aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-04-27fortran: Compare non-constant bound expressions. [PR105379]Mikael Morin3-11/+56
Starting with r12-8235-gfa5cd7102da676dcb1757b1288421f5f3439ae0e, class descriptor types are compared to detect duplicate declarations. This caused ICEs as the comparison of array spec supported only constant explicit bounds, but dummy class variable descriptor types can have a _data field with non-constant array spec bounds. This change adds support for non-constant bounds. For that, gfc_dep_compare_expr is used. It does probably more than strictly necessary, but using it avoids rewriting a specific comparison function, making mistakes and forgetting cases. PR fortran/103662 PR fortran/105379 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * array.cc (compare_bounds): Use bool as return type. Support non-constant expressions. (gfc_compare_array_spec): Update call to compare_bounds. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/class_dummy_8.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/class_dummy_9.f90: New test.
2022-04-27fortran: Avoid infinite self-recursion [PR105381]Mikael Morin2-3/+25
Dummy array decls are local decls different from the argument decl accessible through GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR. If the argument decl has a DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC set, it is copied over to the local decl at the time the latter is created, so that the DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC object is shared between local dummy decl and argument decl, and thus the GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR of the argument decl is the argument decl itself. The r12-8230-g7964ab6c364c410c34efe7ca2eba797d36525349 change introduced the non_negative_strides_array_p predicate which recurses through GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR to avoid seeing dummy decls as purely local decls. As the GFC_DECL_SAVED_DESCRIPTOR of the argument decl is itself, this can cause infinite recursion. This change adds a check to avoid infinite recursion. PR fortran/102043 PR fortran/105381 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * trans-array.cc (non_negative_strides_array_p): Inline variable orig_decl and merge nested if conditions. Add condition to not recurse if the next argument is the same as the current. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/character_array_dummy_1.f90: New test.
2022-04-27testsuite: Add arm testcase for PR105374Christophe Lyon1-0/+8
As discussed in the PR, here is the testcase with the appropriate dg-* directives. Tested on arm-none-eabi with 1 -mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv7ve+simd 2 -mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7ve+simd 3 -mthumb/-mcpu=cortex-a7/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7ve+simd 4 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv6s-m 5 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=soft/-march=armv7-m 6 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7e-m+fp 7 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv7e-m+fp.dp 8 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8-m.main+fp+dsp 9 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp+fp.dp 10 -mthumb/-mfloat-abi=hard/-march=armv8.1-m.main+mve The test is UNSUPPORTED with the first three ones (because of -mcpu=cortex-a7), ignored with armv6s-m, and PASSes with all the other ones, while it used crash without Jakub's fix (r12-8263), ie. FAIL with options 5,6,7,8,10. The test passed without Jakub's fix with option 9 because the problem happens only with an integer-only MVE. 2022-04-26 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@arm.com> gcc/testsuite/ PR tree-optimization/105374 * gcc.target/arm/simd/pr105374.C: New.
2022-04-27[Ada] Revert r12-6599 (Fix up handling of ghost units [PR104027])Pierre-Marie de Rodat1-5/+0
gcc/ada/ PR ada/104027 * gnat1drv.adb: Remove the goto End_Of_Program.
2022-04-27PR102024 - IBM Z: Add psabi diagnosticsAndreas Krebbel8-104/+187
For IBM Z in particular there is a problem with structs like: struct A { float a; int :0; }; Our ABI document allows passing a struct in an FPR only if it has exactly one member. On the other hand it says that structs of 1,2,4,8 bytes are passed in a GPR. So this struct is expected to be passed in a GPR. Since we don't return structs in registers (regardless of the number of members) it is always returned in memory. Situation is as follows: All compiler versions tested return it in memory - as expected. gcc 11, gcc 12, g++ 12, and clang 13 pass it in a GPR - as expected. g++ 11 as well as clang++ 13 pass in an FPR For IBM Z we stick to the current GCC 12 behavior, i.e. zero-width bitfields are NOT ignored. A struct as above will be passed in a GPR. Rational behind this is that not affecting the C ABI is more important here. A patch for clang is in progress: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122388 In addition to the usual regression test I ran the compat and struct-layout-1 testsuites comparing the compiler before and after the patch. gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/102024 * config/s390/s390-protos.h (s390_function_arg_vector): Remove prototype. * config/s390/s390.cc (s390_single_field_struct_p): New function. (s390_function_arg_vector): Invoke s390_single_field_struct_p. (s390_function_arg_float): Likewise. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/102024 * g++.target/s390/pr102024-1.C: New test. * g++.target/s390/pr102024-2.C: New test. * g++.target/s390/pr102024-3.C: New test. * g++.target/s390/pr102024-4.C: New test. * g++.target/s390/pr102024-5.C: New test. * g++.target/s390/pr102024-6.C: New test.
2022-04-27asan: Fix up asan_redzone_buffer::emit_redzone_byte [PR105396]Jakub Jelinek2-5/+28
On the following testcase, we have in main's frame 3 variables, some red zone padding, 4 byte d, followed by 12 bytes of red zone padding, then 8 byte b followed by 24 bytes of red zone padding, then 40 bytes c followed by some red zone padding. The intended content of shadow memory for that is (note, each byte describes 8 bytes of memory): f1 f1 f1 f1 04 f2 00 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3 left red d mr b middle r c right red zone f1 is left red zone magic f2 is middle red zone magic f3 is right red zone magic 00 when all 8 bytes are accessible 01-07 when only 1 to 7 bytes are accessible followed by inaccessible bytes The -fdump-rtl-expand-details dump makes it clear that it misbehaves: Flushing rzbuffer at offset -160 with: f1 f1 f1 f1 Flushing rzbuffer at offset -128 with: 04 f2 00 00 Flushing rzbuffer at offset -128 with: 00 00 00 f2 Flushing rzbuffer at offset -96 with: f2 f2 00 00 Flushing rzbuffer at offset -64 with: 00 00 00 f3 Flushing rzbuffer at offset -32 with: f3 f3 f3 f3 In the end we end up with f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3 f3 shadow bytes because at offset -128 there are 2 overlapping stores as asan_redzone_buffer::emit_redzone_byte has flushed the temporary 4 byte buffer in the middle. The function is called with an offset and value. If the passed offset is consecutive with the prev_offset + buffer size (off == offset), then we handle it correctly, similarly if the new offset is far enough from the old one (we then flush whatever was in the buffer and if needed add up to 3 bytes of 00 before actually pushing value. But what isn't handled correctly is when the offset isn't consecutive to what has been added last time, but it is in the same 4 byte word of shadow memory (32 bytes of actual memory), like the above case where we have consecutive 04 f2 and then skip one shadow memory byte (aka 8 bytes of real memory) and then want to emit f2. Emitting that as a store of little-endian 0x0000f204 followed by a store of 0xf2000000 to the same address doesn't work, we want to emit 0xf200f204. The following patch does that by pushing 1 or 2 00 bytes. Additionally, as a small cleanup, instead of using m_shadow_bytes.safe_push (value); flush_if_full (); in all of if, else if and else bodies it sinks those 2 stmts to the end of function as all do the same thing. 2022-04-27 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR sanitizer/105396 * asan.cc (asan_redzone_buffer::emit_redzone_byte): Handle the case where offset is bigger than off but smaller than m_prev_offset + 32 bits by pushing one or more 0 bytes. Sink the m_shadow_bytes.safe_push (value); flush_if_full (); statements from all cases to the end of the function. * gcc.dg/asan/pr105396.c: New test.
2022-04-26rs6000: Move V2DI vec_neg under power8-vector [PR105271]Kewen Lin2-3/+17
As PR105271 shows, __builtin_altivec_neg_v2di requires option -mpower8-vector as its pattern expansion relies on subv2di which has guard VECTOR_UNIT_P8_VECTOR_P (V2DImode). This fix is to move the related lines for __builtin_altivec_neg_v2di to the section of stanza power8-vector. PR target/105271 gcc/ChangeLog: * config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def (NEG_V2DI): Move to [power8-vector] stanza. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.target/powerpc/pr105271.c: New test.
2022-04-27Daily bump.GCC Administrator9-1/+167
2022-04-26c++: pack init-capture of unresolved overload [PR102629]Jason Merrill2-1/+25
Here we were failing to diagnose that the initializer for the capture pack is an unresolved overload. It turns out that the reason we didn't recognize the deduction failure in do_auto_deduction was that the individual 'auto' in the expansion of the capture pack was still marked as a parameter pack, so we were deducing it to an empty pack instead of failing. PR c++/102629 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (gen_elem_of_pack_expansion_instantiation): Clear TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARAMETER_PACK on auto. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-pack-init7.C: New test.
2022-04-26GCN: Make "gang-private data-share memory exhausted" error more verboseThomas Schwinge1-2/+3
[...]: error: 512 bytes of gang-private data-share memory exhausted (increase with ‘-mgang-private-size=560’, for example) gcc/ * config/gcn/gcn.cc (gcn_print_lds_decl): Make "gang-private data-share memory exhausted" error more verbose.
2022-04-26Update gcc sv.poJoseph Myers1-503/+335
* sv.po: Update.
2022-04-26c++: decltype of non-dependent call of class type [PR105386]Patrick Palka2-1/+16
We need to pass tf_decltype when instantiating a non-dependent decltype operand, like tsubst does in the dependent case, so that we don't force completion of a prvalue operand's class type. PR c++/105386 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * semantics.cc (finish_decltype_type): Pass tf_decltype to instantiate_non_dependent_expr_sfinae. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp0x/decltype81.C: New test.
2022-04-26lto: use diagnostics_context in print_lto_docs_linkMartin Liska1-3/+17
Properly parse OPT_fdiagnostics_urls_ and then initialize both urls and colors for global_dc. Doing that we would follow the configure option --with-documentation-root-url, -fdiagnostics-urls is respected. Plus we'll print colored warning and note messages. PR lto/105364 gcc/ChangeLog: * lto-wrapper.cc (print_lto_docs_link): Use global_dc. (run_gcc): Parse OPT_fdiagnostics_urls_. (main): Initialize global_dc.
2022-04-26libphobos: Don't call free on the TLS array in the emutls destroy function.Iain Buclaw1-4/+4
Fixes a segfault seen on Darwin when a GC scan is ran after a thread has been destroyed. As the global emutlsArrays hash still has a reference to the array itself, and tries to iterate all elements. Setting the length to zero frees all allocated elements in the array, and ensures that it is skipped when the _d_emutls_scan is called. libphobos/ChangeLog: * libdruntime/gcc/emutls.d (emutlsDestroyThread): Clear the per-thread TLS array, don't call free().
2022-04-26libstdc++: Add std::atomic<shared_ptr>(nullptr_t) constructor (LWG 3661)Jonathan Wakely2-0/+6
This DR was approved at the February 2022 plenary. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h (atomic<shared_ptr>): Add constructor for constant initialization from nullptr_t. * testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/atomic/atomic_shared_ptr.cc: Check for new constructor.
2022-04-26libstdc++: Define std::hash<std::filesystem::path> (LWG 3657)Jonathan Wakely2-0/+20
This DR was approved at the February 2022 plenary. libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/fs_path.h (hash<filesystem::path>): Define. * testsuite/27_io/filesystem/path/nonmember/hash_value.cc: Check std::hash specialization.
2022-04-26rs6000: Make the has_arch target selectors actually workSegher Boessenkool1-14/+14
2022-04-26 Segher Boessenkoool <segher@kernel.crashing.org> gcc/testsuite/ PR target/105349 * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr5): Use the specified dg-options. (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr6): Ditto. (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr7): Ditto. (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr8): Ditto. (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr9): Ditto. (check_effective_target_has_arch_pwr10): Ditto. (check_effective_target_has_arch_ppc64): Ditto.
2022-04-26ifcvt: Improve noce_try_store_flag_mask [PR105314]Jakub Jelinek2-3/+15
The following testcase regressed on riscv due to the splitting of critical edges in the sink pass, similarly to x86_64 compared to GCC 11 we now swap the edges, whether true or false edge goes to an empty forwarded bb. From GIMPLE POV, those 2 forms are equivalent, but as can be seen here, for some ifcvt opts it matters one way or another. On this testcase, noce_try_store_flag_mask used to trigger and transformed if (pseudo2) pseudo1 = 0; into pseudo1 &= -(pseudo2 == 0); But with the swapped edges ifcvt actually sees if (!pseudo2) pseudo3 = pseudo1; else pseudo3 = 0; and noce_try_store_flag_mask punts. IMHO there is no reason why it should punt those, it is equivalent to pseudo3 = pseudo1 & -(pseudo2 == 0); and especially if the target has 3 operand AND, it shouldn't be any more costly (and even with 2 operand AND, it might very well happen that RA can make it happen without any extra moves). Initially I've just removed the rtx_equal_p calls from the conditions and didn't add anything there, but that broke aarch64 bootstrap and regressed some testcases on x86_64, where if_info->a or if_info->b could be some larger expression that we can't force into a register. Furthermore, the case where both if_info->a and if_info->b are constants is better handled by other ifcvt optimizations like noce_try_store_flag or noce_try_inverse_constants or noce_try_store_flag_constants. So, I've restricted it to just a REG (perhaps SUBREG of REG might be ok too) next to what has been handled previously. 2022-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR rtl-optimization/105314 * ifcvt.cc (noce_try_store_flag_mask): Don't require that the non-zero operand is equal to if_info->x, instead use the non-zero operand as one of the operands of AND with if_info->x as target. * gcc.target/riscv/pr105314.c: New test.
2022-04-26reassoc: Don't call fold_convert if !fold_convertible_p [PR105374]Jakub Jelinek1-1/+5
As mentioned in the PR, we ICE because maybe_fold_*_comparisons returns an expression with V4SImode type and we try to fold_convert it to V4BImode, which isn't allowed. IMHO no matter whether we change maybe_fold_*_comparisons we should play safe on the reassoc side and punt if we can't convert like we punt for many other reasons. This fixes the testcase on ARM. Testcase not included, not exactly sure where and what directives it should have in gcc.target/arm/ testsuite. Christophe, do you think you could handle that incrementally? 2022-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/105374 * tree-ssa-reassoc.cc (eliminate_redundant_comparison): Punt if !fold_convertible_p rather than assuming fold_convert must succeed.
2022-04-26testsuite: Fix up g++.target/i386/vec-tmpl1.C testcase [PR65211]Jakub Jelinek1-0/+1
This test fails on i686-linux: Excess errors: .../gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/vec-tmpl1.C:13:27: warning: SSE vector return without SSE enabled changes the ABI [-Wpsabi] 2022-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR c++/65211 * g++.target/i386/vec-tmpl1.C: Add -Wno-psabi as dg-additional-options.
2022-04-26i386: Fix up ICE with -mveclibabi={acml,svml} [PR105367]Jakub Jelinek2-2/+16
The following testcase ICEs, because conversion between scalar float types which have the same mode are useless in GIMPLE, but for mathfn_built_in the exact type matters (it treats say double and _Float64 or float and _Float32 differently, using different suffixes and for the _Float* sometimes returning NULL when float/double do have a builtin). In ix86_veclibabi_{svml,acml} we are using mathfn_built_in just so that we don't have to translate the combined_fn and SFmode vs. DFmode into strings ourselfs, and we already earlier punt on anything but SFmode and DFmode. So, this patch just uses the double or float types depending on the modes, rather than the types we actually got and which might be _Float64 or _Float32 etc. 2022-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR target/105367 * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_veclibabi_svml, ix86_veclibabi_acml): Pass el_mode == DFmode ? double_type_node : float_type_node instead of TREE_TYPE (type_in) as first arguments to mathfn_built_in. * gcc.target/i386/pr105367.c: New test.
2022-04-26testsuite: Improve unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03 [PR103662]Jakub Jelinek2-3/+5
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > I have just pushed the attached fix for two UNRESOLVED checks at -O0 that I > hadn’t seen. I don't like forcing of DSE in -O0 compilation, wouldn't it be better to just not check the dse dump at -O0 like in the following patch? Even better would be to check that the z._data = stores are both present in *.optimized dump, but that doesn't really work at -O2 or above because we inline the functions and optimize it completely away (both the stores and corresponding reads). The first hunk is needed so that __OPTIMIZE__ effective target works in Fortran testsuite, otherwise one gets a pedantic error and __OPTIMIZE__ is considered not to match at all. 2022-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR fortran/103662 * lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target___OPTIMIZE__): Add a var definition to avoid pedwarn about empty translation unit. * gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03: Remove -ftree-dse from dg-additional-options, guard scan-tree-dump-not directives on __OPTIMIZE__ target.
2022-04-26libgomp: Fix up two non-GOMP_USE_ALIGNED_WORK_SHARES related issues [PR105358]Jakub Jelinek4-7/+18
Last fall I've changed struct gomp_work_share, so that it doesn't have __attribute__((aligned (64))) lock member in the middle unless the target has non-emulated aligned allocator, otherwise it just makes sure the first and second halves are 64 bytes appart for cache line reasons, but doesn't make the struct 64-byte aligned itself and so we can use normal allocators for it. When the struct isn't 64-byte aligned, the amount of tail padding significantly decreases, to 0 or 4 bytes or so. The library uses that tail padding when the ordered_teams_ids array (array of uints) and/or the memory for lastprivate conditional temporaries (the latter wants to guarantee long long alignment). The problem with it on ia32 darwin9 is that while the struct contains long long members, long long is just 4 byte aligned while __alignof__(long long) is 8. That causes problems in gomp_init_work_share, where we currently rely on if offsetof (struct gomp_work_share, inline_ordered_team_ids) is long long aligned, then that tail array will be aligned at runtime and so no extra memory for dynamic realignment will be needed (that is false when the whole struct doesn't have long long alignment). And also in the remaining hunks causes another problem, where we compute INLINE_ORDERED_TEAM_IDS_OFF as the above offsetof aligned up to long long boundary and subtract sizeof (struct gomp_work_share) and INLINE_ORDERED_TEAM_IDS_OFF. When unlucky, the former isn't multiple of 8 and the latter is 4 bigger than that and as the subtraction is done in size_t, we end up with (size_t) -4, so the comparison doesn't really work. The fixes add additional conditions to make it work properly, but all of them should be evaluated at compile time when optimizing and so shouldn't slow anything. 2022-04-26 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR libgomp/105358 * work.c (gomp_init_work_share): Don't mask of adjustment for dynamic long long realignment if struct gomp_work_share has smaller alignof than long long. * loop.c (GOMP_loop_start): Don't use inline_ordered_team_ids if struct gomp_work_share has smaller alignof than long long or if sizeof (struct gomp_work_share) is smaller than INLINE_ORDERED_TEAM_IDS_OFF. * loop_ull.c (GOMP_loop_ull_start): Likewise. * sections.c (GOMP_sections2_start): Likewise.
2022-04-25c++: generic lambda fn parm pack [PR104624]Jason Merrill2-1/+18
Parameter packs from the enclosing context can be used unexpanded in a lambda that is itself part of a pack expansion, but not packs that are part of the lambda itself. We already check for capture packs; we also need to check for function parameter packs of the lambda call operator. PR c++/104624 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (check_for_bare_parameter_packs): Check for lambda function parameter pack. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-variadic22.C: New test.
2022-04-25c++: ICE with requires-expr and -Wsequence-point [PR105304]Patrick Palka2-1/+11
Here we're crashing from verify_sequence_points for this requires-expr condition because it contains a templated CAST_EXPR with empty operand, and verify_tree doesn't ignore this empty operand only because the manual tail recursion that it performs for unary expression trees skips the NULL test. PR c++/105304 gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: * c-common.cc (verify_tree) [restart]: Move up to before the NULL test. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-requires30.C: New test.
2022-04-25c++: partial ordering with dependent NTTP type [PR105289]Patrick Palka3-3/+27
Here ever since r11-6483-ge2e2f3f2c9400f we're rejecting and crashing on (respectively) two testcases that we used to accept in C++17 mode since r8-1437-g3da557ec145823. Both testcases declare a partial specialization of a primary template that has an NTTP with dependent type, and the validity of these partial specializations is unclear and the subject of PR86193 / CWG 455. So for now, this minimal patch just aims to fix the crash in the second testcase. During deduction, when checking whether the type of an NTTP uses still-undeduced parameters, we were incorrectly substituting into the previously substituted type instead of into its original type. In passing this patch also downgrades the "not more specialized" diagnostic from a permerror to a pedwarn. PR c++/105289 PR c++/86193 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (process_partial_specialization): Downgrade "partial specialization isn't more specialized" diagnostic from permerror to an on-by-default pedwarn. (unify) <case TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX>: When substituting into the NTTP type a second time, use the original type not the substituted type. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/template/partial-specialization11.C: New test. * g++.dg/template/partial-specialization12.C: New test.
2022-04-26Daily bump.GCC Administrator9-1/+196
2022-04-25analyzer: fix ICEs on complex constants [PR105365,105366]David Malcolm3-9/+57
gcc/analyzer/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/105365 PR analyzer/105366 * svalue.cc (cmp_cst): Rename to... (cmp_csts_same_type): ...this. Convert all recursive calls to calls to... (cmp_csts_and_types): ....this new function. (svalue::cmp_ptr): Update for renaming of cmp_cst gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/105365 PR analyzer/105366 * gcc.dg/analyzer/pr105365.c: New test. * gcc.dg/analyzer/pr105366.c: New test. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
2022-04-25gimple-fold: fix further missing stmt locations [PR104308]David Malcolm2-1/+15
PR analyzer/104308 initially reported about a -Wanalyzer-use-of-uninitialized-value diagnostic using UNKNOWN_LOCATION when complaining about certain memmove operations where the source is uninitialized. In r12-7856-g875342766d4298 I fixed the missing location for a stmt generated by gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op, but the reporter then found another way to generate such a stmt with UNKNOWN_LOCATION. I've now gone through gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op looking at all statement creation, and found three places in which a new statement doesn't have a location set on it (either directly via gimple_set_location, or indirectly via gsi_replace), one of which is the new reproducer. This patch adds a gimple_set_location to these three cases, and adds test coverage for one of them (the third hunk within the patch), fixing the new reproducer for PR analyzer/104308. gcc/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/104308 * gimple-fold.cc (gimple_fold_builtin_memory_op): Explicitly set the location of new_stmt in all places that don't already set it, whether explicitly, or via a call to gsi_replace. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR analyzer/104308 * gcc.dg/analyzer/pr104308.c: Add test coverage. Signed-off-by: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
2022-04-25fortran: Fix up gfc_trans_oacc_construct [PR104717]Jakub Jelinek4-3/+35
So that move_sese_region_to_fn works properly, OpenMP/OpenACC constructs for which that function is invoked need an extra artificial BIND_EXPR around their body so that we move all variables of the bodies. The C/C++ FEs do that both for OpenMP constructs like OMP_PARALLEL, OMP_TASK or OMP_TARGET and for OpenACC constructs that behave similarly to OMP_TARGET, but the Fortran FE only does that for OpenMP constructs. The following patch does that for OpenACC constructs too. PR fortran/104717 gcc/fortran/ * trans-openmp.cc (gfc_trans_oacc_construct): Wrap construct body in an extra BIND_EXPR. gcc/testsuite/ * gfortran.dg/goacc/pr104717.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/goacc/privatization-1-compute-loop.f90: Adjust. libgomp/ * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-fortran/privatized-ref-2.f90: Adjust. Co-authored-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
2022-04-25contrib: filter out a new Clang warningMartin Liska1-1/+2
Filter out: libcpp/lex.cc:1289:7: warning: use of the 'likely' attribute is a C++20 extension [-Wc++20-attribute-extensions] contrib/ChangeLog: * filter-clang-warnings.py: Filter out -Wc++20-attribute-extensions in lex.cc.
2022-04-25libstdc++: Implement constexpr std::unique_ptr for C++23 (P2273R3)Jonathan Wakely9-21/+466
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * include/bits/ptr_traits.h (__cpp_lib_constexpr_memory): Define conditionally. * include/bits/unique_ptr.h (__cpp_lib_constexpr_memory): Define for C++23. (default_delete, default_delete<T[]>, __uniq_ptr_impl) (unique_ptr, unique_ptr<T[], D>): Add constexpr to all member functions. * include/std/version (__cpp_lib_constexpr_memory): Define new value for C++23. * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/assign/constexpr.cc: New test. * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/comparison/constexpr.cc: New test. * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/cons/constexpr_c++20.cc: New test. * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/creation/constexpr.cc: New test. * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/modifiers/constexpr.cc: New test. * testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/specialized_algorithms/constexpr.cc: New test.
2022-04-25libstdc++: Add deduction guides for std::packaged_task [PR105375]Jonathan Wakely2-0/+96
This change was LWG 3117. The test is copied from 20_util/function/cons/deduction.cc libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: PR libstdc++/105375 * include/std/future (packaged_task): Add deduction guides. * testsuite/30_threads/packaged_task/cons/deduction.cc: New test.
2022-04-25c++: __builtin_shufflevector with value-dep expr [PR105353]Marek Polacek2-1/+26
Here we issue an error from c_build_shufflevector while parsing a template because it got a TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX, but this function expects INTEGER_CSTs (except the first two arguments). It checks if any of the arguments are type-dependent, if so, we leave the processing for later, but it should also check value-dependency for the 3rd+ arguments, so as to avoid the problem above. This is not a regression -- __builtin_shufflevector was introduced in GCC 12, but it looks safe enough. PR c++/105353 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * typeck.cc (build_x_shufflevector): Use instantiation_dependent_expression_p except for the first two arguments. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/ext/builtin-shufflevector-3.C: New test.
2022-04-25docs: Fix 'modff' reference in extend.texiPaul A. Clarke1-1/+1
In commit a2a919aa501e3 (2003), built-ins for modf and modff were added. In extend.texi, section "Other Builtins", "modf" was added to the paragraph "There are also built-in versions of the ISO C99 functions [...]" and "modf" was also added to the paragraph "The ISO C90 functions [...]". "modff" was not added to either paragraph. Based on the context clues about where "modfl" and other similar function pairs like "powf/powl" appear, I believe the reference to "modf" in the first paragraph (C99) should instead be "modff". 2022-04-25 Paul A. Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> gcc * doc/extend.texi (Other Builtins): Correct reference to 'modff'.
2022-04-25Retain existing range knowledge when prefilling statements.Andrew MacLeod2-0/+22
When range_of_stmt was adjusted to avoid large recursion depth, we need to intersect the calculated range whth the any known range to avoid losing info. Range_of_stmt does this, but the new prefill code missed it. PR tree-optimization/105276 gcc/ * gimple-range.cc (gimple_ranger::prefill_stmt_dependencies): Include existing global range with calculated value. gcc/testsuite/ * g++.dg/pr105276.C: New.
2022-04-25contrib: filter out a new Clang warningMartin Liska1-1/+2
contrib/ChangeLog: * filter-clang-warnings.py: Filter out -Wbitwise-instead-of-logical.
2022-04-25libstdc++: Add pretty printer for std::initializer_listPhilipp Fent2-2/+28
Re-using the std::span printer, this now shows the contents of the initializer list instead of the pointer and length members. Signed-off-by: Philipp Fent <fent@in.tum.de> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: * python/libstdcxx/v6/printers.py (StdSpanPrinter._iterator): Rename as iterator. (StdInitializerListPrinter): Define new printer. (build_libstdcxx_dictionary): Register new printer. * testsuite/libstdc++-prettyprinters/cxx11.cc: Check printer for initializer_list.
2022-04-25testsuite: add additional option to force DSE execution [PR103662]Mikael Morin1-1/+1
This fixes a dump tree match check that is UNRESOLVED with the -O0 optimization option, as the optimization pass corresponding to the dump file is not run at -O0, and the dump is not generated. PR fortran/103662 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03: Force execution of the DSE optimization pass.
2022-04-25tree-optimization/105368 - avoid overflow in powi_costRichard Biener1-1/+1
The following avoids undefined signed overflow when computing the absolute of the exponent in powi_cost. 2022-04-25 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> PR tree-optimization/105368 * tree-ssa-math-opts.cc (powi_cost): Use absu_hwi.
2022-04-25tree-optimization/100810 - avoid undefs in IVOPT rewritesRichard Biener3-0/+96
The following attempts to avoid IVOPTs rewriting uses using IV candidates that involve undefined behavior by using uninitialized SSA names. First we restrict the set of candidates we produce for such IVs to the original ones and mark them as not important. Second we try to only allow expressing uses with such IV if they originally use them. That is to avoid rewriting all such uses in terms of other IVs. Since cand->iv and use->iv seem to never exactly match up we resort to comparing the IV bases. The approach ends up similar to the one posted by Roger at https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/578441.html but it marks IV candidates rather than use groups and the cases we allow in determine_group_iv_cost_generic are slightly different. 2022-01-04 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> PR tree-optimization/100810 * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.cc (struct iv_cand): Add involves_undefs flag. (find_ssa_undef): New function. (add_candidate_1): Avoid adding derived candidates with undefined SSA names and mark the original ones. (determine_group_iv_cost_generic): Reject rewriting uses with a different IV when that involves undefined SSA names. * gcc.dg/torture/pr100810.c: New testcase. * gcc.dg/torture/pr105337.c: Likewise.
2022-04-25target/89125 - BSD and math functionsSteve Kargl3-1/+16
Back story: When GCC is configured and built on non-glibc platforms, it seems very little to no effort is made to enumerate the available C99 libm functions. It is all or nothing for C99 libm. The patch introduces a new function, used on only FreeBSD, to inform gcc that it has C99 libm functions (minus a few which clearly GCC does not check nor test). 2022-04-15 Steven G. Kargl <kargl@gcc.gnu.org> PR target/89125 * config/freebsd.h: Define TARGET_LIBC_HAS_FUNCTION to be bsd_libc_has_function. * targhooks.cc (bsd_libc_has_function): New function. Expand the supported math functions to inclue C99 libm. * targhooks.h (bsd_libc_has_function): New Prototype.
2022-04-25rtl-optimization/105231 - distribute_notes and REG_EH_REGIONRichard Biener2-18/+78
The following mitigates a problem in combine distribute_notes which places an original REG_EH_REGION based on only may_trap_p which is good to test whether a non-call insn can possibly throw but not if actually it does or we care. That's something we decided at RTL expansion time where we possibly still know the insn evaluates to a constant. In fact, the REG_EH_REGION note with lp > 0 can only come from the original i3 and an assert is added to that effect. That means we only need to retain the note on i3 or, if that cannot trap, drop it but we should never move it to i2. The following places constraints on the insns to combine with non-call exceptions since we cannot handle the case where we have more than one EH side-effect in the IL. The patch also makes sure we can accumulate that on i3 and do not split a possible exception raising part of it to i2. As a special case we do not place any restriction on all externally throwing insns when there is no REG_EH_REGION present. 2022-04-22 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> PR rtl-optimization/105231 * combine.cc (distribute_notes): Assert that a REG_EH_REGION with landing pad > 0 is from i3. Put any REG_EH_REGION note on i3 or drop it if the insn can not trap. (try_combine): Ensure that we can merge REG_EH_REGION notes with non-call exceptions. Ensure we are not splitting a trapping part of an insn with non-call exceptions when there is any REG_EH_REGION note to preserve. * gcc.dg/torture/pr105231.c: New testcase.
2022-04-25AVX512F: Add missing macro for mask(z?)_scalf_s[sd] [PR 105339]Hongyu Wang2-20/+60
Add missing macro under O0 and adjust macro format for scalf intrinsics. gcc/ChangeLog: PR target/105339 * config/i386/avx512fintrin.h (_mm512_scalef_round_pd): Add parentheses for parameters and djust format. (_mm512_mask_scalef_round_pd): Ditto. (_mm512_maskz_scalef_round_pd): Ditto. (_mm512_scalef_round_ps): Ditto. (_mm512_mask_scalef_round_ps): Ditto. (_mm512_maskz_scalef_round_ps): Ditto. (_mm_scalef_round_sd): Use _mm_undefined_pd. (_mm_scalef_round_ss): Use _mm_undefined_ps. (_mm_mask_scalef_round_sd): New macro. (_mm_mask_scalef_round_ss): Ditto. (_mm_maskz_scalef_round_sd): Ditto. (_mm_maskz_scalef_round_ss): Ditto. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR target/105339 * gcc.target/i386/sse-14.c: Add tests for new macro.
2022-04-25Daily bump.GCC Administrator3-1/+29
2022-04-24[committed] exec-stack warning for test which wants executable stacksJeff Law1-1/+1
gcc/testsuite * gcc.dg/lto/pr94157_0.c: Also request executable stack from the linker.
2022-04-24fortran: Detect duplicate unlimited polymorphic types [PR103662]Mikael Morin3-22/+58
This fixes a type-based alias analysis issue with unlimited polymorphic class descriptors (types behind class(*)) causing data initialisation to be removed by optimization. The fortran front-end may create multiple declarations for types, for example if a type is redeclared in each program unit it is used in. To avoid optimization seeing them as non-aliasing, a list of derived types is created at resolution time, and used at translation to set the same TYPE_CANONICAL type for each duplicate type declaration. This mechanism didn’t work for unlimited polymorphic descriptors types, as there is a short-circuit return skipping all the resolution handling for them, including the type registration. This change adds type registration at the short-circuit return, and updates type comparison to handle specifically unlimited polymorphic fake symbols, class descriptor types and virtual table types. The test, which exhibited mismatching dynamic types had to be fixed as well. PR fortran/103662 gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: * interface.cc (gfc_compare_derived_types): Support comparing unlimited polymorphic fake symbols. Recursively compare class descriptor types and virtual table types. * resolve.cc (resolve_fl_derived): Add type to the types list on unlimited polymorphic short-circuit return. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gfortran.dg/unlimited_polymorphic_3.f03 (foo): Separate bind(c) and sequence checks to... (foo_bc, foo_sq): ... two different procedures. (main, foo*): Change type declarations so that type name, component name, and either bind(c) or sequence attribute match between the main type declarations and the procedure type declarations. (toplevel): Add optimization dump checks. Co-Authored-By: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
2022-04-24Daily bump.GCC Administrator3-1/+13
2022-04-23i386: Improve ix86_expand_int_movcc [PR105338]Jakub Jelinek2-4/+47
The following testcase regressed on x86_64 on the trunk, due to some GIMPLE pass changes (r12-7687) we end up an *.optimized dump difference of: @@ -8,14 +8,14 @@ int foo (int i) <bb 2> [local count: 1073741824]: if (i_2(D) != 0) - goto <bb 4>; [35.00%] + goto <bb 3>; [35.00%] else - goto <bb 3>; [65.00%] + goto <bb 4>; [65.00%] - <bb 3> [local count: 697932184]: + <bb 3> [local count: 375809640]: <bb 4> [local count: 1073741824]: - # iftmp.0_1 = PHI <5(2), i_2(D)(3)> + # iftmp.0_1 = PHI <5(3), i_2(D)(2)> return iftmp.0_1; } and similarly for the other functions. That is functionally equivalent and there is no canonical form for those. The reason for i_2(D) in the PHI argument as opposed to 0 is the uncprop pass, that is in many cases beneficial for expansion as we don't need to load the value into some pseudo in one of the if blocks. Now, for the 11.x ordering we have the pseudo = i insn in the extended basic block (it comes first) and so forwprop1 undoes what uncprop does by propagating constant 0 there. But for the 12.x ordering, the extended basic block contains pseudo = 5 and pseudo = i is in the other bb and so fwprop1 doesn't change it. During the ce1 pass, we attempt to emit a conditional move and we have very nice code for the cases where both last operands of ?: are constant, and yet another for !TARGET_CMOVE if at least one of them is. The following patch will undo the uncprop behavior during ix86_expand_int_movcc, but just for those spots that can benefit from both or at least one operands being constant, leaving the pure cmov case as is (because then it is useful not to have to load a constant into a pseudo as it already is in one). We can do that in the op0 == op1 ? op0 : op3 or op0 != op1 ? op2 : op0 cases if op1 is a CONST_INT by pretending it is op0 == op1 ? op1 : op3 or op0 != op1 ? op2 : op1 2022-04-23 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> PR target/105338 * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_int_movcc): Handle op0 == cst1 ? op0 : op3 like op0 == cst1 ? cst1 : op3 for the non-cmov cases. * gcc.target/i386/pr105338.c: New test.
2022-04-23Daily bump.GCC Administrator5-1/+93