
code) to see if there is anything that can be removed from @value{GDBN}
(an old target, an unused file).
Obsolete code is identified by adding an @code{OBSOLETE} prefix to every
-line. Doing this means that it is easy to identify obsolete code when
-grepping through the sources.
+line. Doing this means that it is easy to identify something that has
+been obsoleted when greping through the sources.
-The process has a number of steps and is intentionally slow --- this is
-to mainly ensure that people have had a reasonable chance to respond.
-Remember, everything on the internet takes a week.
+The process is done in stages --- this is mainly to ensure that the
+wider @value{GDBN} community has a reasonable opportunity to respond.
+Remember, everything on the Internet takes a week.
-@itemize @bullet
+@enumerate
@item
-announce the change on @email{gdb@@sources.redhat.com, GDB mailing list}
+Post the proposal on @email{gdb@@sources.redhat.com, the GDB mailing
+list} Creating a bug report to track the task's state, is also highly
+recommended.
@item
-wait a week or so
+Wait a week or so.
@item
-announce the change on @email{gdb-announce@@sources.redhat.com, GDB
-Announcement mailing list}
+Post the proposal on @email{gdb-announce@@sources.redhat.com, the GDB
+Announcement mailing list}.
@item
-wait a week or so
+Wait a week or so.
@item
-go through and edit all relevant files and lines (e.g., in
-@file{configure.tgt}) so that they are prefixed with the word
-@code{OBSOLETE}.
-@end itemize
+Go through and edit all relevant files and lines so that they are
+prefixed with the word @code{OBSOLETE}.
+@item
+Wait until the next GDB version, containing this obsolete code, has been
+released.
+@item
+Remove the obsolete code.
+@end enumerate
+
+@noindent
+@emph{Maintainer note: While removing old code is regrettable it is
+hopefully better for @value{GDBN}'s long term development. Firstly it
+helps the developers by removing code that is either no longer relevant
+or simply wrong. Secondly since it removes any history associated with
+the file (effectively clearing the slate) the developer has a much freer
+hand when it comes to fixing broken files.}
-@emph{Maintainer note: Removing old code, while regrettable, is a good
-thing. Firstly it helps the developers by removing code that is either
-no longer relevant or simply wrong. Secondly since it removes any
-history associated with the file (effectively clearing the slate) the
-developer has a much freer hand when it comes to fixing broken files.}
@section Before the Branch