aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c27
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c
index 5ca9458..da2fb1f 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadedge.c
@@ -551,11 +551,13 @@ simplify_control_stmt_condition (edge e,
|| !is_gimple_min_invariant (cached_lhs))
cached_lhs = (*simplify) (dummy_cond, stmt, avail_exprs_stack);
- /* If we were just testing that an integral type was != 0, and that
- failed, just return the first operand. This gives the FSM code a
- chance to optimize the path. */
- if (cached_lhs == NULL
- && cond_code == NE_EXPR)
+ /* If we were testing an integer/pointer against a constant, then
+ we can use the FSM code to trace the value of the SSA_NAME. If
+ a value is found, then the condition will collapse to a constant.
+
+ Return the SSA_NAME we want to trace back rather than the full
+ expression and give the FSM threader a chance to find its value. */
+ if (cached_lhs == NULL)
{
/* Recover the original operands. They may have been simplified
using context sensitive equivalences. Those context sensitive
@@ -563,9 +565,10 @@ simplify_control_stmt_condition (edge e,
tree op0 = gimple_cond_lhs (stmt);
tree op1 = gimple_cond_rhs (stmt);
- if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0))
+ if ((INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0))
+ || POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op0)))
&& TREE_CODE (op0) == SSA_NAME
- && integer_zerop (op1))
+ && TREE_CODE (op1) == INTEGER_CST)
return op0;
}
@@ -1046,11 +1049,19 @@ thread_through_normal_block (edge e,
if (!flag_expensive_optimizations
|| optimize_function_for_size_p (cfun)
- || TREE_CODE (cond) != SSA_NAME
+ || !(TREE_CODE (cond) == SSA_NAME
+ || (TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (cond)) == tcc_comparison
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0)) == SSA_NAME
+ && TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (cond, 1)) == INTEGER_CST))
|| e->dest->loop_father != e->src->loop_father
|| loop_depth (e->dest->loop_father) == 0)
return 0;
+ /* Extract the SSA_NAME we want to trace backwards if COND is not
+ already a bare SSA_NAME. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (cond) != SSA_NAME)
+ cond = TREE_OPERAND (cond, 0);
+
/* When COND cannot be simplified, try to find paths from a control
statement back through the PHI nodes which would affect that control
statement. */