aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-12-20Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+6
2022-12-19c: Diagnose compound literals with function type [PR108043]Jakub Jelinek1-0/+5
Both C99 and latest C2X say that compound literal shall have an object type (complete object type in the latter case) or array of unknown bound, so complit with function type is invalid. When the initializer had to be non-empty for such case, we used to diagnose it as incorrect initializer, but with (fntype){} now allowed we just ICE on it. The following patch diagnoses that. 2022-12-19 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c/108043 * c-parser.cc (c_parser_postfix_expression_after_paren_type): Diagnose compound literals with function type. * gcc.dg/pr108043.c: New test. * gcc.dg/c99-complit-2.c (foo): Adjust expected diagnostics for complit with function type.
2022-12-08Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+5
2022-12-07c: Diagnose auto constexpr used with a typeJoseph Myers1-0/+12
The constraints on auto in C2x disallow use with other storage-class specifiers unless the type is inferred from an initializer. That includes constexpr; add the missing checks for this case (the combination of auto, constexpr and a type specifier). Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (declspecs_add_type, declspecs_add_scspec): Check for auto, constexpr and a type used together. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-1.c: Do not use auto, constexpr and a type together. * gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-3.c: Add tests of auto, constexpr and type used together.
2022-12-07Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+5
2022-12-06Update -Warray-bounds with -fstrict-flex-arrays.Qing Zhao1-20/+1
A. add the following to clarify the relationship between -Warray-bounds and the LEVEL of -fstrict-flex-array: By default, the trailing array of a structure will be treated as a flexible array member by '-Warray-bounds' or '-Warray-bounds=N' if it is declared as either a flexible array member per C99 standard onwards ('[]'), a GCC zero-length array extension ('[0]'), or an one-element array ('[1]'). As a result, out of bounds subscripts or offsets into zero-length arrays or one-element arrays are not warned by default. You can add the option '-fstrict-flex-arrays' or '-fstrict-flex-arrays=LEVEL' to control how this option treat trailing array of a structure as a flexible array member. when LEVEL<=1, no change to the default behavior. when LEVEL=2, additional warnings will be issued for out of bounds subscripts or offsets into one-element arrays; when LEVEL=3, in addition to LEVEL=2, additional warnings will be issued for out of bounds subscripts or offsets into zero-length arrays. B. change -Warray-bounds=2 to exclude its control on how to treat trailing arrays as flexible array members: '-Warray-bounds=2' This warning level also warns about the intermediate results of pointer arithmetic that may yield out of bounds values. This warning level may give a larger number of false positives and is deactivated by default. gcc/ChangeLog: * attribs.cc (strict_flex_array_level_of): New function. * attribs.h (strict_flex_array_level_of): Prototype for new function. * doc/invoke.texi: Update -Warray-bounds by specifying the impact from -fstrict-flex-arrays. Also update -Warray-bounds=2 by eliminating its impact on treating trailing arrays as flexible array members. * gimple-array-bounds.cc (get_up_bounds_for_array_ref): New function. (check_out_of_bounds_and_warn): New function. (array_bounds_checker::check_array_ref): Update with call to the above new functions. * tree.cc (array_ref_flexible_size_p): Add one new argument. (component_ref_sam_type): New function. (component_ref_size): Control with level of strict-flex-array. * tree.h (array_ref_flexible_size_p): Update prototype. (enum struct special_array_member): Add two new enum values. (component_ref_sam_type): New prototype. gcc/c/ChangeLog: * c-decl.cc (is_flexible_array_member_p): Call new function strict_flex_array_level_of. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-11.c: Update warnings for -Warray-bounds=2. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-flex-arrays-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-flex-arrays-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-flex-arrays-3.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-flex-arrays-4.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-flex-arrays-5.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Warray-bounds-flex-arrays-6.c: New test.
2022-11-25Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+6
2022-11-24c: Propagate erroneous types to declaration specifiers [PR107805]Florian Weimer1-4/+2
Without this change, finish_declspecs cannot tell that whether there was an erroneous type specified, or no type at all. This may result in additional diagnostics for implicit ints, or missing diagnostics for multiple types. PR c/107805 gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (declspecs_add_type): Propagate error_mark_bode from type to specs. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/pr107805-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/pr107805-2.c: Likewise.
2022-11-18Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+12
2022-11-17c: Set the locus of the function result declBernhard Reutner-Fischer1-1/+5
gcc/c/ChangeLog: * c-decl.cc (start_function): Set the result decl source location to the location of the typespec.
2022-11-17c, analyzer: fix ICE with -fanalyzer and -Wunused-macros [PR107711]David Malcolm1-1/+1
PR analyzer/107711 reports an ICE since r13-4073-gd8aba860b34203 with the combination of -fanalyzer and -Wunused-macros. The issue is that in c_translation_unit::consider_macro's call to cpp_create_reader I was passing "ident_hash" for use by the the new reader, but that takes ownership of that hash_table, so that ident_hash erroneously gets freed when c_translation_unit::consider_macro calls cpp_destroy, leading to a use-after-free in -Wunused-macros, where: (gdb) p pfile->hash_table->pfile == pfile $23 = false and it's instead pointing at the freed reader from consider_macro, leading to a use-after-free ICE. Fixed thusly. gcc/c/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/107711 * c-parser.cc (ana::c_translation_unit::consider_macro): Pass NULL to cpp_create_reader, rather than ident_hash, so that the new reader gets its own hash table. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/107711 * gcc.dg/analyzer/named-constants-Wunused-macros.c: New test. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
2022-11-16Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+7
2022-11-15c, analyzer: support named constants in analyzer [PR106302]David Malcolm1-0/+90
The analyzer's file-descriptor state machine tracks the access mode of opened files, so that it can emit -Wanalyzer-fd-access-mode-mismatch. To do this, its symbolic execution needs to "know" the values of the constants "O_RDONLY", "O_WRONLY", and "O_ACCMODE". Currently analyzer/sm-fd.cc simply uses these values directly from the build-time header files, but these are the values on the host, not those from the target, which could be different (PR analyzer/106302). In an earlier discussion of this issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-June/238954.html we talked about adding a target hook for this. However, I've also been experimenting with extending the fd state machine to track sockets (PR analyzer/106140). For this, it's useful to "know" the values of the constants "SOCK_STREAM" and "SOCK_DGRAM". Unfortunately, these seem to have many arbitrary differences from target to target. For example: Linux/glibc general has SOCK_STREAM == 1, SOCK_DGRAM == 2, as does AIX, but annoyingly, e.g. Linux on MIPS has them the other way around. It seems to me that as the analyzer grows more ambitious modeling of the behavior of APIs (perhaps via plugins) it's more likely that the analyzer will need to know the values of named constants, which might not even exist on the host. For example, at LPC it was suggested to me that -fanalyzer could check rules about memory management inside the Linux kernel (probably via a plugin), but doing so involves a bunch of GFP_* flags (see PR 107472). So rather than trying to capture all this knowledge in a target hook, this patch attempts to get at named constant values from the user's source code. The patch adds an interface for frontends to call into the analyzer as the translation unit finishes. The analyzer can then call back into the frontend to ask about the values of the named constants it cares about whilst the frontend's data structures are still around. The patch implements this for the C frontend, which looks up the names by looking for named CONST_DECLs (which handles enum values). Failing that, it attempts to look up the values of macros but only the simplest cases are supported (a non-traditional macro with a single CPP_NUMBER token). It does this by building a buffer containing the macro definition and rerunning a lexer on it. The analyzer gracefully handles the cases where named values aren't found (such as anything more complicated than described above). The patch ports the analyzer to use this mechanism for "O_RDONLY", "O_WRONLY", and "O_ACCMODE". I have successfully tested my socket patch to also use this for "SOCK_STREAM" and "SOCK_DGRAM", so the technique seems to work. gcc/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/106302 * Makefile.in (ANALYZER_OBJS): Add analyzer/analyzer-language.o. (GTFILES): Add analyzer/analyzer-language.cc. * doc/analyzer.texi: Document __analyzer_dump_named_constant. gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/106302 * analyzer-language.cc: New file. * analyzer-language.h: New file. * analyzer.h (get_stashed_constant_by_name): New decl. (log_stashed_constants): New decl. * engine.cc (impl_run_checkers): Call log_stashed_constants. * region-model-impl-calls.cc (region_model::impl_call_analyzer_dump_named_constant): New. * region-model.cc (region_model::on_stmt_pre): Handle __analyzer_dump_named_constant. * region-model.h (region_model::impl_call_analyzer_dump_named_constant): New decl. * sm-fd.cc (fd_state_machine::m_O_ACCMODE): New. (fd_state_machine::m_O_RDONLY): New. (fd_state_machine::m_O_WRONLY): New. (fd_state_machine::fd_state_machine): Initialize the new fields. (fd_state_machine::get_access_mode_from_flag): Use the new fields, rather than using the host values. gcc/c/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/106302 * c-parser.cc: Include "analyzer/analyzer-language.h" and "toplev.h". (class ana::c_translation_unit): New. (c_parser_translation_unit): Call ana::on_finish_translation_unit. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer-decls.h (__analyzer_dump_named_constant): New decl. * gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-4.c (void): Likewise. (O_ACCMODE): Define. * gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-enum.c: New test, based on . * gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-5.c: ...this. Rename to... * gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-macros.c: ...this. (O_ACCMODE): Define. * gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-access-mode-target-headers.c: New test, also based on fd-5.c. (test_sm_fd_constants): New. * gcc.dg/analyzer/fd-dup-1.c (O_ACCMODE): Define. * gcc.dg/analyzer/named-constants-via-enum.c: New test. * gcc.dg/analyzer/named-constants-via-enum-and-macro.c: New test. * gcc.dg/analyzer/named-constants-via-macros-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/analyzer/named-constants-via-macros.c: New test. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
2022-11-13Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+54
2022-11-12c: C2x constexprJoseph Myers4-96/+658
Implement C2x constexpr (a feature based on the C++ one but much more minimal, with only constexpr variables, not functions). I believe this implementation is fully functional for use of this feature. However, there are several things that seem unclear about the specification that I'll need to raise in NB comments. There are also areas where there may be followup bug fixes because the implementation doesn't reject some more obscure cases that ought to be rejected: cases where a constexpr initializer for floating type meets the constraints for a constant expression in initializers but not those for an arithmetic constant expression (previously we haven't had to track whether something is an arithmetic constant expression in detail, unlike with integer constant expressions), and some cases where a tag or struct or union member gets declared indirectly in the declaration specifiers or declarator of a constexpr declaration, which is not permitted (modulo lack of clarity in the specification) for underspecified declarations in general (the cases of a declaration in the initializer, or a tagged type being directly declared as a type specifier, are already detected). Cases of ambiguity in the specification include: * Many questions (previously raised in WG14 discussions) over the rule about what conversions do or do not involve a change of value that's not allowed in a constexpr initializer, that aren't properly addressed by the normative text (and where the footnote on the subject isn't very clear either, and the examples don't necessarily follow from the normative text). I've made a series of choices there, that include disallowing all conversions between real and complex types or between binary and decimal floating types in constexpr initializers, that might not necessarily agree with how things end up getting clarified. The dfp.cc change also arises here, to allow quiet NaN initializers of one DFP type to be used in a constexpr initializer for another DFP type (as is possible for signaling NaNs) by ensuring the result of such a conversion is properly marked as canonical (note that most of the DFP code doesn't actually do anything with NaN payloads at all). * Various issues with what exactly counts as part of a declaration for the purposes of the rule on underspecified declarations not declaring any identifiers other than ordinary identifiers (and not declaring more than one ordinary identifier, though the latter is undefined behavior). These include cases where the declaration of a struct / union / enum type appears inside typeof or alignas in the declaration specifiers (the latter also applies with auto), or in the declarator (e.g. an array size or in a parameter declaration). The issues are similar to those involved in C90 DR#115 and C99 DRs #277 and #341; the intent may not be the same in all the different cases involved, but it's not clear that the normative wording in the various places is sufficient to deduce the differences in intent. * The wording about producing a compound literal constant using member access is present in one place but another place only applies that to named constants. * It's not clear when a structure or union constant (a constexpr variable or compound literal with structure or union type, or a member with such type extracted by a series of member access operations) can itself be used in an initializer (constexpr or otherwise). Based on general wording for initializers not having been changed, the working draft might only strictly allow it at automatic storage duration (but elsewhere it would be undefined behavior, not a constraint violation, so no diagnostic required) - since that's the only case mentioned where a single expression of structure or union type can be used to initialize an object of such a type. But it definitely seems to be allowed in even constexpr initializers at automatic storage duration - and since generally constexpr initializers (any storage duration) are *more* constrained than ordinary static storage duration initializers, it would seem odd for it not to be allowed at static storage duration. * When you do allow such initializers, it's then not entirely clear how the constraint that constexpr pointer initializers must be null pointer constants should be applied (given that a constexpr object of pointer type is a null pointer but *not* a null pointer constant). My guess would be that a constexpr struct or union containing such a field should still be allowed as an initializer, but the wording could be read otherwise. * It also becomes important with constexpr exactly what kind of constant expression an implicit zero initializer is; the wording for default initialization only really deals with the value of the initializer and not what kind of constant it is. In particular, this affects whether {} is a valid constexpr initializer for a pointer not of type void *, since the wording only talks about a null pointer, not whether it's a null pointer *constant*. I assumed that it should be a null pointer constant in that case. * It's also not entirely clear whether constexpr can be used in the declaration part of a for loop (which "shall only declare identifiers for objects having storage class auto or register"). I interpreted it as allowed (treating such objects as implicitly auto just like those with no storage class specifiers), but it could also be argued that constexpr is another storage class specifier and so not allowed there. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. gcc/ * dfp.cc (decimal_from_binary): Convert a canonical NaN to a canonical NaN. gcc/c-family/ * c-common.cc (c_common_reswords): Use D_C2X instead of D_CXXONLY. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (start_underspecified_init) (finish_underspecified_init): Handle name == NULL_TREE for compound literals. (merge_decls): Merge C_DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR. (shadow_tag_warned): Check for constexpr. (start_decl): Add parameter do_push. (build_compound_literal): Set C_DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR. (grokdeclarator): Handle constexpr. (finish_struct): Set C_TYPE_FIELDS_NON_CONSTEXPR. (declspecs_add_scspec): Handle constexpr. * c-parser.cc (c_token_starts_compound_literal) (c_token_starts_declspecs, c_parser_declaration_or_fndef) (c_parser_declspecs, c_parser_gnu_attribute_any_word) (c_parser_compound_literal_scspecs) (c_parser_postfix_expression_after_paren_type): Handle constexpr. Update calls to start_init. (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef, c_parser_initializer) (c_parser_initval): Pass true for new argument of convert_lvalue_to_rvalue. Call convert_lvalue_to_rvalue for constexpr compound literals. (c_parser_static_assert_declaration_no_semi) (c_parser_enum_specifier, c_parser_struct_declaration) (c_parser_alignas_specifier, c_parser_initelt, c_parser_label): Call convert_lvalue_to_rvalue on expressions required to be integer constant expressions. (c_parser_omp_declare_reduction): Update call to start_init. * c-tree.h (C_TYPE_FIELDS_NON_CONSTEXPR) (C_DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR): New macros. (struct c_declspecs): Add constexpr_p. (start_decl, convert_lvalue_to_rvalue, start_init): Update prototypes. * c-typeck.cc (require_constant_value, require_constant_elements): Change to bool. (require_constexpr_value, maybe_get_constexpr_init) (constexpr_init_fits_real_type, check_constexpr_init): New. (convert_lvalue_to_rvalue): Add new parameter for_init. Call maybe_get_constexpr_init. (store_init_value): Update call to digest_init. (digest_init): Add parameters int_const_expr, arith_const_expr and require_constexpr. Check constexpr initializers. (constructor_top_level): Remove. (struct initializer_stack): Remove top_level. Add require_constexpr_value. (start_init): Remove parameter top_level. Add parameters init_require_constant and init_require_constexpr. Save require_constexpr_value on stack. (pop_init_level): Use a null pointer constant for zero initializer of pointer initialized with {}. (output_init_element): Update call to digest_init. Avoid passing null pointer constants of pointer type through digest_init a second time when initializing a constexpr object. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c11-keywords-1.c: Also test constexpr. * gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-2a.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-2b.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-4.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-5.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-6.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-7.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-8.c, gcc.dg/c2x-constexpr-9.c, gcc.dg/dfp/c2x-constexpr-dfp-1.c, gcc.dg/dfp/c2x-constexpr-dfp-2.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-constexpr-1.c, gcc.target/i386/excess-precision-11.c, gcc.target/i386/excess-precision-12.c: New tests.
2022-11-04Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+20
2022-11-03c: C2x autoJoseph Myers4-19/+219
Implement C2x auto, a more restricted version of the C++ feature (closer to GNU C __auto_type in terms of what's supported). Since the feature is very close to GNU C __auto_type, much of the implementation can be shared. The main differences are: * Any prior declaration of the identifier in an outer scope is shadowed during the initializer (whereas __auto_type leaves any such declaration visible until the initializer ends and the scope of the __auto_type declaration itself starts). (A prior declaration in the same scope is undefined behavior.) * The standard feature supports braced initializers (containing a single expression, optionally followed by a comma). * The standard feature disallows the declaration from declaring anything that's not an ordinary identifier (thus, the initializer cannot declare a tag or the members of a structure or union), while making it undefined behavior for it to declare more than one ordinary identifier. (For the latter, while I keep the existing error from __auto_type in the case of more than one declarator, I don't restrict other ordinary identifiers from being declared in inner scopes such as GNU statement expressions. I do however disallow defining the members of an enumeration inside the initializer (if the enum definition has no tag, that doesn't actually violate a constraint), to avoid an enum type becoming accessible beyond where it would have been without auto. (Preventing new types from escaping the initializer - thus, ensuring that anything written with auto corresponds to something that could have been written without auto, modulo multiple evaluation of VLA size expressions when not using auto - is a key motivation for some restrictions on what can be declared in the initializer.) The rule on shadowing and restrictions on other declarations in the initializer are actually general rules for what C2x calls underspecified declarations, a description that covers constexpr as well as auto (in particular, this disallows a constexpr initializer from referencing the variable being initialized). Thus, some of the code added for those restrictions will also be of use in implementing C2x constexpr. auto with a type specifier remains a storage class specifier with the same meaning as before (i.e. a redundant storage class specifier for use at block scope). Note that the feature is only enabled in C2x mode (-std=c2x or -std=gnu2x); in older modes, a declaration with auto and no type is treated as a case of implicit int (only accepted at block scope). Since many of the restrictions on C2x auto are specified as undefined behavior rather than constraint violations, it would be possible to support more features from C++ auto without requiring diagnostics (but maybe not a good idea, if it isn't clear exactly what semantics might be given to such a feature in a future revision of C; and -Wc23-c2y-compat should arguably warn for any such future feature anyway). For now the features are limited to something close to what's supported with __auto_type, with the differences as discussed above between the two features. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (in_underspecified_init, start_underspecified_init) (finish_underspecified_init): New. (shadow_tag_warned, parser_xref_tag, start_struct, start_enum): Give errors inside initializers of underspecified declarations. (grokdeclarator): Handle (erroneous) case of C2X auto on a parameter. (declspecs_add_type): Handle c2x_auto_p case. (declspecs_add_scspec): Handle auto possibly setting c2x_auto_p in C2X mode. (finish_declspecs): Handle c2x_auto_p. * c-parser.cc (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Handle C2X auto. * c-tree.h (C_DECL_UNDERSPECIFIED): New macro. (struct c_declspecs): Add c2x_auto_p. (start_underspecified_init, finish_underspecified_init): New prototypes. * c-typeck.cc (build_external_ref): Give error for underspecified declaration referenced in its initializer. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c2x-auto-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-auto-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-auto-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-auto-4.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-auto-1.c: New tests.
2022-10-29Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+83
2022-10-28c: tree: target: C2x (...) function prototypes and va_start relaxationJoseph Myers4-25/+32
C2x allows function prototypes to be given as (...), a prototype meaning a variable-argument function with no named arguments. To allow such functions to access their arguments, requirements for va_start calls are relaxed so it ignores all but its first argument (i.e. subsequent arguments, if any, can be arbitrary pp-token sequences). Implement this feature accordingly. The va_start relaxation in <stdarg.h> is itself easy: __builtin_va_start already supports a second argument of 0 instead of a parameter name, and calls get converted internally to the form using 0 for that argument, so <stdarg.h> just needs changing to use a variadic macro that passes 0 as the second argument of __builtin_va_start. (This is done only in C2x mode, on the expectation that users of older standard would expect unsupported uses of va_start to be diagnosed.) For the (...) functions, it's necessary to distinguish these from unprototyped functions, whereas previously C++ (...) functions and unprototyped functions both used NULL TYPE_ARG_TYPES. A flag is added to tree_type_common to mark the (...) functions; as discussed on gcc@, doing things this way is likely to be safer for unchanged code in GCC than adding a different form of representation in TYPE_ARG_TYPES, or adding a flag that instead signals that the function is unprototyped. There was previously an option -fallow-parameterless-variadic-functions to enable support for (...) prototypes. The support was incomplete - it treated the functions as unprototyped, and only parsed some declarations, not e.g. "int g (int (...));". This option is changed into a no-op ignored option; (...) is always accepted syntactically, with a pedwarn_c11 call to given required diagnostics when appropriate. The peculiarity of a parameter list with __attribute__ followed by '...' being accepted with that option is removed. Interfaces in tree.cc that create function types are adjusted to set this flag as appropriate. It is of course possible that some existing users of the functions to create variable-argument functions actually wanted unprototyped functions in the no-named-argument case, rather than functions with a (...) prototype; some such cases in c-common.cc (for built-in functions and implicit function declarations) turn out to need updating for that reason. I didn't do anything to change how the C++ front end creates (...) function types. It's very likely there are unchanged places in the compiler that in fact turn out to need changes to work properly with (...) function prototypes. Target setup_incoming_varargs hooks, where they used the information passed about the last named argument, needed updating to avoid using that information in the (...) case. Note that apart from the x86 changes, I haven't done any testing of those target changes beyond building cc1 to check for syntax errors. It's possible further target-specific fixes will be needed; target maintainers should watch out for failures of c2x-stdarg-4.c or c2x-stdarg-split-1a.c, the execution tests, which would indicate that this feature is not working correctly. Those tests also verify the case where there are named arguments but the last named argument has a declaration that results in undefined behavior in previous C standard versions, such as a type changed by the default argument promotions. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. gcc/ * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_setup_incoming_varargs): Check TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. * config/alpha/alpha.cc (alpha_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/arc/arc.cc (arc_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/arm/arm.cc (arm_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/csky/csky.cc (csky_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/epiphany/epiphany.cc (epiphany_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/fr30/fr30.cc (fr30_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/frv/frv.cc (frv_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/ft32/ft32.cc (ft32_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/ia64/ia64.cc (ia64_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/loongarch/loongarch.cc (loongarch_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/m32r/m32r.cc (m32r_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/mcore/mcore.cc (mcore_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/mips/mips.cc (mips_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/mmix/mmix.cc (mmix_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/nds32/nds32.cc (nds32_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/nios2/nios2.cc (nios2_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/rs6000/rs6000-call.cc (setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/sh/sh.cc (sh_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/visium/visium.cc (visium_setup_incoming_varargs): Likewise. * config/vms/vms-c.cc (vms_c_common_override_options): Do not set flag_allow_parameterless_variadic_functions. * doc/invoke.texi (-fallow-parameterless-variadic-functions): Do not document option. * function.cc (assign_parms): Call assign_parms_setup_varargs for TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P case. * ginclude/stdarg.h [__STDC_VERSION__ > 201710L] (va_start): Make variadic macro. Pass second argument of 0 to __builtin_va_start. * target.def (setup_incoming_varargs): Update documentation. * doc/tm.texi: Regenerate. * tree-core.h (struct tree_type_common): Add no_named_args_stdarg_p. * tree-streamer-in.cc (unpack_ts_type_common_value_fields): Unpack TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. * tree-streamer-out.cc (pack_ts_type_common_value_fields): Pack TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. * tree.cc (type_cache_hasher::equal): Compare TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. (build_function_type): Add argument no_named_args_stdarg_p. (build_function_type_list_1, build_function_type_array_1) (reconstruct_complex_type): Update calls to build_function_type. (stdarg_p, prototype_p): Return true for (...) functions. (gimple_canonical_types_compatible_p): Compare TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. * tree.h (TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P): New. (build_function_type): Update prototype. gcc/c-family/ * c-common.cc (def_fn_type): Call build_function_type for zero-argument variable-argument function. (c_common_nodes_and_builtins): Build default_function_type with build_function_type. * c.opt (fallow-parameterless-variadic-functions): Mark as ignored option. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (grokdeclarator): Pass arg_info->no_named_args_stdarg_p to build_function_type. (grokparms): Check arg_info->no_named_args_stdarg_p before converting () to (void). (build_arg_info): Initialize no_named_args_stdarg_p. (get_parm_info): Set no_named_args_stdarg_p. (start_function): Pass TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P to build_function_type. (store_parm_decls): Count (...) functions as prototyped. * c-parser.cc (c_parser_direct_declarator): Allow '...' after open parenthesis to start parameter list. (c_parser_parms_list_declarator): Always allow '...' with no arguments, call pedwarn_c11 and set no_named_args_stdarg_p. * c-tree.h (struct c_arg_info): Add field no_named_args_stdarg_p. * c-typeck.cc (composite_type): Handle TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. (function_types_compatible_p): Compare TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. gcc/fortran/ * trans-types.cc (gfc_get_function_type): Do not use build_varargs_function_type_vec for unprototyped function. gcc/lto/ * lto-common.cc (compare_tree_sccs_1): Compare TYPE_NO_NAMED_ARGS_STDARG_P. gcc/objc/ * objc-next-runtime-abi-01.cc (build_next_objc_exception_stuff): Use build_function_type to build type of objc_setjmp_decl. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c11-stdarg-1.c, gcc.dg/c11-stdarg-2.c, gcc.dg/c11-stdarg-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-stdarg-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-stdarg-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-stdarg-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-stdarg-4.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-stdarg-1.c, gcc.dg/torture/c2x-stdarg-split-1a.c, gcc.dg/torture/c2x-stdarg-split-1b.c: New tests. * gcc.dg/Wold-style-definition-2.c, gcc.dg/format/sentinel-1.c: Update expected diagnostics. * gcc.dg/c2x-nullptr-1.c (test5): Cast unused parameter to (void). * gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c: Use -pedantic. Expect warning in place of error.
2022-10-28openmp: Allow optional comma after directive-specifier in C/C++Jakub Jelinek1-27/+37
Previously we've been allowing that comma only in C++ when in attribute form (which was the reason why it has been allowed), but 5.1 allows that even in pragma form in C/C++ (with clarifications in 5.2) and 5.2 also in Fortran (which this patch doesn't implement). Note, for directives which take an argument (== unnamed clause), comma is not allowed in between the directive name and the argument, like the directive-1.c testcase shows. 2022-10-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> gcc/c/ * c-parser.cc (c_parser_omp_all_clauses): Allow optional comma before the first clause. (c_parser_omp_allocate, c_parser_omp_atomic, c_parser_omp_depobj, c_parser_omp_flush, c_parser_omp_scan_loop_body, c_parser_omp_ordered, c_finish_omp_declare_variant, c_parser_omp_declare_target, c_parser_omp_declare_reduction, c_parser_omp_requires, c_parser_omp_error, c_parser_omp_assumption_clauses): Likewise. gcc/cp/ * parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_all_clauses): Allow optional comma before the first clause even in pragma syntax. (cp_parser_omp_allocate, cp_parser_omp_atomic, cp_parser_omp_depobj, cp_parser_omp_flush, cp_parser_omp_scan_loop_body, cp_parser_omp_ordered, cp_parser_omp_assumption_clauses, cp_finish_omp_declare_variant, cp_parser_omp_declare_target, cp_parser_omp_declare_reduction_exprs, cp_parser_omp_requires, cp_parser_omp_error): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/gomp/directive-1.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/clauses-6.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/declare-variant-2.c (f75a): Declare. (f75): Use f75a as variant instead of f1 and don't expect error. * g++.dg/gomp/clause-4.C (foo): Don't expect error on comma before first clause. * gcc.dg/gomp/clause-2.c (foo): Likewise.
2022-10-28c: C2x enums with fixed underlying type [PR61469]Joseph Myers6-159/+402
C2x adds support for enums with a fixed underlying type specified ("enum e : long long;" and similar). Implement this in the C front end. The same representation is used for these types as in C++, with two macros moved from cp-tree.h to c-common.h. Such enums can have bool as the underlying type, and various C front-end code checking for boolean types is adjusted to use a new C_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P to handle such enums the same way as bool. (Note that for C++ we have bug 96496 that enums with underlying type bool don't work correctly there.) There are various issues with the wording for such enums in the current C2x working draft (including but not limited to wording in the accepted paper that failed to make it into the working draft), which I intend to raise in NB comments. I think what I've implemented and added tests for matches the intent. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. PR c/61469 gcc/c-family/ * c-common.h (ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE, ENUM_FIXED_UNDERLYING_TYPE_P): New. Moved from cp/cp-tree.h. * c-warn.cc (warnings_for_convert_and_check): Do not consider conversions to enum with underlying type bool to overflow. gcc/c/ * c-convert.cc (c_convert): Handle enums with underlying boolean type like bool. * c-decl.cc (shadow_tag_warned): Allow shadowing declarations for enums with enum type specifier, but give errors for storage class specifiers, qualifiers or alignment specifiers in non-definition declarations of such enums. (grokdeclarator): Give error for non-definition use of type specifier with an enum type specifier. (parser_xref_tag): Add argument has_enum_type_specifier. Pass it to lookup_tag and use it to set ENUM_FIXED_UNDERLYING_TYPE_P. (xref_tag): Update call to parser_xref_tag. (start_enum): Add argument fixed_underlying_type. Complete enum type with a fixed underlying type given in the definition. Give error for defining without a fixed underlying type in the definition if one was given in a prior declaration. Do not mark enums with fixed underlying type as packed for -fshort-enums. Store the enum type in the_enum. (finish_enum): Do not adjust types of values or check their range for an enum with a fixed underlying type. Set underlying type of enum and variants. (build_enumerator): Check enumeration constants for enum with fixed underlying type against that type and convert to that type. Increment in the underlying integer type, with handling for bool. (c_simulate_enum_decl): Update call to start_enum. (declspecs_add_type): Set specs->enum_type_specifier_ref_p. * c-objc-common.cc (c_get_alias_set): Use ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE rather than recomputing an underlying type based on size. * c-parser.cc (c_parser_declspecs) (c_parser_struct_or_union_specifier, c_parser_typeof_specifier): Set has_enum_type_specifier for type specifiers. (c_parser_enum_specifier): Handle enum type specifiers. (c_parser_struct_or_union_specifier): Update call to parser_xref_tag. (c_parser_omp_atomic): Check for boolean increment or decrement using C_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P. * c-tree.h (C_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P): New. (struct c_typespec): Add has_enum_type_specifier. (struct c_declspecs): Add enum_type_specifier_ref_p. (struct c_enum_contents): Add enum_type. (start_enum, parser_xref_tag): Update prototypes. * c-typeck.cc (composite_type): Allow for enumerated types compatible with bool. (common_type, comptypes_internal, perform_integral_promotions): Use ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE. (parser_build_binary_op, build_unary_op, convert_for_assignment) (c_finish_return, c_start_switch, build_binary_op): Check for boolean types using C_BOOLEAN_TYPE_P. gcc/cp/ * cp-tree.h (ENUM_FIXED_UNDERLYING_TYPE_P, ENUM_UNDERLYING_TYPE): Remove. Moved to c-common.h. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c11-enum-4.c, gcc.dg/c11-enum-5.c, gcc.dg/c11-enum-6.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-6.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-7.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-8.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-enum-1.c: New tests.
2022-10-25Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+14
2022-10-24c, c++: Fix up excess precision handling of scalar_to_vector conversion ↵Jakub Jelinek1-2/+2
[PR107358] As mentioned earlier in the C++ excess precision support mail, the following testcase is broken with excess precision both in C and C++ (though just in C++ it was triggered in real-world code). scalar_to_vector is called in both FEs after the excess precision promotions (or stripping of EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR), so we can then get invalid diagnostics that say float vector + float involves truncation (on ia32 from long double to float). The following patch fixes that by calling scalar_to_vector on the operands before the excess precision promotions, let scalar_to_vector just do the diagnostics (it does e.g. fold_for_warn so it will fold EXCESS_PRECISION_EXPR around REAL_CST to constants etc.) but will then do the actual conversions using the excess precision promoted operands (so say if we have vector double + (float + float) we don't actually do vector double + (float) ((long double) float + (long double) float) but vector double + (double) ((long double) float + (long double) float) 2022-10-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/107358 gcc/c/ * c-typeck.cc (build_binary_op): Pass operands before excess precision promotions to scalar_to_vector call. gcc/cp/ * typeck.cc (cp_build_binary_op): Pass operands before excess precision promotions to scalar_to_vector call. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/pr107358.c: New test. * g++.dg/cpp1y/pr68180.C: Remove -fexcess-precision=fast from dg-options.
2022-10-24c-family: Implicitly return zero from main even on freestandingArsen Arsenović2-4/+7
... unless marked noreturn. This should not get in anyone's way, but should permit the use of main() in freestanding more easily, especially for writing test cases that should work both in freestanding and hosted modes. gcc/c/ChangeLog: * c-decl.cc (finish_function): Ignore hosted when deciding whether to implicitly return zero, but check noreturn. * c-objc-common.cc (c_missing_noreturn_ok_p): Loosen the requirements to just MAIN_NAME_P when hosted, or `int main' otherwise. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * cp-tree.h (DECL_MAIN_P): Move most logic, besides the hosted check, from here... (DECL_MAIN_ANY_P): ... to here, so that it can be reused ... (DECL_MAIN_FREESTANDING_P): ... here, with an additional constraint on (hosted OR return type == int) * decl.cc (finish_function): Use DECL_MAIN_FREESTANDING_P instead of DECL_MAIN_P, to loosen the hosted requirement, but check noreturn, before adding implicit returns. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/noreturn-4.c: Removed. * g++.dg/freestanding-main.C: New test. * g++.dg/freestanding-nonint-main.C: New test. * gcc.dg/freestanding-main.c: New test. * gcc.dg/freestanding-nonint-main.c: New test.
2022-10-21Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+7
2022-10-20c/107305 - avoid ICEing with invalid GIMPLE input to the GIMPLE FERichard Biener1-0/+10
The GIMPLE FE was designed to defer semantic error checking to the GIMPLE IL verifier. But that can end up causing spurious ICEs earlier and in fact it will report an internal error. The following tries to improve the situation by explicitely calling into the verifier from the parser and intructing it to not ICE but instead zap the parsed body after an error is discovered. PR c/107305 PR c/107306 gcc/c/ * gimple-parser.cc (c_parser_parse_gimple_body): Verify the parsed IL and zap the body on error. gcc/ * tree-cfg.h (verify_gimple_in_seq): Add parameter to indicate whether to emit an ICE. Add return value. (verify_gimple_in_cfg): Likewise. * tree-cfg.cc (verify_gimple_in_seq): Likewise. (verify_gimple_in_cfg): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/gimplefe-error-15.c: New testcase.
2022-10-19Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+21
2022-10-18c: Diagnose "enum tag;" after definition [PR107164]Joseph Myers1-0/+14
As noted in bug 101764, a declaration "enum tag;" is invalid in standard C after a definition, as well as when no definition is visible; we had a pedwarn-if-pedantic for the forward declaration case, but were missing one for the other case. Add that missing diagnostic (if pedantic only). (These diagnostics will need to be appropriately conditioned when support is added for C2x enums with fixed underlying type, since "enum tag : type;" is OK both before and after a definition.) Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. PR c/107164 gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (shadow_tag_warned): If pedantic, diagnose "enum tag;" with previous declaration visible. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c99-tag-4.c, gcc.dg/c99-tag-5.c, gcc.dg/c99-tag-6.c: New tests.
2022-10-18c: C2x enums wider than int [PR36113]Joseph Myers1-39/+98
C2x has two enhancements to enumerations: allowing enumerations whose values do not all fit in int (similar to an existing extension), and allowing an underlying type to be specified (as in C++). This patch implements the first of those enhancements. Apart from adjusting diagnostics to reflect this being a standard feature, there are some semantics differences from the previous extension: * The standard feature gives all the values of such an enum the enumerated type (while keeping type int if that can represent all values of the enumeration), where previously GCC only gave those values outside the range of int the enumerated type. This change was previously requested in PR 36113; it seems unlikely that people are depending on the detail of the previous extension that some enumerators had different types to others depending on whether their values could be represented as int, and this patch makes the change to types of enumerators unconditionally (if that causes problems in practice we could always make it conditional on C2x mode instead). * The types *while the enumeration is being defined*, for enumerators that can't be represented as int, are now based more directly on the types of the expressions used, rather than a possibly different type with the right precision constructed using c_common_type_for_size. Again, this change is made unconditionally. * Where overflow (or wraparound to 0, in the case of an unsigned type) when 1 is implicitly added to determine the value of the next enumerator was previously an error, it now results in a wider type with the same signedness (as the while-being-defined type of the previous enumerator) being chosen, if available. When a type is chosen in such an overflow case, or when a type is chosen for the underlying integer type of the enumeration, it's possible that (unsigned) __int128 is chosen. Although C2x allows for such types wider than intmax_t to be considered extended integer types, we don't have various features required to do so (integer constant suffixes; sufficient library support would also be needed to define the associated macros for printf/scanf conversions, and <stdint.h> typedef names would need to be defined). Thus, there are also pedwarns for exceeding the range of intmax_t / uintmax_t, as while in principle exceeding that range is OK, it's only OK in a context where the relevant types meet the requirements for extended integer types, which does not currently apply here. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also manually checked diagnostics for c2x-enum-3.c with -m32 to confirm the diagnostics in that { target { ! int128 } } test are as expected. PR c/36113 gcc/c-family/ * c-common.cc (c_common_type_for_size): Add fallback to widest_unsigned_literal_type_node or widest_integer_literal_type_node for precision that may not exactly match the precision of those types. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (finish_enum): If any enumerators do not fit in int, convert all to the type of the enumeration. pedwarn if no integer type fits all enumerators and default to widest_integer_literal_type_node in that case. Otherwise pedwarn for type wider than intmax_t. (build_enumerator): pedwarn for enumerators outside the range of uintmax_t or intmax_t, and otherwise use pedwarn_c11 for enumerators outside the range of int. On overflow, attempt to find a wider type that can hold the value of the next enumerator. Do not convert value to type determined with c_common_type_for_size. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c11-enum-1.c, gcc.dg/c11-enum-2.c, gcc.dg/c11-enum-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-4.c, gcc.dg/c2x-enum-5.c: New tests. * gcc.dg/pr30260.c: Explicitly use -std=gnu11. Update expected diagnostics. * gcc.dg/torture/pr25183.c: Update expected diagnostics.
2022-10-15Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+23
2022-10-14middle-end, c++, i386, libgcc: std::bfloat16_t and __bf16 arithmetic supportJakub Jelinek1-0/+3
Here is a complete patch to add std::bfloat16_t support on x86 (AArch64 and ARM left for later). Almost no BFmode optabs are added by the patch, so for binops/unops it extends to SFmode first and then truncates back to BFmode. For {HF,SF,DF,XF,TF}mode -> BFmode conversions libgcc has implementations of all those conversions so that we avoid double rounding, for BFmode -> {DF,XF,TF}mode conversions to avoid growing libgcc too much it emits BFmode -> SFmode conversion first and then converts to the even wider mode, neither step should be imprecise. For BFmode -> HFmode, it first emits a precise BFmode -> SFmode conversion and then SFmode -> HFmode, because neither format is subset or superset of the other, while SFmode is superset of both. expr.cc then contains a -ffast-math optimization of the BF -> SF and SF -> BF conversions if we don't optimize for space (and for the latter if -frounding-math isn't enabled either). For x86, perhaps truncsfbf2 optab could be defined for TARGET_AVX512BF16 but IMNSHO should FAIL if !flag_finite_math || flag_rounding_math || !flag_unsafe_math_optimizations, because I think the insn doesn't raise on sNaNs, hardcodes round to nearest and flushes denormals to zero. By default (unless x86 -fexcess-precision=16) we use float excess precision for BFmode, so truncate only on explicit casts and assignments. The patch introduces a single __bf16 builtin - __builtin_nansf16b, because (__bf16) __builtin_nansf ("") will drop the sNaN into qNaN, and uses f16b suffix instead of bf16 because there would be ambiguity on log vs. logb - __builtin_logbf16 could be either log with bf16 suffix or logb with f16 suffix. In other cases libstdc++ should mostly use __builtin_*f for std::bfloat16_t overloads (we have a problem with std::nextafter though but that one we have also for std::float16_t). 2022-10-14 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> gcc/ * tree-core.h (enum tree_index): Add TI_BFLOAT16_TYPE. * tree.h (bfloat16_type_node): Define. * tree.cc (excess_precision_type): Promote bfloat16_type_mode like float16_type_mode. (build_common_tree_nodes): Initialize bfloat16_type_node if BFmode is supported. * expmed.h (maybe_expand_shift): Declare. * expmed.cc (maybe_expand_shift): No longer static. * expr.cc (convert_mode_scalar): Don't ICE on BF -> HF or HF -> BF conversions. If there is no optab, handle BF -> {DF,XF,TF,HF} conversions as separate BF -> SF -> {DF,XF,TF,HF} conversions, add -ffast-math generic implementation for BF -> SF and SF -> BF conversions. * builtin-types.def (BT_BFLOAT16, BT_FN_BFLOAT16_CONST_STRING): New. * builtins.def (BUILT_IN_NANSF16B): New builtin. * fold-const-call.cc (fold_const_call): Handle CFN_BUILT_IN_NANSF16B. * config/i386/i386.cc (classify_argument): Handle E_BCmode. (ix86_libgcc_floating_mode_supported_p): Also return true for BFmode for -msse2. (ix86_mangle_type): Mangle BFmode as DF16b. (ix86_invalid_conversion, ix86_invalid_unary_op, ix86_invalid_binary_op): Remove. (TARGET_INVALID_CONVERSION, TARGET_INVALID_UNARY_OP, TARGET_INVALID_BINARY_OP): Don't redefine. * config/i386/i386-builtins.cc (ix86_bf16_type_node): Remove. (ix86_register_bf16_builtin_type): Use bfloat16_type_node rather than ix86_bf16_type_node, only create it if still NULL. * config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def (BFLOAT16): Likewise. * config/i386/i386.md (cbranchbf4, cstorebf4): New expanders. gcc/c-family/ * c-cppbuiltin.cc (c_cpp_builtins): If bfloat16_type_node, predefine __BFLT16_*__ macros and for C++23 also __STDCPP_BFLOAT16_T__. Predefine bfloat16_type_node related macros for -fbuilding-libgcc. * c-lex.cc (interpret_float): Handle CPP_N_BFLOAT16. gcc/c/ * c-typeck.cc (convert_arguments): Don't promote __bf16 to double. gcc/cp/ * cp-tree.h (extended_float_type_p): Return true for bfloat16_type_node. * typeck.cc (cp_compare_floating_point_conversion_ranks): Set extended{1,2} if mv{1,2} is bfloat16_type_node. Adjust comment. gcc/testsuite/ * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_bfloat16, check_effective_target_bfloat16_runtime, add_options_for_bfloat16): New. * gcc.dg/torture/bfloat16-basic.c: New test. * gcc.dg/torture/bfloat16-builtin.c: New test. * gcc.dg/torture/bfloat16-builtin-issignaling-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/torture/bfloat16-complex.c: New test. * gcc.dg/torture/builtin-issignaling-1.c: Allow to be includable from bfloat16-builtin-issignaling-1.c. * gcc.dg/torture/floatn-basic.h: Allow to be includable from bfloat16-basic.c. * gcc.target/i386/vect-bfloat16-typecheck_2.c: Adjust expected diagnostics. * gcc.target/i386/sse2-bfloat16-scalar-typecheck.c: Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/vect-bfloat16-typecheck_1.c: Likewise. * g++.target/i386/bfloat_cpp_typecheck.C: Likewise. libcpp/ * include/cpplib.h (CPP_N_BFLOAT16): Define. * expr.cc (interpret_float_suffix): Handle bf16 and BF16 suffixes for C++. libgcc/ * config/i386/t-softfp (softfp_extensions): Add bfsf. (softfp_truncations): Add tfbf xfbf dfbf sfbf hfbf. (CFLAGS-extendbfsf2.c, CFLAGS-truncsfbf2.c, CFLAGS-truncdfbf2.c, CFLAGS-truncxfbf2.c, CFLAGS-trunctfbf2.c, CFLAGS-trunchfbf2.c): Add -msse2. * config/i386/libgcc-glibc.ver (GCC_13.0.0): Export __extendbfsf2 and __trunc{s,d,x,t,h}fbf2. * config/i386/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANSIGN_B): Define. * config/i386/64/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_B): Define. * config/i386/32/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_B): Define. * soft-fp/brain.h: New file. * soft-fp/truncsfbf2.c: New file. * soft-fp/truncdfbf2.c: New file. * soft-fp/truncxfbf2.c: New file. * soft-fp/trunctfbf2.c: New file. * soft-fp/trunchfbf2.c: New file. * soft-fp/truncbfhf2.c: New file. * soft-fp/extendbfsf2.c: New file. libiberty/ * cp-demangle.h (D_BUILTIN_TYPE_COUNT): Increment. * cp-demangle.c (cplus_demangle_builtin_types): Add std::bfloat16_t entry. (cplus_demangle_type): Demangle DF16b. * testsuite/demangle-expected (_Z3xxxDF16b): New test.
2022-10-14c: C2x storage class specifiers in compound literalsJoseph Myers4-14/+117
Implement the C2x feature of storage class specifiers in compound literals. Such storage class specifiers (static, register or thread_local; also constexpr, but we don't yet have C2x constexpr support implemented) can be used before the type name (not mixed with type specifiers, unlike in declarations) and have the same semantics and constraints as for declarations of named objects. Also allow GNU __thread to be used, given that thread_local can be. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (build_compound_literal): Add parameter scspecs. Handle storage class specifiers. * c-parser.cc (c_token_starts_compound_literal) (c_parser_compound_literal_scspecs): New. (c_parser_postfix_expression_after_paren_type): Add parameter scspecs. Call pedwarn_c11 for use of storage class specifiers. Update call to build_compound_literal. (c_parser_cast_expression, c_parser_sizeof_expression) (c_parser_alignof_expression): Handle storage class specifiers for compound literals. Update calls to c_parser_postfix_expression_after_paren_type. (c_parser_postfix_expression): Update syntax comment. * c-tree.h (build_compound_literal): Update prototype. * c-typeck.cc (c_mark_addressable): Diagnose taking address of register compound literal. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c11-complit-1.c, gcc.dg/c11-complit-2.c, gcc.dg/c11-complit-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-complit-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-complit-3.c, gcc.dg/c2x-complit-4.c, gcc.dg/c2x-complit-5.c, gcc.dg/c2x-complit-6.c, gcc.dg/c2x-complit-7.c, gcc.dg/c90-complit-2.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-complit-1.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-complit-2.c: New tests.
2022-10-08Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+10
2022-10-07Add a new option -fstrict-flex-arrays[=n] and new attribute strict_flex_arrayQing Zhao1-9/+121
Add the following new option -fstrict-flex-arrays[=n] and a corresponding attribute strict_flex_array to GCC: '-fstrict-flex-arrays' Control when to treat the trailing array of a structure as a flexible array member for the purpose of accessing the elements of such an array. The positive form is equivalent to '-fstrict-flex-arrays=3', which is the strictest. A trailing array is treated as a flexible array member only when it declared as a flexible array member per C99 standard onwards. The negative form is equivalent to '-fstrict-flex-arrays=0', which is the least strict. All trailing arrays of structures are treated as flexible array members. '-fstrict-flex-arrays=LEVEL' Control when to treat the trailing array of a structure as a flexible array member for the purpose of accessing the elements of such an array. The value of LEVEL controls the level of strictness The possible values of LEVEL are the same as for the 'strict_flex_array' attribute (*note Variable Attributes::). You can control this behavior for a specific trailing array field of a structure by using the variable attribute 'strict_flex_array' attribute (*note Variable Attributes::). 'strict_flex_array (LEVEL)' The 'strict_flex_array' attribute should be attached to the trailing array field of a structure. It controls when to treat the trailing array field of a structure as a flexible array member for the purposes of accessing the elements of such an array. LEVEL must be an integer betwen 0 to 3. LEVEL=0 is the least strict level, all trailing arrays of structures are treated as flexible array members. LEVEL=3 is the strictest level, only when the trailing array is declared as a flexible array member per C99 standard onwards ('[]'), it is treated as a flexible array member. There are two more levels in between 0 and 3, which are provided to support older codes that use GCC zero-length array extension ('[0]') or one-element array as flexible array members('[1]'): When LEVEL is 1, the trailing array is treated as a flexible array member when it is declared as either '[]', '[0]', or '[1]'; When LEVEL is 2, the trailing array is treated as a flexible array member when it is declared as either '[]', or '[0]'. This attribute can be used with or without the '-fstrict-flex-arrays'. When both the attribute and the option present at the same time, the level of the strictness for the specific trailing array field is determined by the attribute. gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c-attribs.cc (handle_strict_flex_array_attribute): New function. (c_common_attribute_table): New item for strict_flex_array. * c.opt: (fstrict-flex-arrays): New option. (fstrict-flex-arrays=): New option. gcc/c/ChangeLog: * c-decl.cc (flexible_array_member_type_p): New function. (one_element_array_type_p): Likewise. (zero_length_array_type_p): Likewise. (add_flexible_array_elts_to_size): Call new utility routine flexible_array_member_type_p. (is_flexible_array_member_p): New function. (finish_struct): Set the new DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY flag. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * module.cc (trees_out::core_bools): Stream out new bit decl_not_flexarray. (trees_in::core_bools): Stream in new bit decl_not_flexarray. gcc/ChangeLog: * doc/extend.texi: Document strict_flex_array attribute. * doc/invoke.texi: Document -fstrict-flex-arrays[=n] option. * print-tree.cc (print_node): Print new bit decl_not_flexarray. * tree-core.h (struct tree_decl_common): New bit field decl_not_flexarray. * tree-streamer-in.cc (unpack_ts_decl_common_value_fields): Stream in new bit decl_not_flexarray. * tree-streamer-out.cc (pack_ts_decl_common_value_fields): Stream out new bit decl_not_flexarray. * tree.cc (array_at_struct_end_p): Update it with the new bit field decl_not_flexarray. * tree.h (DECL_NOT_FLEXARRAY): New flag. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/strict-flex-array-1.C: New test. * gcc.dg/strict-flex-array-1.c: New test.
2022-10-07Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+32
2022-10-06c: C2x typeofJoseph Myers2-8/+53
C2x adds typeof as a standard feature. In general this follows existing GNU C semantics very closely, but there are various ways in which the implementation involves more than simply enabling the keyword for C2x: * As well as typeof, there is a typeof_unqual variant, which removes all qualifiers and _Atomic from the resulting type (whereas typeof preserves qualifiers and _Atomic on qualified or atomic (lvalue or type name) operands). * The typeof keyword is disabled by -fno-asm, so enabling it for C2x needs to be implemented in a way that preserves the disabling by -fno-asm for older standard versions (which having -fno-asm having no effect on it in C2x mode). This is done via adding a new D_EXT11 mask (which is also where the C++ front-end change comes from, to handle D_EXT11 appropriately there for -fno-asm and -fno-gnu-keywords). * GNU typeof treats the noreturn property of a function (as specified in standard C with _Noreturn or [[noreturn]]) as being part of the type of a pointer to function, but it is not part of the type in standard terms. Thus a special case is needed in the typeof implementation, just like in the _Generic implementation, to avoid treating it as a type for standard typeof. It seems plausible this is being used when copying the type of one object to another using typeof, so the existing semantics are preserved for __typeof__, and for typeof in pre-C2x modes, while typeof for C2x or later has the standard semantics. * It turns out that, even after Martin Uecker's changes in this area, there were still cases where rvalues could wrongly have a qualified or atomic type in GCC. This applied to ++ and -- increment and decrement expressions, and also to calls to functions returning an atomic type. (For the latter, the working draft doesn't actually explicitly exclude the function call expression having an atomic type, but given all the changes that have gone into C17 and C2x to avoid rvalues ever having qualified types, and given that lvalue-to-rvalue conversion removes both qualifiers and _Atomic, it seems unlikely that this (or casts, where GCC already removes _Atomic) is actually intended as a route to allow an _Atomic-qualified rvalue; I've noted this to raise as an NB comment on the CD ballot.) Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. OK to commit (C+ gcc/ * doc/invoke.texi (-fno-asm): Update description of effects on typeof keyword. gcc/c-family/ * c-common.cc (c_common_reswords): Mark typeof as D_EXT11. Add typeof_unqual. * c-common.h (enum rid): Add RID_TYPEOF_UNQUAL. (D_EXT11): New macro. Values of subsequent macros updated. gcc/c/ * c-parser.cc (c_parse_init): Add D_EXT11 to mask if flag_no_asm and not C2x. (c_keyword_starts_typename, c_token_starts_declspecs) (c_parser_declspecs, c_parser_objc_selector): Handle RID_TYPEOF_UNQUAL. (c_parser_typeof_specifier): Handle RID_TYPEOF_UNQUAL. Distinguish typeof for C2x from __typeof__ for all standard versions and typeof before C2x. * c-typeck.cc (build_function_call_vec): Use unqualified version of non-void return type. (build_unary_op): Use unqualified type for increment and decrement. gcc/cp/ * lex.cc (init_reswords): Handle D_EXT11. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c11-typeof-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-typeof-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-typeof-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-typeof-3.c, gcc.dg/gnu11-typeof-1.c, gcc.dg/gnu11-typeof-2.c, gcc.dg/gnu2x-typeof-1.c: New tests.
2022-10-06openmp: Map holds clause to IFN_ASSUME for C/C++Jakub Jelinek1-3/+5
Now that [[assume (cond)]] support is in, this simple patch makes #pragma omp assume holds(cond) use it. 2022-10-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> * c-parser.cc (c_parser_omp_assumption_clauses): Emit IFN_ASSUME call for holds clause on assume construct. * parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_assumption_clauses): Emit IFN_ASSUME call for holds clause on assume construct. * c-c++-common/gomp/assume-4.c: New test.
2022-10-06c++, c: Implement C++23 P1774R8 - Portable assumptions [PR106654]Jakub Jelinek1-9/+104
The following patch implements C++23 P1774R8 - Portable assumptions paper, by introducing support for [[assume (cond)]]; attribute for C++. In addition to that the patch adds [[gnu::assume (cond)]]; and __attribute__((assume (cond))); support to both C and C++. As described in C++23, the attribute argument is conditional-expression rather than the usual assignment-expression for attribute arguments, the condition is contextually converted to bool (for C truthvalue conversion is done on it) and is never evaluated at runtime. For C++ constant expression evaluation, I only check the simplest conditions for undefined behavior, because otherwise I'd need to undo changes to *ctx->global which happened during the evaluation (but I believe the spec allows that and we can further improve later). The patch uses a new internal function, .ASSUME, to hold the condition in the FEs. At gimplification time, if the condition is simple/without side-effects, it is gimplified as if (cond) ; else __builtin_unreachable (); and otherwise for now dropped on the floor. The intent is to incrementally outline the conditions into separate artificial functions and use .ASSUME further to tell the ranger and perhaps other optimization passes about the assumptions, as detailed in the PR. When implementing it, I found that assume entry hasn't been added to https://eel.is/c++draft/cpp.cond#6 Jonathan said he'll file a NB comment about it, this patch assumes it has been added into the table as 202207L when the paper has been voted in. With the attributes for both C/C++, I'd say we don't need to add __builtin_assume with similar purpose, especially when __builtin_assume in LLVM is just weird. It is strange for side-effects in function call's argument not to be evaluated, and LLVM in that case (annoyingly) warns and ignores the side-effects (but doesn't do then anything with it), if there are no side-effects, it will work like our if (!cond) __builtin_unreachable (); 2022-10-06 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/106654 gcc/ * internal-fn.def (ASSUME): New internal function. * internal-fn.h (expand_ASSUME): Declare. * internal-fn.cc (expand_ASSUME): Define. * gimplify.cc (gimplify_call_expr): Gimplify IFN_ASSUME. * fold-const.h (simple_condition_p): Declare. * fold-const.cc (simple_operand_p_2): Rename to ... (simple_condition_p): ... this. Remove forward declaration. No longer static. Adjust function comment and fix a typo in it. Adjust recursive call. (simple_operand_p): Adjust function comment. (fold_truth_andor): Adjust simple_operand_p_2 callers to call simple_condition_p. * doc/extend.texi: Document assume attribute. Move fallthrough attribute example to its section. gcc/c-family/ * c-attribs.cc (handle_assume_attribute): New function. (c_common_attribute_table): Add entry for assume attribute. * c-lex.cc (c_common_has_attribute): Handle __have_cpp_attribute (assume). gcc/c/ * c-parser.cc (handle_assume_attribute): New function. (c_parser_declaration_or_fndef): Handle assume attribute. (c_parser_attribute_arguments): Add assume_attr argument, if true, parse first argument as conditional expression. (c_parser_gnu_attribute, c_parser_std_attribute): Adjust c_parser_attribute_arguments callers. (c_parser_statement_after_labels) <case RID_ATTRIBUTE>: Handle assume attribute. gcc/cp/ * cp-tree.h (process_stmt_assume_attribute): Implement C++23 P1774R8 - Portable assumptions. Declare. (diagnose_failing_condition): Declare. (find_failing_clause): Likewise. * parser.cc (assume_attr): New enumerator. (cp_parser_parenthesized_expression_list): Handle assume_attr. Remove identifier variable, for id_attr push the identifier into expression_list right away instead of inserting it before all the others at the end. (cp_parser_conditional_expression): New function. (cp_parser_constant_expression): Use it. (cp_parser_statement): Handle assume attribute. (cp_parser_expression_statement): Likewise. (cp_parser_gnu_attribute_list): Use assume_attr for assume attribute. (cp_parser_std_attribute): Likewise. Handle standard assume attribute like gnu::assume. * cp-gimplify.cc (process_stmt_assume_attribute): New function. * constexpr.cc: Include fold-const.h. (find_failing_clause_r, find_failing_clause): New functions, moved from semantics.cc with ctx argument added and if non-NULL, call cxx_eval_constant_expression rather than fold_non_dependent_expr. (cxx_eval_internal_function): Handle IFN_ASSUME. (potential_constant_expression_1): Likewise. * pt.cc (tsubst_copy_and_build): Likewise. * semantics.cc (diagnose_failing_condition): New function. (find_failing_clause_r, find_failing_clause): Moved to constexpr.cc. (finish_static_assert): Use it. Add auto_diagnostic_group. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/attr-assume-1.c: New test. * gcc.dg/attr-assume-2.c: New test. * gcc.dg/attr-assume-3.c: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/feat-cxx2a.C: Add colon to C++20 features comment, add C++20 attributes comment and move C++20 new features after the attributes before them. * g++.dg/cpp23/feat-cxx2b.C: Likewise. Test __has_cpp_attribute(assume). * g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume1.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume2.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume3.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume4.C: New test.
2022-10-05Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+27
2022-10-04openmp: Add begin declare target supportJakub Jelinek3-24/+82
The following patch adds support for the begin declare target construct, which is another spelling for declare target construct without clauses (where it needs paired end declare target), but unlike that one accepts clauses. This is an OpenMP 5.1 feature, implemented with 5.2 clarification because in 5.1 we had a restriction in the declare target chapter shared by declare target and begin declare target that if there are any clauses specified at least one of them needs to be to or link. But that was of course meant just for declare target and not begin declare target, because begin declare target doesn't even allow to/link/enter clauses. In addition to that, the patch also makes device_type clause duplication an error (as stated in 5.1) and similarly makes declare target with just device_type clause an error rather than warning. What this patch doesn't do is: 1) OpenMP 5.1 also added an indirect clause, we don't support that neither on declare target nor begin declare target and I couldn't find it in our features pages (neither libgomp.texi nor web) 2) I think device_type(nohost)/device_type(host) support can't work for variables (in 5.0 it only talked about procedures so this could be also thought as 5.1 feature that we should just add to the list and implement) 3) I don't see any use of the "omp declare target nohost" attribute, so I'm not sure if device_type(nohost) works at all 2022-10-04 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> gcc/c-family/ * c-omp.cc (c_omp_directives): Uncomment begin declare target entry. gcc/c/ * c-lang.h (struct c_omp_declare_target_attr): New type. (current_omp_declare_target_attribute): Change type from int to vec<c_omp_declare_target_attr, va_gc> *. * c-parser.cc (c_parser_translation_unit): Adjust for that change. If last pushed directive was begin declare target, use different wording and simplify format strings for easier translations. (c_parser_omp_clause_device_type): Uncomment check_no_duplicate_clause call. (c_parser_omp_declare_target): Adjust for the current_omp_declare_target_attribute type change, push { -1 }. Use error_at rather than warning_at for declare target with only device_type clauses. (OMP_BEGIN_DECLARE_TARGET_CLAUSE_MASK): Define. (c_parser_omp_begin): Add begin declare target support. (c_parser_omp_end): Adjust for the current_omp_declare_target_attribute type change, adjust diagnostics wording and simplify format strings for easier translations. * c-decl.cc (current_omp_declare_target_attribute): Change type from int to vec<c_omp_declare_target_attr, va_gc> *. (c_decl_attributes): Adjust for the current_omp_declare_target_attribute type change. If device_type was present on begin declare target, add "omp declare target host" and/or "omp declare target nohost" attributes. gcc/cp/ * cp-tree.h (struct omp_declare_target_attr): Rename to ... (cp_omp_declare_target_attr): ... this. Add device_type member. (omp_begin_assumes_data): Rename to ... (cp_omp_begin_assumes_data): ... this. (struct saved_scope): Change types of omp_declare_target_attribute and omp_begin_assumes. * parser.cc (cp_parser_omp_clause_device_type): Uncomment check_no_duplicate_clause call. (cp_parser_omp_all_clauses): Fix up pasto, c_name for OMP_CLAUSE_LINK should be "link" rather than "to". (cp_parser_omp_declare_target): Adjust for omp_declare_target_attr to cp_omp_declare_target_attr changes, push -1 as device_type. Use error_at rather than warning_at for declare target with only device_type clauses. (OMP_BEGIN_DECLARE_TARGET_CLAUSE_MASK): Define. (cp_parser_omp_begin): Add begin declare target support. Adjust for omp_begin_assumes_data to cp_omp_begin_assumes_data change. (cp_parser_omp_end): Adjust for the omp_declare_target_attr to cp_omp_declare_target_attr and omp_begin_assumes_data to cp_omp_begin_assumes_data type changes, adjust diagnostics wording and simplify format strings for easier translations. * semantics.cc (finish_translation_unit): Likewise. * decl2.cc (cplus_decl_attributes): If device_type was present on begin declare target, add "omp declare target host" and/or "omp declare target nohost" attributes. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/gomp/declare-target-4.c: Move tests that are now rejected into declare-target-7.c. * c-c++-common/gomp/declare-target-6.c: Adjust expected diagnostics. * c-c++-common/gomp/declare-target-7.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-declare-target-1.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-declare-target-2.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-declare-target-3.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-declare-target-4.c: New test. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-9.C: Add begin declare target tests. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-18.C: New test. libgomp/ * libgomp.texi (Support begin/end declare target syntax in C/C++): Mark as implemented.
2022-09-30Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+5
2022-09-29c: C2x noreturn attributeJoseph Myers1-0/+25
C2x adds a standard [[noreturn]] attribute (which can also be spelt [[_Noreturn]] for use with <stdnoreturn.h>), so allowing non-returning functions to be declared in a manner compatible with C++; the _Noreturn function specifier remains available but is marked obsolescent. Implement this attribute. It's more restricted than GNU __attribute__ ((noreturn)) - that allows function pointers but using the standard attribute on a function pointer is a constraint violation. Thus, the attribute gets its own handler that checks for a FUNCTION_DECL before calling the handler for the GNU attribute. Tests for the attribute are based on those for C11 _Noreturn and for other C2x attributes. Bootstrapped with no regressions for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. gcc/c-family/ * c-lex.cc (c_common_has_attribute): Handle noreturn attribute for C. gcc/c/ * c-decl.cc (handle_std_noreturn_attribute): New function. (std_attribute_table): Add _Noreturn and noreturn. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/c2x-attr-noreturn-1.c, gcc.dg/c2x-attr-noreturn-2.c, gcc.dg/c2x-attr-noreturn-3.c: New tests. * gcc.dg/c2x-has-c-attribute-2.c: Also test __has_c_attribute for noreturn attribute.
2022-09-28Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+18
2022-09-27openmp: Add OpenMP assume, assumes and begin/end assumes supportJakub Jelinek3-17/+298
The following patch implements OpenMP 5.1 #pragma omp assume #pragma omp assumes and #pragma omp begin assumes #pragma omp end assumes directive support for C and C++. Currently it doesn't remember anything from the assumption clauses for later, so is mainly to support the directives and diagnose errors in their use. If the recently posted C++23 [[assume (cond)]]; support makes it in, the intent is that this can be easily adjusted at least for the #pragma omp assume directive with holds clause(s) to use the same infrastructure. Now, C++23 portable assumptions are slightly different from OpenMP 5.1 assumptions' holds clause in that C++23 assumption holds just where it appears, while OpenMP 5.1 assumptions hold everywhere in the scope of the directive. For assumes directive which can appear at file or namespace scope it is the whole TU and everything that functions from there call at runtime, for begin assumes/end assumes pair all the functions in between those directives and everything they call and for assume directive the associated (currently structured) block. I have no idea how to represents such holds to be usable for optimizers, except to make #pragma omp assume holds (cond) block; expand essentially to [[assume (cond)]]; block; or [[assume (cond)]]; block; [[assume (cond)]]; for now. Except for holds clause, the other assumptions are OpenMP related, I'd say we should brainstorm where it would be useful to optimize based on such information (I guess e.g. in target regions it easily could) and only when we come up with something like that think about how to propagate the assumptions to the optimizers. 2022-09-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> gcc/c-family/ * c-pragma.h (enum pragma_kind): Add PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUME, PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUMES and PRAGMA_OMP_BEGIN. Rename PRAGMA_OMP_END_DECLARE_TARGET to PRAGMA_OMP_END. * c-pragma.cc (omp_pragmas): Add assumes and begin. For end rename PRAGMA_OMP_END_DECLARE_TARGET to PRAGMA_OMP_END. (omp_pragmas_simd): Add assume. * c-common.h (c_omp_directives): Declare. * c-omp.cc (omp_directives): Rename to ... (c_omp_directives): ... this. No longer static. Uncomment assume, assumes, begin assumes and end assumes entries. In end declare target entry rename PRAGMA_OMP_END_DECLARE_TARGET to PRAGMA_OMP_END. (c_omp_categorize_directive): Adjust for omp_directives to c_omp_directives renaming. gcc/c/ * c-lang.h (current_omp_begin_assumes): Declare. * c-parser.cc: Include bitmap.h. (c_parser_omp_end_declare_target): Rename to ... (c_parser_omp_end): ... this. Handle also end assumes. (c_parser_omp_begin, c_parser_omp_assumption_clauses, c_parser_omp_assumes, c_parser_omp_assume): New functions. (c_parser_translation_unit): Also diagnose #pragma omp begin assumes without corresponding #pragma omp end assumes. (c_parser_pragma): Use %s in may only be used at file scope diagnostics to decrease number of translatable messages. Handle PRAGMA_OMP_BEGIN and PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUMES. Handle PRAGMA_OMP_END rather than PRAGMA_OMP_END_DECLARE_TARGET and call c_parser_omp_end for it rather than c_parser_omp_end_declare_target. (c_parser_omp_construct): Handle PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUME. * c-decl.cc (current_omp_begin_assumes): Define. gcc/cp/ * cp-tree.h (struct omp_begin_assumes_data): New type. (struct saved_scope): Add omp_begin_assumes member. * parser.cc: Include bitmap.h. (cp_parser_omp_assumption_clauses, cp_parser_omp_assume, cp_parser_omp_assumes, cp_parser_omp_begin): New functions. (cp_parser_omp_end_declare_target): Rename to ... (cp_parser_omp_end): ... this. Handle also end assumes. (cp_parser_omp_construct): Handle PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUME. (cp_parser_pragma): Handle PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUME, PRAGMA_OMP_ASSUMES and PRAGMA_OMP_BEGIN. Handle PRAGMA_OMP_END rather than PRAGMA_OMP_END_DECLARE_TARGET and call cp_parser_omp_end for it rather than cp_parser_omp_end_declare_target. * pt.cc (apply_late_template_attributes): Also temporarily clear omp_begin_assumes. * semantics.cc (finish_translation_unit): Also diagnose #pragma omp begin assumes without corresponding #pragma omp end assumes. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/gomp/assume-1.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/assume-2.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/assume-3.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/assumes-1.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/assumes-2.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/assumes-3.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/assumes-4.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-assumes-1.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-assumes-2.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-assumes-3.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/begin-assumes-4.c: New test. * c-c++-common/gomp/declare-target-6.c: New test. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-1.C (bar): Add n1 and n2 arguments, add tests for assume directive. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-2.C (bar): Likewise. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-9.C: Add n1 and n2 variables, add tests for begin assumes directive. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-15.C: New test. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-16.C: New test. * g++.dg/gomp/attrs-17.C: New test.
2022-09-25Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+7
2022-09-24openmp, c: Tighten up c_tree_equal [PR106981]Jakub Jelinek1-6/+10
This patch changes c_tree_equal to work more like cp_tree_equal, be more strict in what it accepts. The ICE on the first testcase was due to INTEGER_CST wi::wide (t1) == wi::wide (t2) comparison which ICEs if the two constants have different precision, but as the second testcase shows, being too lenient in it can also lead to miscompilation of valid OpenMP programs where we think certain expression is the same even when it isn't and can be guaranteed at runtime to represent different memory location. So, the patch looks through only NON_LVALUE_EXPRs and for constants as well as casts requires that the types match before actually comparing the constant values or recursing on the cast operands. 2022-09-24 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c/106981 gcc/c/ * c-typeck.cc (c_tree_equal): Only strip NON_LVALUE_EXPRs at the start. For CONSTANT_CLASS_P or CASE_CONVERT: return false if t1 and t2 have different types. gcc/testsuite/ * c-c++-common/gomp/pr106981.c: New test. libgomp/ * testsuite/libgomp.c-c++-common/pr106981.c: New test.
2022-09-23Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+19
2022-09-22c: fix uninitialized c_expr::m_decimal [PR106830]David Malcolm4-1/+26
I added c_expr::m_decimal in r13-2386-gbedfca647a9e9c1a as part of the implementation of -Wxor-used-as-pow, but I missed various places where the field needed to be initialized. Fixed thusly. gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: PR c/106830 * c-warn.cc (check_for_xor_used_as_pow): Don't try checking values that don't fit in uhwi. gcc/c/ChangeLog: PR c/106830 * c-parser.cc (c_parser_initelt): Initialize m_decimal. (c_parser_cast_expression): Likewise. (c_parser_alignof_expression): Likewise. (c_parser_postfix_expression_after_paren_type): Likewise. (c_parser_postfix_expression_after_primary): Likewise. (c_parser_expression): Likewise. (c_parser_omp_variable_list): Likewise. (c_parser_transaction_expression): Likewise. * c-tree.h (c_expr::set_error): Likewise. * c-typeck.cc (c_expr_sizeof_expr): Likewise. (parser_build_unary_op): Likewise. (parser_build_binary_op): Likewise. (digest_init): Likewise. (pop_init_level): Likewise. * gimple-parser.cc (c_parser_gimple_call_internal): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR c/106830 * gcc.dg/Wxor-used-as-pow-pr106830.c: New test. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
2022-09-20Daily bump.GCC Administrator1-0/+6
2022-09-19c: Stray inform note with -Waddress [PR106947]Marek Polacek1-9/+10
A trivial fix for maybe_warn_for_null_address where we print an inform note without first checking the return value of a warning call. PR c/106947 gcc/c/ChangeLog: * c-typeck.cc (maybe_warn_for_null_address): Don't emit stray notes. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c: New test.