diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/doloop-1.c | 3 |
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 96a9625..364affb 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2004-03-28 David Edelsohn <edelsohn@gnu.org> + + * gcc.dg/doloop-1.c: Do not check for lack of "blt". + 2004-03-28 Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> * gcc.dg/noncompile/undeclared-2.c: New test. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/doloop-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/doloop-1.c index 3561a17..0362399 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/doloop-1.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/doloop-1.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /* Make sure both loops are recognized as doloops. If so, "bdnz" will be generated on ppc; if not, - you will get "ble". */ + you will get "ble" or "blt" or "bge". */ /* { dg-do compile { target powerpc-*-* } } */ /* { dg-options "-O2" } */ @@ -15,4 +15,3 @@ void foo (int count, char* pca, char* pcb) { *pca = *pcb; } /* { dg-final { scan-assembler "bdnz" } } */ -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "blt" } } */ |