From 399b9016a73cf485b8f1863ae21e5cf06e6f6273 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey A Law Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 18:46:46 +0000 Subject: * regclass.c: Revert my Jan 4 change to loop cost computation. From-SVN: r31210 --- gcc/regclass.c | 12 ++++-------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'gcc/regclass.c') diff --git a/gcc/regclass.c b/gcc/regclass.c index d1bcf30..1a45b24 100644 --- a/gcc/regclass.c +++ b/gcc/regclass.c @@ -1100,17 +1100,13 @@ regclass (f, nregs, dump) basic_block bb = BASIC_BLOCK (index); /* Show that an insn inside a loop is likely to be executed three - times more than insns outside a loop. This is much more - aggressive than the assumptions made elsewhere and is being - tried as an experiment. - - Note that a block's loop depth starts at zero, not one! We - must not subract one from the loop depth as that could give - a negative shift count below. */ + times more than insns outside a loop. This is much more aggressive + than the assumptions made elsewhere and is being tried as an + experiment. */ if (optimize_size) loop_cost = 1; else - loop_cost = 1 << (2 * MIN (bb->loop_depth, 5)); + loop_cost = 1 << (2 * MIN (bb->loop_depth - 1, 5)); for (insn = bb->head; ; insn = NEXT_INSN (insn)) { insn = scan_one_insn (insn, pass); -- cgit v1.1