aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/pr105325.C
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/pr105325.C')
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/pr105325.C28
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/pr105325.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/pr105325.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..18a2e52
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/powerpc/pr105325.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+/* { dg-do assemble } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target power10_ok } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_prefixed_addr } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mdejagnu-cpu=power10 -fstack-protector" } */
+
+/* PR target/105324. Test that power10 fusion does not generate an LWA/CMPDI
+ with a large offset that the assembler rejects. Instead it should a
+ PLWZ/CMPWI combination.
+
+ Originally, the code was dying because the fusion load + compare -1/0/1
+ patterns did not handle the possibility that the load might be prefixed.
+ The -fstack-protector option is needed to show the bug. */
+
+struct Ath__array1D {
+ int _current;
+ int getCnt() { return _current; }
+};
+struct extMeasure {
+ int _mapTable[10000];
+ Ath__array1D _metRCTable;
+};
+void measureRC() {
+ extMeasure m;
+ for (; m._metRCTable.getCnt();)
+ for (;;)
+ ;
+}