aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c721
1 files changed, 721 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c b/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fede889
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-slp-patterns.c
@@ -0,0 +1,721 @@
+/* SLP - Pattern matcher on SLP trees
+ Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+This file is part of GCC.
+
+GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under
+the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
+Software Foundation; either version 3, or (at your option) any later
+version.
+
+GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY
+WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
+for more details.
+
+You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
+<http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include "config.h"
+#include "system.h"
+#include "coretypes.h"
+#include "backend.h"
+#include "target.h"
+#include "rtl.h"
+#include "tree.h"
+#include "gimple.h"
+#include "tree-pass.h"
+#include "ssa.h"
+#include "optabs-tree.h"
+#include "insn-config.h"
+#include "recog.h" /* FIXME: for insn_data */
+#include "fold-const.h"
+#include "stor-layout.h"
+#include "gimple-iterator.h"
+#include "cfgloop.h"
+#include "tree-vectorizer.h"
+#include "langhooks.h"
+#include "gimple-walk.h"
+#include "dbgcnt.h"
+#include "tree-vector-builder.h"
+#include "vec-perm-indices.h"
+#include "gimple-fold.h"
+#include "internal-fn.h"
+
+/* SLP Pattern matching mechanism.
+
+ This extension to the SLP vectorizer allows one to transform the generated SLP
+ tree based on any pattern. The difference between this and the normal vect
+ pattern matcher is that unlike the former, this matcher allows you to match
+ with instructions that do not belong to the same SSA dominator graph.
+
+ The only requirement that this pattern matcher has is that you are only
+ only allowed to either match an entire group or none.
+
+ The pattern matcher currently only allows you to perform replacements to
+ internal functions.
+
+ Once the patterns are matched it is one way, these cannot be undone. It is
+ currently not supported to match patterns recursively.
+
+ To add a new pattern, implement the vect_pattern class and add the type to
+ slp_patterns.
+
+*/
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * vect_pattern class
+ ******************************************************************************/
+
+/* Default implementation of recognize that performs matching, validation and
+ replacement of nodes but that can be overriden if required. */
+
+static bool
+vect_pattern_validate_optab (internal_fn ifn, slp_tree node)
+{
+ tree vectype = SLP_TREE_VECTYPE (node);
+ if (ifn == IFN_LAST || !vectype)
+ return false;
+
+ if (dump_enabled_p ())
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
+ "Found %s pattern in SLP tree\n",
+ internal_fn_name (ifn));
+
+ if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (ifn, vectype, OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
+ {
+ if (dump_enabled_p ())
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
+ "Target supports %s vectorization with mode %T\n",
+ internal_fn_name (ifn), vectype);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ if (dump_enabled_p ())
+ {
+ if (!vectype)
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
+ "Target does not support vector type for %T\n",
+ SLP_TREE_DEF_TYPE (node));
+ else
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_NOTE, vect_location,
+ "Target does not support %s for vector type "
+ "%T\n", internal_fn_name (ifn), vectype);
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * General helper types
+ ******************************************************************************/
+
+/* The COMPLEX_OPERATION enum denotes the possible pair of operations that can
+ be matched when looking for expressions that we are interested matching for
+ complex numbers addition and mla. */
+
+typedef enum _complex_operation : unsigned {
+ PLUS_PLUS,
+ MINUS_PLUS,
+ PLUS_MINUS,
+ MULT_MULT,
+ CMPLX_NONE
+} complex_operation_t;
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * General helper functions
+ ******************************************************************************/
+
+/* Helper function of linear_loads_p that checks to see if the load permutation
+ is sequential and in monotonically increasing order of loads with no gaps.
+*/
+
+static inline complex_perm_kinds_t
+is_linear_load_p (load_permutation_t loads)
+{
+ if (loads.length() == 0)
+ return PERM_UNKNOWN;
+
+ unsigned load, i;
+ complex_perm_kinds_t candidates[4]
+ = { PERM_EVENODD
+ , PERM_ODDEVEN
+ , PERM_ODDODD
+ , PERM_EVENEVEN
+ };
+
+ int valid_patterns = 4;
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT_FROM (loads, i, load, 1)
+ {
+ if (candidates[0] != PERM_UNKNOWN && load != i)
+ {
+ candidates[0] = PERM_UNKNOWN;
+ valid_patterns--;
+ }
+ if (candidates[1] != PERM_UNKNOWN
+ && load != (i % 2 == 0 ? i + 1 : i - 1))
+ {
+ candidates[1] = PERM_UNKNOWN;
+ valid_patterns--;
+ }
+ if (candidates[2] != PERM_UNKNOWN && load != 1)
+ {
+ candidates[2] = PERM_UNKNOWN;
+ valid_patterns--;
+ }
+ if (candidates[3] != PERM_UNKNOWN && load != 0)
+ {
+ candidates[3] = PERM_UNKNOWN;
+ valid_patterns--;
+ }
+
+ if (valid_patterns == 0)
+ return PERM_UNKNOWN;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(candidates); i++)
+ if (candidates[i] != PERM_UNKNOWN)
+ return candidates[i];
+
+ return PERM_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+/* Combine complex_perm_kinds A and B into a new permute kind that describes the
+ resulting operation. */
+
+static inline complex_perm_kinds_t
+vect_merge_perms (complex_perm_kinds_t a, complex_perm_kinds_t b)
+{
+ if (a == b)
+ return a;
+
+ if (a == PERM_TOP)
+ return b;
+
+ if (b == PERM_TOP)
+ return a;
+
+ return PERM_UNKNOWN;
+}
+
+/* Check to see if all loads rooted in ROOT are linear. Linearity is
+ defined as having no gaps between values loaded. */
+
+static complex_load_perm_t
+linear_loads_p (slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *perm_cache, slp_tree root)
+{
+ if (!root)
+ return std::make_pair (PERM_UNKNOWN, vNULL);
+
+ unsigned i;
+ complex_load_perm_t *tmp;
+
+ if ((tmp = perm_cache->get (root)) != NULL)
+ return *tmp;
+
+ complex_load_perm_t retval = std::make_pair (PERM_UNKNOWN, vNULL);
+ perm_cache->put (root, retval);
+
+ /* If it's a load node, then just read the load permute. */
+ if (SLP_TREE_LOAD_PERMUTATION (root).exists ())
+ {
+ retval.first = is_linear_load_p (SLP_TREE_LOAD_PERMUTATION (root));
+ retval.second = SLP_TREE_LOAD_PERMUTATION (root);
+ perm_cache->put (root, retval);
+ return retval;
+ }
+ else if (SLP_TREE_DEF_TYPE (root) != vect_internal_def)
+ {
+ retval.first = PERM_TOP;
+ return retval;
+ }
+
+ auto_vec<load_permutation_t> all_loads;
+ complex_perm_kinds_t kind = PERM_TOP;
+
+ slp_tree child;
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (root), i, child)
+ {
+ complex_load_perm_t res = linear_loads_p (perm_cache, child);
+ kind = vect_merge_perms (kind, res.first);
+ /* Unknown and Top are not valid on blends as they produce no permute. */
+ if (kind == PERM_UNKNOWN || kind == PERM_TOP)
+ return retval;
+ all_loads.safe_push (res.second);
+ }
+
+ if (SLP_TREE_LANE_PERMUTATION (root).exists ())
+ {
+ lane_permutation_t perm = SLP_TREE_LANE_PERMUTATION (root);
+ load_permutation_t nloads;
+ nloads.create (SLP_TREE_LANES (root));
+ nloads.quick_grow (SLP_TREE_LANES (root));
+ for (i = 0; i < SLP_TREE_LANES (root); i++)
+ nloads[i] = all_loads[perm[i].first][perm[i].second];
+
+ retval.first = kind;
+ retval.second = nloads;
+ }
+ else if (all_loads.length () == 1)
+ {
+ retval.first = kind;
+ retval.second = all_loads[0];
+ }
+
+ perm_cache->put (root, retval);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+/* This function attempts to make a node rooted in NODE is linear. If the node
+ if already linear than the node itself is returned in RESULT.
+
+ If the node is not linear then a new VEC_PERM_EXPR node is created with a
+ lane permute that when applied will make the node linear. If such a
+ permute cannot be created then FALSE is returned from the function.
+
+ Here linearity is defined as having a sequential, monotically increasing
+ load position inside the load permute generated by the loads reachable from
+ NODE. */
+
+static slp_tree
+vect_build_swap_evenodd_node (slp_tree node)
+{
+ /* Attempt to linearise the permute. */
+ vec<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned> > zipped;
+ zipped.create (SLP_TREE_LANES (node));
+
+ for (unsigned x = 0; x < SLP_TREE_LANES (node); x+=2)
+ {
+ zipped.quick_push (std::make_pair (0, x+1));
+ zipped.quick_push (std::make_pair (0, x));
+ }
+
+ /* Create the new permute node and store it instead. */
+ slp_tree vnode = vect_create_new_slp_node (1, VEC_PERM_EXPR);
+ SLP_TREE_LANE_PERMUTATION (vnode) = zipped;
+ SLP_TREE_VECTYPE (vnode) = SLP_TREE_VECTYPE (node);
+ SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (vnode).quick_push (node);
+ SLP_TREE_REF_COUNT (vnode) = 1;
+ SLP_TREE_LANES (vnode) = SLP_TREE_LANES (node);
+ SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE (vnode) = SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE (node);
+ SLP_TREE_REF_COUNT (node)++;
+ return vnode;
+}
+
+/* Checks to see of the expression represented by NODE is a gimple assign with
+ code CODE. */
+
+static inline bool
+vect_match_expression_p (slp_tree node, tree_code code)
+{
+ if (!node
+ || !SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE (node))
+ return false;
+
+ gimple* expr = STMT_VINFO_STMT (SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE (node));
+ if (!is_gimple_assign (expr)
+ || gimple_assign_rhs_code (expr) != code)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* Check if the given lane permute in PERMUTES matches an alternating sequence
+ of {even odd even odd ...}. This to account for unrolled loops. Further
+ mode there resulting permute must be linear. */
+
+static inline bool
+vect_check_evenodd_blend (lane_permutation_t &permutes,
+ unsigned even, unsigned odd)
+{
+ if (permutes.length () == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ unsigned val[2] = {even, odd};
+ unsigned seed = 0;
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < permutes.length (); i++)
+ if (permutes[i].first != val[i % 2]
+ || permutes[i].second != seed++)
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+/* This function will match the two gimple expressions representing NODE1 and
+ NODE2 in parallel and returns the pair operation that represents the two
+ expressions in the two statements.
+
+ If match is successful then the corresponding complex_operation is
+ returned and the arguments to the two matched operations are returned in OPS.
+
+ If TWO_OPERANDS it is expected that the LANES of the parent VEC_PERM select
+ from the two nodes alternatingly.
+
+ If unsuccessful then CMPLX_NONE is returned and OPS is untouched.
+
+ e.g. the following gimple statements
+
+ stmt 0 _39 = _37 + _12;
+ stmt 1 _6 = _38 - _36;
+
+ will return PLUS_MINUS along with OPS containing {_37, _12, _38, _36}.
+*/
+
+static complex_operation_t
+vect_detect_pair_op (slp_tree node1, slp_tree node2, lane_permutation_t &lanes,
+ bool two_operands = true, vec<slp_tree> *ops = NULL)
+{
+ complex_operation_t result = CMPLX_NONE;
+
+ if (vect_match_expression_p (node1, MINUS_EXPR)
+ && vect_match_expression_p (node2, PLUS_EXPR)
+ && (!two_operands || vect_check_evenodd_blend (lanes, 0, 1)))
+ result = MINUS_PLUS;
+ else if (vect_match_expression_p (node1, PLUS_EXPR)
+ && vect_match_expression_p (node2, MINUS_EXPR)
+ && (!two_operands || vect_check_evenodd_blend (lanes, 0, 1)))
+ result = PLUS_MINUS;
+ else if (vect_match_expression_p (node1, PLUS_EXPR)
+ && vect_match_expression_p (node2, PLUS_EXPR))
+ result = PLUS_PLUS;
+ else if (vect_match_expression_p (node1, MULT_EXPR)
+ && vect_match_expression_p (node2, MULT_EXPR))
+ result = MULT_MULT;
+
+ if (result != CMPLX_NONE && ops != NULL)
+ {
+ ops->create (2);
+ ops->quick_push (node1);
+ ops->quick_push (node2);
+ }
+ return result;
+}
+
+/* Overload of vect_detect_pair_op that matches against the representative
+ statements in the children of NODE. It is expected that NODE has exactly
+ two children and when TWO_OPERANDS then NODE must be a VEC_PERM. */
+
+static complex_operation_t
+vect_detect_pair_op (slp_tree node, bool two_operands = true,
+ vec<slp_tree> *ops = NULL)
+{
+ if (!two_operands && SLP_TREE_CODE (node) == VEC_PERM_EXPR)
+ return CMPLX_NONE;
+
+ if (SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (node).length () != 2)
+ return CMPLX_NONE;
+
+ vec<slp_tree> children = SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (node);
+ lane_permutation_t &lanes = SLP_TREE_LANE_PERMUTATION (node);
+
+ return vect_detect_pair_op (children[0], children[1], lanes, two_operands,
+ ops);
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * complex_pattern class
+ ******************************************************************************/
+
+/* SLP Complex Numbers pattern matching.
+
+ As an example, the following simple loop:
+
+ double a[restrict N]; double b[restrict N]; double c[restrict N];
+
+ for (int i=0; i < N; i+=2)
+ {
+ c[i] = a[i] - b[i+1];
+ c[i+1] = a[i+1] + b[i];
+ }
+
+ which represents a complex addition on with a rotation of 90* around the
+ argand plane. i.e. if `a` and `b` were complex numbers then this would be the
+ same as `a + (b * I)`.
+
+ Here the expressions for `c[i]` and `c[i+1]` are independent but have to be
+ both recognized in order for the pattern to work. As an SLP tree this is
+ represented as
+
+ +--------------------------------+
+ | stmt 0 *_9 = _10; |
+ | stmt 1 *_15 = _16; |
+ +--------------------------------+
+ |
+ |
+ v
+ +--------------------------------+
+ | stmt 0 _10 = _4 - _8; |
+ | stmt 1 _16 = _12 + _14; |
+ | lane permutation { 0[0] 1[1] } |
+ +--------------------------------+
+ | |
+ | |
+ | |
+ +-----+ | | +-----+
+ | | | | | |
+ +-----| { } |<-----+ +----->| { } --------+
+ | | | +------------------| | |
+ | +-----+ | +-----+ |
+ | | | |
+ | | | |
+ | +------|------------------+ |
+ | | | |
+ v v v v
+ +--------------------------+ +--------------------------------+
+ | stmt 0 _8 = *_7; | | stmt 0 _4 = *_3; |
+ | stmt 1 _14 = *_13; | | stmt 1 _12 = *_11; |
+ | load permutation { 1 0 } | | load permutation { 0 1 } |
+ +--------------------------+ +--------------------------------+
+
+ The pattern matcher allows you to replace both statements 0 and 1 or none at
+ all. Because this operation is a two operands operation the actual nodes
+ being replaced are those in the { } nodes. The actual scalar statements
+ themselves are not replaced or used during the matching but instead the
+ SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE statements are inspected. You are also allowed to
+ replace and match on any number of nodes.
+
+ Because the pattern matcher matches on the representative statement for the
+ SLP node the case of two_operators it allows you to match the children of the
+ node. This is done using the method `recognize ()`.
+
+*/
+
+/* The complex_pattern class contains common code for pattern matchers that work
+ on complex numbers. These provide functionality to allow de-construction and
+ validation of sequences depicting/transforming REAL and IMAG pairs. */
+
+class complex_pattern : public vect_pattern
+{
+ protected:
+ auto_vec<slp_tree> m_workset;
+ complex_pattern (slp_tree *node, vec<slp_tree> *m_ops, internal_fn ifn)
+ : vect_pattern (node, m_ops, ifn)
+ {
+ this->m_workset.safe_push (*node);
+ }
+
+ public:
+ void build (vec_info *);
+
+ static internal_fn
+ matches (complex_operation_t op, slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *,
+ vec<slp_tree> *);
+};
+
+/* Create a replacement pattern statement for each node in m_node and inserts
+ the new statement into m_node as the new representative statement. The old
+ statement is marked as being in a pattern defined by the new statement. The
+ statement is created as call to internal function IFN with m_num_args
+ arguments.
+
+ Futhermore the new pattern is also added to the vectorization information
+ structure VINFO and the old statement STMT_INFO is marked as unused while
+ the new statement is marked as used and the number of SLP uses of the new
+ statement is incremented.
+
+ The newly created SLP nodes are marked as SLP only and will be dissolved
+ if SLP is aborted.
+
+ The newly created gimple call is returned and the BB remains unchanged.
+
+ This default method is designed to only match against simple operands where
+ all the input and output types are the same.
+*/
+
+void
+complex_pattern::build (vec_info *vinfo)
+{
+ stmt_vec_info stmt_info;
+
+ auto_vec<tree> args;
+ args.create (this->m_num_args);
+ args.quick_grow_cleared (this->m_num_args);
+ slp_tree node;
+ unsigned ix;
+ stmt_vec_info call_stmt_info;
+ gcall *call_stmt = NULL;
+
+ /* Now modify the nodes themselves. */
+ FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (this->m_workset, ix, node)
+ {
+ /* Calculate the location of the statement in NODE to replace. */
+ stmt_info = SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE (node);
+ gimple* old_stmt = STMT_VINFO_STMT (stmt_info);
+ tree lhs_old_stmt = gimple_get_lhs (old_stmt);
+ tree type = TREE_TYPE (lhs_old_stmt);
+
+ /* Create the argument set for use by gimple_build_call_internal_vec. */
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < this->m_num_args; i++)
+ args[i] = lhs_old_stmt;
+
+ /* Create the new pattern statements. */
+ call_stmt = gimple_build_call_internal_vec (this->m_ifn, args);
+ tree var = make_temp_ssa_name (type, call_stmt, "slp_patt");
+ gimple_call_set_lhs (call_stmt, var);
+ gimple_set_location (call_stmt, gimple_location (old_stmt));
+ gimple_call_set_nothrow (call_stmt, true);
+
+ /* Adjust the book-keeping for the new and old statements for use during
+ SLP. This is required to get the right VF and statement during SLP
+ analysis. These changes are created after relevancy has been set for
+ the nodes as such we need to manually update them. Any changes will be
+ undone if SLP is cancelled. */
+ call_stmt_info
+ = vinfo->add_pattern_stmt (call_stmt, stmt_info);
+
+ /* Make sure to mark the representative statement pure_slp and
+ relevant. */
+ STMT_VINFO_RELEVANT (call_stmt_info) = vect_used_in_scope;
+ STMT_SLP_TYPE (call_stmt_info) = pure_slp;
+
+ /* add_pattern_stmt can't be done in vect_mark_pattern_stmts because
+ the non-SLP pattern matchers already have added the statement to VINFO
+ by the time it is called. Some of them need to modify the returned
+ stmt_info. vect_mark_pattern_stmts is called by recog_pattern and it
+ would increase the size of each pattern with boilerplate code to make
+ the call there. */
+ vect_mark_pattern_stmts (vinfo, stmt_info, call_stmt,
+ SLP_TREE_VECTYPE (node));
+ STMT_VINFO_SLP_VECT_ONLY (call_stmt_info) = true;
+
+ /* Since we are replacing all the statements in the group with the same
+ thing it doesn't really matter. So just set it every time a new stmt
+ is created. */
+ SLP_TREE_REPRESENTATIVE (node) = call_stmt_info;
+ SLP_TREE_LANE_PERMUTATION (node).release ();
+ SLP_TREE_CODE (node) = CALL_EXPR;
+ }
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * complex_add_pattern class
+ ******************************************************************************/
+
+class complex_add_pattern : public complex_pattern
+{
+ protected:
+ complex_add_pattern (slp_tree *node, vec<slp_tree> *m_ops, internal_fn ifn)
+ : complex_pattern (node, m_ops, ifn)
+ {
+ this->m_num_args = 2;
+ }
+
+ public:
+ void build (vec_info *);
+ static internal_fn
+ matches (complex_operation_t op, slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *,
+ vec<slp_tree> *);
+
+ static vect_pattern*
+ recognize (slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *, slp_tree *);
+};
+
+/* Perform a replacement of the detected complex add pattern with the new
+ instruction sequences. */
+
+void
+complex_add_pattern::build (vec_info *vinfo)
+{
+ auto_vec<slp_tree> nodes;
+ slp_tree node = this->m_ops[0];
+ vec<slp_tree> children = SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (node);
+
+ /* First re-arrange the children. */
+ nodes.create (children.length ());
+ nodes.quick_push (children[0]);
+ nodes.quick_push (vect_build_swap_evenodd_node (children[1]));
+
+ SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (*this->m_node).truncate (0);
+ SLP_TREE_CHILDREN (*this->m_node).safe_splice (nodes);
+
+ complex_pattern::build (vinfo);
+}
+
+/* Pattern matcher for trying to match complex addition pattern in SLP tree.
+
+ If no match is found then IFN is set to IFN_LAST.
+ This function matches the patterns shaped as:
+
+ c[i] = a[i] - b[i+1];
+ c[i+1] = a[i+1] + b[i];
+
+ If a match occurred then TRUE is returned, else FALSE. The initial match is
+ expected to be in OP1 and the initial match operands in args0. */
+
+internal_fn
+complex_add_pattern::matches (complex_operation_t op,
+ slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *perm_cache,
+ vec<slp_tree> *ops)
+{
+ internal_fn ifn = IFN_LAST;
+
+ /* Find the two components. Rotation in the complex plane will modify
+ the operations:
+
+ * Rotation 0: + +
+ * Rotation 90: - +
+ * Rotation 180: - -
+ * Rotation 270: + -
+
+ Rotation 0 and 180 can be handled by normal SIMD code, so we don't need
+ to care about them here. */
+ if (op == MINUS_PLUS)
+ ifn = IFN_COMPLEX_ADD_ROT90;
+ else if (op == PLUS_MINUS)
+ ifn = IFN_COMPLEX_ADD_ROT270;
+ else
+ return ifn;
+
+ /* verify that there is a permute, otherwise this isn't a pattern we
+ we support. */
+ gcc_assert (ops->length () == 2);
+
+ vec<slp_tree> children = SLP_TREE_CHILDREN ((*ops)[0]);
+
+ /* First node must be unpermuted. */
+ if (linear_loads_p (perm_cache, children[0]).first != PERM_EVENODD)
+ return IFN_LAST;
+
+ /* Second node must be permuted. */
+ if (linear_loads_p (perm_cache, children[1]).first != PERM_ODDEVEN)
+ return IFN_LAST;
+
+ return ifn;
+}
+
+/* Attempt to recognize a complex add pattern. */
+
+vect_pattern*
+complex_add_pattern::recognize (slp_tree_to_load_perm_map_t *perm_cache,
+ slp_tree *node)
+{
+ auto_vec<slp_tree> ops;
+ complex_operation_t op
+ = vect_detect_pair_op (*node, true, &ops);
+ internal_fn ifn = complex_add_pattern::matches (op, perm_cache, &ops);
+ if (!vect_pattern_validate_optab (ifn, *node))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return new complex_add_pattern (node, &ops, ifn);
+}
+
+/*******************************************************************************
+ * Pattern matching definitions
+ ******************************************************************************/
+
+#define SLP_PATTERN(x) &x::recognize
+vect_pattern_decl_t slp_patterns[]
+{
+ /* For least amount of back-tracking and more efficient matching
+ order patterns from the largest to the smallest. Especially if they
+ overlap in what they can detect. */
+
+ SLP_PATTERN (complex_add_pattern),
+};
+#undef SLP_PATTERN
+
+/* Set the number of SLP pattern matchers available. */
+size_t num__slp_patterns = sizeof(slp_patterns)/sizeof(vect_pattern_decl_t);