aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2025-03-02[RISC-V][PR target/118934] Fix ICE in RISC-V long branch supportJeff Law3-5/+5
I'm not sure if I goof'd this or if I merely upstreamed someone else's goof. Either way the long branch code isn't working correctly. We were using 'n' as the output modifier to negate the condition. But 'n' has a special meaning elsewhere, so when presented with a condition rather than what was expected, boom, the compiler ICE'd. Thankfully there's only a few places where we were using %n which I turned into %r. The BZ entry includes a good testcase, it just takes a long time to compile as it's trying to create the out-of-range scenario. I'm not including the testcase due to how long it takes, but I did test it locally to ensure it's working properly now. I'm sure that with a little bit of work I could create at testcase that worked before and fails with the trunk (by taking advantage of the fuzzyness in length computations). So I'm going to consider this a regression. Will push to the trunk after pre-commit testing does its thing. PR target/118934 gcc/ * config/riscv/corev.md (cv_branch): Adjust output template. (branch): Likewise. * config/riscv/riscv.md (branch): Likewise. * config/riscv/riscv.cc (riscv_asm_output_opcode): Handle 'r' rather than 'n'.
2025-03-02PR modula2/119088 ICE when for loop accesses an unknown variable as the iteratorGaius Mulley2-7/+21
This patch fixes an ICE which occurs when a FOR statement attempts to use an undeclared variable as its iterator. gcc/m2/ChangeLog: PR modula2/119088 * gm2-compiler/M2SymInit.mod (ConfigSymInit): Reimplement to defensively check for NulSym type. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR modula2/119088 * gm2/pim/fail/tinyfor4.mod: New test. Signed-off-by: Gaius Mulley <gaiusmod2@gmail.com>
2025-03-02Fortran: Small fixes in intrinsic.texi.Sandra Loosemore1-13/+13
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog * intrinsic.texi: Fix inconsistent capitalization of argument names and other minor copy-editing.
2025-03-02Fortran: Move "Standard" subheading in documentation [PR47928]Sandra Loosemore1-923/+923
As noted in the issue, the version of the standard an intrinsic was introduced in is usually not the second-most-important thing a user needs to know. This patch moves it from near the beginning of each section towards the end, just ahead of "See also". gcc/fortran/ChangeLog PR fortran/47928 * intrinsic.texi: Move the "Standard" subheading farther down.
2025-03-02Fortran: Rename/move "Syntax" subheading in documentation [PR47928]Sandra Loosemore2-1159/+1159
As suggested in the issue, it makes more sense to describe the function call argument syntax before talking about the arguments in the description. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog PR fortran/47928 * gfortran.texi: Move all the "Syntax" subheadings ahead of "Description", and rename to "Synopsis". * intrinsic.texi: Likewise.
2025-03-02Fortran: Whitespace cleanup in documentation [PR47928]Sandra Loosemore1-19/+15
This is a preparatory patch for the main changes requested in the issue. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog PR fortran/47928 * intrinsic.texi: Put a blank line between "@item @emph{}" subheadings, but not more than one.
2025-03-02Fortran: Tidy subheadings in Fortran documentation [PR47928]Sandra Loosemore2-49/+48
This is a preparatory patch for the main documentation changes requested in the issue. gcc/fortran/ChangeLog PR fortran/47928 * gfortran.texi: Consistently use "@emph{Notes}:" instead of other spellings. * intrinsic.texi: Likewise. Also fix an inconsistent capitalization and remove a redundant "Standard" entry.
2025-03-02avr: Fix up avr_print_operand diagnostics [PR118991]Jakub Jelinek1-4/+13
As can be seen in gcc/po/gcc.pot: #: config/avr/avr.cc:2754 #, c-format msgid "bad I/O address 0x" msgstr "" exgettext couldn't retrieve the whole format string in this case, because it uses a macro in the middle. output_operand_lossage is c-format function though, so we can't use %wx to print HOST_WIDE_INT, and HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_HEX_PURE is on some hosts %lx, on others %llx and on others %I64x so isn't really translatable that way. As Joseph mentioned in the PR, there is no easy way around this but go through a temporary buffer, which the following patch does. 2025-03-02 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR translation/118991 * config/avr/avr.cc (avr_print_operand): Print ival into a temporary buffer and use %s in output_operand_lossage to make the diagnostics translatable.
2025-03-02gimple: sccopy: Prune removed statements from SCCs [PR117919]Filip Kastl2-0/+65
While writing the sccopy pass I didn't realize that 'replace_uses_by ()' can remove portions of the CFG. This happens when replacing arguments of some statement results in the removal of an EH edge. Because of this sccopy can then work with GIMPLE statements that aren't part of the IR anymore. In PR117919 this triggered an assertion within the pass which assumes that statements the pass works with are reachable. This patch tells the pass to notice when a statement isn't in the IR anymore and remove it from it's worklist. PR tree-optimization/117919 gcc/ChangeLog: * gimple-ssa-sccopy.cc (scc_copy_prop::propagate): Prune statements that 'replace_uses_by ()' removed. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/pr117919.C: New test. Signed-off-by: Filip Kastl <fkastl@suse.cz>
2025-03-02Daily bump.GCC Administrator5-1/+56
2025-03-01doc: Simplify description of *-*-freebsd*Gerald Pfeifer1-2/+1
gcc: PR target/69374 * doc/install.texi (Specific, *-*-freebsd*): Simplify description.
2025-03-01ggc: Fix up ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor [PR117047]Jakub Jelinek1-1/+1
Apparently I got one of the !HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS fallbacks wrong. It compiled with a warning: ../../gcc/ggc-common.cc: In function 'void* ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor(size_t, void (*)(void*), size_t, size_t)': ../../gcc/ggc-common.cc:154:44: warning: unused parameter 'size' [-Wunused-parameter] 154 | ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor (size_t size, void (*f)(void *), | ~~~~~~~^~~~ and obviously didn't work right (always allocated 0-sized objects). Fixed thusly. 2025-03-01 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR jit/117047 * ggc-common.cc (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor): Pass size rather than s as the first argument to ggc_internal_cleared_alloc.
2025-03-01Fortran: fix front-end memleak after failure during parsing of NULLIFYHarald Anlauf2-0/+3
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * match.cc (gfc_match_nullify): Free matched expression when cleaning up. * primary.cc (match_variable): Initialize result to NULL.
2025-03-01[PR target/118906] [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Fix a typo in zce to zcf implicationYuriy Kolerov5-1/+25
zce must imply zcf but this rule was corrupted after refactoring in 9e12010b5e724277ea. This may be observed ater generating an .s file from any source code file with -mriscv-attribute -march=rv32if_zce -mabi=ilp32 -S options. A full march will be presented in arch attribute: rv32i2p1_f2p2_zicsr2p0_zca1p0_zcb1p0_zce1p0_zcmp1p0_zcmt1p0 As you see, zcf is not presented here though f_zce pair is passed in -march. According to The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual: Specifying Zce on RV32 with F includes Zca, Zcb, Zcmp, Zcmt and Zcf. PR target/118906 gcc/ChangeLog: * common/config/riscv/riscv-common.cc: fix zce to zcf implication. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-zce-1.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-zce-2.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-zce-3.c: New test. * gcc.target/riscv/attribute-zce-4.c: New test.
2025-03-01[PATCH] H8/300, libgcc: PR target/114222 For HImode call internal ffs() ↵Jan Dubiec3-0/+51
implementation instead of an external one When INT_TYPE_SIZE < BITS_PER_WORD gcc emits a call to an external ffs() implementation instead of a call to "__builtin_ffs()" – see function init_optabs() in <SRCROOT>/gcc/optabs-libfuncs.cc. External ffs() (which is usually the one from newlib) in turn calls __builtin_ffs() what causes infinite recursion and stack overflow. This patch overrides default gcc bahaviour for H8/300H (and newer) and provides a generic ffs() implementation for HImode. PR target/114222 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/h8300/h8300.cc (h8300_init_libfuncs): For HImode override calls to external ffs() (from newlib) with calls to __ffshi2() from libgcc. The implementation of ffs() in newlib calls __builtin_ffs() what causes infinite recursion and finally a stack overflow. libgcc/ChangeLog: * config/h8300/t-h8300: Add __ffshi2(). * config/h8300/ffshi2.c: New file.
2025-03-01input: Fix UB during self-tests [PR119052]Jakub Jelinek1-5/+12
As the comment in check_line says: /* get_buffer is not null terminated, but the sscanf stops after a number. */ the buffer is not null terminated, there is line.length () to determine the size of the line. But unlike what the comment says, sscanf actually still requires null terminated string argument, anything else is UB. E.g. glibc when initializing the temporary FILE stream for the string does if (size == 0) end = strchr (ptr, '\0'); and this strchr/rawmemchr is what shows up in valgrind report on cc1/cc1plus doing self-tests. The function is used only in a test with 1000 lines, each containg its number, so numbers from 1 to 1000 inclusive (each time with '\n' separator, but that isn't included in line.length ()). So the function just uses a temporary buffer which can fit numbers from 1 to 1000 as strings with terminating '\0' and runs sscanf on that (why not strtoul?). Furthermore, the caller allocated number of lines * 15 bytes for the string, but 1000\n is 5 bytes, so I think * 5 is more than enough. 2025-03-01 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR other/119052 * input.cc (check_line): Don't call sscanf on non-null terminated buffer, instead copy line.length () bytes from line.get_buffer () to a local buffer, null terminate it and call sscanf on that. Formatting fix. (test_replacement): Just allocate maxline * 5 rather than maxline * 15 bytes for the file. Formatting fix.
2025-03-01Daily bump.GCC Administrator11-1/+340
2025-03-01ggc: Avoid using ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC for allocations that need finalization ↵Jakub Jelinek9-17/+211
[PR117047] As analyzed by Andrew/David/Richi/Sam in the PR, the reason for the libgccjit ICE is that there are GC allocations with finalizers and we still mark ggc_internal_{,cleared_}alloc with ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC, which to the optimizers hints that nothing will actually read the state of the objects when they get out of lifetime. The finalizer actually inspects those though. What actually happens in the testcases is that on tree expr_size = TYPE_SIZE (expr->get_type ()->as_tree ()); we see that expr->get_type () was allocated using something with malloc attribute but it doesn't escape and only the type size from it is queried, so there is no need to store other members of it. Except that it does escape in the GC internals. Normal GC allocations are fine, they don't look at the data in the allocated objects on "free", but the ones with finalizers actually call a function on that object and expect the data to be in there. So that we don't lose ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC for the common case when no finalization is needed, the following patch uses the approach used e.g. for glibc error function which can sometimes be noreturn but at other times just return normally. If possible, it uses __attribute__((alias ("..."))) to add an alias to the function, where one is without ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC and one (with _no_dtor suffix) is with ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC (note, as this is C++ and I didn't want to hardcode particular mangling I used an extern "C" function with 2 aliases to it), and otherwise adds a wrapper (for the ggc-page/ggc-common case with noinline attribute if possible, for ggc-none that doesn't matter because ggc-none doesn't support finalizers). The *_no_dtor aliases/wrappers are then used in inline functions which pass unconditional NULL, 0 as the f/s pair. 2025-03-01 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR jit/117047 * acinclude.m4 (gcc_CHECK_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS): New. * configure.ac: Add gcc_CHECK_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS. * ggc.h (ggc_internal_alloc): Remove ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC from overload with finalizer pointer. Call ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor in inline overload without finalizer pointer. (ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor): Declare. (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc): Remove ATTRIBUTE_MALLOC from overload with finalizer pointer. Call ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor in inline overload without finalizer pointer. (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor): Declare. (ggc_alloc): Call ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor if no finalization is needed. (ggc_alloc_no_dtor): Call ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor. (ggc_cleared_alloc): Call ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor if no finalization is needed. (ggc_vec_alloc): Call ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor if no finalization is needed. (ggc_cleared_vec_alloc): Call ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor if no finalization is needed. * ggc-page.cc (ggc_internal_alloc): If HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, turn overload with finalizer into alias to ggc_internal_alloc_ and rename it to ... (ggc_internal_alloc_): ... this, make it extern "C". (ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor): New alias if HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, otherwise new noinline wrapper. * ggc-common.cc (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc): If HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, turn overload with finalizer into alias to ggc_internal_alloc_ and rename it to ... (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_): ... this, make it extern "C". (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor): New alias if HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, otherwise new noinline wrapper. * ggc-none.cc (ggc_internal_alloc): If HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, turn overload with finalizer into alias to ggc_internal_alloc_ and rename it to ... (ggc_internal_alloc_): ... this, make it extern "C". (ggc_internal_alloc_no_dtor): New alias if HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, otherwise new wrapper. (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc): If HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, turn overload with finalizer into alias to ggc_internal_alloc_ and rename it to ... (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_): ... this, make it extern "C". (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor): New alias if HAVE_ATTRIBUTE_ALIAS, otherwise new wrapper. * genmatch.cc (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc, ggc_free): Formatting fix. (ggc_internal_cleared_alloc_no_dtor): Define. * config.in: Regenerate. * configure: Regenerate.
2025-03-01openmp: Fix up simd clone mask argument creation on x86 [PR115871]Jakub Jelinek2-1/+11
The following testcase ICEs since r14-5057. The Intel vector ABI says that in the ZMM case the masks is passed in unsigned int or unsigned long long arguments and how many bits in them and how many of those arguments are is determined by the characteristic data type of the function. In the testcase simdlen is 32 and characteristic data type is double, so return as well as first argument is passed in 4 V8DFmode arguments and the mask is supposed to be passed in 4 unsigned int arguments (8 bits in each). Before the r14-5057 change there was sc->args[i].orig_type = parm_type; ... case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_LINEAR_VAL_CONSTANT_STEP: case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_LINEAR_VAL_VARIABLE_STEP: case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_VECTOR: if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (parm_type) || POINTER_TYPE_P (parm_type)) veclen = sc->vecsize_int; else veclen = sc->vecsize_float; if (known_eq (veclen, 0U)) veclen = sc->simdlen; else veclen = exact_div (veclen, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (parm_type))); for the argument handling and if (sc->inbranch) { tree base_type = simd_clone_compute_base_data_type (sc->origin, sc); ... if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (base_type) || POINTER_TYPE_P (base_type)) veclen = sc->vecsize_int; else veclen = sc->vecsize_float; if (known_eq (veclen, 0U)) veclen = sc->simdlen; else veclen = exact_div (veclen, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (base_type))); for the mask handling. r14-5057 moved this argument creation later and unified that: case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_MASK: case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_LINEAR_VAL_CONSTANT_STEP: case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_LINEAR_VAL_VARIABLE_STEP: case SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_VECTOR: if (sc->args[i].arg_type == SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_MASK && sc->mask_mode != VOIDmode) elem_type = boolean_type_node; else elem_type = TREE_TYPE (sc->args[i].vector_type); if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (elem_type) || POINTER_TYPE_P (elem_type)) veclen = sc->vecsize_int; else veclen = sc->vecsize_float; if (known_eq (veclen, 0U)) veclen = sc->simdlen; else veclen = exact_div (veclen, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (SCALAR_TYPE_MODE (elem_type))); This is correct for the argument cases (so linear or vector) (though POINTER_TYPE_P will never appear as TREE_TYPE of a vector), but the boolean_type_node in there is completely bogus, when using AVX512 integer masks as I wrote above we need the characteristic data type, not bool, and bool is strange in that it has bitsize of 8 (or 32 on darwin), while the masks are 1 bit per lane anyway. Fixed thusly. 2025-03-01 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR middle-end/115871 * omp-simd-clone.cc (simd_clone_adjust): For SIMD_CLONE_ARG_TYPE_MASK and sc->mask_mode not VOIDmode, set elem_type to the characteristic type rather than boolean_type_node. * gcc.dg/gomp/simd-clones-8.c: New test.
2025-02-28[PATCH] H8/300: PR target/109189 Silence -Wformat warnings on WindowsJan Dubiec1-11/+11
This patch fixes annoying -Wformat warnings when gcc is built on Windows/MinGW64. Instead of %ld it uses HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC macro, just like many other targets do. PR target/109189 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/h8300/h8300.cc (h8300_print_operand): Replace %ld format strings with HOST_WIDE_INT_PRINT_DEC macro in order to silence -Wformat warnings when building on Windows/MinGW64.
2025-03-01testsuite: Fix up toplevel-asm-1.c for LoongArchXi Ruoyao1-1/+1
Like RISC-V, on LoongArch we don't really support %cN for SYMBOL_REFs even with -fno-pic. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * c-c++-common/toplevel-asm-1.c: Use %cc3 %cc4 instead of %c3 %c4 on LoongArch.
2025-02-28libstdc++: Fix ranges::iter_move handling of rvalues [PR106612]Jonathan Wakely2-9/+119
The specification for std::ranges::iter_move apparently requires us to handle types which do not satisfy std::indirectly_readable, for example with overloaded operator* which behaves differently for different value categories. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/106612 * include/bits/iterator_concepts.h (_IterMove::__iter_ref_t): New alias template. (_IterMove::__result): Use __iter_ref_t instead of std::iter_reference_t. (_IterMove::__type): Remove incorrect __dereferenceable constraint. (_IterMove::operator()): Likewise. Add correct constraints. Use __iter_ref_t instead of std::iter_reference_t. Forward parameter as correct value category. (iter_swap): Add comments. * testsuite/24_iterators/customization_points/iter_move.cc: Test that iter_move is found by ADL and that rvalue arguments are handled correctly. Reviewed-by: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
2025-02-28libstdc++: Fix ranges::move and ranges::move_backward to use iter_move ↵Jonathan Wakely3-6/+78
[PR105609] The ranges::move and ranges::move_backward algorithms are supposed to use ranges::iter_move(iter) instead of std::move(*iter), which matters for an iterator type with an iter_move overload findable by ADL. Currently those algorithms use std::__assign_one which uses std::move, so define a new ranges::__detail::__assign_one helper function that uses ranges::iter_move. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/105609 * include/bits/ranges_algobase.h (__detail::__assign_one): New helper function. (__copy_or_move, __copy_or_move_backward): Use new function instead of std::__assign_one. * testsuite/25_algorithms/move/constrained.cc: Check that ADL iter_move is used in preference to std::move. * testsuite/25_algorithms/move_backward/constrained.cc: Likewise.
2025-02-28libstdc++: Add static_assertions to ranges::to adaptor factory [PR112803]Jonathan Wakely2-0/+23
The standard requires that we reject attempts to create a ranges::to adaptor for cv-qualified types and non-class types. Currently we only diagnose it once the adaptor is used in a pipeline. This adds static assertions to diagnose it immediately. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/112803 * include/std/ranges (ranges::to): Add static assertions to enforce Mandates conditions. * testsuite/std/ranges/conv/112803.cc: New test.
2025-02-28d: Fix comparing uninitialized memory in dstruct.d [PR116961]Iain Buclaw5-14/+21
Floating-point emulation in the D front-end is done via a type named `struct longdouble`, which in GDC is a small interface around the real_value type. Because the D code cannot include gcc/real.h directly, a big enough buffer is used for the data instead. On x86_64, this buffer is actually bigger than real_value itself, so when a new longdouble object is created with longdouble r; real_from_string3 (&r.rv (), buffer, mode); return r; there is uninitialized padding at the end of `r`. This was never a problem when D was implemented in C++ (until GCC 12) as comparing two longdouble objects with `==' would be forwarded to the relevant operator== overload that extracted the underlying real_value. However when the front-end was translated to D, such conditions were instead rewritten into identity comparisons return exp.toReal() is CTFloat.zero The `is` operator gets lowered as a call to `memcmp() == 0', which is where the read of uninitialized memory occurs, as seen by valgrind. ==26778== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==26778== at 0x911F41: dmd.dstruct._isZeroInit(dmd.expression.Expression) (dstruct.d:635) ==26778== by 0x9123BE: StructDeclaration::finalizeSize() (dstruct.d:373) ==26778== by 0x86747C: dmd.aggregate.AggregateDeclaration.determineSize(ref const(dmd.location.Loc)) (aggregate.d:226) [...] To avoid accidentally reading uninitialized data, explicitly initialize all `longdouble` variables with an empty constructor on C++ side of the implementation before initializing underlying real_value type it holds. PR d/116961 gcc/d/ChangeLog: * d-codegen.cc (build_float_cst): Change new_value type from real_t to real_value. * d-ctfloat.cc (CTFloat::fabs): Default initialize the return value. (CTFloat::ldexp): Likewise. (CTFloat::parse): Likewise. * d-longdouble.cc (longdouble::add): Likewise. (longdouble::sub): Likewise. (longdouble::mul): Likewise. (longdouble::div): Likewise. (longdouble::mod): Likewise. (longdouble::neg): Likewise. * d-port.cc (Port::isFloat32LiteralOutOfRange): Likewise. (Port::isFloat64LiteralOutOfRange): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdc.dg/pr116961.d: New test.
2025-02-28c++: fix rejects-valid and ICE with constexpr NSDMI [PR110822]Marek Polacek3-1/+54
Since r10-7718 the attached tests produce an ICE in verify_address: error: constant not recomputed when 'ADDR_EXPR' changed but before that we wrongly rejected the tests with "is not a constant expression". This patch fixes both problems. Since r10-7718 replace_decl_r can replace {._M_dataplus=&<retval>._M_local_buf, ._M_local_buf=0} with {._M_dataplus=&HelloWorld._M_local_buf, ._M_local_buf=0} The initial &<retval>._M_local_buf was not constant, but since HelloWorld is a static VAR_DECL, the resulting &HelloWorld._M_local_buf should have been marked as TREE_CONSTANT. And since we're taking its address, the whole thing should be TREE_ADDRESSABLE. PR c++/114913 PR c++/110822 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (replace_decl_r): If we've replaced something inside of an ADDR_EXPR, call cxx_mark_addressable and recompute_tree_invariant_for_addr_expr on the resulting ADDR_EXPR. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nsdmi4.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nsdmi5.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-02-28c++: ICE in replace_decl [PR118986]Marek Polacek2-9/+43
Yet another problem that started with r15-6052, compile time evaluation of prvalues. cp_fold_r/TARGET_EXPR sees: TARGET_EXPR <D.2701, <<< Unknown tree: expr_stmt D.2701.__p = TARGET_EXPR <D.2684, <<< Unknown tree: aggr_init_expr 3 f1 D.2684 >>>> >>>> so when we call maybe_constant_init, the object we're initializing is D.2701, and the init is the expr_stmt. We unwrap the EXPR_STMT/INIT_EXPR/TARGET_EXPR in maybe_constant_init_1 and so end up evaluating the f1 call. But f1 returns c2 whereas the type of D.2701 is ._anon_0 -- the closure. So then we crash in replace_decl on: gcc_checking_assert (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (TREE_TYPE (decl), TREE_TYPE (replacement))); due to the mismatched types. cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr is already ready for the types to be different, in which case the result isn't constant. But replace_decl is called before that check. I'm leaving the assert in replace_decl on purpose, maybe we'll find another use for it. PR c++/118986 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_call_expression): Check that the types match before calling replace_decl, if not, set *non_constant_p. (maybe_constant_init_1): Don't strip INIT_EXPR if it would change the type of the expression. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-prvalue1.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-02-28ipa-sra: Avoid clashes with ipa-cp when pulling accesses across calls (PR ↵Martin Jambor2-10/+68
118243) Among other things, IPA-SRA checks whether splitting out a bit of an aggregate or something passed by reference would lead into a clash with an already known IPA-CP constant a way which would cause problems later on. Unfortunately the test is done only in adjust_parameter_descriptions and is missing when accesses are propagated from callees to callers, which leads to miscompilation reported as PR 118243 (where the callee is a function created by ipa-split). The matter is then further complicated by the fact that we consider complex numbers as scalars even though they can be modified piecemeal (IPA-CP can detect and propagate the pieces separately too) which then confuses the parameter manipulation machinery furter. This patch simply adds the missing check to avoid the IPA-SRA transform in these cases too, which should be suitable for backporting to all affected release branches. It is a bit of a shame as in the PR testcase we do propagate both components of the complex number in question and the transformation phase could recover. I have some prototype patches in this direction but that is something for (a) stage 1. gcc/ChangeLog: 2025-02-10 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> PR ipa/118243 * ipa-sra.cc (pull_accesses_from_callee): New parameters caller_ipcp_ts and param_idx. Check that scalar pulled accesses would not clash with a known IPA-CP aggregate constant. (param_splitting_across_edge): Pass IPA-CP transformation summary and caller parameter index to pull_accesses_from_callee. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2025-02-10 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> PR ipa/118243 * g++.dg/ipa/pr118243.C: New test.
2025-02-28c++: generic lambda, implicit 'this' capture, xobj memfn [PR119038]Patrick Palka2-4/+14
When a generic lambda calls an overload set containing an iobj member function we speculatively capture 'this'. We need to do the same for an xobj member function. PR c++/119038 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * lambda.cc (maybe_generic_this_capture): Consider xobj member functions as well, not just iobj. Update function comment. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp23/explicit-obj-lambda15.C: New test. Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
2025-02-28libstdc++: Improve optional's <=> constraint recursion workaround [PR104606]Patrick Palka1-1/+2
It turns out the reason the behavior of this testcase changed after CWG 2369 is because validity of the substituted return type is now checked later, after constraints. So a more reliable workaround for this issue is to add a constraint to check the validity of the return type earlier, matching the pre-CWG 2369 semantics. PR libstdc++/104606 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/optional (operator<=>): Revert r14-9771 change. Add constraint checking the validity of the return type compare_three_way_result_t before the three_way_comparable_with constraint. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
2025-02-28libstdc++: Fix constraint recursion in basic_const_iterator relops [PR112490]Patrick Palka2-8/+20
Here for using RCI = reverse_iterator<basic_const_iterator<vector<int>::iterator>> static_assert(std::totally_ordered<RCI>); we effectively need to check the requirement requires (RCI x) { x RELOP x; } for each RELOP in {<, >, <=, >=} which we expect to be straightforwardly satisfied by reverse_iterator's namespace-scope relops. But due to ADL we find ourselves also considering the basic_const_iterator relop friends, which before CWG 2369 would be quickly discarded since RCI clearly isn't convertible to basic_const_iterator. After CWG 2369 though we must first check these relops' constraints (with _It = vector<int>::iterator and _It2 = RCI), which entails checking totally_ordered<RCI> recursively. This patch fixes this by turning the problematic non-dependent function parameters of type basic_const_iterator<_It> into dependent ones of type basic_const_iterator<_It3> where _It3 is constrained to match _It. Thus the basic_const_iterator relop friends now get quickly discarded during deduction and before the constraint check if the second operand isn't a specialization of basic_const_iterator (or derived from one) like before CWG 2369. PR libstdc++/112490 libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/stl_iterator.h (basic_const_iterator::operator<): Replace non-dependent basic_const_iterator function parameter with a dependent one of type basic_const_iterator<_It3> where _It3 matches _It. (basic_const_iterator::operator>): Likewise. (basic_const_iterator::operator<=): Likewise. (basic_const_iterator::operator>=): Likewise. * testsuite/24_iterators/const_iterator/112490.cc: New test. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>
2025-02-28c++: Fix cxx_eval_store_expression {REAL,IMAG}PART_EXPR handling [PR119045]Jakub Jelinek2-2/+20
I've added the asserts that probe == target because {REAL,IMAG}PART_EXPR always implies a scalar type and so applying ARRAY_REF/COMPONENT_REF etc. on it further doesn't make sense and the later code relies on it to be the last one in refs array. But as the following testcase shows, we can fail those assertions in case there is a reference or pointer to the __real__ or __imag__ part, in that case we just evaluate the constant expression and so probe won't be the same as target. That case doesn't push anything into the refs array though. The following patch changes those asserts to verify that refs is still empty, which fixes it. 2025-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/119045 * constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_store_expression) <case REALPART_EXPR>: Assert that refs->is_empty () rather than probe == target. (cxx_eval_store_expression) <case IMAGPART_EXPR>: Likewise. * g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-complex2.C: New test.
2025-02-28c++: Adjust #embed support for P1967R14Jakub Jelinek9-12/+39
Now that the #embed paper has been voted in, the following patch removes the pedwarn for C++26 on it (and adjusts pedwarn warning for older C++ versions) and predefines __cpp_pp_embed FTM. Also, the patch changes cpp_error to cpp_pedwarning with for C++ -Wc++26-extensions guarding, and for C add -Wc11-c23-compat warning about #embed. I believe we otherwise implement everything in the paper already, except I'm really confused by the [Example: #embed <data.dat> limit(__has_include("a.h")) #if __has_embed(<data.dat> limit(__has_include("a.h"))) // ill-formed: __has_include [cpp.cond] cannot appear here #endif — end example] part. My reading of both C23 and C++ with the P1967R14 paper in is that the first case (#embed with __has_include or __has_embed in its clauses) is what is clearly invalid and so the ill-formed note should be for #embed. And the __has_include/__has_embed in __has_embed is actually questionable. Both C and C++ have something like "The identifiers __has_include, __has_embed, and __has_c_attribute shall not appear in any context not mentioned in this subclause." or "The identifiers __has_include and __has_cpp_attribute shall not appear in any context not mentioned in this subclause." (into which P1967R14 adds __has_embed) in the conditional inclusion subclause. #embed is defined in a different one, so using those in there is invalid (unless "using the rules specified for conditional inclusion" wording e.g. in limit clause overrides that). The reason why I think it is fuzzy for __has_embed is that __has_embed is actually defined in the Conditional inclusion subclause (so that would mean one can use __has_include, __has_embed and __has_*attribute in there) but its clauses are described in a different one. GCC currently accepts #embed __FILE__ limit (__has_include (<stdarg.h>)) #if __has_embed (__FILE__ limit (__has_include (<stdarg.h>))) #endif #embed __FILE__ limit (__has_embed (__FILE__)) #if __has_embed (__FILE__ limit (__has_embed (__FILE__))) #endif Note, it isn't just about limit clause, but also about prefix/suffix/if_empty, except that in those cases the "using the rules specified for conditional inclusion" doesn't apply. In any case, I'd hope that can be dealt with incrementally (and should be handled the same for both C and C++). 2025-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> libcpp/ * include/cpplib.h (enum cpp_warning_reason): Add CPP_W_CXX26_EXTENSIONS enumerator. * init.cc (lang_defaults): Set embed for GNUCXX26 and CXX26. * directives.cc (do_embed): Adjust pedwarn wording for embed in C++, use cpp_pedwarning instead of cpp_error and add CPP_W_C11_C23_COMPAT warning of cpp_pedwarning hasn't diagnosed anything. gcc/c-family/ * c.opt (Wc++26-extensions): Add CppReason(CPP_W_CXX26_EXTENSIONS). * c-cppbuiltin.cc (c_cpp_builtins): Predefine __cpp_pp_embed=202502 for C++26. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/cpp/embed-1.C: Adjust for pedwarn wording change and don't expect any error for C++26. * g++.dg/cpp/embed-2.C: Adjust for pedwarn wording change and don't expect any warning for C++26. * g++.dg/cpp26/feat-cxx26.C: Test __cpp_pp_embed value. * gcc.dg/cpp/embed-17.c: New test.
2025-02-28lto/91299 - weak definition inlined with LTORichard Biener3-1/+23
The following fixes a thinko in the handling of interposed weak definitions which confused the interposition check in get_availability by setting DECL_EXTERNAL too early. PR lto/91299 gcc/lto/ * lto-symtab.cc (lto_symtab_merge_symbols): Set DECL_EXTERNAL only after calling get_availability. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.dg/lto/pr91299_0.c: New testcase. * gcc.dg/lto/pr91299_1.c: Likewise.
2025-02-28ipa/111245 - bogus modref analysis for store in call that might throwRichard Biener2-2/+24
We currently record a kill for *x_4(D) = always_throws (); because we consider the store always executing since the appropriate check for whether the stmt could throw is guarded by !cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions. PR ipa/111245 * ipa-modref.cc (modref_access_analysis::analyze_store): Do not guard the check of whether the stmt could throw by cfun->can_throw_non_call_exceptions. * g++.dg/torture/pr111245.C: New testcase.
2025-02-28ifcvt: Fix ICE with (fix:SI (fix:DF (reg:DF))) [PR117712]Jakub Jelinek2-1/+26
As documented in the manual, FIX/UNSIGNED_FIX from floating point mode to integral mode has unspecified rounding and FIX from floating point mode to the same floating point mode is expressing rounding toward zero. So, some targets (arc, arm, csky, m68k, mmix, nds32, pdp11, sparc and visium) use (fix:SI (fix:SF (match_operand:SF 1 "..._operand"))) etc. to express the rounding toward zero during conversion to integer. For some reason other targets don't use that. Anyway, the 2 FIXes (or inner FIX with outer UNSIGNED_FIX) cause problems since the r15-2890 which removed some strict checks in ifcvt.cc on what SET_SRC can be actually conditionalized (I must say I'm still worried about the change, don't know why one can't get e.g. inline asm or something with UNSPEC or some complex backend specific RTLs that force_operand can't handle), force_operand just ICEs on it, it can only handle (through expand_fix) conversions from floating point to integral. The following patch fixes this by detecting this case and just pretend the inner FIX isn't there, i.e. call expand_fix with the inner FIX's operand instead, which works and on targets like arm it will just create the nested FIXes again. 2025-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR rtl-optimization/117712 * expr.cc (force_operand): Handle {,UNSIGNED_}FIX with FIX operand using expand_fix on the inner FIX operand. * gcc.dg/pr117712.c: New test.
2025-02-28tree-optimization/87984 - hard register assignments not preservedRichard Biener3-1/+28
The following disables redundant store elimination to hard register variables which isn't valid. PR tree-optimization/87984 * tree-ssa-dom.cc (dom_opt_dom_walker::optimize_stmt): Do not perform redundant store elimination to hard register variables. * tree-ssa-sccvn.cc (eliminate_dom_walker::eliminate_stmt): Likewise. * gcc.target/i386/pr87984.c: New testcase.
2025-02-28middle-end/66279 - gimplification clobbers shared asm constraintsRichard Biener2-0/+24
When the C++ frontend clones a CTOR we do not copy ASM_EXPR constraints fully as walk_tree does not recurse to TREE_PURPOSE of TREE_LIST nodes. At this point doing that seems too dangerous so the following instead avoids gimplification of ASM_EXPRs to clobber the shared constraints and unshares it there, like it also unshares TREE_VALUE when it re-writes a "+" output constraint to separate "=" output and matching input constraint. PR middle-end/66279 * gimplify.cc (gimplify_asm_expr): Copy TREE_PURPOSE before rewriting it for "+" processing. * g++.dg/pr66279.C: New testcase.
2025-02-28testsuite: Remove -m32 from another i386/ testJakub Jelinek1-1/+1
I found another test which uses -m32 in gcc.target/i386/ . Similarly to the previously posted test, the test ought to be tested during i686-linux testing or x86_64-linux test with --target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} There is nothing ia32 specific on the test, so I've just dropped the -m32. 2025-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> * gcc.target/i386/strub-pr118006.c: Remove -m32 from dg-options.
2025-02-28testsuite: Fix up gcc.target/i386/pr118940.c test [PR118940]Jakub Jelinek1-124/+27
The testcase uses -m32 in dg-options, something we try hard not to do, if something should be tested only for -m32, it is { target ia32 } test, if it can be tested for -m64/-mx32 too, just some extra options are needed for ia32, it should have dg-additional-options with ia32 target. Also, the test wasn't reduced, so I've reduced it using cvise and manual tweaks and verified the test still FAILs before r15-7700 and succeeds with current trunk. 2025-02-28 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR target/118940 * gcc.target/i386/pr118940.c: Drop -w, -g and -m32 from dg-options, move -march=i386 -mregparm=3 to dg-additional-options for ia32 and -fno-pie to dg-additional-options for pie. Reduce the test.
2025-02-28Fortran: Ensure finalizer is called for unreferenced variable [PR118730]Andre Vehreschild5-3/+44
PR fortran/118730 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * resolve.cc: Mark unused derived type variable with finalizers referenced to execute finalizer when leaving scope. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/class_array_15.f03: Remove unused variable. * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_7.f90: Adapt scan-tree-dump expr. * gfortran.dg/coarray_poly_8.f90: Same. * gfortran.dg/finalize_60.f90: New test.
2025-02-28MAINTAINERS: add myself to write after approval and DCOGiuseppe D'Angelo1-0/+2
ChangeLog: * MAINTAINERS: Added myself as write after approval and DCO.
2025-02-28x86: Move TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P to i386.ccH.J. Lu2-6/+6
Move the TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P target hook from i386.h to i386.cc. * config/i386/i386.h (TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P): Moved to ... * config/i386/i386.cc (TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P): Here. Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
2025-02-28Daily bump.GCC Administrator8-1/+214
2025-02-28RISC-V: Fix bug for expand_const_vector interleave [PR118931]Pan Li2-7/+48
This patch would like to fix one bug when expanding const vector for the interleave case. For example, we have: base1 = 151 step = 121 For vec_series, we will generate vector in format of v[i] = base + i * step. Then the vec_series will have below result for HImode, and we can find that the result overflow to the highest 8 bits of HImode. v1.b = {151, 255, 7, 0, 119, 0, 231, 0, 87, 1, 199, 1, 55, 2, 167, 2} Aka we expect v1.b should be: v1.b = {151, 0, 7, 0, 119, 0, 231, 0, 87, 0, 199, 0, 55, 0, 167, 0} After that it will perform the IOR with v2 for the base2(aka another series). v2.b = {0, 17, 0, 33, 0, 49, 0, 65, 0, 81, 0, 97, 0, 113, 0, 129} Unfortunately, the base1 + i * step1 in HImode may overflow to the high 8 bits, and the high 8 bits will pollute the v2 and result in incorrect value in const_vector. This patch would like to perform the overflow to smode check before the optimized interleave code generation. If overflow or VLA, it will fall back to the default merge approach. The below test suites are passed for this patch. * The rv64gcv fully regression test. PR target/118931 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (expand_const_vector): Add overflow to smode check and clean up highest bits if overflow. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/pr118931-run-1.c: New test. Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
2025-02-27libphobos: Run unittest tests with dg-runtest.Iain Buclaw1-1/+3
Use `dg-runtest' test driver rather than `dg-test' to run the libphobos unittest testsuite, same as all other libphobos tests. This prevents the tests from being ran multiple times when parallelized. Set `libphobos_test_name' as well so that all tests get a unique name. libphobos/ChangeLog: * testsuite/libphobos.unittest/unittest.exp: Use `dg-runtest' rather than `dg-test'. Set `libphobos_test_name'.
2025-02-27libstdc++: Fix outdated comment in <stacktrace>Jonathan Wakely1-1/+1
My r15-998-g2a83084ce55363 change replaced the use of nothrow operator new with a call to __get_temporary_buffer, so update the comment to match. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/std/stacktrace (_Impl::_M_allocate): Fix outdated comment.
2025-02-27gimple-fold: Fix a pasto in fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine [PR119030]Jakub Jelinek2-1/+27
The following testcase is miscompiled since r15-7597. The left comparison is unsigned (x & 0x8000U) != 0) while the right one is signed (x >> 16) >= 0 and is actually a signbit test, so rsignbit is 64. After debugging this and reading the r15-7597 change, I believe there is just a pasto, the if (lsignbit) and if (rsignbit) blocks are pretty much identical with just the first l on all variables starting with l replaced with r (the only difference is that if (lsignbit) has a comment explaining the sign <<= 1; stuff, while it isn't repeated in the second one. Except the second one was using ll_unsignedp instead of rl_unsignedp in one spot. I think it should use the latter, the signedness of the left comparison doesn't affect the other one, they are basically independent with the exception that we check that after transformations they are both EQ or both NE and later on we try to merge them together. 2025-02-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/119030 * gimple-fold.cc (fold_truth_andor_for_ifcombine): Fix a pasto, ll_unsignedp -> rl_unsignedp. * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr119030.c: New test.
2025-02-27input: Fix up ICEs with --param=file-cache-files=N for N > 16 [PR118860]Jakub Jelinek4-34/+49
The following testcase ICEs, because we first construct file_cache object inside of *global_dc, then process options and then call file_cache::tune. The earlier construction allocates the m_file_slots array (using new) based on the static data member file_cache::num_file_slots, but then tune changes it, without actually reallocating all m_file_slots arrays in already constructed file_cache objects. I think it is just weird to have the count be a static data member and the pointer be non-static data member, that is just asking for issues like this. So, this patch changes num_file_slots into m_num_file_slots and turns tune into a non-static member function and changes toplev.cc to call it on the global_gc->get_file_cache () object. And let's the tune just delete the array and allocate it freshly if there is a change in the number of slots or lines. Note, file_cache_slot has similar problem, but because there are many, I haven't moved the count into those objects; I just hope that when tune is called there is exactly one file_cache constructed and all the file_cache_slot objects constructed are pointed by its m_file_slots member, so also on lines change it just deletes it and allocates again. I think it should be unlikely that the cache actually has any used slots by the time it is called. 2025-02-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR middle-end/118860 * input.h (file_cache::tune): No longer static. Rename argument from num_file_slots_ to num_file_slots. Formatting fix. (file_cache::num_file_slots): Renamed to ... (file_cache::m_num_file_slots): ... this. No longer static. * input.cc (file_cache_slot::tune): Change return type from void to size_t, return previous file_cache_slot::line_record_size value. Formatting fixes. (file_cache::tune): Rename argument from num_file_slots_ to num_file_slots. Set m_num_file_slots rather than num_file_slots. If m_num_file_slots or file_cache_slot::line_record_size changes, delete[] m_file_slots and new it again. (file_cache::num_file_slots): Remove definition. (file_cache::lookup_file): Use m_num_file_slots rather than num_file_slots. (file_cache::evicted_cache_tab_entry): Likewise. (file_cache::file_cache): Likewise. Initialize m_num_file_slots to 16. (file_cache::dump): Use m_num_file_slots rather than num_file_slots. (file_cache_slot::get_next_line): Formatting fixes. (file_cache_slot::read_line_num): Likewise. (get_source_text_between): Likewise. * toplev.cc (toplev::main): Call global_dc->get_file_cache ().tune rather than file_cache::tune. * gcc.dg/pr118860.c: New test.
2025-02-27nvptx: '#define MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE 128'Thomas Schwinge2-5/+4
... instead of 64 via 'gcc/defaults.h': MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE GET_MODE_BITSIZE (DImode) This fixes ICEs: [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -Wc++-compat (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -Wc++-compat [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++17 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++17 [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++26 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++26 [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++98 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) [-UNRESOLVED:-]{+PASS:+} c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c -std=gnu++98 [-compilation failed to produce executable-]{+execution test+} [-FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O0 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) [-FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O1 (internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268)-] [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O2 (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors) PASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr116480-1.c -Os (test for excess errors) ..., where we ran into 'gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);' in 'gcc/internal-fn.cc:expand_fn_using_insn' for '__int128' '__builtin_clzg' etc.: during RTL pass: expand [...]/c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c: In function 'clzI': [...]/c-c++-common/pr111309-1.c:69:10: internal compiler error: in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:268 0x120ec2cf internal_error(char const*, ...) [...]/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517 0x102c7c5b fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*) [...]/gcc/diagnostic.cc:1722 0x109708eb expand_fn_using_insn [...]/gcc/internal-fn.cc:268 0x1098114f expand_internal_call(internal_fn, gcall*) [...]/gcc/internal-fn.cc:5273 0x1098114f expand_internal_call(gcall*) [...]/gcc/internal-fn.cc:5281 0x10594fc7 expand_call_stmt [...]/gcc/cfgexpand.cc:3049 [...] Likewise, as of commit e8ad697a75b0870a833366daf687668a57cabb6e "libstdc++: Use new type-generic built-ins in <bit> [PR118855]", the libstdc++ target library build ICEd in the same way. Additionally, this change fixes: [-FAIL:-]{+PASS:+} gcc.dg/pr105094.c (test for excess errors) ..., which was: [...]/gcc.dg/pr105094.c: In function 'foo': [...]/gcc.dg/pr105094.c:11:12: error: size of variable 's' is too large And, finally, regarding 'gcc.target/nvptx/stack_frame-1.c'. Before, in 'gcc/cfgexpand.cc': 'expand_used_vars' -> 'expand_used_vars_for_block' -> 'expand_one_var' for 'ww' -> 'gcc/function.cc:use_register_for_decl' due to 'DECL_MODE (decl) == BLKmode' did 'return false;', thus -> 'add_stack_var' (even if 'ww' wasn't then actually living on the stack). Now, 'ww' has 'TImode' and 'use_register_for_decl' does 'return true;', thus -> 'expand_one_register_var', and therefore no unused stack frame emitted. gcc/ * config/nvptx/nvptx.h (MAX_FIXED_MODE_SIZE): '#define'. gcc/testsuite/ * gcc.target/nvptx/stack_frame-1.c: Adjust.