aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/cp/semantics.cc')
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/semantics.cc75
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 50 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
index 30cf2f9..39b11ee 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.cc
@@ -11172,42 +11172,31 @@ init_cp_semantics (void)
}
-/* If we have a condition in conjunctive normal form (CNF), find the first
- failing clause. In other words, given an expression like
+/* Emit additional diagnostics for failing condition BAD.
+ Used by finish_static_assert and IFN_ASSUME constexpr diagnostics.
+ If SHOW_EXPR_P is true, print the condition (because it was
+ instantiation-dependent). */
- true && true && false && true && false
-
- return the first 'false'. EXPR is the expression. */
-
-static tree
-find_failing_clause_r (tree expr)
+void
+diagnose_failing_condition (tree bad, location_t cloc, bool show_expr_p)
{
- if (TREE_CODE (expr) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR)
+ /* Nobody wants to see the artificial (bool) cast. */
+ bad = tree_strip_nop_conversions (bad);
+
+ /* Actually explain the failure if this is a concept check or a
+ requires-expression. */
+ if (concept_check_p (bad) || TREE_CODE (bad) == REQUIRES_EXPR)
+ diagnose_constraints (cloc, bad, NULL_TREE);
+ else if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (bad)
+ && ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (bad, 0))))
{
- /* First check the left side... */
- tree e = find_failing_clause_r (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 0));
- if (e == NULL_TREE)
- /* ...if we didn't find a false clause, check the right side. */
- e = find_failing_clause_r (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1));
- return e;
+ tree op0 = fold_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (bad, 0));
+ tree op1 = fold_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (bad, 1));
+ tree cond = build2 (TREE_CODE (bad), boolean_type_node, op0, op1);
+ inform (cloc, "the comparison reduces to %qE", cond);
}
- tree e = contextual_conv_bool (expr, tf_none);
- e = fold_non_dependent_expr (e, tf_none, /*manifestly_const_eval=*/true);
- if (integer_zerop (e))
- /* This is the failing clause. */
- return expr;
- return NULL_TREE;
-}
-
-/* Wrapper for find_failing_clause_r. */
-
-static tree
-find_failing_clause (tree expr)
-{
- if (TREE_CODE (expr) == TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR)
- if (tree e = find_failing_clause_r (expr))
- expr = e;
- return expr;
+ else if (show_expr_p)
+ inform (cloc, "%qE evaluates to false", bad);
}
/* Build a STATIC_ASSERT for a static assertion with the condition
@@ -11274,12 +11263,12 @@ finish_static_assert (tree condition, tree message, location_t location,
int len = TREE_STRING_LENGTH (message) / sz - 1;
/* See if we can find which clause was failing (for logical AND). */
- tree bad = find_failing_clause (orig_condition);
+ tree bad = find_failing_clause (NULL, orig_condition);
/* If not, or its location is unusable, fall back to the previous
location. */
location_t cloc = cp_expr_loc_or_loc (bad, location);
- /* Nobody wants to see the artificial (bool) cast. */
- bad = tree_strip_nop_conversions (bad);
+
+ auto_diagnostic_group d;
/* Report the error. */
if (len == 0)
@@ -11288,21 +11277,7 @@ finish_static_assert (tree condition, tree message, location_t location,
error_at (cloc, "static assertion failed: %s",
TREE_STRING_POINTER (message));
- /* Actually explain the failure if this is a concept check or a
- requires-expression. */
- if (concept_check_p (bad)
- || TREE_CODE (bad) == REQUIRES_EXPR)
- diagnose_constraints (location, bad, NULL_TREE);
- else if (COMPARISON_CLASS_P (bad)
- && ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_OPERAND (bad, 0))))
- {
- tree op0 = fold_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (bad, 0));
- tree op1 = fold_non_dependent_expr (TREE_OPERAND (bad, 1));
- tree cond = build2 (TREE_CODE (bad), boolean_type_node, op0, op1);
- inform (cloc, "the comparison reduces to %qE", cond);
- }
- else if (show_expr_p)
- inform (cloc, "%qE evaluates to false", bad);
+ diagnose_failing_condition (bad, cloc, show_expr_p);
}
else if (condition && condition != error_mark_node)
{