From 0e5dcad1a4b8e68567fda31ec66c9f31b8d60a0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Merrill Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:46:58 -0500 Subject: re PR c++/46873 ([C++0x] ICE: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5489) PR c++/46873 PR c++/46877 * semantics.c (build_data_member_initialization): Handle cv-qualified data member. From-SVN: r167770 --- gcc/cp/ChangeLog | 7 +++++++ gcc/cp/semantics.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) (limited to 'gcc/cp') diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog index caea47e..3ca2697 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +2010-12-13 Jason Merrill + + PR c++/46873 + PR c++/46877 + * semantics.c (build_data_member_initialization): Handle + cv-qualified data member. + 2010-12-13 Jan Hubicka PR middle-end/45388 diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c index 1b3bfa3..27e2982 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c +++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c @@ -5483,49 +5483,43 @@ build_data_member_initialization (tree t, VEC(constructor_elt,gc) **vec) { member = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0); init = unshare_expr (TREE_OPERAND (t, 1)); - if (TREE_CODE (member) == INDIRECT_REF) - { - tree op = TREE_OPERAND (member, 0); - STRIP_NOPS (op); - gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (op) == ADDR_EXPR); - op = TREE_OPERAND (op, 0); - if (TREE_CODE (op) == COMPONENT_REF) - /* Initializing a cv-qualified member; we just looked through - the const_cast. */ - member = op; - else - { - /* Initializing an empty base; just skip it. */ - gcc_assert (is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (member))); - return true; - } - } } else { - tree memtype; gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (t) == CALL_EXPR); member = CALL_EXPR_ARG (t, 0); - memtype = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (member))); - if (TREE_CODE (member) == NOP_EXPR) + /* We don't use build_cplus_new here because it complains about + abstract bases. Leaving the call unwrapped means that it has the + wrong type, but cxx_eval_constant_expression doesn't care. */ + init = unshare_expr (t); + } + if (TREE_CODE (member) == INDIRECT_REF) + member = TREE_OPERAND (member, 0); + if (TREE_CODE (member) == NOP_EXPR) + { + tree op = member; + STRIP_NOPS (op); + if (TREE_CODE (op) == ADDR_EXPR) { - /* We don't put out anything for an empty base. */ - gcc_assert (is_empty_class (memtype)); - /* But if the constructor used isn't constexpr, leave in the call - so we complain later. */ - if (potential_constant_expression (t, tf_none)) - return true; + gcc_assert (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p + (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op)), + TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (member)))); + /* Initializing a cv-qualified member; we need to look through + the const_cast. */ + member = op; } else { - gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (member) == ADDR_EXPR); - member = TREE_OPERAND (member, 0); + /* We don't put out anything for an empty base. */ + gcc_assert (is_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (member)))); + /* But if the initializer isn't constexpr, leave it in so we + complain later. */ + if (potential_constant_expression (init, tf_none)) + return true; } - /* We don't use build_cplus_new here because it complains about - abstract bases. T has the wrong type, but - cxx_eval_constant_expression doesn't care. */ - init = unshare_expr (t); } + if (TREE_CODE (member) == ADDR_EXPR) + member = TREE_OPERAND (member, 0); if (TREE_CODE (member) == COMPONENT_REF) member = TREE_OPERAND (member, 1); CONSTRUCTOR_APPEND_ELT (*vec, member, init); -- cgit v1.1