From 30da2906ac521749aef8260fc1d942e62073f19d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marek Polacek Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:36:17 -0400 Subject: c++: Parenthesized-init of aggregates accepts invalid code [PR94885] Here we have (conceptually *) something like struct B { }; struct D : B { }; D(0); // invalid and in C++20 the ()-initialization has created a { 0 } constructor that it tries to initialize an object of type D with. We should reject initializing an object of type B from 0, but we wrongly accept it because process_init_constructor_record skips initializers for empty bases/fields: if (DECL_SIZE (field) && integer_zerop (DECL_SIZE (field)) && !TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (next)) /* Don't add trivial initialization of an empty base/field to the constructor, as they might not be ordered the way the back-end expects. */ continue; but here 'next' was error_mark_node, returned by massage_elt_init, so we wound up with { } which would validly value-initialize the object. [*] Usually digest_init in build_new_method_call_1 would detect this, but in this case the instance is is_dummy_object and we don't call digest just yet. PR c++/94885 * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS if an initializer element was erroneous. * g++.dg/cpp2a/paren-init26.C: New test. --- gcc/cp/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++ gcc/cp/typeck2.c | 6 +++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'gcc/cp') diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index 0675f98..0b6b0ee 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2020-05-01 Marek Polacek + + PR c++/94885 + * typeck2.c (process_init_constructor_record): Return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS + if an initializer element was erroneous. + 2020-05-01 Jason Merrill PR c++/90479 diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck2.c b/gcc/cp/typeck2.c index 56fd9ba..9e5d145 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/typeck2.c +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck2.c @@ -1661,7 +1661,11 @@ process_init_constructor_record (tree type, tree init, int nested, int flags, ++idx; } } - if (next) + if (next == error_mark_node) + /* We skip initializers for empty bases/fields, so skipping an invalid + one could make us accept invalid code. */ + return PICFLAG_ERRONEOUS; + else if (next) /* Already handled above. */; else if (DECL_INITIAL (field)) { -- cgit v1.1