diff options
author | Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@kwikemart.cygnus.com> | 2000-05-03 13:45:17 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@kwikemart.cygnus.com> | 2000-05-03 13:45:17 +0000 |
commit | 54cf9c0344af81977caffd086d53a74c3b5d3aaf (patch) | |
tree | c8a6cbd917f787ce652be116e987bca97c219161 | |
parent | 9369728402b129b7f3c839b6da7f3b88854b3630 (diff) | |
download | gdb-54cf9c0344af81977caffd086d53a74c3b5d3aaf.zip gdb-54cf9c0344af81977caffd086d53a74c3b5d3aaf.tar.gz gdb-54cf9c0344af81977caffd086d53a74c3b5d3aaf.tar.bz2 |
Tue May 2 13:17:21 2000 Elena Zannoni (ezannoni@makita.cygnus.com)
* symtab.c (in_prologue): From Jim Blandy. Rewrite, more
intelligently, making sure we use the information from the
symbol tables fully.
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/ChangeLog | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/symtab.c | 81 |
2 files changed, 57 insertions, 30 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog index 2a6214f..7b1fcc1 100644 --- a/gdb/ChangeLog +++ b/gdb/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2000-05-03 Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@makita.cygnus.com> + + * symtab.c (in_prologue): From Jim Blandy. Rewrite, more + intelligently, making sure we use the information from the + symbol tables fully. + 2000-05-02 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> * ia64-tdep.c (ia64_gdbarch_init): Reference to ELFOSABI_NONE diff --git a/gdb/symtab.c b/gdb/symtab.c index 5131352..229e37b 100644 --- a/gdb/symtab.c +++ b/gdb/symtab.c @@ -4402,43 +4402,64 @@ in_prologue (pc, func_start) struct symtab_and_line sal; CORE_ADDR func_addr, func_end; - if (!find_pc_partial_function (pc, NULL, &func_addr, &func_end)) - goto nosyms; /* Might be in prologue */ - - sal = find_pc_line (func_addr, 0); - - if (sal.line == 0) - goto nosyms; - - /* sal.end is the address of the first instruction past sal.line. */ - if (sal.end > func_addr - && sal.end <= func_end) /* Is prologue in function? */ - return pc < sal.end; /* Yes, is pc in prologue? */ - - /* The line after the prologue seems to be outside the function. In this - case, tell the caller to find the prologue the hard way. */ - - return 1; + /* We have several sources of information we can consult to figure + this out. + - Compilers usually emit line number info that marks the prologue + as its own "source line". So the ending address of that "line" + is the end of the prologue. If available, this is the most + reliable method. + - The minimal symbols and partial symbols, which can usually tell + us the starting and ending addresses of a function. + - If we know the function's start address, we can call the + architecture-defined SKIP_PROLOGUE function to analyze the + instruction stream and guess where the prologue ends. + - Our `func_start' argument; if non-zero, this is the caller's + best guess as to the function's entry point. At the time of + this writing, handle_inferior_event doesn't get this right, so + it should be our last resort. */ + + /* Consult the partial symbol table, to find which function + the PC is in. */ + if (! find_pc_partial_function (pc, NULL, &func_addr, &func_end)) + { + CORE_ADDR prologue_end; -/* Come here when symtabs don't contain line # info. In this case, it is - likely that the user has stepped into a library function w/o symbols, or - is doing a stepi/nexti through code without symbols. */ + /* We don't even have minsym information, so fall back to using + func_start, if given. */ + if (! func_start) + return 1; /* We *might* be in a prologue. */ -nosyms: + prologue_end = SKIP_PROLOGUE (func_start); -/* If func_start is zero (meaning unknown) then we don't know whether pc is - in the prologue or not. I.E. it might be. */ + return func_start <= pc && pc < prologue_end; + } - if (!func_start) - return 1; + /* If we have line number information for the function, that's + usually pretty reliable. */ + sal = find_pc_line (func_addr, 0); -/* We need to call the target-specific prologue skipping functions with the - function's start address because PC may be pointing at an instruction that - could be mistakenly considered part of the prologue. */ + /* Now sal describes the source line at the function's entry point, + which (by convention) is the prologue. The end of that "line", + sal.end, is the end of the prologue. + + Note that, for functions whose source code is all on a single + line, the line number information doesn't always end up this way. + So we must verify that our purported end-of-prologue address is + *within* the function, not at its start or end. */ + if (sal.line == 0 + || sal.end <= func_addr + || func_end <= sal.end) + { + /* We don't have any good line number info, so use the minsym + information, together with the architecture-specific prologue + scanning code. */ + CORE_ADDR prologue_end = SKIP_PROLOGUE (func_addr); - func_start = SKIP_PROLOGUE (func_start); + return func_addr <= pc && pc < prologue_end; + } - return pc < func_start; + /* We have line number info, and it looks good. */ + return func_addr <= pc && pc < sal.end; } |