From 3cabd6d17c8ea1b9a2a7cd666339eb07e736ac6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurynas Biveinis Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 04:48:34 +0000 Subject: cfghooks.c (tidy_fallthru_edges): Remove find_basic_blocks references from comments. 2009-04-22 Laurynas Biveinis * cfghooks.c (tidy_fallthru_edges): Remove find_basic_blocks references from comments. * cfgbuild.c: (count_basic_blocks): Delete. (find_basic_blocks_1): Delete. (find_basic_blocks): Delete. * except.c (finish_eh_generation): Make static. Move comment from except.h here. Remove find_basic_blocks references from comments. * except.h (finish_eh_generation): Delete. * basic-block.h (find_basic_blocks): Delete. * config/sh/sh.c (sh_output_mi_thunk): Delete a "#if 0" block. From-SVN: r146544 --- gcc/cfghooks.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'gcc/cfghooks.c') diff --git a/gcc/cfghooks.c b/gcc/cfghooks.c index 10c04a8..2c65726 100644 --- a/gcc/cfghooks.c +++ b/gcc/cfghooks.c @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ tidy_fallthru_edge (edge e) /* Fix up edges that now fall through, or rather should now fall through but previously required a jump around now deleted blocks. Simplify the search by only examining blocks numerically adjacent, since this - is how find_basic_blocks created them. */ + is how they were created. */ void tidy_fallthru_edges (void) @@ -852,9 +852,9 @@ tidy_fallthru_edges (void) a single successor. If we had a conditional branch to the next instruction when - find_basic_blocks was called, then there will only be one - out edge for the block which ended with the conditional - branch (since we do not create duplicate edges). + CFG was built, then there will only be one out edge for the + block which ended with the conditional branch (since we do + not create duplicate edges). Furthermore, the edge will be marked as a fallthru because we merge the flags for the duplicate edges. So we do not want to -- cgit v1.1