diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/combine.c | 7 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index c294b01..50c430a 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2015-05-07 Venkataramanan Kumar <venkataramanan.kumar@amd.com> + + * combine.c (make_compound_operation): Remove checks for PLUS/MINUS + rtx type. + 2015-05-07 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> PR tree-optimization/66002 diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c index c04146a..9e3eb03 100644 --- a/gcc/combine.c +++ b/gcc/combine.c @@ -7723,9 +7723,8 @@ extract_left_shift (rtx x, int count) We try, as much as possible, to re-use rtl expressions to save memory. IN_CODE says what kind of expression we are processing. Normally, it is - SET. In a memory address (inside a MEM, PLUS or minus, the latter two - being kludges), it is MEM. When processing the arguments of a comparison - or a COMPARE against zero, it is COMPARE. */ + SET. In a memory address it is MEM. When processing the arguments of + a comparison or a COMPARE against zero, it is COMPARE. */ rtx make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code) @@ -7745,8 +7744,6 @@ make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code) but once inside, go back to our default of SET. */ next_code = (code == MEM ? MEM - : ((code == PLUS || code == MINUS) - && SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (mode)) ? MEM : ((code == COMPARE || COMPARISON_P (x)) && XEXP (x, 1) == const0_rtx) ? COMPARE : in_code == COMPARE ? SET : in_code); |