aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/cp
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-08-24Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+10
2025-08-23c++: Fix greater-than operator in braced-init-lists [PR116928]Eczbek1-0/+4
PR c++/116928 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_braced_list): Set greater_than_is_operator_p. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/template33.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-23c++/modules: Provide definitions of synthesized methods outside their ↵Nathaniel Shead1-0/+3
defining module [PR120499] In the PR, we're getting a linker error from _Vector_impl's destructor never getting emitted. This is because of a combination of factors: 1. in imp-member-4_a, the destructor is not used and so there is no definition generated. 2. in imp-member-4_b, the destructor gets synthesized (as part of the synthesis for Coll's destructor) but is not ODR-used and so does not get emitted. Despite there being a definition provided in this TU, the destructor is still considered imported and so isn't streamed into the module body. 3. in imp-member-4_c, we need to ODR-use the destructor but we only got a forward declaration from imp-member-4_b, so we cannot emit a body. The point of failure here is step 2; this function has effectively been declared in the imp-member-4_b module, and so we shouldn't treat it as imported. This way we'll properly stream the body so that importers can emit it. PR c++/120499 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * method.cc (synthesize_method): Set the instantiating module. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/modules/imp-member-4_a.C: New test. * g++.dg/modules/imp-member-4_b.C: New test. * g++.dg/modules/imp-member-4_c.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
2025-08-22Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+11
2025-08-21c++: constexpr clobber of const [PR121068]Jason Merrill1-0/+3
Since r16-3022, 20_util/variant/102912.cc was failing in C++20 and above due to wrong errors about destruction modifying a const object; destruction is OK. PR c++/121068 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_store_expression): Allow clobber of a const object. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dtor18.C: New test.
2025-08-20c++: pointer to auto member function [PR120757]Jason Merrill1-2/+6
Here r13-1210 correctly changed &A<int>::foo to not be considered type-dependent, but tsubst_expr of the OFFSET_REF got confused trying to tsubst a type that involved auto. Fixed by getting the type from the member rather than tsubst. PR c++/120757 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (tsubst_expr) [OFFSET_REF]: Don't tsubst the type. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp1y/auto-fn66.C: New test.
2025-08-21Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+5
2025-08-20c++: lambda capture and shadowing [PR121553]Marek Polacek1-1/+2
P2036 says that this: [x=1]{ int x; } should be rejected, but with my P2036 we started giving an error for the attached testcase as well, breaking Dolphin. So let's keep the error only for init-captures. PR c++/121553 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * name-lookup.cc (check_local_shadow): Check !is_normal_capture_proxy. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-19.C: Revert P2036 changes. * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-6.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-20.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-21.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-20Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+18
2025-08-19c++: Fix ICE on mangling invalid compound requirement [PR120618]Ben Wu1-3/+6
This testcase caused an ICE when mangling the invalid type-constraint in write_requirement since write_type_constraint expects a TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM. Setting the trailing return type to NULL_TREE when a return-type-requirement is found in place of a type-constraint prevents the failed assertion in write_requirement. It also allows the invalid constraint to be satisfied in some contexts to prevent redundant errors, e.g. in concepts-requires5.C. Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. PR c++/120618 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_compound_requirement): Set type to NULL_TREE for invalid type-constraint. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires5.C: Don't require redundant diagnostic in static assertion. * g++.dg/concepts/pr120618.C: New test. Suggested-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-19c++: constrained corresponding using from partial spec [PR121351]Patrick Palka1-4/+4
When comparing constraints during correspondence checking for a using from a partial specialization, we need to substitute the partial specialization arguments into the constraints rather than the primary template arguments. Otherwise we incorrectly reject e.g. the below testcase as ambiguous since we substitute T=int* instead of T=int into #1's constraints and don't notice the correspondence. This patch corrects the recent r16-2771-gb9f1cc4e119da9 fix by using outer_template_args instead of TI_ARGS of the DECL_CONTEXT, which should always give the correct outer arguments for substitution. PR c++/121351 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * class.cc (add_method): Use outer_template_args when substituting outer template arguments into constraints. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-using7.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-19c++/modules: Fix exporting using-decls of unattached purview functions ↵Nathaniel Shead1-2/+4
[PR120195] We have logic to adjust a function decl if it gets re-declared as a using-decl with different purviewness, but we also need to do the same if it gets redeclared with different exportedness. PR c++/120195 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * name-lookup.cc (do_nonmember_using_decl): Also handle change in exportedness of a function. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/modules/using-32_a.C: New test. * g++.dg/modules/using-32_b.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
2025-08-19Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+5
2025-08-18opts: use sanitize_code_type for sanitizer flagsIndu Bhagat1-1/+1
Currently, the data type of sanitizer flags is unsigned int, with SANITIZE_SHADOW_CALL_STACK (1UL << 31) being highest individual enumerator for enum sanitize_code. Use 'sanitize_code_type' data type to allow for more distinct instrumentation modes be added when needed. gcc/ChangeLog: * flag-types.h (sanitize_code_type): Define. * asan.h (sanitize_flags_p): Use 'sanitize_code_type' instead of 'unsigned int'. * common.opt: Likewise. * dwarf2asm.cc (dw2_output_indirect_constant_1): Likewise. * opts.cc (find_sanitizer_argument): Likewise. (report_conflicting_sanitizer_options): Likewise. (parse_sanitizer_options): Likewise. (parse_no_sanitize_attribute): Likewise. * opts.h (parse_sanitizer_options): Likewise. (parse_no_sanitize_attribute): Likewise. * tree-cfg.cc (print_no_sanitize_attr_value): Likewise. * tree.cc (tree_fits_sanitize_code_type_p): Define. (tree_to_sanitize_code_type): Likewise. * tree.h (tree_fits_sanitize_code_type_p): Declare. (tree_to_sanitize_code_type): Likewise. gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c-attribs.cc (add_no_sanitize_value): Use 'sanitize_code_type' instead of 'unsigned int'. (handle_no_sanitize_attribute): Likewise. (handle_no_sanitize_address_attribute): Likewise. (handle_no_sanitize_thread_attribute): Likewise. (handle_no_address_safety_analysis_attribute): Likewise. * c-common.h (add_no_sanitize_value): Likewise. gcc/c/ChangeLog: * c-parser.cc (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Use 'sanitize_code_type' instead of 'unsigned int'. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck.cc (get_member_function_from_ptrfunc): Use 'sanitize_code_type' instead of 'unsigned int'. gcc/d/ChangeLog: * d-attribs.cc (d_handle_no_sanitize_attribute): Use 'sanitize_code_type' instead of 'unsigned int'. Signed-off-by: Claudiu Zissulescu <claudiu.zissulescu-ianculescu@oracle.com>
2025-08-17Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+19
2025-08-17c++: Implement P2115R0 linkage changes for unnamed unscoped enums [PR120503]Nathaniel Shead4-7/+45
We currently list P2115R0 as implemented, but only the modules changes had been done. This patch implements the linkage changes so that unnamed unscoped enums will use the name of the first enumerator for linkage purposes. This is (strictly speaking) a breaking change, as code that previously relied on unnamed enumerations being internal linkage may have overloads using those types become exposed and clash with other functions in a different TU that have been similarly exposed. As such this feature is only implemented for C++20. No ABI flag warning is provided, partly because C++20 is still an experimental standard, but also because any affected functions could not have been part of an ABI until this change anyway. A number of testcases that are testing for behaviour of no-linkage types are adjusted to use an enumeration with no values, so that the pre-C++20 and post-C++20 behaviour is equivalently tested. In terms of implementation, I had originally considered adjusting the DECL_NAME of the enum, as with 'name_unnamed_type', but this ended up being more complicated as it had unwanted interactions with the existing modules streaming and with name lookup and diagnostic messages. This patch instead uses a new function to derive this case. The standard says that ([dcl.enum] p11) such an enum "...is denoted, for linkage purposes, by its underlying type and its first enumerator", so we need to add a new mangling production as well to handle this. PR c++/120503 PR c++/120824 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cp-tree.h (TYPE_UNNAMED_P): Adjust for enums with enumerators for linkage purposes. (enum_with_enumerator_for_linkage_p): Declare. * decl.cc (name_unnamed_type): Adjust assertions to handle enums with enumerators for linkage purposes. (grokdeclarator): Use a typedef name for enums with enumerators for linkage purposes. (enum_with_enumerator_for_linkage_p): New function. (finish_enum_value_list): Reset type linkage for enums with enumerators for linkage purposes. * mangle.cc (write_unnamed_enum_name): New function. (write_unqualified_name): Handle enums with enumerators for linkage purposes. * tree.cc (decl_linkage): Fixup unnamed enums. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/abi/mangle32.C: Remove enumerator list. * g++.dg/cpp0x/linkage2.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/ext/vector26.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/other/anon3.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/abi/mangle83.C: New test. * g++.dg/modules/enum-15_a.C: New test. * g++.dg/modules/enum-15_b.C: New test. include/ChangeLog: * demangle.h (enum demangle_component_type): Add enumeration DEMANGLE_COMPONENT_UNNAMED_ENUM. libiberty/ChangeLog: * cp-demangle.c (d_unnamed_enum): New function. (d_unqualified_name): Call it. (cplus_demangle_type): Handle unscoped unnamed types (Ue, Ul, etc.) (d_count_templates_scopes): Handle unnamed enums. (d_find_pack): Likewise. (d_print_comp_inner): Print unnamed enums. * testsuite/demangle-expected: Add tests. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-16Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+39
2025-08-15c++: Implement __builtin_structured_binding_size traitJakub Jelinek6-28/+58
clang++ apparently added a SFINAE-friendly __builtin_structured_binding_size trait to return the structured binding size (or error if not in SFINAE contexts if a type doesn't have a structured binding size). The expansion statement patch already anticipated this through adding complain argument to cp_finish_decomp. The following patch implements it. 2025-08-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> gcc/ * doc/extend.texi (Type Traits): Document __builtin_structured_binding_size. gcc/cp/ * cp-trait.def (STRUCTURED_BINDING_SIZE): New unary trait. * cp-tree.h (finish_structured_binding_size): Declare. * semantics.cc (trait_expr_value): Handle CPTK_STRUCTURED_BINDING_SIZE. (finish_structured_binding_size): New function. (finish_trait_expr): Handle CPTK_RANK and CPTK_TYPE_ORDER in the switch instead of just doing break; for those and ifs at the end to handle them. Handle CPTK_STRUCTURED_BINDING_SIZE. * pt.cc (tsubst_expr): Likewise. * constraint.cc (diagnose_trait_expr): Likewise. * decl.cc (get_tuple_size): Use mce_true for maybe_const_value. (cp_decomp_size): Diagnose incomplete types not just if processing_template_decl, and use error_at instead of pedwarn. If btype is NULL, just return 0 instead of diagnosing an error. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt15.C: Expect different diagnostics for zero size destructuring expansion statement. * g++.dg/ext/builtin-structured-binding-size1.C: New test. * g++.dg/ext/builtin-structured-binding-size2.C: New test. * g++.dg/ext/builtin-structured-binding-size3.C: New test. * g++.dg/ext/builtin-structured-binding-size4.C: New test.
2025-08-15c++: Implement C++20 P1766R1 - Mitigating minor modules maladies [PR121552]Jakub Jelinek1-0/+85
The following patch attempts to implement the C++20 P1766R1 - Mitigating minor modules maladies paper. clang++ a few years ago introduced for the diagnostics required in the paper -Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage pedwarn and the following patch does that too. The paper was accepted as a DR, the patch enables the warning also for C++98, dunno whether it might not be better to do it only for C++11 onwards. The paper is also about differences in default arguments of functions in different TUs and in modules, I think within the same TU we diagnose it correctly (maybe I should add some testcase) and perhaps try something with modules as well. But in different TUs it is IFNDR. 2025-08-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/121552 gcc/ * doc/invoke.texi (-Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage): Document. gcc/c-family/ * c.opt (Wnon-c-typedef-for-linkage): New option. * c.opt.urls: Regenerate. gcc/cp/ * decl.cc: Implement C++20 P1766R1 - Mitigating minor modules maladies. (diagnose_non_c_class_typedef_for_linkage, maybe_diagnose_non_c_class_typedef_for_linkage): New functions. (name_unnamed_type): Call maybe_diagnose_non_c_class_typedef_for_linkage. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/cpp2a/typedef1.C: New test. * g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/typedef5.C: Add -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage to dg-options. * g++.dg/inherit/typeinfo1.C: Add -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage to dg-additional-options. * g++.dg/parse/ctor2.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/ext/anon-struct9.C: Add -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage to dg-options. * g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon11.C: Add -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage to dg-additional-options. * g++.dg/lto/pr69137_0.C: Add -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage to dg-lto-options. * g++.dg/other/anon8.C: Add -Wno-non-c-typedef-for-linkage to dg-additional-options. * g++.dg/template/pr84973.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/template/pr84973-2.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/template/pr84973-3.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/abi/anon2.C: Likewise. * g++.dg/abi/anon3.C: Likewise. * g++.old-deja/g++.oliva/linkage1.C: Likewise.
2025-08-15c++: Fix default argument parsing in non-comma variadic methods [PR121539]Jakub Jelinek1-1/+5
While the non-comma variadic functions/methods were deprecated in C++26, they are still valid and they are valid without deprecation in C++98 to C++23. We parse default arguments followed by ...) outside of classes or for out of class definitions of methods, but I think since C++11 support in GCC 4.9 or so we consider ... to be a part of a default argument and error on it. I think a default argument can't validly contain a pack expansion that ends the expression with ..., so I think we can simply handle ...) if at depth 0 as not part of the default argument. 2025-08-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/121539 * parser.cc (cp_parser_cache_defarg): Set done to true for CPP_ELLIPSIS followed by CPP_CLOSE_PAREN in !nsdmi at depth 0. * g++.dg/parse/defarg20.C: New test.
2025-08-15c++: Warn on #undef/#define of remaining cpp.predefined macros [PR120778]Jakub Jelinek1-23/+18
We already warn on #undef or pedwarn on #define (but not on #define after #undef) of some builtin macros mentioned in cpp.predefined. The C++26 P2843R3 paper changes it from (compile time) undefined behavior to ill-formed. The following patch arranges for warning (for #undef) and pedwarn (on #define) for the remaining cpp.predefined macros. __cpp_* feature test macros only for C++20 which added some of them to cpp.predefined, in earlier C++ versions it was just an extension and for pedantic diagnostic I think we don't need to diagnose anything, __STDCPP_* and __cplusplus macros for all C++ versions where they appeared. Like the earlier posted -Wkeyword-macro diagnostics (which is done regardless whether the identifier is defined as a macro or not, obviously most likely none of the keywords are defined as macros initially), this one also warns on #undef when a macro isn't defined or later #define after #undef. 2025-08-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR preprocessor/120778 PR target/121520 gcc/c-family/ * c-cppbuiltin.cc (c_cpp_builtins): Implement C++26 DR 2581. Add cpp_define_warn lambda and use it as well as cpp_warn where needed. In the if (c_dialect_cxx ()) block with __cpp_* predefinitions add cpp_define lambda. Formatting fixes. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (c_init_decl_processing): Use cpp_warn instead of cpp_lookup and NODE_WARN bit setting. gcc/cp/ * lex.cc (cxx_init): Remove warn_on lambda. Use cpp_warn instead of cpp_lookup and NODE_WARN bit setting or warn_on. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/DRs/dr2581-1.C: New test. * g++.dg/DRs/dr2581-2.C: New test. * c-c++-common/cpp/pr92296-2.c: Expect warnings also on defining special macros after undefining them. libcpp/ * include/cpplib.h (struct cpp_options): Add suppress_builtin_macro_warnings member. (cpp_warn): New inline functions. * init.cc (cpp_create_reader): Clear suppress_builtin_macro_warnings. (cpp_init_builtins): Call cpp_warn on __cplusplus, __STDC__, __STDC_VERSION__, __STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__ and __STDCPP_STRICT_POINTER_SAFETY__ when appropriate. * directives.cc (do_undef): Warn on undefining NODE_WARN macros if not cpp_keyword_p. Don't emit any NODE_WARN related diagnostics if CPP_OPTION (pfile, suppress_builtin_macro_warnings). (cpp_define, _cpp_define_builtin, cpp_undef): Temporarily set CPP_OPTION (pfile, suppress_builtin_macro_warnings) around run_directive calls. * macro.cc (_cpp_create_definition): Warn on defining NODE_WARN macros if they weren't previously defined and not cpp_keyword_p. Ignore NODE_WARN for diagnostics if CPP_OPTION (pfile, suppress_builtin_macro_warnings).
2025-08-15Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+8
2025-08-14c++: Fix up build_cplus_array_type [PR121524]Jakub Jelinek1-1/+6
The following testcase is miscompiled since my r15-3046 change to properly apply std attributes after closing ] for arrays to the array type. Array type is not a class type, so when cplus_decl_attribute is called on the ARRAY_TYPE, it doesn't do ATTR_FLAG_TYPE_IN_PLACE. Though, for alignas/gnu::aligned/deprecated/gnu::unavailable/gnu::unused attributes the handlers of those attributes for non-ATTR_FLAG_TYPE_IN_PLACE on types call build_variant_type_copy and modify some flags on the new variant type. They also usually don't clear *no_add_attrs, so the caller then checks if the attributes are present on the new type and if not, calls build_type_attribute_variant. On the following testcase, it results in the B::foo type to be properly 32 byte aligned. The problem happens later when we build_cplus_array_type for C::a. elt_type is T (typedef, or using works likewise), we get as m main variant type with unsigned int element type but because elt_type is different, build_cplus_array_type searches the TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT chain to find if there isn't already a useful ARRAY_TYPE to reuse. It checks for NULL TYPE_NAME, NULL TYPE_ATTRIBUTES and the right TREE_TYPE. Unfortunately this is not good enough, build_variant_type_copy above created a variant type on which it modified TYPE_USER_ALIGN and TYPE_ALIGN, but TYPE_ATTRIBUTES is still NULL, only the build_type_attribute_variant call later adds attributes. The problem is that the intermediate type is found in the TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT chain and reused. The following patch adds conditions to prevent problems with the affected attributes (except gnu::unused, I think whether TREE_USED is set or not shouldn't prevent sharing). In particular, if TYPE_USER_ALIGN is not set on the variant, it wasn't user realigned, if it is set, it verifies it has it set because the elt_type has been user aligned and TYPE_ALIGN is the expected one. For deprecated it punts on the flag being set and for gnu::unavailable as well. 2025-08-14 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/121524 * tree.cc (build_cplus_array_type): Don't reuse variant type if it has TREE_DEPRECATED or TREE_UNAVAILABLE flags set or, unless elt_type has TYPE_USER_ALIGN set and TYPE_ALIGN is TYPE_ALIGN of elt_type, TYPE_USER_ALIGN is not set. * g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-89.C: New test.
2025-08-14Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+116
2025-08-13c++: P2036R3 - Change scope of lambda trailing-return-type [PR102610]Marek Polacek7-30/+212
This patch is an attempt to implement P2036R3 along with P2579R0, fixing build breakages caused by P2036R3. The simplest example is: auto counter1 = [j=0]() mutable -> decltype(j) { return j++; }; which currently doesn't compile because the 'j' in the capture isn't visible in the trailing return type. With these proposals, the 'j' will be in a lambda scope which spans the trailing return type, so this test will compile. This oughtn't be difficult but decltype and other issues made this patch much more challenging. We have to push the explicit captures before going into _lambda_declarator_opt because that is what parses the trailing return type. Yet we can't build any captures until after _lambda_body -> start_lambda_function which creates the lambda's operator(), without which we can't build a proxy, but _lambda_body happens only after parsing the declarator. This patch works around it by creating a fake operator() and adding it to the capture and then removing it when we have the real operator(). Another thing is that in "-> decltype(j)" we don't have the right current_function_decl yet. If current_lambda_expr gives us a lambda, we know this decltype appertains to a lambda. But we have to know if we are in a parameter-declaration-clause: as per [expr.prim.id.unqual]/4.4, if we are, we shouldn't be adding "const". The new LAMBDA_EXPR_CONST_QUAL_P flag tracks this. But it doesn't handle nested lambdas yet, specifically, [expr.prim.id.unqual]/14. I don't think this patch changes behavior for the tests in "capture-default with [=]" as the paper promises; clang++ behaves the same as gcc with this patch. PR c++/102610 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cp-tree.h (LAMBDA_EXPR_CONST_QUAL_P): Define. (maybe_add_dummy_lambda_op): Declare. (remove_dummy_lambda_op): Declare. (push_capture_proxies): Adjust. * lambda.cc (build_capture_proxy): No longer static. New early_p parameter. Use it. (add_capture): Adjust the call to build_capture_proxy. (resolvable_dummy_lambda): Check DECL_LAMBDA_FUNCTION_P. (push_capture_proxies): New. (start_lambda_function): Use it. * name-lookup.cc (check_local_shadow): Give an error for is_capture_proxy. (cp_binding_level_descriptor): Add lambda-scope. (begin_scope) <case sk_lambda>: New case. * name-lookup.h (enum scope_kind): Add sk_lambda. (struct cp_binding_level): Widen kind. * parser.cc (cp_parser_lambda_expression): Create a new (lambda) scope after the lambda-introducer. (cp_parser_lambda_declarator_opt): Set LAMBDA_EXPR_CONST_QUAL_P. Create a dummy operator() if needed. Inject the captures into the lambda scope. Remove the dummy operator(). (make_dummy_lambda_op): New. (maybe_add_dummy_lambda_op): New. (remove_dummy_lambda_op): New. * pt.cc (tsubst_lambda_expr): Begin/end a lambda scope. Push the capture proxies. Build/remove a dummy operator() if needed. Set LAMBDA_EXPR_CONST_QUAL_P. * semantics.cc (parsing_lambda_declarator): New. (outer_var_p): Also consider captures as outer variables if in a lambda declarator. (process_outer_var_ref): Reset containing_function when parsing_lambda_declarator. (finish_decltype_type): Process decls in the lambda-declarator as well. Look at LAMBDA_EXPR_CONST_QUAL_P unless we have an xobj function. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-decltype3.C: Remove xfail. * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-19.C: Add -Wpedantic. Adjust a dg-warning. * g++.dg/warn/Wshadow-6.C: Adjust expected diagnostics. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope1.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope2.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope3.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope4.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope4b.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope5.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope6.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope7.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope8.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/lambda-scope9.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-13c++: Implement C++26 P1306R5 - Expansion statements [PR120776]Jakub Jelinek15-164/+1141
The following patch implements the C++26 P1306R5 - Expansion statements paper. When expansion statements are used outside of templates, the lowering of the statement uses push_tinst_level_loc and instantiates the body multiple times, otherwise when the new TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT statement is being instantiated and !processing_template_decl, it instantiates the body several times with just local_specialization_stack around each iteration but with the original args. Because the lowering of these statements is mostly about instantiation, I've put the lowering code into pt.cc rather than semantics.cc. Only destructuring expansion statements currently use in the patch temporary lifetime extension which matches the proposed resolution of https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3043.html I'm not sure what will CWG decide about that if there will be some temporary lifetime extension for enumerating expansion statements and if yes, under what exact rules (e.g. whether it extends all the temporaries across one iteration of the body, or only if a reference is initialized or nothing at all). And for iterating expansion statements, I think I don't understand the P2686R4 rules well yet, I think if the expansion-initializer is used in static constexpr rvalue reference, then it isn't needed, but not sure if it won't be needed if static would be dropped (whether struct S { constexpr S () : s (0) {} constexpr ~S () {} int s; }; struct T { const S &t, &u; }; void foo () { constexpr T t = { S {}, S {} }; use (t.t, t.u); } is ok under P2686R4; though without constexpr before T I see S::~S () being called after use, not at the end of the t declaration, so maybe it is fine also without static). As per https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3044.html the patch uses build_int_cst (ptrdiff_type_node, i) to create second operand of begin + i and doesn't lookup overloaded comma operator (note, I'm actually not even creating a lambda there, just using TARGET_EXPRs). I guess my preference would be dropping those 4 static keywords from [stmt.expand] but the patch does use those for now and it won't be possible to change that until the rest of P2686R4 is implemented. As per https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3045.html it treats sk_template_for like sk_for for the purpose of redeclaration of vars in the body but doesn't yet reject [[fallthrough]]; in the expansion stmt body (when not nested in another switch). I'm not sure if cp_perform_range_for_lookup used in the patch is exactly what we want for the https://eel.is/c++draft/stmt.expand#3.2 - it does finish_call_expr on the perform_koenig_lookup as well, shouldn't for the decision whether it is iterating or destructing (i.e. tf_none) just call perform_koenig_lookup and check if it found some FUNCTION_DECL/OVERLOAD/TEMPLATE_DECL? cp_decomp_size in the patch has tsubst_flags_t argument and attempts to be SFINAE friendly, even when it isn't needed strictly for this patch. This is with PR96185 __builtin_structured_binding_size implementation in mind (to follow clang). The new TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT statement is expected to be lowered to something that doesn't use the statement at all, I've implemented break/continue discovery in the body, so all I needed was to punt on TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT in potential_constant_expression_1 so that we don't try to constant evaluate it when it is still dependent (and cxx_eval_constant_expression rejects it without any extra code). I think only enumerating and iterating expansion statements can have zero iteration, because for destructuring ones it doesn't use a structured binding pack and so valid structured binding has to have at least one iteration. Though https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/3048.html could change that, this patch currently rejects it though. 2025-08-13 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/120776 gcc/c-family/ * c-cppbuiltin.cc (c_cpp_builtins): Predefine __cpp_expansion_statements=202506L for C++26. gcc/cp/ * cp-tree.def: Implement C++26 P1306R5 - Expansion statements. (TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT): New tree code. * cp-tree.h (struct saved_scope): Add expansion_stmt. (in_expansion_stmt): Define. (TEMPLATE_FOR_DECL, TEMPLATE_FOR_EXPR, TEMPLATE_FOR_BODY, TEMPLATE_FOR_SCOPE, TEMPLATE_FOR_INIT_STMT): Define. (struct tinst_level): Adjust comment. (cp_decomp_size, finish_expansion_stmt, do_pushlevel, cp_build_range_for_decls, build_range_temp, cp_perform_range_for_lookup, begin_template_for_scope): Declare. (finish_range_for_stmt): Remove declaration. * cp-objcp-common.cc (cp_common_init_ts): Handle TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT. * name-lookup.h (enum scope_kind): Add sk_template_for enumerator. (struct cp_binding_level): Enlarge kind bitfield from 4 to 5 bits. Adjust comment with remaining space bits. * name-lookup.cc (check_local_shadow): Handle sk_template_for like sk_for. (cp_binding_level_descriptor): Add entry for sk_template_for. (begin_scope): Handle sk_template_for. * parser.h (IN_EXPANSION_STMT): Define. * parser.cc (cp_debug_parser): Print IN_EXPANSION_STMT bit. (cp_parser_lambda_expression): Temporarily clear in_expansion_stmt. (cp_parser_statement): Handle RID_TEMPLATE followed by RID_FOR for C++11. (cp_parser_label_for_labeled_statement): Complain about named labels inside of expansion stmt body. (cp_hide_range_decl): New function. (cp_parser_range_for): Use it. Adjust do_range_for_auto_deduction caller. Remove second template argument from auto_vecs bindings and names. (build_range_temp): No longer static. (do_range_for_auto_deduction): Add expansion_stmt argument. (cp_build_range_for_decls): New function. (cp_convert_range_for): Use it. Call cp_perform_range_for_lookup rather than cp_parser_perform_range_for_lookup. (cp_parser_perform_range_for_lookup): Rename to ... (cp_perform_range_for_lookup): ... this. No longer static. Add complain argument and handle it. (cp_parser_range_for_member_function): Rename to ... (cp_range_for_member_function): ... this. (cp_parser_expansion_statement): New function. (cp_parser_jump_statement): Handle IN_EXPANSION_STMT. (cp_convert_omp_range_for): Adjust do_range_for_auto_deduction caller. Call cp_perform_range_for_lookup rather than cp_parser_perform_range_for_lookup. * error.cc (print_instantiation_full_context): Handle tldcl being TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT. (print_instantiation_partial_context_line): Likewise. * constexpr.cc (potential_constant_expression_1): Handle TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT. * decl.cc (poplevel_named_label_1): Use obl instead of bl->level_chain. (finish_case_label): Diagnose case labels inside of template for. (find_decomp_class_base): Add complain argument, don't diagnose anything and just return error_mark_node if tf_none, adjust recursive call. (cp_decomp_size): New function. (cp_finish_decomp): Adjust find_decomp_class_base caller. * semantics.cc (do_pushlevel): No longer static. (begin_template_for_scope): New function. * pt.cc (push_tinst_level_loc): Handle TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT. (reopen_tinst_level): Likewise. (tsubst_stmt): Handle TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT. (struct expansion_stmt_bc): New type. (expansion_stmt_find_bc_r, finish_expansion_stmt): New functions. * decl2.cc (decl_dependent_p): Return true for current function's decl if in_expansion_stmt. * call.cc (extend_ref_init_temps): Don't extend_all_temps if TREE_STATIC (decl). * cxx-pretty-print.cc (cxx_pretty_printer::statement): Handle TEMPLATE_FOR_STMT. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp64.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt1.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt2.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt3.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt4.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt5.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt6.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt7.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt8.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt9.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt10.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt11.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt12.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt13.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt14.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt15.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt16.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt17.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt18.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/expansion-stmt19.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/feat-cxx26.C: Add __cpp_expansion_statements tests.
2025-08-13c++: fix typo in commentBenjamin Wu1-1/+1
gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * lex.cc (init_operators): Fix typo.
2025-08-12Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+25
2025-08-11c++: Quoting in -fmodules-mapperNicolas Werner1-32/+14
Users might be using a space in their build directory path. To allow specifying such a root for the module mapper started by GCC, we need the command to allow quotes. Previously quoting a path passed to the module mapper was not possible, so replace the custom argv parsing with the argv parsing logic from libiberty, that supports fairly standard shell quoting using single and double quotes. The primary purpose of this patch is to allow passing paths with spaces to the --root parameter of the module mapper. No test is included as spaces in build directories are tricky cross platform. The patch was tested manually on my system. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * mapper-client.cc (spawn_mapper_program): change argv parsing Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>
2025-08-11c++: Fix up handling of name independent structured binding packs [PR117783]Jakub Jelinek1-7/+17
I've realized I haven't added testsuite coverage for name independent structured binding packs. And the auto [i, ..._, j] = T {}; auto [k, ..._, l] = T {}; case shows a problem with that. The elements of the structured binding pack have #i appended to their names, so for the _ case e.g. _#0, _#1 etc. (to print something useful in diagnostics, perhaps debug info later on). The above is valid though as long as one doesn't use _ (which is ambiguous), but we were emitting errors on redeclaration of _#0, _#1 etc. The following patch uses DECL_NAME (decl) = NULL_TREE; for the name independent decl case so that the false positive redeclaration errors aren't emitted. 2025-08-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/117783 * decl.cc (set_sb_pack_name): For name independent decls just clear DECL_NAME instead of appending #i to it. * g++.dg/cpp26/name-independent-decl11.C: New test.
2025-08-11c++: Implement mangling for structured binding packs [PR117783]Jakub Jelinek1-8/+8
On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 11:53:55AM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote: > The Clang mangling of the underlying variable seems fine, just mentioning > the bound names; we can't get mangling collisions between pack and non-pack > versions of the same name. > > But It looks like they use .N discriminators for the individual elements, > which is wrong because . is reserved for implementation details. But I'd > think it should be fine to use [<discriminator>] instead. If you want the whole structured bindings to be mangled normally as if the pack isn't a pack and the individual vars of the structured binding pack mangled as multiple occurrences of the named entities, the following patch does that. 2025-08-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/117783 * decl.cc (cp_finish_decomp): Don't sorry on tuple static structured bindings with a pack, instead temporarily reset DECL_NAME of the individual vars in the pack to the name of the pack for cp_finish_decl time and force mangling. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp19.C: Don't expect sorry on tuple static structured bindings with a pack. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp26.C: New test.
2025-08-11c++: Fix structured binding redeclaration error recovery [PR121442]Jakub Jelinek1-2/+7
My C++26 P2686R4 PR117784 caused ICE on the following testcase. While the earlier conditions guarantee decl2 is not error_mark_node, decl can be (that is used when something erroneous has been seen earlier and the whole structured bindings will be ignored after parsing). So, the following patch avoids the copying of constexpr/constinit flags if decl is error_mark_node. 2025-08-11 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/121442 * parser.cc (cp_parser_decomposition_declaration): Don't copy DECL_DECLARED_CONST{EXPR,INIT}_P bits from decl to decl2 if decl is error_mark_node. * g++.dg/cpp1z/decomp65.C: New test.
2025-08-09Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+5
2025-08-08diagnostics: update signature of some callbacksDavid Malcolm1-2/+2
No functional change intended. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * error.cc (cp_adjust_diagnostic_info): Convert "context" arg from ptr to const &. gcc/ChangeLog: * diagnostics/context.cc (context::get_any_inlining_info): Convert "context" arg of m_set_locations_cb from ptr to const &. (context::report_diagnostic): Convert "context" arg of m_adjust_diagnostic_info from ptr to const &. * diagnostics/context.h (context::set_locations_callback_t): Likewise. (context::set_adjust_diagnostic_info_callback): Likewise. (context::m_adjust_diagnostic_info): Likewise. * tree-diagnostic.cc (set_inlining_locations): Likewise. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
2025-08-08Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+45
2025-08-07c++: extract_call_expr and C++20 rewritten opsPatrick Palka1-22/+0
After r16-2519-gba5a6787374dea, we'll never express a C++20 rewritten comparison operator as a built-in operator acting on an operator<=> call, e.g. operator<=>(x, y) @ 0. This is because operator<=> always returns a class type (std::foo_ordering), so the outer operator@ will necessarily resolve to a non-built-in operator@ for that class type (even in the non-dependent templated case, after that commit). So the corresponding handling in extract_call_expr is basically dead code, except for the TRUTH_NOT_EXPR case where we can plausibly still have !(operator==(x, y)), but it doesn't make sense to recognize just that one special case of operator rewriting. So let's just remove it altogether; apparently it's no longer needed. Also, the handling is imprecise: it recognizes expressions such as 0 < f() which never corresponded to a call in the first place. All the more reason to remove it. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * call.cc (extract_call_expr): Remove handling of C++20 rewritten comparison operators. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-07c++: Implement C++26 P1061R10 - Structured Bindings can introduce a Pack ↵Jakub Jelinek4-39/+408
[PR117783] The following patch implements the C++26 P1061R10 - Structured Bindings can introduce a Pack paper. One thing unresolved in the patch is mangling, I've raised https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/200 for that but no comments there yet. One question is if it is ok not to mention the fact that there is a structured binding pack in the mangling of the structured bindings but more important is in case of std::tuple* we might need to mangle individual structured binding pack elements separately (each might need an exported name for the var itself and perhaps its guard variable as well). The patch just uses the normal mangling for the whole structured bindings and emits sorry if we need to mangle the structured binding pack elements. The patch just marks the structured binding pack specially (considered e.g. using some bit on it, but in the end I'm identifying it using a made up type which causes DECL_PACK_P to be true; it is kind of self-referential solution, because the type on the pack mentions the DECL_DECOMPOSITION_P VAR_DECL on which the type is attached as its pack, so it needs to be handled carefully during instantiation to avoid infinite recursion, but it is the type that should be used if something else actually needs to use the same type as the structured binding pack, e.g. a capture proxy), and stores the pack elements when actually processed through cp_finish_decomp with non-dependent initializer into a TREE_VEC used as DECL_VALUE_EXPR of the pack; though because several spots use the DECL_VALUE_EXPR and assume it is ARRAY_REF from which they can find out the base variable and the index, it stores the base variable and index in the first 2 TREE_VEC elts and has the structured binding elements only after that. https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.dep.expr#3.6 says the packs are type dependent regardless of whether the initializer of the structured binding is type dependent or not, so I hope having a dependent type on the structured binding VAR_DECL is ok. The paper also has an exception for sizeof... which is then not value dependent when the structured bindings are initialized with non-dependent initializer: https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.dep.constexpr#4 The patch special cases that in 3 spots (I've been wondering if e.g. during parsing I couldn't just fold the sizeof... to the INTEGER_CST right away, but guess I'd need to repeat that also during partial instantiation). And one thing still unresolved is debug info, I've just added DECL_IGNORED_P on the structured binding pack VAR_DECL because there were ICEs with -g for now, hope it can be fixed incrementally but am not sure what exactly we should emit in the debug info for that. Speaking of which, I see DW_TAG_GNU_template_parameter_pack DW_TAG_GNU_formal_parameter_pack etc. DIEs emitted regardless of DWARF version, shouldn't we try to upstream those into DWARF 6 or check what other compilers emit for the packs? And bet we'd need DW_TAG_GNU_structured_binding_pack as well. 2025-08-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/117783 gcc/c-family/ * c-cppbuiltin.cc (c_cpp_builtins): Change __cpp_structured_bindings predefined value for C++26 from 202403L to 202411L. gcc/cp/ * parser.cc: Implement C++26 P1061R10 - Structured Bindings can introduce a Pack. (cp_parser_range_for): Also handle TREE_VEC as DECL_VALUE_EXPR instead of ARRAY_REF. (cp_parser_decomposition_declaration): Use sb-identifier-list instead of identifier-list in comments. Parse structured bindings with structured binding pack. Don't emit pedwarn about structured binding attributes in structured bindings inside of a condition. (cp_convert_omp_range_for): Also handle TREE_VEC as DECL_VALUE_EXPR instead of ARRAY_REF. * decl.cc (get_tuple_element_type): Change i argument type from unsigned to unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT. (get_tuple_decomp_init): Likewise. (set_sb_pack_name): New function. (cp_finish_decomp): Handle structured binding packs. * pt.cc (tsubst_pack_expansion): Handle structured binding packs and capture proxies for them. Formatting fixes. (tsubst_decl): For structured binding packs don't tsubst TREE_TYPE first, instead recreate the type after r is created. (tsubst_omp_for_iterator): Also handle TREE_VEC as DECL_VALUE_EXPR instead of ARRAY_REF. (tsubst_expr): Handle sizeof... on non-dependent structure binding packs. (value_dependent_expression_p): Return false for sizeof... on non-dependent structure binding packs. (instantiation_dependent_r): Don't recurse on sizeof... on non-dependent structure binding packs. * constexpr.cc (potential_constant_expression_1): Also handle TREE_VEC on DECL_VALUE_EXPR of structure binding packs. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp13.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp14.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp15.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp16.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp17.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp18.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp19.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp20.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/decomp21.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp26/feat-cxx26.C (__cpp_structured_bindings): Expect 202411 rather than 202403.
2025-08-07c++, c: Introduce -Wkeyword-macro warning/pedwarn - part of C++26 P2843R3 ↵Jakub Jelinek1-0/+60
[PR120778] The following patch introduces a -Wkeyword-macro warning that clang has since 2014 to implement part of C++26 P2843R3 Preprocessing is never undefined paper. The relevant change in the paper is moving [macro.names]/2 paragraph to https://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.replace.general#9 : "A translation unit shall not #define or #undef names lexically identical to keywords, to the identifiers listed in Table 4, or to the attribute-tokens described in [dcl.attr], except that the names likely and unlikely may be defined as function-like macros." Now, my understanding of the paper is that in [macro.names] and surrounding sections the word shall bears different meaning from [cpp.replace.general], where only the latter location implies ill-formed, diagnostic required. The warning in clang when introduced diagnosed all #define/#undef directives on keywords, but shortly after introduction has been changed not to diagnose #undef at all (with "#undef a keyword is generally harmless but used often in configuration scripts" message) and later on even the #define part tweaked - not warn about say #define inline (or const, extern, static), or #define keyword keyword or #define keyword __keyword or #define keyword __keyword__ Later on the warning has been moved to be only pedantic diagnostic unless requested by users. Clearly some code in the wild does e.g. #define private public and similar games, or e.g. Linux kernel (sure, C) does #define inline __inline__ __attribute__((__always_inline__)) etc. Now, I believe at least with the current C++26 wording such exceptions aren't allowed (unless it is changed to IFNDR). But given that this is just pedantic stuff, the following patch makes the warning off by default for C and C++ before C++26 and even for C++26 it enables it by default only if -pedantic/-pedantic-errors (in that case it pedwarns, otherwise it warns). And it diagnoses both #define and #undef without exceptions. From what I can see, all the current NODE_WARN cases are macros starting with __ with one exception (_Pragma). As the NODE_* flags seem to be a limited resource, I chose to just use NODE_WARN as well and differentiate on the node names (if they don't start with __ or _P, they are considered to be -Wkeyword-macro registered ones, otherwise old NODE_WARN cases, typically builtin macros or __STDC* macros). 2025-08-07 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR preprocessor/120778 gcc/ * doc/invoke.texi (Wkeyword-macro): Document. gcc/c-family/ * c.opt (Wkeyword-macro): New option. * c.opt.urls: Regenerate. * c-common.h (cxx_dialect): Comment formatting fix. * c-opts.cc (c_common_post_options): Default to -Wkeyword-macro for C++26 if pedantic. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (c_init_decl_processing): Mark cpp nodes corresponding to keywords as NODE_WARN if warn_keyword_macro. gcc/cp/ * lex.cc (cxx_init): Mark cpp nodes corresponding to keywords, identifiers with special meaning and standard attribute identifiers as NODE_WARN if warn_keyword_macro. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-4.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-5.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-6.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-7.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-8.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wkeyword-macro-9.c: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-1.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-2.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-3.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-4.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-5.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-6.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-7.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-8.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-9.C: New test. * g++.dg/warn/Wkeyword-macro-10.C: New test. * g++.dg/opt/pr82577.C: Don't #define register to nothing for C++17 and later. Instead define reg macro to nothing for C++17 and later or to register and use it instead of register. * g++.dg/modules/atom-preamble-3.C: Add -Wno-keyword-macro to dg-additional-options. * g++.dg/template/sfinae17.C (static_assert): Rename macro to ... (my_static_assert): ... this. (main): Use my_static_assert instead of static_assert. libcpp/ * include/cpplib.h (struct cpp_options): Add cpp_warn_keyword_macro. (enum cpp_warning_reason): Add CPP_W_KEYWORD_MACRO enumerator. (cpp_keyword_p): New inline function. * directives.cc (do_undef): Support -Wkeyword-macro diagnostics. * macro.cc (warn_of_redefinition): Ignore NODE_WARN flag on nodes registered for -Wkeyword-macro. (_cpp_create_definition): Support -Wkeyword-macro diagnostics. Formatting fixes.
2025-08-07Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+25
2025-08-06c++: mangling cNTTP object w/ implicit non-trailing zeros [PR121231]Patrick Palka1-0/+51
Here the results of A::make(0, 0, 1), (0, 1, 0) and (1, 0, 0) are each represented as a single-element CONSTRUCTOR with CONSTRUCTOR_NO_CLEARING cleared, and when used as as a class NTTP argument we end up mangling them all as A{1}, i.e. eliding both the implicit initial and trailing zeros. Mangling them all the same seems clearly wrong since they're logically different values. It turns out the mangling also omits intermediate zeros, e.g. A::make(1, 0, 1) is mangled as A{1, 1}, the same as A::make(1, 1, 0). It seems we can't omit both trailing and non-trailing implicit zeros without introducing mangling ambiguities. This patch makes us include non-trailing zeros in these manglings (while continuing to omit trailing zeros). This also manifests as a wrong-code bug where the specializations table would conflate different specializations that are in terms of different class NTTP arguments, since the identity of such arguments is tied to their mangling. PR c++/121231 PR c++/119688 PR c++/94511 gcc/ChangeLog: * common.opt: Document additional ABI version 21 change. * doc/invoke.texi: Likewise. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * mangle.cc (write_expression): Write out implicit non-trailing zeroes of a CONSTRUCTOR when the ABI version is at least 21. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/abi/mangle82.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/nontype-class73.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-06c++: improve constexpr type mismatch diagnosticJason Merrill1-4/+17
This diagnostic failed to specify the actual type of the object being accessed through a glvalue of an incompatible type, and could also use to indicate where that object comes from. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_indirect_ref): Improve diagnostic. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp26/constexpr-new3.C: Tweak diagnostic.
2025-08-06openmp: Add support for iterators in 'target update' clauses (C/C++)Kwok Cheung Yeung2-12/+106
This adds support for iterators in 'to' and 'from' clauses in the 'target update' OpenMP directive. gcc/c/ * c-parser.cc (c_parser_omp_clause_from_to): Parse 'iterator' modifier. * c-typeck.cc (c_finish_omp_clauses): Finish iterators for to/from clauses. gcc/cp/ * parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_clause_from_to): Parse 'iterator' modifier. * semantics.cc (finish_omp_clauses): Finish iterators for to/from clauses. gcc/ * gimplify.cc (remove_unused_omp_iterator_vars): Display unused variable warning for 'to' and 'from' clauses. (gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): Add argument for iterator loop sequence. Gimplify the clause decl and size into the iterator loop if iterators are used. (gimplify_omp_workshare): Add argument for iterator loops sequence in call to gimplify_scan_omp_clauses. (gimplify_omp_target_update): Call remove_unused_omp_iterator_vars and build_omp_iterators_loops. Add loop sequence as argument when calling gimplify_scan_omp_clauses, gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses and building the Gimple statement. * tree-pretty-print.cc (dump_omp_clause): Call dump_omp_iterators for to/from clauses with iterators. * tree.cc (omp_clause_num_ops): Add extra operand for OMP_CLAUSE_FROM and OMP_CLAUSE_TO. * tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_HAS_ITERATORS): Add check for OMP_CLAUSE_TO and OMP_CLAUSE_FROM. (OMP_CLAUSE_ITERATORS): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/gomp/target-update-iterators-1.c: New. * c-c++-common/gomp/target-update-iterators-2.c: New. * c-c++-common/gomp/target-update-iterators-3.c: New. libgomp/ * target.c (gomp_update): Call gomp_merge_iterator_maps. Free allocated variables. * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/target-update-iterators-1.c: New. * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/target-update-iterators-2.c: New. * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/target-update-iterators-3.c: New.
2025-08-06openmp: Add support for iterators in map clauses (C/C++)Kwok Cheung Yeung2-6/+68
This adds preliminary support for iterators in map clauses within OpenMP 'target' constructs (which includes constructs such as 'target enter data'). Iterators with non-constant loop bounds are not currently supported. gcc/c/ * c-parser.cc (c_parser_omp_variable_list): Use location of the map expression as the clause location. (c_parser_omp_clause_map): Parse 'iterator' modifier. * c-typeck.cc (c_finish_omp_clauses): Finish iterators. Apply iterators to generated clauses. gcc/cp/ * parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_clause_map): Parse 'iterator' modifier. * semantics.cc (finish_omp_clauses): Finish iterators. Apply iterators to generated clauses. gcc/ * gimple-pretty-print.cc (dump_gimple_omp_target): Print expanded iterator loops. * gimple.cc (gimple_build_omp_target): Add argument for iterator loops sequence. Initialize iterator loops field. * gimple.def (GIMPLE_OMP_TARGET): Set GSS symbol to GSS_OMP_TARGET. * gimple.h (gomp_target): Set GSS symbol to GSS_OMP_TARGET. Add extra field for iterator loops. (gimple_build_omp_target): Add argument for iterator loops sequence. (gimple_omp_target_iterator_loops): New. (gimple_omp_target_iterator_loops_ptr): New. (gimple_omp_target_set_iterator_loops): New. * gimplify.cc (find_var_decl): New. (copy_omp_iterator): New. (remap_omp_iterator_var_1): New. (remap_omp_iterator_var): New. (remove_unused_omp_iterator_vars): New. (struct iterator_loop_info_t): New type. (iterator_loop_info_map_t): New type. (build_omp_iterators_loops): New. (enter_omp_iterator_loop_context_1): New. (enter_omp_iterator_loop_context): New. (enter_omp_iterator_loop_context): New. (exit_omp_iterator_loop_context): New. (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses): Add argument for iterator loop sequence. Gimplify the clause decl and size into the iterator loop if iterators are used. (gimplify_omp_workshare): Call remove_unused_omp_iterator_vars and build_omp_iterators_loops for OpenMP target expressions. Add loop sequence as argument when calling gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses and building the Gimple statement. * gimplify.h (enter_omp_iterator_loop_context): New prototype. (exit_omp_iterator_loop_context): New prototype. * gsstruct.def (GSS_OMP_TARGET): New. * omp-low.cc (lower_omp_map_iterator_expr): New. (lower_omp_map_iterator_size): New. (finish_omp_map_iterators): New. (lower_omp_target): Add sorry if iterators used with deep mapping. Call lower_omp_map_iterator_expr before assigning to sender ref. Call lower_omp_map_iterator_size before setting the size. Insert iterator loop sequence before the statements for the target clause. * tree-nested.cc (convert_nonlocal_reference_stmt): Walk the iterator loop sequence of OpenMP target statements. (convert_local_reference_stmt): Likewise. (convert_tramp_reference_stmt): Likewise. * tree-pretty-print.cc (dump_omp_iterators): Dump extra iterator information if present. (dump_omp_clause): Call dump_omp_iterators for iterators in map clauses. * tree.cc (omp_clause_num_ops): Add operand for OMP_CLAUSE_MAP. (walk_tree_1): Do not walk last operand of OMP_CLAUSE_MAP. * tree.h (OMP_CLAUSE_HAS_ITERATORS): New. (OMP_CLAUSE_ITERATORS): New. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/gomp/map-6.c (foo): Amend expected error message. * c-c++-common/gomp/target-map-iterators-1.c: New. * c-c++-common/gomp/target-map-iterators-2.c: New. * c-c++-common/gomp/target-map-iterators-3.c: New. * c-c++-common/gomp/target-map-iterators-4.c: New. libgomp/ * target.c (kind_to_name): New. (gomp_merge_iterator_maps): New. (gomp_map_vars_internal): Call gomp_merge_iterator_maps. Copy address of only the first iteration to target vars. Free allocated variables. * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/target-map-iterators-1.c: New. * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/target-map-iterators-2.c: New. * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/target-map-iterators-3.c: New. Co-authored-by: Andrew Stubbs <ams@baylibre.com>
2025-08-06Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+9
2025-08-05c++: clobber object on placement new [PR121068]Jason Merrill3-16/+90
My r16-2432 patch addressed the original testcase involving an array of scalars, but not this additional testcase involving an array of classes. This patch addresses the issue more thoroughly, by having placement new first clobber the new object, and improving cxx_eval_store_expression to implement initial clobbers as well. My earlier attempt to do this clobbered the array as a whole, which broke construct_at after the resolution of LWG3436 due to trying to create a multidimensional array over the top of a single-dimensional array. To side-step that issue, this patch instead clobbers the individual elements of an array, taking advantage of the earlier change to let that activate the array member of a union. PR c++/121068 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_store_expression): Handle clobbers. (potential_constant_expression_1): Handle clobbers more. * decl.cc (build_clobber_this): Use INIT_EXPR for initial clobber. * init.cc (build_new_1): Clobber on placement new. (build_vec_init): Don't clean up after clobber. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp26/constexpr-new5.C: New test.
2025-08-05Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+14
2025-08-04c++: constrained memfn vs corresponding using [PR121351]Patrick Palka1-1/+24
The b.f(42) calls in the below testcases started to get rejected as ambiguous after r15-3740 which corrected our inheritedness tiebreaker to only apply to constructors (and not all member functions) as per CWG2273. But arguably these calls should still be valid regardless of the tiebreaker because B::f corresponds to and therefore hides A::f, so there should only be a single candidate in the first place. This doesn't happen because when determining correspondence we compare the members' uninstantiated constraints instead of their partially substituted constraints as in other declaration matching situations. It doesn't really make sense to compare uninstantiated constraints from two different template contexts. This patch fixes this by substituting in outer template arguments before comparing constraints of two potentially corresponding member functions. PR c++/121351 PR c++/119859 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * class.cc (add_method): Substitute outer template arguments into constraints before comparing them if the declarations are from different classes. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-using5.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-using5a.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-04c++: constexpr evaluation of abi::__dynamic_cast [PR120620]Patrick Palka1-1/+5
r13-3299 changed our internal declaration of __dynamic_cast to reside inside the abi/__cxxabiv1:: namespace instead of the global namespace, matching the real declaration. This inadvertently made us now attempt constexpr evaluation of user-written calls to abi::__dynamic_cast since cxx_dynamic_cast_fn_p now also returns true for them, but we're not prepared to handle arbitrary calls to __dynamic_cast, and therefore ICE. This patch restores cxx_dynamic_cast_fn_p to return true only for synthesized calls to __dynamic_cast, which can be distinguished by DECL_ARTIFICIAL, since apparently the synthesized declaration of __dynamic_cast doesn't get merged with the actual declaration. PR c++/120620 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (cxx_dynamic_cast_fn_p): Return true only for synthesized __dynamic_cast. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dynamic19.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dynamic1a.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-08-02Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+13
2025-08-01c++/modules: Warn for optimize attributes instead of ICEing [PR108080]Nathaniel Shead1-10/+19
This PR is the most frequently reported modules bug for 15, as the ICE message does not indicate the issue at all and reducing to find the underlying cause can be tricky. I have a WIP patch to fix this issue by just reconstructing these nodes on stream-in from any attributes applied to the functions, but since at this stage it may still take a while to be ready, it seems useful to me to at least make the error here more friendly and guide users to what they could do to work around this issue. In fact, as noted on the PR, a lot of the time it should be harmless to just ignore the optimize etc. attribute and continue translation, at the user's own risk; this patch as such turns the ICE into a warning with no option to silence. PR c++/108080 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * module.cc (trees_out::core_vals): Warn when streaming target/optimize node; adjust comments. (trees_in::core_vals): Don't stream a target/optimize node. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/modules/pr108080.H: New test. Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>