From 6d3fbe2feee0627f2e3669c4d30c2ea003927dce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@spamcop.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 03:58:30 +0000
Subject: re PR target/46881 (arm_preferred_rename_class uses keyword class as
 parameter name)

	PR target/46881
	* doc/tm.texi: Regenerate.
	* target.def: Fix "preferred" spelling.  Refer to rclass by its
	exact name.
	* config/arm/arm.c (arm_preferred_rename_class): Rename parameter class
	to rclass.

From-SVN: r167678
---
 gcc/target.def | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'gcc/target.def')

diff --git a/gcc/target.def b/gcc/target.def
index 7e4fe12..8162d76 100644
--- a/gcc/target.def
+++ b/gcc/target.def
@@ -2228,8 +2228,8 @@ DEFHOOK
 (preferred_rename_class,
  "A target hook that places additional preference on the register\
  class to use when it is necessary to rename a register in class\
- @var{class} to another class, or perhaps @var{NO_REGS}, if no\
- prefered register class is found or hook @code{preferred_rename_class}\
+ @var{rclass} to another class, or perhaps @var{NO_REGS}, if no\
+ preferred register class is found or hook @code{preferred_rename_class}\
  is not implemented.\
  Sometimes returning a more restrictive class makes better code.  For\
  example, on ARM, thumb-2 instructions using @code{LO_REGS} may be\
-- 
cgit v1.1

