From dec55d763c498096e4f8211e212c8b0631829ce6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Wildenhues Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:28:19 +0000 Subject: g-table.adb, [...]: Fix comment typos. gcc/ada/ * g-table.adb, g-tasloc.adb, g-traceb.ads, g-trasym.adb, g-utf_32.adb, gen-soccon.c, gigi.h, gmem.c, gnatbind.adb, gnatchop.adb, gnatcmd.adb, gnatcmd.ads, gnatdll.adb, gnatfind.adb, gnatlink.adb, gnatmem.adb, gprep.adb, i-cstrea-vms.adb, i-cstrin.adb, i-pacdec.ads, i-vxwork.ads, impunit.adb, init.c, initialize.c, inline.adb, layout.adb, lib-writ.adb, lib-writ.ads, lib-xref.adb, lib-xref.ads, lib.adb, link.c, live.ads, make.adb, makegpr.adb, makeutl.adb, math_lib.adb, mdll-utl.adb, mdll.ads, memroot.adb, memroot.ads, misc.c, mlib-prj.adb, mlib-tgt-hpux.adb, mlib-tgt-linux.adb, mlib-tgt-tru64.adb, mlib-tgt.ads, namet.adb, namet.h, nlists.adb, nlists.ads, nlists.h, opt.ads, osint-b.ads, osint-c.adb, osint-c.ads, osint.adb, osint.ads, output.ads, par-ch10.adb, par-ch12.adb, par-ch2.adb, par-ch3.adb, par-ch4.adb, par-ch5.adb, par-ch6.adb, par-ch9.adb, par-endh.adb, par-labl.adb, par-prag.adb, par-sync.adb, par-tchk.adb, par-util.adb, par.adb, prep.adb, prep.ads, prepcomp.adb, prj-attr.ads, prj-dect.adb, prj-env.adb, prj-ext.adb, prj-nmsc.adb, prj-nmsc.ads, prj-pp.adb, prj-proc.adb, prj-strt.ads, prj-tree.ads, prj.adb, prj.ads: Fix comment typos. From-SVN: r133770 --- gcc/ada/par.adb | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'gcc/ada/par.adb') diff --git a/gcc/ada/par.adb b/gcc/ada/par.adb index 016d502..a76ee25 100644 --- a/gcc/ada/par.adb +++ b/gcc/ada/par.adb @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ is -- 4. We encounter a valid pragma INTERFACE or IMPORT that effectively -- supplies the missing body. In this case we reset the entry. - -- 5. We encounter the end of the declarative region without encoutering + -- 5. We encounter the end of the declarative region without encountering -- a BEGIN first. In this situation we simply reset the entry. We know -- that there is a missing body, but it seems more reasonable to let the -- later semantic checking discover this. @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ is ---------------------------------------------------- -- Note: throughout the parser, the terms reserved word and keyword - -- are used interchangably to refer to the same set of reserved + -- are used interchangeably to refer to the same set of reserved -- keywords (including until, protected, etc). -- If a reserved word is used in place of an identifier, the parser @@ -213,14 +213,14 @@ is -- further confirmation. -- In the case of an identifier appearing in the identifier list of a - -- declaration, the appearence of a comma or colon right after the + -- declaration, the appearance of a comma or colon right after the -- keyword on the same line is taken as confirmation. For an enumeration -- literal, a comma or right paren right after the identifier is also -- treated as adequate confirmation. -- The following type is used in calls to Is_Reserved_Identifier and -- also to P_Defining_Identifier and P_Identifier. The default for all - -- these functins is that reserved words in reserved word case are not + -- these functions is that reserved words in reserved word case are not -- considered to be reserved identifiers. The Id_Check value indicates -- tokens, which if they appear immediately after the identifier, are -- taken as confirming that the use of an identifier was expected @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ is -- end; -- The trouble is that the section of text from PROCEDURE B through END; - -- consitutes a valid procedure body, and the danger is that we find out + -- constitutes a valid procedure body, and the danger is that we find out -- far too late that something is wrong (indeed most compilers will behave -- uncomfortably on the above example). @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ is -- reserve the END; for the outer level.) For more details on this aspect -- of the handling, see package Par.Endh. - -- If we can avoid eating up the END; then the result in the absense of + -- If we can avoid eating up the END; then the result in the absence of -- any additional steps would be to post a missing END referring back to -- the subprogram with the bogus IS. Similarly, if the enclosing package -- has no BEGIN, then the result is a missing BEGIN message, which again @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ is -- allowed). procedure Skip_Declaration (S : List_Id); - -- Used when scanning statements to skip past a mispaced declaration + -- Used when scanning statements to skip past a misplaced declaration -- The declaration is scanned out and appended to the given list. -- Token is known to be a declaration token (in Token_Class_Declk) -- on entry, so there definition is a declaration to be scanned. @@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ is -- Used if an error occurs while scanning a parenthesized list of items -- separated by semicolons. The scan pointer is advanced to the next -- semicolon or right parenthesis at the outer parenthesis level, or - -- to the next is or RETURN keyword occurence, whichever comes first. + -- to the next is or RETURN keyword occurrence, whichever comes first. procedure Resync_Cunit; -- Synchronize to next token which could be the start of a compilation -- cgit v1.1