From 6356f8928853bc14e841e5b4e990ce2508c38f26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kazu Hirata <kazu@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 19:01:08 +0000
Subject: ChangeLog: Follow spelling conventions.

	* ChangeLog: Follow spelling conventions.
	* ChangeLog.2: Likewise.
	* c-decl.c: Likewise.
	* cfgloop.h: Likewise.
	* cgraph.c: Likewise.
	* coverage.c: Likewise.
	* cppcharset.c: Likewise.
	* cpphash.h: Likewise.
	* cpplex.c: Likewise.
	* cpplib.c: Likewise.
	* dbxout.c: Likewise.
	* df.c: Likewise.
	* dwarf2out.c: Likewise.
	* dwarfout.c: Likewise.
	* emit-rtl.c: Likewise.
	* explow.c: Likewise.
	* gcov-io.c: Likewise.
	* gcov-io.h: Likewise.
	* gcov.c: Likewise.
	* gengtype.c: Likewise.
	* ggc.h: Likewise.
	* opts.c: Likewise.
	* real.c: Likewise.
	* reload.c: Likewise.
	* stmt.c: Likewise.

From-SVN: r67849
---
 gcc/reload.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'gcc/reload.c')

diff --git a/gcc/reload.c b/gcc/reload.c
index 5a82d99..7ab823d 100644
--- a/gcc/reload.c
+++ b/gcc/reload.c
@@ -4887,7 +4887,7 @@ find_reloads_address (mode, memrefloc, ad, loc, opnum, type, ind_levels, insn)
      of it.
 
      Handle all base registers here, not just fp/ap/sp, because on some
-     targets (namely Sparc) we can also get invalid addresses from preventive
+     targets (namely SPARC) we can also get invalid addresses from preventive
      subreg big-endian corrections made by find_reloads_toplev.
 
      If we decide to do something, it must be that `double_reg_address_ok'
-- 
cgit v1.1