From 529909f9e92dd3b0ed0383f45a44d2b5f8a58958 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roger Sayle Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2023 23:19:10 +0100 Subject: [Committed] Avoid FAIL of gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c My apologies (again), I managed to mess up the 64-bit version of the test case for PR 110792. Unlike the 32-bit version, the 64-bit case contains exactly the same load instructions, just in a different order making the correct and incorrect behaviours impossible to distinguish with a scan-assembler-not. Somewhere between checking that this test failed in a clean tree without the patch, and getting the escaping correct, I'd failed to notice that this also FAILs in the patched tree. Doh! Instead of removing the test completely, I've left it as a compilation test. The original fix is tested by the 32-bit test case. Committed to mainline as obvious. Sorry for the incovenience. 2023-08-06 Roger Sayle gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog PR target/110792 * gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c: Remove dg-final scan-assembler-not. --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c index b65125c..eea4e18 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr110792.c @@ -15,4 +15,3 @@ unsigned __int128 whirl(unsigned char x0) asm("":::"memory"); return tt; } -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "movq\tWHIRL_S\\+8\\(%rdi\\), %rdi" } } */ -- cgit v1.1