aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>2005-02-20 01:19:24 +0000
committerMark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>2005-02-20 01:19:24 +0000
commita6c442d88114a76fe77ff3e3f6aa62993703759d (patch)
tree5ab13b27752d31560191470bb6ae89fad5e2349c
parent0ac0f72ae7b02217b8525a62c776b5aa190e185f (diff)
downloadgdb-a6c442d88114a76fe77ff3e3f6aa62993703759d.zip
gdb-a6c442d88114a76fe77ff3e3f6aa62993703759d.tar.gz
gdb-a6c442d88114a76fe77ff3e3f6aa62993703759d.tar.bz2
* value.h (value_contents_equal): New prototype.
* value.c (value_contents_equal): New function. * varobj.c: Include "exceptions.h" and "gdb_assert.h". Don't include <math.h>. (varobj_set_value): Initialize error to zero. (varobj_update): Rename error2 to error and initialize it to zero. Slightly change the wording of some comments. (my_value_equal): Reimplement using TRY_CATCH and value_contents_equal.
-rw-r--r--gdb/ChangeLog12
-rw-r--r--gdb/value.c20
-rw-r--r--gdb/value.h1
-rw-r--r--gdb/varobj.c84
4 files changed, 65 insertions, 52 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 860b76d..779696a 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+2005-02-16 Mark Kettenis <kettenis@gnu.org>
+
+ * value.h (value_contents_equal): New prototype.
+ * value.c (value_contents_equal): New function.
+ * varobj.c: Include "exceptions.h" and "gdb_assert.h". Don't
+ include <math.h>.
+ (varobj_set_value): Initialize error to zero.
+ (varobj_update): Rename error2 to error and initialize it to zero.
+ Slightly change the wording of some comments.
+ (my_value_equal): Reimplement using TRY_CATCH and
+ value_contents_equal.
+
2005-02-18 Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
* cli/cli-decode.c (add_setshow_integer_cmd): New function.
diff --git a/gdb/value.c b/gdb/value.c
index eb0cc2c..1ab5f79 100644
--- a/gdb/value.c
+++ b/gdb/value.c
@@ -358,6 +358,26 @@ value_contents_writeable (struct value *value)
return value->aligner.contents;
}
+/* Return non-zero if VAL1 and VAL2 have the same contents. Note that
+ this function is different from value_equal; in C the operator ==
+ can return 0 even if the two values being compared are equal. */
+
+int
+value_contents_equal (struct value *val1, struct value *val2)
+{
+ struct type *type1;
+ struct type *type2;
+ int len;
+
+ type1 = check_typedef (value_type (val1));
+ type2 = check_typedef (value_type (val2));
+ len = TYPE_LENGTH (type1);
+ if (len != TYPE_LENGTH (type2))
+ return 0;
+
+ return (memcmp (value_contents (val1), value_contents (val2), len) == 0);
+}
+
int
value_optimized_out (struct value *value)
{
diff --git a/gdb/value.h b/gdb/value.h
index e66daa0..8e31c86 100644
--- a/gdb/value.h
+++ b/gdb/value.h
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ extern bfd_byte *value_contents_all_raw (struct value *);
extern const bfd_byte *value_contents_all (struct value *);
extern int value_fetch_lazy (struct value *val);
+extern int value_contents_equal (struct value *val1, struct value *val2);
/* If nonzero, this is the value of a variable which does not actually
exist in the program. */
diff --git a/gdb/varobj.c b/gdb/varobj.c
index 824c3e5..c86e38c 100644
--- a/gdb/varobj.c
+++ b/gdb/varobj.c
@@ -18,14 +18,16 @@
Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA. */
#include "defs.h"
+#include "exceptions.h"
#include "value.h"
#include "expression.h"
#include "frame.h"
#include "language.h"
#include "wrapper.h"
#include "gdbcmd.h"
+
+#include "gdb_assert.h"
#include "gdb_string.h"
-#include <math.h>
#include "varobj.h"
@@ -784,8 +786,8 @@ int
varobj_set_value (struct varobj *var, char *expression)
{
struct value *val;
- int error;
int offset = 0;
+ int error = 0;
/* The argument "expression" contains the variable's new value.
We need to first construct a legal expression for this -- ugh! */
@@ -875,10 +877,10 @@ int
varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist)
{
int changed = 0;
+ int error = 0;
int type_changed;
int i;
int vleft;
- int error2;
struct varobj *v;
struct varobj **cv;
struct varobj **templist = NULL;
@@ -928,14 +930,13 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist)
There a couple of exceptions here, though.
We don't want some types to be reported as "changed". */
else if (type_changeable (*varp) &&
- ((*varp)->updated || !my_value_equal ((*varp)->value, new, &error2)))
+ ((*varp)->updated || !my_value_equal ((*varp)->value, new, &error)))
{
vpush (&result, *varp);
(*varp)->updated = 0;
changed++;
- /* error2 replaces var->error since this new value
- WILL replace the old one. */
- (*varp)->error = error2;
+ /* Its value is going to be updated to NEW. */
+ (*varp)->error = error;
}
/* We must always keep around the new value for this root
@@ -969,16 +970,15 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist)
/* Update this variable */
new = value_of_child (v->parent, v->index);
if (type_changeable (v) &&
- (v->updated || !my_value_equal (v->value, new, &error2)))
+ (v->updated || !my_value_equal (v->value, new, &error)))
{
/* Note that it's changed */
vpush (&result, v);
v->updated = 0;
changed++;
}
- /* error2 replaces v->error since this new value
- WILL replace the old one. */
- v->error = error2;
+ /* Its value is going to be updated to NEW. */
+ v->error = error;
/* We must always keep new values, since children depend on it. */
if (v->value != NULL)
@@ -1438,60 +1438,40 @@ variable_default_display (struct varobj *var)
return FORMAT_NATURAL;
}
-/* This function is similar to gdb's value_equal, except that this
- one is "safe" -- it NEVER longjmps. It determines if the VAR's
- value is the same as VAL2. */
+/* This function is similar to GDB's value_contents_equal, except that
+ this one is "safe"; it never longjmps. It determines if the VAL1's
+ value is the same as VAL2. If for some reason the value of VAR2
+ can't be established, *ERROR2 is set to non-zero. */
+
static int
my_value_equal (struct value *val1, struct value *val2, int *error2)
{
- int r, err1, err2;
+ volatile struct exception except;
- *error2 = 0;
- /* Special case: NULL values. If both are null, say
- they're equal. */
+ /* As a special case, if both are null, we say they're equal. */
if (val1 == NULL && val2 == NULL)
return 1;
else if (val1 == NULL || val2 == NULL)
return 0;
- /* This is bogus, but unfortunately necessary. We must know
- exactly what caused an error -- reading val1 or val2 -- so
- that we can really determine if we think that something has changed. */
- err1 = 0;
- err2 = 0;
- /* We do need to catch errors here because the whole purpose
- is to test if value_equal() has errored */
- if (!gdb_value_equal (val1, val1, &r))
- err1 = 1;
-
- if (!gdb_value_equal (val2, val2, &r))
- *error2 = err2 = 1;
+ /* The contents of VAL1 are supposed to be known. */
+ gdb_assert (!value_lazy (val1));
- if (err1 != err2)
- return 0;
-
- if (!gdb_value_equal (val1, val2, &r))
+ /* Make sure we also know the contents of VAL2. */
+ val2 = coerce_array (val2);
+ TRY_CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ERROR)
{
- /* An error occurred, this could have happened if
- either val1 or val2 errored. ERR1 and ERR2 tell
- us which of these it is. If both errored, then
- we assume nothing has changed. If one of them is
- valid, though, then something has changed. */
- if (err1 == err2)
- {
- /* both the old and new values caused errors, so
- we say the value did not change */
- /* This is indeterminate, though. Perhaps we should
- be safe and say, yes, it changed anyway?? */
- return 1;
- }
- else
- {
- return 0;
- }
+ if (value_lazy (val2))
+ value_fetch_lazy (val2);
}
+ if (except.reason < 0)
+ {
+ *error2 = 1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ gdb_assert (!value_lazy (val2));
- return r;
+ return value_contents_equal (val1, val2);
}
/* FIXME: The following should be generic for any pointer */