Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following fixes code GENERIC generation for (convert! ...)
which currently generates
if (TREE_TYPE (_o1[0]) != type)
_r1 = fold_build1_loc (loc, NOP_EXPR, type, _o1[0]);
if (EXPR_P (_r1))
goto next_after_fail867;
else
_r1 = _o1[0];
where obviously braces are missing.
PR middle-end/110200
* genmatch.c (expr::gen_transform): Put braces around
the if arm for the (convert ...) short-cut.
(cherry picked from commit 820d1aec89c43dbbc70d3d0b888201878388454c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In r11-966-g9a182ef9ee011935d827ab5c6c9a7cd8e22257d8 we introduce a
simplification to emit_move_insn that attempts to simplify moves of the form:
(set (subreg:M1 (reg:M2 ...)) (constant C))
where M1 and M2 are of equal mode size. That is problematic for the splitter
vfp.md:no_literal_pool_df_immediate in the arm backend, which tries to pun an
lvalue DFmode pseudo into DImode and assign a constant to it with
emit_move_insn, as the new transformation simply undoes this, and we end up
splitting indefinitely.
This patch changes things around in the arm backend so that we use a
DImode temporary (instead of DFmode) and first load the DImode constant
into the pseudo, and then pun the pseudo into DFmode as an rvalue in a
reg -> reg move. I believe this should be semantically equivalent but
avoids the pathalogical behaviour seen in the PR.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/109800
* config/arm/arm.md (movdf): Generate temporary pseudo in DImode
instead of DFmode.
* config/arm/vfp.md (no_literal_pool_df_immediate): Rather than punning an
lvalue DFmode pseudo into DImode, use a DImode pseudo and pun it into
DFmode as an rvalue.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/109800
* gcc.target/arm/pure-code/pr109800.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit f5298d9969b4fa34ff3aecd54b9630e22b2984a5)
|
|
This bug was essentially that darwin_rs6000_special_round_type_align()
was ignoring externally-imposed capping of field alignment.
Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR target/110044
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (darwin_rs6000_special_round_type_align):
Make sure that we do not have a cap on field alignment before altering
the struct layout based on the type alignment of the first entry.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/powerpc/darwin-abi-13-0.c: New test.
* gcc.target/powerpc/darwin-abi-13-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/powerpc/darwin-abi-13-2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/powerpc/darwin-structs-0.h: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 84d080a29a780973bef47171ba708ae2f7b4ee47)
|
|
The pr96024.f90 testcase ICEs on big-endian hosts. The problem is
that length->val.integer is accessed after checking
length->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT, but it is a CHARACTER constant
which uses length->val.character union member instead and on big-endian
we end up reading constant 0x100000000 rather than some small number
on little-endian and if target doesn't have enough memory for 4 times
that (i.e. 16GB allocation), it ICEs.
2023-06-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR fortran/96024
* primary.c (gfc_convert_to_structure_constructor): Only do
constant string ctor length verification and truncation/padding
if constant length has INTEGER type.
(cherry picked from commit 4cf6e322adc19f927859e0a5edfa93cec4b8c844)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/100607
* resolve.c (resolve_select_rank): Remove duplicate error.
(resolve_fl_var_and_proc): Prevent NULL pointer dereference and
suppress error message for temporary.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/100607
* gfortran.dg/select_rank_6.f90: New test.
(cherry picked from commit fae09dfc0e6bf4cfe35d817558827aea78c6426f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
On the following testcase we hang, because POLY_INT_CST is CONSTANT_CLASS_P,
but BIT_AND_EXPR with it and INTEGER_CST doesn't simplify and the
(x | CST1) & CST2 -> (x & CST2) | (CST1 & CST2)
simplification actually relies on the (CST1 & CST2) simplification,
otherwise it is a deoptimization, trading 2 ops for 3 and furthermore
running into
/* Given a bit-wise operation CODE applied to ARG0 and ARG1, see if both
operands are another bit-wise operation with a common input. If so,
distribute the bit operations to save an operation and possibly two if
constants are involved. For example, convert
(A | B) & (A | C) into A | (B & C)
Further simplification will occur if B and C are constants. */
simplification which simplifies that
(x & CST2) | (CST1 & CST2) back to
CST2 & (x | CST1).
I went through all other places I could find where we have a simplification
with 2 CONSTANT_CLASS_P operands and perform some operation on those two,
while the other spots aren't that severe (just trade 2 operations for
another 2 if the two constants don't simplify, rather than as in the above
case trading 2 ops for 3), I still think all those spots really intend
to optimize only if the 2 constants simplify.
So, the following patch adds to those a ! modifier to ensure that,
even at GENERIC that modifier means !EXPR_P which is exactly what we want
IMHO.
2023-05-21 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/109505
* match.pd ((x | CST1) & CST2 -> (x & CST2) | (CST1 & CST2),
Combine successive equal operations with constants,
(A +- CST1) +- CST2 -> A + CST3, (CST1 - A) +- CST2 -> CST3 - A,
CST1 - (CST2 - A) -> CST3 + A): Use ! on ops with 2 CONSTANT_CLASS_P
operands.
* gcc.target/aarch64/sve/pr109505.c: New test.
(cherry picked from commit f211757f6fa9515e3fd1a4f66f1a8b48e500c9de)
|
|
The patch adds support for the ! modifier to GENERIC, backported
from r12-7361-gfdc46830f1b793.
2023-06-02 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/109505
* doc/match-and-simplify.texi: Amend ! documentation.
* genmatch.c (expr::gen_transform): Code-generate ! support
for GENERIC.
(parser::parse_expr): Allow ! for GENERIC.
|
|
|
|
This option does not imply -march=i386 so it's incorrect to say it
generates code that will run on "any i386 system".
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/109954
* doc/invoke.texi (x86 Options): Fix description of -m32 option.
(cherry picked from commit eeb92704967875411416b0b9508aa6f49e8192fd)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2023-05-29 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* BASE-VER: Set to 11.4.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is version 3 of the patch. This is essentially version 1 with the removal
of changes to altivec.md, and cleanup of the comments.
Version 2 generated the vmaddfp and vnmsubfp instructions if -Ofast was used,
and those changes are deleted in this patch.
The Altivec instructions vmaddfp and vnmsubfp have different rounding behaviors
than the VSX xvmaddsp and xvnmsubsp instructions. In particular, generating
these instructions seems to break Eigen on big endian systems.
I have done bootstrap builds on power9 little endian (with both IEEE long
double and IBM long double). I have also done the builds and test on a power8
big endian system (testing both 32-bit and 64-bit code generation). Chip has
verified that it fixes the problem that Eigen encountered. Can I check this
into the master GCC branch? After a burn-in period, can I check this patch
into the active GCC branches?
Thanks in advance.
2023-04-07 Michael Meissner <meissner@linux.ibm.com>
gcc/
PR target/70243
* config/rs6000/vsx.md (vsx_fmav4sf4): Do not generate vmaddfp. Back
port from master 04/10/2023.
(vsx_nfmsv4sf4): Do not generate vnmsubfp.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/70243
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr70243.c: New test. Back port from master
04/10/2023.
|
|
In order to fix PR100295, r13-4730-g18499b9f848707 attempted to make
extract_local_specs walk the given pattern twice, ignoring unevaluated
operands the first time around so that we prefer to process a local
specialization in an evaluated context if it appears in one (we process
each local specialization once even if it appears multiple times in the
pattern).
But there's a thinko in the patch, namely that we don't actually walk
the pattern twice since we don't clear the visited set for the second
walk (to avoid processing a local specialization twice) and so the root
node (and any node leading up to an unevaluated operand) is considered
visited already. So the patch effectively made extract_local_specs
ignore unevaluated operands altogether, which this testcase demonstrates
isn't quite safe (extract_local_specs never sees 'aa' and we don't record
its local specialization, so later we try to specialize 'aa' on the spot
with the args {{int},{17}} which causes us to nonsensically substitute
its auto with 17.)
This patch fixes this by refining the second walk to start from the
trees we skipped over during the first walk.
PR c++/108998
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.c (el_data::skipped_trees): New data member.
(extract_locals_r): Push to skipped_trees any unevaluated
contexts that we skipped over.
(extract_local_specs): For the second walk, start from each
tree in skipped_trees.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-generic11.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 341e6cd8d603a334fd34657a6b454176be1c6437)
|
|
Here during partial instantiation of the constexpr if, extra_local_specs
walks the statement looking for local specializations within to capture.
However, we're thwarted by the fact that 'ts' first appears inside an
unevaluated context, and so the calls to process_outer_var_ref for its
local specializations are a no-op. And since we walk each tree exactly
once, we end up not capturing the local specializations despite 'ts'
later occurring in an evaluated context.
This patch fixes this by making extract_local_specs walk evaluated
contexts first before walking unevaluated contexts. We could probably
get away with not walking unevaluated contexts at all, but this approach
seems more clearly safe.
PR c++/100295
PR c++/107579
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.c (el_data::skip_unevaluated_operands): New data member.
(extract_locals_r): If skip_unevaluated_operands is true,
don't walk into unevaluated contexts.
(extract_local_specs): Walk the pattern twice, first with
skip_unevaluated_operands true followed by it set to false.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp1z/constexpr-if-lambda5.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 18499b9f848707aee42d810e99ac0a4c9788433c)
|
|
Here we're crashing when using the explicit specialization of the
function template g with trailing requirements ultimately because
earlier decls_match (called indirectly from register_specialization) for
for the explicit specialization returned false since the template has
trailing requirements whereas the specialization doesn't.
In r12-2230-gddd25bd1a7c8f4, we fixed a similar issue concerning template
requirements instead of trailing requirements. We could extend that fix
to ignore trailing requirement mismatches for explicit specializations
as well, but it seems cleaner to just propagate constraints from the
specialized template to the specialization when declaring an explicit
specialization so that decls_match will naturally return true in this
case. And it looks like determine_specialization already does this,
albeit inconsistently (only when specializing a non-template member
function of a class template as in cpp2a/concepts-explicit-spec4.C).
So this patch makes determine_specialization consistently propagate
constraints from the specialized template to the specialization, which
in turn lets us get rid of the function_requirements_equivalent_p special
case added by r12-2230.
PR c++/107864
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.c (function_requirements_equivalent_p): Don't check
DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION.
* pt.c (determine_specialization): Propagate constraints when
specializing a function template too. Simplify by using
add_outermost_template_args.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/concepts/explicit-spec1a.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 36cabc257dfb7dd4f7625896891f6c5b195a0241)
|
|
Like during satisfaction, we also need to avoid deferring access checks
during substitution of a requires-expr because the outcome of an access
check can determine the value of the requires-expr. Otherwise (in
deferred access checking contexts such as within a base-clause), the
requires-expr may evaluate to the wrong result, and along the way a
failed access check may leak out from it into a non-SFINAE context and
cause a hard error (as in the below testcase).
PR c++/107179
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constraint.cc (tsubst_requires_expr): Make sure we're not
deferring access checks.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires31.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 40c34beef620ed13c4113c893ed4335ccc1b8f92)
|
|
Here we're crashing when diagnosing an unsatisfied __is_constructible
constraint because diagnose_trait_expr doesn't recognize this trait
(along with a bunch of other traits). Fix this by adding handling for
all remaining traits and removing the default case so that when adding a
new trait we'll get a warning that diagnose_trait_expr needs to handle it.
PR c++/100474
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Handle all remaining
traits appropriately. Remove default case.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-traits3.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 3aaf9bf77047aecc23072fe3db7f13ecff72a7cf)
|
|
Here the template context for the atomic constraint has two levels of
template parameters, but since it depends only on the innermost parameter
T we use a single-level argument vector (built by get_mapped_args) during
substitution into the atom. We eventually pass this vector to
do_auto_deduction as part of checking the return-type-requirement within
the atom, but do_auto_deduction expects outer_targs to be a full set of
arguments for sake of satisfaction.
This patch fixes this by making get_mapped_args always return an
argument vector whose depth corresponds to the template depth of the
context in which the atomic constraint expression was written, instead
of the highest parameter level that the expression happens to use.
PR c++/104527
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constraint.cc (normalize_atom): Set
ATOMIC_CONSTR_EXPR_FROM_CONCEPT_P appropriately.
(get_mapped_args): Make static, adjust parameters. Always
return a vector whose depth corresponds to the template depth of
the context of the atomic constraint expression. Micro-optimize
by passing false as exact to safe_grow_cleared and by collapsing
a multi-level depth-one argument vector.
(satisfy_atom): Adjust call to get_mapped_args and
diagnose_atomic_constraint.
(diagnose_atomic_constraint): Replace map parameter with an args
parameter.
* cp-tree.h (ATOMIC_CONSTR_EXPR_FROM_CONCEPT_P): Define.
(get_mapped_args): Remove declaration.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-return-req4.C: New test.
(cherry picked from commit 9413bb55185b9e88d84e91d5145d59f9f83b884a)
|
|
Here we're emitting a -Wignored-qualifiers warning for an intermediate
compiler-generated cast of nullptr to 'method-type* const' as part of
value initialization of a const pmf. This patch suppresses the warning
by instead casting to the corresponding unqualified type.
PR c++/92752
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* typeck.c (build_ptrmemfunc): Cast a nullptr constant to the
unqualified pointer type not the qualified one.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/warn/Wignored-qualifiers2.C: New test.
Co-authored-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit e971990cbda091b4caf5e1a5bded5121068934e4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/109846
* expr.c (gfc_check_vardef_context): Check appropriate pointer
attribute for CLASS vs. non-CLASS function result in variable
definition context.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/109846
* gfortran.dg/ptr-func-5.f90: New test.
(cherry picked from commit fa0569e90efe8a5cb895a3f50dd502f849940828)
|