aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libstdc++-v3
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>2005-04-24 22:37:07 +0000
committerPaolo Carlini <paolo@gcc.gnu.org>2005-04-24 22:37:07 +0000
commite180079e8479b5cb499cbc9e2823e0a12aad4702 (patch)
treea741d507e96458b3908a14849d92ebfac2ca8f0f /libstdc++-v3
parent58a690ae240d0abc0fde8b1e6787ad53f1464c46 (diff)
downloadgcc-e180079e8479b5cb499cbc9e2823e0a12aad4702.zip
gcc-e180079e8479b5cb499cbc9e2823e0a12aad4702.tar.gz
gcc-e180079e8479b5cb499cbc9e2823e0a12aad4702.tar.bz2
lwg-active.html, [...]: Import Revision 35.
2005-04-24 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> * docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html, lwg-defects.html: Import Revision 35. From-SVN: r98681
Diffstat (limited to 'libstdc++-v3')
-rw-r--r--libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog4
-rw-r--r--libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html677
-rw-r--r--libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html1762
3 files changed, 1252 insertions, 1191 deletions
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
index 0853f49..749d285 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2005-04-24 Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de>
+
+ * docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html, lwg-defects.html: Import Revision 35.
+
2005-04-20 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* testsuite/ext/bitmap_allocator/check_allocate_max_size.cpp: Add
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html
index c0e5439..bb6dd4c 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-active.html
@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
<table>
<tbody><tr>
<td align="left">Doc. no.</td>
-<td align="left">N1753=05-0013</td>
+<td align="left">N1762=05-0022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Date:</td>
-<td align="left">2005-01-17</td>
+<td align="left">2005-03-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Project:</td>
@@ -17,21 +17,21 @@
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Reply to:</td>
-<td align="left">Matt Austern &lt;austern@apple.com&gt;</td>
+<td align="left">Matt Austern &lt;austern@google.com&gt;</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
-<h1>C++ Standard Library Active Issues List (Revision 34)</h1>
+<h1>C++ Standard Library Active Issues List (Revision 35)</h1>
<p>Reference ISO/IEC IS 14882:1998(E)</p>
<p>Also see:</p>
<ul>
<li>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li>
<li>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li>
<li>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li>
- <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a></li>
- <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li>
+ <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a></li>
+ <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li>
</ul>
<p>The purpose of this document is to record the status of issues
which have come before the Library Working Group (LWG) of the ANSI
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@
<p>This document contains only library issues which are actively being
considered by the Library Working Group. That is, issues which have a
- status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>,
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>. See
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a> for issues considered defects and
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues considered closed.</p>
+ status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>,
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>. See
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html">Library Defect Reports List</a> for issues considered defects and
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues considered closed.</p>
<p>The issues in these lists are not necessarily formal ISO Defect
Reports (DR's). While some issues will eventually be elevated to
@@ -88,8 +88,11 @@
directory as the issues list files. </p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
+<li>R35:
+2005-03 pre-Lillehammer mailing.
+</li>
<li>R34:
-2005-01 mid-term mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#488">488</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#494">494</a>.
+2005-01 mid-term mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#488">488</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#494">494</a>.
</li>
<li>R33:
2004-11 post-Redmond mailing. Reflections actions taken in Redmond.
@@ -97,27 +100,27 @@
<li>R32:
2004-09 pre-Redmond mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and
new issues received after the 2004-07 mailing. Added
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>.
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>.
</li>
<li>R31:
2004-07 mid-term mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and
new issues received after the post-Sydney mailing. Added
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>.
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>.
</li>
<li>R30:
Post-Sydney mailing: reflects decisions made at the Sydney meeting.
Voted all "Ready" issues from R29 into the working paper.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>.
</li>
<li>R29:
-Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>.
+Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>.
</li>
<li>R28:
Post-Kona mailing: reflects decisions made at the Kona meeting.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>.
</li>
<li>R27:
-Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>.
+Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>.
</li>
<li>R26:
Post-Oxford mailing: reflects decisions made at the Oxford meeting.
@@ -125,139 +128,139 @@ All issues in Ready status were voted into DR status. All issues in
DR status were voted into WP status.
</li>
<li>R25:
-Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>.
+Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>.
</li>
<li>R24:
Post-Santa Cruz mailing: reflects decisions made at the Santa Cruz
-meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were
-moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed
-at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining
-concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording.
+meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were
+moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed
+at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining
+concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording.
</li>
<li>R23:
-Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>.
+Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>.
Moved issues in the TC to TC status.
</li>
<li>R22:
-Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>.
+Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>.
</li>
<li>R21:
-Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>.
+Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>.
</li>
<li>R20:
Post-Redmond mailing; reflects actions taken in Redmond. Added
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence
not discussed at the meeting.
All Ready issues were moved to DR status, with the exception of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
Noteworthy issues discussed at Redmond include
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.
</li>
<li>R19:
Pre-Redmond mailing. Added new issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>.
</li>
<li>R18:
Post-Copenhagen mailing; reflects actions taken in Copenhagen.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>.
Changed status of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a>
to DR.
Changed status of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>
to Ready.
Closed issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>
as NAD.
</li>
<li>R17:
Pre-Copenhagen mailing. Converted issues list to XML. Added proposed
-resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>.
+resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>.
</li>
<li>R16:
post-Toronto mailing; reflects actions taken in Toronto. Added new
-issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it
-appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix
+issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it
+appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix
the bug in enough places.
</li>
<li>R15:
pre-Toronto mailing. Added issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting
changes so that we pass Weblint tests.
</li>
<li>R14:
post-Tokyo II mailing; reflects committee actions taken in
-Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242)
+Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242)
</li>
<li>R13:
-pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>.
+pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>.
</li>
<li>R12:
-pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution
-of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>.
+pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution
+of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>.
</li>
<li>R11:
post-Kona mailing: Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions
in Kona (99-0048/N1224). Note changed resolution of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a>
-to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a>
+to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and
"closed" documents. Changed the proposed resolution of issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution
-of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution
+of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>.
</li>
<li>R10:
-pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99)
+pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99)
</li>
<li>R9:
-pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and
+pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and
"closed" documents. (99-0030/N1206, 25 Aug 99)
</li>
<li>R8:
@@ -265,36 +268,36 @@ post-Dublin mailing. Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions
in Dublin. (99-0016/N1193, 21 Apr 99)
</li>
<li>R7:
-pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99)
+pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99)
</li>
<li>R6:
-pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>,
-and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99)
+pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>,
+and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99)
</li>
<li>R5:
-update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare
+update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare
for making list public. (30 Dec 98)
</li>
<li>R4:
-post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several
+post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several
issues corrected. (22 Oct 98)
</li>
<li>R3:
-post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>
+post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>
added, many issues updated to reflect LWG consensus (12 Oct 98)
</li>
<li>R2:
-pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added,
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98)
+pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added,
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98)
</li>
<li>R1:
-Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code
-format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98)
+Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code
+format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98)
</li>
</ul>
<h2>
@@ -369,24 +372,24 @@ format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-def
status, the LWG believes that this issue should be revisited at the
next revision of the standard. It is usually paired with NAD.</p>
- <p>Issues are always given the status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> when
+ <p>Issues are always given the status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a> when
they first appear on the issues list. They may progress to
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> while the LWG
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a> or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a> while the LWG
is actively working on them. When the LWG has reached consensus on
the disposition of an issue, the status will then change to
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Dup">Dup</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#NAD">NAD</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> as appropriate. Once the full J16 committee votes to
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Dup">Dup</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#NAD">NAD</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a> as appropriate. Once the full J16 committee votes to
forward Ready issues to the Project Editor, they are given the
- status of Defect Report ( <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>). These in turn may
- become the basis for Technical Corrigenda (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>),
+ status of Defect Report ( <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>). These in turn may
+ become the basis for Technical Corrigenda (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>),
or are closed without action other than a Record of Response
- (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a> ). The intent of this LWG process is that
+ (<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a> ). The intent of this LWG process is that
only issues which are truly defects in the Standard move to the
formal ISO DR status.
</p>
<h2>Active Issues</h2>
<hr>
-<a name="23"><h3>23.&nbsp;Num_get overflow result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="23"><h3>23.&nbsp;Num_get overflow result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The current description of numeric input does not account for the
possibility of overflow. This is an implicit result of changing the
description to rely on the definition of scanf() (which fails to
@@ -411,7 +414,7 @@ and hard to trace, so I will describe it briefly:
<ul>
<li>
- According to 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>
+ According to 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>
paragraph 11 <tt>failbit</tt> is set if <tt>scanf()</tt> would
return an input error; otherwise a value is converted to the rules
of <tt>scanf</tt>.
@@ -505,10 +508,10 @@ upon overflow. We considered three options based on this:</p>
it.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>typo: 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, para 2, bullet 3. Strike "in." from
+<p>typo: 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, para 2, bullet 3. Strike "in." from
the end.</p>
-<p>Change 22.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.nm.put"> [lib.locale.nm.put]</a>, para 11, bullet 2 from:</p>
+<p>Change 22.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.nm.put"> [lib.locale.nm.put]</a>, para 11, bullet 2 from:</p>
<blockquote>
The sequence of chars accumulated in stage 2 would have
caused scanf to report an input failure. ios_base::failbit is
@@ -538,7 +541,7 @@ what kind of error happened. Martin will provide wording, Howard may
help.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="96"><h3>96.&nbsp;Vector&lt;bool&gt; is not a container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="96"><h3>96.&nbsp;Vector&lt;bool&gt; is not a container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
<p><tt>vector&lt;bool&gt;</tt> is not a container as its reference and
pointer types are not references and pointers. </p>
@@ -605,7 +608,7 @@ solution.]</i></p>
be a fully conforming container. These options are not mutually
exclusive.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="130"><h3>130.&nbsp;Return type of container::erase(iterator) differs for associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Mar 1999</p>
+<a name="130"><h3>130.&nbsp;Return type of container::erase(iterator) differs for associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Mar 1999</p>
<p>Table 67 (23.1.1) says that container::erase(iterator) returns an
iterator. Table 69 (23.1.2) says that in addition to this requirement,
associative containers also say that container::erase(iterator)
@@ -615,7 +618,7 @@ fail to meet the requirements for containers.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container
+In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container
requirements, change the return type of <tt>a.erase(q)</tt> from
<tt>void</tt> to <tt>iterator</tt>. Change the
assertion/not/pre/post-condition from "erases the element pointed to
@@ -626,7 +629,7 @@ is returned."
</p>
<p>
-In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container
+In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in Table 69 Associative container
requirements, change the return type of <tt>a.erase(q1, q2)</tt>
from <tt>void</tt> to <tt>iterator</tt>. Change the
assertion/not/pre/post-condition from "erases the elements in the
@@ -635,10 +638,10 @@ q2)</tt>. Returns q2."
</p>
<p>
-In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, in the <tt>map</tt> class synopsis; and
-in 23.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multimap"> [lib.multimap]</a>, in the <tt>multimap</tt> class synopsis; and
-in 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, in the <tt>set</tt> class synopsis; and
-in 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a>, in the <tt>multiset</tt> class synopsis:
+In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, in the <tt>map</tt> class synopsis; and
+in 23.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multimap"> [lib.multimap]</a>, in the <tt>multimap</tt> class synopsis; and
+in 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, in the <tt>set</tt> class synopsis; and
+in 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a>, in the <tt>multiset</tt> class synopsis:
change the signature of the first <tt>erase</tt> overload to
</p>
<pre> iterator erase(iterator position);
@@ -664,7 +667,7 @@ Matt provided wording.]</i></p>
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="197"><h3>197.&nbsp;max_size() underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Oct 1999</p>
+<a name="197"></a><h3><a name="197">197.&nbsp;max_size() underspecified</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Oct 1999</p>
<p>Must the value returned by max_size() be unchanged from call to call? </p>
<p>Must the value returned from max_size() be meaningful? </p>
@@ -696,21 +699,21 @@ into account the actual currently available resources). This,
obviously, has to be determined dynamically each time max_size() is
called. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> table 32 max_size() wording from:<br>
+<p>Change 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> table 32 max_size() wording from:<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the largest value that can meaningfully be
passed to X::allocate<br>
to:<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the value of the largest constant expression
-(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be passed to X::allocate</p>
+(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be passed to X::allocate</p>
<p>
-Change 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 max_size() wording from:<br>
+Change 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 max_size() wording from:<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; size() of the largest possible container.<br>
to:<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; the value of the largest constant expression
-(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be returned by X::size().
+(5.19 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.const"> [expr.const]</a>) that could ever meaningfully be returned by X::size().
</p>
<p><i>[Kona: The LWG informally discussed this and asked Andy Sawyer to submit
@@ -719,7 +722,7 @@ an issue.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG believes (1) above is the intended meaning.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Beman Dawes supplied the above resolution at the
-request of the LWG. 21.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.capacity"> [lib.string.capacity]</a> was not changed because it
+request of the LWG. 21.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.capacity"> [lib.string.capacity]</a> was not changed because it
references max_size() in 23.1. The term "compile-time" was
avoided because it is not defined anywhere in the standard (even
though it is used several places in the library clauses).]</i></p>
@@ -730,7 +733,7 @@ function than as an allocator member function. For the latter,
it is probably best thought of as an architectural limit.
Nathan will provide new wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="201"><h3>201.&nbsp;Numeric limits terminology wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.limits"> [lib.limits]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Stephen Cleary&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Dec 1999</p>
+<a name="201"><h3>201.&nbsp;Numeric limits terminology wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.limits"> [lib.limits]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Stephen Cleary&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Dec 1999</p>
<p>
In some places in this section, the terms "fundamental types" and
"scalar types" are used when the term "arithmetic types" is intended.
@@ -825,7 +828,7 @@ types and for user-defined types, and the standard doesn't make it
clear how numeric_limits applies to each of those cases. A wholesale
review of numeric_limits is needed. A paper would be welcome.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="233"><h3>233.&nbsp;Insertion hints in associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="233"><h3>233.&nbsp;Insertion hints in associative containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Apr 2000</p>
<p>
If <tt>mm</tt> is a multimap and <tt>p</tt> is an iterator
into the multimap, then <tt>mm.insert(p, x)</tt> inserts
@@ -860,7 +863,7 @@ proposed "before or after, if possible, otherwise [...]".
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In table 69 "Associative Container Requirements" in 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in the row for <tt>a.insert(p, t)</tt>,
+<p>In table 69 "Associative Container Requirements" in 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, in the row for <tt>a.insert(p, t)</tt>,
change</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -921,7 +924,7 @@ enough to make the detailed semantics hard to satisfy."]</i></p>
suggests so the LWG can decide between the two options.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="247"><h3>247.&nbsp;<tt>vector</tt>, <tt>deque::insert</tt> complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Lisa Lippincott&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;06 June 2000</p>
+<a name="247"><h3>247.&nbsp;<tt>vector</tt>, <tt>deque::insert</tt> complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Lisa Lippincott&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;06 June 2000</p>
<p>Paragraph 2 of 23.2.4.3 [lib.vector.modifiers] describes the complexity
of <tt>vector::insert</tt>:</p>
@@ -954,7 +957,7 @@ inserting at the end of the <tt>vector</tt>, and then using
<p>I looked to see if <tt>deque</tt> had a similar problem, and was
surprised to find that <tt>deque</tt> places no requirement on the
-complexity of inserting multiple elements (23.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.modifiers"> [lib.deque.modifiers]</a>,
+complexity of inserting multiple elements (23.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.modifiers"> [lib.deque.modifiers]</a>,
paragraph 3):</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -991,7 +994,7 @@ complicated than a while loop whose body is a single-element
insert.]</i></p>
<hr>
<a name="254"><h3>254.&nbsp;Exception types in clause 19 are constructed from <tt>std::string</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;19.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.std.exceptions"> [lib.std.exceptions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;01 Aug 2000</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;19.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.std.exceptions"> [lib.std.exceptions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;01 Aug 2000</p>
<p>
Many of the standard exception types which implementations are
required to throw are constructed with a const std::string&amp;
@@ -1091,8 +1094,8 @@ include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Limit the size of a string that exception objects are required to
-throw: change the postconditions of 19.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.domain.error"> [lib.domain.error]</a> paragraph 3
-and 19.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.runtime.error"> [lib.runtime.error]</a> paragraph 3 to something like this:
+throw: change the postconditions of 19.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.domain.error"> [lib.domain.error]</a> paragraph 3
+and 19.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.runtime.error"> [lib.runtime.error]</a> paragraph 3 to something like this:
"strncmp(what(), what_arg._str(), N) == 0, where N is an
implementation defined constant no smaller than 256".</li>
<li>Allow the const string&amp; constructor to throw, but not the
@@ -1132,7 +1135,7 @@ intended here is that the copy constructors can't fail.</p>
compiler-generated constructors might in principle throw anything.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="258"></a><h3><a name="258">258.&nbsp;Missing allocator requirement</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Aug 2000</p>
+<a name="258"><h3>258.&nbsp;Missing allocator requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Aug 2000</p>
<p>
From lib-7752:
</p>
@@ -1201,10 +1204,10 @@ the second line from the bottom in table 32 already implies the
desired property. This issue should be considered in light of
other issues related to allocator instances.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="280"><h3>280.&nbsp;Comparison of reverse_iterator to const reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterators"> [lib.reverse.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Cleary&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="280"><h3>280.&nbsp;Comparison of reverse_iterator to const reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterators"> [lib.reverse.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Cleary&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
This came from an email from Steve Cleary to Fergus in reference to
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#179">179</a>. The library working group briefly discussed
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#179">179</a>. The library working group briefly discussed
this in Toronto and believed it should be a separate issue. There was
also some reservations about whether this was a worthwhile problem to
fix.
@@ -1225,7 +1228,7 @@ that, I don't see how <i>any</i> user code could break."
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-<b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a>
+<b>Section:</b> 24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a>
add/change the following declarations:</p>
<pre> A) Add a templated assignment operator, after the same manner
as the templated copy constructor, i.e.:
@@ -1251,7 +1254,7 @@ add/change the following declarations:</p>
</pre>
<p>
Also make the addition/changes for these signatures in
-24.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.ops"> [lib.reverse.iter.ops]</a>.
+24.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.ops"> [lib.reverse.iter.ops]</a>.
</p>
<p><i>[
@@ -1263,7 +1266,7 @@ desirable to provide this feature in a different way.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="290"><h3>290.&nbsp;Requirements to for_each and its function object</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;03 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="290"><h3>290.&nbsp;Requirements to for_each and its function object</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;03 Jan 2001</p>
<p>The specification of the for_each algorithm does not have a
"Requires" section, which means that there are no
restrictions imposed on the function object whatsoever. In essence it
@@ -1291,7 +1294,7 @@ algorithm does not say so.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Add a "Requires" section to section 25.1.1 similar to those
proposed for transform and the numeric algorithms (see issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a>):
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a>):
</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1307,8 +1310,8 @@ blanket statement in Clause 25, not just a special requirement for
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="294"><h3>294.&nbsp;User defined macros and standard headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Jan 2001</p>
-<p>Paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> reads: "A
+<a name="294"></a><h3><a name="294">294.&nbsp;User defined macros and standard headers</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Jan 2001</p>
+<p>Paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> reads: "A
translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros
that define names declared in that header." As I read this, it
would mean that the following program is legal:</p>
@@ -1324,30 +1327,30 @@ which &lt;sstream&gt; didn't include &lt;string&gt;.</p>
<p>I think that this phrase was probably formulated before it was
decided that a standard header may freely include other standard
headers. The phrase would be perfectly appropriate for C, for
-example. In light of 17.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.headers"> [lib.res.on.headers]</a> paragraph 1, however,
+example. In light of 17.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.headers"> [lib.res.on.headers]</a> paragraph 1, however,
it isn't stringent enough.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a>, change "A
+<p>In paragraph 2 of 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a>, change "A
translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros
that define names declared in that header." to "A
translation unit that includes a header shall not contain any macros
that define names declared in any standard header."</p>
<p><i>[Copenhagen: the general idea is clearly correct, but there is
-concern about making sure that the two paragraphs in 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> remain consistent. Nathan will provide new
+concern about making sure that the two paragraphs in 17.4.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.macro.names"> [lib.macro.names]</a> remain consistent. Nathan will provide new
wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="299"><h3>299.&nbsp;Incorrect return types for iterator dereference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>, 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John Potter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="299"><h3>299.&nbsp;Incorrect return types for iterator dereference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>, 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John Potter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Jan 2001</p>
<p>
-In section 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>,
+In section 24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>,
Table 75 gives the return type of *r-- as convertible to T. This is
not consistent with Table 74 which gives the return type of *r++ as
T&amp;. *r++ = t is valid while *r-- = t is invalid.
</p>
<p>
-In section 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>,
+In section 24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>,
Table 76 gives the return type of a[n] as convertible to T. This is
not consistent with the semantics of *(a + n) which returns T&amp; by
Table 74. *(a + n) = t is valid while a[n] = t is invalid.
@@ -1438,11 +1441,11 @@ with a return type of convertible to <tt>T</tt> and operational semantics of
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="309"><h3>309.&nbsp;Does sentry catch exceptions?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.format"> [lib.iostream.format]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Mar 2001</p>
+<a name="309"><h3>309.&nbsp;Does sentry catch exceptions?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.format"> [lib.iostream.format]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Mar 2001</p>
<p>
The descriptions of the constructors of basic_istream&lt;&gt;::sentry
-(27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>) and basic_ostream&lt;&gt;::sentry
-(27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>) do not explain what the functions do in
+(27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>) and basic_ostream&lt;&gt;::sentry
+(27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>) do not explain what the functions do in
case an exception is thrown while they execute. Some current
implementations allow all exceptions to propagate, others catch them
and set ios_base::badbit instead, still others catch some but let
@@ -1453,16 +1456,16 @@ others propagate.
The text also mentions that the functions may call setstate(failbit)
(without actually saying on what object, but presumably the stream
argument is meant). That may have been fine for
-basic_istream&lt;&gt;::sentry prior to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>, since
+basic_istream&lt;&gt;::sentry prior to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>, since
the function performs an input operation which may fail. However,
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a> amends 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>, p2 to
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a> amends 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>, p2 to
clarify that the function should actually call setstate(failbit |
eofbit), so the sentence in p3 is redundant or even somewhat
contradictory.
</p>
<p>
-The same sentence that appears in 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>, p3
+The same sentence that appears in 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>, p3
doesn't seem to be very meaningful for basic_istream&lt;&gt;::sentry
which performs no input. It is actually rather misleading since it
would appear to guide library implementers to calling
@@ -1667,9 +1670,9 @@ result of a call to strm.clear().
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> p5 (but not
+<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> p5 (but not
the footnote, which should be moved to the preceding sentence).</p>
-<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> p3 (but not
+<p>Remove the last sentence of 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> p3 (but not
the footnote, which should be moved to the preceding sentence).</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG feels that no clarification of EH policy is necessary: the
@@ -1677,11 +1680,11 @@ result of a call to strm.clear().
performs, and about which of those operations can throw. However, the
sentence at the end should be removed because it's redundant.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="342"><h3>342.&nbsp;seek and eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;09 Oct 201</p>
+<a name="342"><h3>342.&nbsp;seek and eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;09 Oct 201</p>
<p>I think we have a defect.</p>
-<p>According to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> which is now a dr, the
-description of seekg in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 38 now looks
+<p>According to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> which is now a dr, the
+description of seekg in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 38 now looks
like:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1692,7 +1695,7 @@ gcount(). After constructing a sentry object, if fail() != true,
executes rdbuf()­&gt;pubseekpos( pos).
</blockquote>
-<p>And according to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> which is also now a dr,
+<p>And according to lwg issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> which is also now a dr,
27.6.1.3, paragraph 1 looks like:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1757,7 +1760,7 @@ examined by the user to determine why something failed.</p>
and propose a resolution.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="356"><h3>356.&nbsp;Meaning of ctype_base::mask enumerators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jan 2002</p>
+<a name="356"><h3>356.&nbsp;Meaning of ctype_base::mask enumerators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jan 2002</p>
<p>What should the following program print?</p>
@@ -1801,7 +1804,7 @@ The above program assumes that ctype_base::mask enumerators like
<tt>space</tt> and <tt>print</tt> are disjoint, and that the way to
say that a character is both a space and a printing character is to or
those two enumerators together. This is suggested by the "exposition
-only" values in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, but it is nowhere specified in
+only" values in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, but it is nowhere specified in
normative text. An alternative interpretation is that the more
specific categories subsume the less specific. The above program
gives the results it does on the Microsoft compiler because, on that
@@ -1826,8 +1829,8 @@ lib-9224, lib-9226, lib-9229, lib-9270, lib-9272, lib-9273, lib-9274,
lib-9277, lib-9279.
</p>
-<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> is related, but not identical. The
-proposed resolution if issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> says that
+<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> is related, but not identical. The
+proposed resolution if issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#339">339</a> says that
ctype_base::mask must be a bitmask type. It does not say that the
ctype_base::mask elements are bitmask elements, so it doesn't
directly affect this issue.</p>
@@ -1899,9 +1902,9 @@ option 1 is required for C99 compatibility.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="362"><h3>362.&nbsp;bind1st/bind2nd type safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Demkin&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Apr 2002</p>
+<a name="362"><h3>362.&nbsp;bind1st/bind2nd type safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Demkin&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Apr 2002</p>
<p>
-The definition of bind1st() (20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a>) can result in
+The definition of bind1st() (20.3.6.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.1st"> [lib.bind.1st]</a>) can result in
the construction of an unsafe binding between incompatible pointer
types. For example, given a function whose first parameter type is
'pointer to T', it's possible without error to bind an argument of
@@ -1929,12 +1932,12 @@ map its argument to the expected argument type of the bound function
</pre>
<p>
-A functional-style conversion (5.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.type.conv"> [expr.type.conv]</a>) is defined to be
-semantically equivalent to an explicit cast expression (5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/expr.html#expr.cast"> [expr.cast]</a>), which may (according to 5.4, paragraph 5) be interpreted
+A functional-style conversion (5.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.type.conv"> [expr.type.conv]</a>) is defined to be
+semantically equivalent to an explicit cast expression (5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/expr.html#expr.cast"> [expr.cast]</a>), which may (according to 5.4, paragraph 5) be interpreted
as a reinterpret_cast, thus masking the error.
</p>
-<p>The problem and proposed change also apply to 20.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.2nd"> [lib.bind.2nd]</a>.</p>
+<p>The problem and proposed change also apply to 20.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.bind.2nd"> [lib.bind.2nd]</a>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
The simplest and most localized change to prevent such errors is to
@@ -1965,7 +1968,7 @@ programming.
all. Jeremy will check with the original author of this part
of the Standard and will see what the original intent was.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="366"><h3>366.&nbsp;Excessive const-qualification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown, Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 May 2002</p>
+<a name="366"><h3>366.&nbsp;Excessive const-qualification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown, Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 May 2002</p>
<p>
The following member functions are declared const, yet return non-const
pointers. We believe they are should be changed, because they allow code
@@ -2067,9 +2070,9 @@ those terms, does not appear in the standard.]</i></p>
const basic_filebuf&lt;charT,traits&gt;* rdbuf() const;
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="368"><h3>368.&nbsp;basic_string::replace has two "Throws" paragraphs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jun 2002</p>
+<a name="368"><h3>368.&nbsp;basic_string::replace has two "Throws" paragraphs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jun 2002</p>
<p>
-21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a> basic_string::replace, second
+21.3.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::replace"> [lib.string::replace]</a> basic_string::replace, second
signature, given in paragraph 1, has two "Throws" paragraphs (3 and
5).
</p>
@@ -2085,7 +2088,7 @@ part of the "Effects" paragraph.
Someone who understands string replace well needs to work on
this.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="369"><h3>369.&nbsp;io stream objects and static ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ruslan Abdikeev&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Jul 2002</p>
+<a name="369"><h3>369.&nbsp;io stream objects and static ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ruslan Abdikeev&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Jul 2002</p>
<p>
Is it safe to use standard iostream objects from constructors of
static objects? Are standard iostream objects constructed and are
@@ -2216,7 +2219,7 @@ including the following example:
int main () { return i; }
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="371"><h3>371.&nbsp;Stability of multiset and multimap member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Frank Compagner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 2002</p>
+<a name="371"></a><h3><a name="371">371.&nbsp;Stability of multiset and multimap member functions</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Frank Compagner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 2002</p>
<p>
The requirements for multiset and multimap containers (23.1
[lib.containers.requirements], 23.1.2 [lib.associative.reqmnts],
@@ -2268,7 +2271,7 @@ be hard to track down by users. This would also make the need for an
erase_if() member function that much greater.
</p>
-<p>This issue is somewhat related to LWG issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>.</p>
+<p>This issue is somewhat related to LWG issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>.</p>
<p><i>[Santa Cruz: More people need to look at this. Much user code
may assume stability. On the other hand, it seems drastic to add a
@@ -2276,9 +2279,9 @@ erase_if() member function that much greater.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="376"><h3>376.&nbsp;basic_streambuf semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Aug 2002</p>
+<a name="376"><h3>376.&nbsp;basic_streambuf semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Aug 2002</p>
<p>
-In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, Table 90, the implication is that
+In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, Table 90, the implication is that
the four conditions should be mutually exclusive, but they are not.
The first two cases, as written, are subcases of the third. I think it
would be clearer if the conditions were rewritten as follows:
@@ -2316,7 +2319,7 @@ implementations before we decide on a solution.]</i></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="382"><h3>382.&nbsp;codecvt do_in/out result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Aug 2002</p>
+<a name="382"><h3>382.&nbsp;codecvt do_in/out result</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Aug 2002</p>
<p>
It seems that the descriptions of codecvt do_in() and do_out() leave
sufficient room for interpretation so that two implementations of
@@ -2341,7 +2344,7 @@ the following seems less than adequately specified:
<ol>
<li>
- 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2 says this about the effects of the
+ 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2 says this about the effects of the
function: ...Stops if it encounters a character it cannot
convert... This assumes that there *is* a character to
convert. What happens when there is a sequence that doesn't form a
@@ -2374,7 +2377,7 @@ the following seems less than adequately specified:
</li>
</ol>
<p>
-Finally, the conditions described at the end of 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p4 don't seem to be possible:
+Finally, the conditions described at the end of 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p4 don't seem to be possible:
</p>
<blockquote>
"A return value of partial, if (from_next == from_end),
@@ -2388,7 +2391,7 @@ If the value is partial, it's not clear to me that (from_next
==from_end) could ever hold if there isn't enough room
in the destination buffer. In order for (from_next==from_end) to
hold, all characters in that range must have been successfully
-converted (according to 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2) and since there are no
+converted (according to 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, p2) and since there are no
further source characters to convert, no more room in the
destination buffer can be needed.
</p>
@@ -2485,9 +2488,9 @@ written with the assumption of 1-&gt;N conversion in mind, not M-&gt;N.
Bill, Howard, and Martin will provide new wording.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="384"><h3>384.&nbsp;equal_range has unimplementable runtime complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans Bos&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Oct 2002</p>
+<a name="384"><h3>384.&nbsp;equal_range has unimplementable runtime complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans Bos&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Oct 2002</p>
<p>
-Section 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>
+Section 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>
states that at most 2 * log(last - first) + 1
comparisons are allowed for equal_range.
</p>
@@ -2532,11 +2535,11 @@ other questions matter.)]</i></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="385"><h3>385.&nbsp;Does call by value imply the CopyConstructible requirement?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Oct 2002</p>
+<a name="385"><h3>385.&nbsp;Does call by value imply the CopyConstructible requirement?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Oct 2002</p>
<p>
Many function templates have parameters that are passed by value;
a typical example is <tt>find_if</tt>'s <i>pred</i> parameter in
-25.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find"> [lib.alg.find]</a>. Are the corresponding template parameters
+25.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find"> [lib.alg.find]</a>. Are the corresponding template parameters
(<tt>Predicate</tt> in this case) implicitly required to be
CopyConstructible, or does that need to be spelled out explicitly?
</p>
@@ -2555,8 +2558,8 @@ my_predicate&amp; is not CopyConstructible.
<p>
The scope of this problem, if it is a problem, is unknown. Function
-object arguments to generic algorithms in clauses 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>
-and 26 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.numerics"> [lib.numerics]</a> are obvious examples. A review of the whole
+object arguments to generic algorithms in clauses 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>
+and 26 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.numerics"> [lib.numerics]</a> are obvious examples. A review of the whole
library is necessary.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -2568,8 +2571,8 @@ into references? References aren't copy constructible, so this should
not be allowed.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="386"></a><h3><a name="386">386.&nbsp;Reverse iterator's operator[] has impossible return type</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Oct 2002</p>
-<p>In 24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a>, <tt>reverse_iterator&lt;&gt;::operator[]</tt>
+<a name="386"><h3>386.&nbsp;Reverse iterator's operator[] has impossible return type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Oct 2002</p>
+<p>In 24.4.1.3.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opindex"> [lib.reverse.iter.opindex]</a>, <tt>reverse_iterator&lt;&gt;::operator[]</tt>
is specified as having a return type of <tt>reverse_iterator::reference</tt>,
which is the same as <tt>iterator_traits&lt;Iterator&gt;::reference</tt>.
(Where <tt>Iterator</tt> is the underlying iterator type.)</p>
@@ -2581,7 +2584,7 @@ which is the same as <tt>iterator_traits&lt;Iterator&gt;::reference</tt>.
to <tt>Iterator</tt>'s value type. The return type specified for
reverse_iterator's operator[] would thus appear to be impossible.</p>
-<p>With the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>, the type of
+<p>With the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>, the type of
<tt>a[n]</tt> will continue to be required (for random access
iterators) to be convertible to the value type, and also <tt>a[n] =
t</tt> will be a valid expression. Implementations of
@@ -2593,7 +2596,7 @@ which is the same as <tt>iterator_traits&lt;Iterator&gt;::reference</tt>.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 24.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.requirements"> [lib.reverse.iter.requirements]</a> change:</p>
+<p>In 24.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.requirements"> [lib.reverse.iter.requirements]</a> change:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>reference operator[](difference_type n) const;
@@ -2619,7 +2622,7 @@ Comments from Dave Abrahams: IMO we should resolve 386 by just saying
readable and writable, which is about as good as we can do.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="387"><h3>387.&nbsp;std::complex over-encapsulated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Gabriel Dos Reis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Nov 2002</p>
+<a name="387"><h3>387.&nbsp;std::complex over-encapsulated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Gabriel Dos Reis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Nov 2002</p>
<p>
The absence of explicit description of std::complex&lt;T&gt; layout
makes it imposible to reuse existing software developed in traditional
@@ -2651,7 +2654,7 @@ of std::complex&lt;&gt; is not justified.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following requirements to 26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a> as 26.2/4:</p>
+<p>Add the following requirements to 26.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.numbers"> [lib.complex.numbers]</a> as 26.2/4:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If z is an lvalue expression of type cv std::complex&lt;T&gt; then</p>
@@ -2678,7 +2681,7 @@ imaginary part of a[i].</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
-<p>In the header synopsis in 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, replace</p>
+<p>In the header synopsis in 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, replace</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; T real(const complex&lt;T&gt;&amp;);
template&lt;class T&gt; T imag(const complex&lt;T&gt;&amp;);
</pre>
@@ -2691,7 +2694,7 @@ imaginary part of a[i].</li>
template&lt;class T&gt; T&amp; imag( complex&lt;T&gt;&amp;);
</pre>
-<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 1, change</p>
+<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 1, change</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; T real(const complex&lt;T&gt;&amp;);
</pre>
<p>to</p>
@@ -2701,7 +2704,7 @@ imaginary part of a[i].</li>
<p>and change the <b>Returns</b> clause to "<b>Returns:</b> The real
part of <i>x</i></p>.
-<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 2, change</p>
+<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> paragraph 2, change</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; T imag(const complex&lt;T&gt;&amp;);
</pre>
<p>to</p>
@@ -2729,7 +2732,7 @@ part of <i>x</i></p>.
justification for this change even without other considerations. All
existing implementations already have the layout proposed here.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="394"><h3>394.&nbsp;behavior of formatted output on failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Dec 2002</p>
+<a name="394"><h3>394.&nbsp;behavior of formatted output on failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Dec 2002</p>
<p>
There is a contradiction in Formatted output about what bit is
supposed to be set if the formatting fails. On sentence says it's
@@ -2824,7 +2827,7 @@ functions should be changed as proposed below.
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="396"></a><h3><a name="396">396.&nbsp;what are characters zero and one</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Jan 2003</p>
+<a name="396"><h3>396.&nbsp;what are characters zero and one</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Jan 2003</p>
<p>
23.3.5.1, p6 [lib.bitset.cons] talks about a generic character
having the value of 0 or 1 but there is no definition of what
@@ -2858,7 +2861,7 @@ is a bitset, not a string.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Change the constructor's function declaration immediately before
-23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p3 to:</p>
+23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p3 to:</p>
<pre> template &lt;class charT, class traits, class Allocator&gt;
explicit
bitset(const basic_string&lt;charT, traits, Allocator&gt;&amp; str,
@@ -2867,7 +2870,7 @@ is a bitset, not a string.
basic_string&lt;charT, traits, Allocator&gt;::npos,
charT zero = charT('0'), charT one = charT('1'))
</pre>
-<p>Change the first two sentences of 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p6 to: "An
+<p>Change the first two sentences of 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> p6 to: "An
element of the constructed string has value 0 if the corresponding
character in <i>str</i>, beginning at position <i>pos</i>,
is <i>zero</i>. Otherwise, the element has the value 1.</p>
@@ -2880,15 +2883,15 @@ is <i>zero</i>. Otherwise, the element has the value 1.</p>
</p>
<p>Change the declaration of the <tt>to_string</tt> member function
- immediately before 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to:</p>
+ immediately before 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to:</p>
<pre> template &lt;class charT, class traits, class Allocator&gt;
basic_string&lt;charT, traits, Allocator&gt;
to_string(charT zero = charT('0'), charT one = charT('1')) const;
</pre>
-<p>Change the last sentence of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to: "Bit
+<p>Change the last sentence of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> p33 to: "Bit
value 0 becomes the character <tt><i>zero</i></tt>, bit value 1 becomes the
character <tt><i>one</i></tt>.</p>
-<p>Change 23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a> p8 to:</p>
+<p>Change 23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a> p8 to:</p>
<p><b>Returns</b>:</p>
<pre> os &lt;&lt; x.template to_string&lt;charT,traits,allocator&lt;charT&gt; &gt;(
use_facet&lt;ctype&lt;charT&gt; &gt;(<i>os</i>.getloc()).widen('0'),
@@ -2904,10 +2907,10 @@ is <i>zero</i>. Otherwise, the element has the value 1.</p>
resolution allows those users who care about this issue to get it
right.</p>
<p>We fix the inserter to use the new arguments. Note that we already
- fixed the analogous problem with the extractor in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a>.</p>
+ fixed the analogous problem with the extractor in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="397"><h3>397.&nbsp;ostream::sentry dtor throws exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Jan 2003</p>
+<a name="397"><h3>397.&nbsp;ostream::sentry dtor throws exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Jan 2003</p>
<p>
17.4.4.8, p3 prohibits library dtors from throwing exceptions.
</p>
@@ -2939,7 +2942,7 @@ is the only one that can throw. PJP suggests specifying that
sentry::~sentry() should internally catch any exceptions it might cause.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="398"><h3>398.&nbsp;effects of end-of-file on unformatted input functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Jan 2003</p>
+<a name="398"><h3>398.&nbsp;effects of end-of-file on unformatted input functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Jan 2003</p>
<p>
While reviewing unformatted input member functions of istream
for their behavior when they encounter end-of-file during input
@@ -3054,9 +3057,9 @@ end-of-file):
and changing it on an individual basis wouldn't make things better.
Dietmar will do this work.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="401"><h3>401.&nbsp; incorrect type casts in table 32 in lib.allocator.requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2003</p>
+<a name="401"><h3>401.&nbsp; incorrect type casts in table 32 in lib.allocator.requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2003</p>
<p>
-I think that in par2 of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> the last two
+I think that in par2 of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> the last two
lines of table 32 contain two incorrect type casts. The lines are ...
</p>
@@ -3093,7 +3096,7 @@ current requirement (being a random access iterator).
<p>
Note: Actually I would prefer to replace "((T*)p)?-&gt;dtor_name" with
"p?-&gt;dtor_name", but AFAICS this is not possible cause of an omission
-in 13.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/over.html#over.ref"> [over.ref]</a> (for which I have filed another DR on 29.11.2002).
+in 13.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/over.html#over.ref"> [over.ref]</a> (for which I have filed another DR on 29.11.2002).
</p>
<p><i>[Kona: The LWG thinks this is somewhere on the border between
@@ -3105,7 +3108,7 @@ in 13.5.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/over.
non-default pointer types.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="406"><h3>406.&nbsp;vector::insert(s) exception safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Apr 2003</p>
+<a name="406"><h3>406.&nbsp;vector::insert(s) exception safety</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Apr 2003</p>
<p>
There is a possible defect in the standard: the standard text was
never intended to prevent arbitrary ForwardIterators, whose operations
@@ -3116,7 +3119,7 @@ standard appears to impose requirements that aren't met by any
existing implementation.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 1 with:</p>
+<p>Replace 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 1 with:</p>
<blockquote>
1- Notes: Causes reallocation if the new size is greater than the
old capacity. If no reallocation happens, all the iterators and
@@ -3128,14 +3131,14 @@ existing implementation.
<p><i>[We probably need to say something similar for deque.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="408"><h3>408.&nbsp;Is vector&lt;reverse_iterator&lt;char*&gt; &gt; forbidden?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 June 2003</p>
+<a name="408"><h3>408.&nbsp;Is vector&lt;reverse_iterator&lt;char*&gt; &gt; forbidden?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 June 2003</p>
<p>
I've been discussing iterator semantics with Dave Abrahams, and a
surprise has popped up. I don't think this has been discussed before.
</p>
<p>
-24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> says that the only operation that can be performed on "singular"
+24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> says that the only operation that can be performed on "singular"
iterator values is to assign a non-singular value to them. (It
doesn't say they can be destroyed, and that's probably a defect.)
Some implementations have taken this to imply that there is no need
@@ -3185,7 +3188,7 @@ T(), and so copying is defined if the result of T() is copyable.
</p>
<p>
-Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, which defines reverse_iterator's default
+Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, which defines reverse_iterator's default
constructor more precisely, has some relevance to this issue.
However, it is not the whole story.
</p>
@@ -3211,7 +3214,7 @@ uninitialized, and possibly equal to an existing pointer value, or
<p>
8.5 paragraph 5 seems to make clear that the second is required to
-satisfy DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, at least for non-class Iterator argument
+satisfy DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, at least for non-class Iterator argument
types.
</p>
@@ -3238,7 +3241,7 @@ are default-initialized, and it should explicitly allow destroying any
iterator value, singular or not, default-initialized or not.
</p>
-<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#407">407</a></p>
+<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#407">407</a></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p><i>[
@@ -3252,9 +3255,9 @@ wrong to impose so strict a requirement for iterators.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="409"><h3>409.&nbsp;Closing an fstream should clear error state</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 June 2003</p>
+<a name="409"><h3>409.&nbsp;Closing an fstream should clear error state</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 June 2003</p>
<p>
-A strict reading of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> shows that opening or
+A strict reading of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> shows that opening or
closing a basic_[io]fstream does not affect the error bits. This
means, for example, that if you read through a file up to EOF, and
then close the stream and reopen it at the beginning of the file,
@@ -3262,7 +3265,7 @@ the EOF bit in the stream's error state is still set. This is
counterintuitive.
</p>
<p>
-The LWG considered this issue once before, as issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#22">22</a>,
+The LWG considered this issue once before, as issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#22">22</a>,
and put in a footnote to clarify that the strict reading was indeed
correct. We did that because we believed the standard was
unambiguous and consistent, and that we should not make architectural
@@ -3271,7 +3274,7 @@ language, those considerations no longer apply.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p>
+<p>Change 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p>
<blockquote>
Calls rdbuf()-&gt;open(s,mode|in). If that function returns a null
@@ -3286,7 +3289,7 @@ a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit) (which may throw
ios_base::failure [Footnote: (lib.iostate.flags)), else calls clear().
</blockquote>
-<p>Change 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p>
+<p>Change 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p>
<blockquote>Calls rdbuf()-&gt;open(s,mode|out). If that function
returns a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit) (which may throw
@@ -3300,7 +3303,7 @@ returns a null pointer, calls setstate(failbit) (which may throw
ios_base::failure [Footnote: (lib.iostate.flags)), else calls clear().
</blockquote>
-<p>Change 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p>
+<p>Change 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, para. 3 from:</p>
<blockquote>Calls rdbuf()-&gt;open(s,mode), If that function returns a
null pointer, calls setstate(failbit), (which may throw
@@ -3327,7 +3330,7 @@ flags.]</i></p>
of the three fstream class template instead.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="413"></a><h3><a name="413">413.&nbsp;Proposed resolution to LDR#64 still wrong</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bo Persson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Jul 2003</p>
+<a name="413"><h3>413.&nbsp;Proposed resolution to LDR#64 still wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bo Persson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Jul 2003</p>
<p>
The second sentence of the proposed resolution says:
</p>
@@ -3346,7 +3349,7 @@ basic_istream (*this) and inserting into sb. I can't really tell if
<p><i>[
Sydney: Definitely a real issue. We are, indeed, extracting characters
from an istream and not from sb. The problem was there in the FDIS and
-wasn't fixed by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a>. Probably what was intended was
+wasn't fixed by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a>. Probably what was intended was
to have *this instead of sb. We're talking about the exception flag
state of a basic_istream object, and there's only one basic_istream
object in this discussion, so that would be a consistent
@@ -3372,7 +3375,7 @@ while extracting characters from *this and failbit is on in exceptions(),
then the caught exception is rethrown.
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="416"><h3>416.&nbsp;definitions of XXX_MIN and XXX_MAX macros in climits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.c.limits"> [lib.c.limits]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="416"><h3>416.&nbsp;definitions of XXX_MIN and XXX_MAX macros in climits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.c.limits"> [lib.c.limits]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
Given two overloads of the function foo(), one taking an argument of type
@@ -3421,7 +3424,7 @@ where the actual type is easily detectable by overload resolution.
&lt;climits&gt;.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="417"></a><h3><a name="417">417.&nbsp;what does ctype::do_widen() return on failure</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="417"><h3>417.&nbsp;what does ctype::do_widen() return on failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The Effects and Returns clauses of the do_widen() member function of
the ctype facet fail to specify the behavior of the function on failure.
@@ -3443,7 +3446,7 @@ and iostream to reliably detect this failure.
existing library components aren't written with the assumption
that <i>widen</i> can throw.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="418"><h3>418.&nbsp;exceptions thrown during iostream cleanup</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::Init"> [lib.ios::Init]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="418"><h3>418.&nbsp;exceptions thrown during iostream cleanup</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::Init"> [lib.ios::Init]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The dtor of the ios_base::Init object is supposed to call flush() on the
6 standard iostream objects cout, cerr, clog, wcout, wcerr, and wclog.
@@ -3469,7 +3472,7 @@ object throws.
might reasonably swallow the exception, or call abort, or do
something even more drastic.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="419"><h3>419.&nbsp;istream extractors not setting failbit if eofbit is already set</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="419"><h3>419.&nbsp;istream extractors not setting failbit if eofbit is already set</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
27.6.1.1.2, p2 says that istream::sentry ctor prepares for input if is.good()
@@ -3547,7 +3550,7 @@ corrected.
clearer.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="421"><h3>421.&nbsp;is basic_streambuf copy-constructible?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="421"><h3>421.&nbsp;is basic_streambuf copy-constructible?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The reflector thread starting with c++std-lib-11346 notes that the class
template basic_streambuf, along with basic_stringbuf and basic_filebuf,
@@ -3566,7 +3569,7 @@ of the standard provide a compiler-generated copy ctor and assignment
operator yet fail to specify their semantics. It's believed that the
only types for which this is actually a problem (i.e. types where the
compiler-generated default may be inappropriate and may not have been
-intended) are locale facets. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#439">439</a>.
+intended) are locale facets. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#439">439</a>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
@@ -3718,7 +3721,7 @@ basic_filebuf.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="422"><h3>422.&nbsp;explicit specializations of member functions of class templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="422"></a><h3><a name="422">422.&nbsp;explicit specializations of member functions of class templates</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
It has been suggested that 17.4.3.1, p1 may or may not allow programs to
explicitly specialize members of standard templates on user-defined types.
@@ -3732,7 +3735,7 @@ the program) by relying on the "as if" rule.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
- Add the following sentence immediately after the text of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>, p1:
+ Add the following sentence immediately after the text of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>, p1:
</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -3756,7 +3759,7 @@ library class templates. We need to consult with CWG to make sure we
use the right wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="423"><h3>423.&nbsp;effects of negative streamsize in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="423"><h3>423.&nbsp;effects of negative streamsize in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
A third party test suite tries to exercise istream::ignore(N) with
@@ -3786,7 +3789,7 @@ ostream::write().
negative. Martin will do that review.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="424"><h3>424.&nbsp;normative notes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.summary"> [lib.structure.summary]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="424"><h3>424.&nbsp;normative notes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.3.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.summary"> [lib.structure.summary]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The text in 17.3.1.1, p1 says:
@@ -3837,7 +3840,7 @@ None of these lists is meant to be exhaustive.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="427"><h3>427.&nbsp;stage 2 and rationale of DR 221</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="427"><h3>427.&nbsp;stage 2 and rationale of DR 221</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The requirements specified in Stage 2 and reiterated in the rationale
of DR 221 (and echoed again in DR 303) specify that num_get&lt;charT&gt;::
@@ -3868,7 +3871,7 @@ instantiate the num_get template on user-defined types.
and traits is in order. The LWG considered and rejected the
possibility of changing numeric facets to use narrowing instead of
widening. This may be a good idea for other reasons (see issue
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#459">459</a>), but it doesn't solve the problem raised by this
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#459">459</a>), but it doesn't solve the problem raised by this
issue. Whether we use widen or narrow the <tt>num_get</tt> facet
still has no idea which traits class the user wants to use for
the comparison, because only streams, not facets, are passed traits
@@ -3884,7 +3887,7 @@ traits classes, then the facet could reasonably be required to
use <tt>char_traits&lt;charT&gt;</tt></p>.
<hr>
-<a name="430"><h3>430.&nbsp;valarray subset operations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.sub"> [lib.valarray.sub]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="430"><h3>430.&nbsp;valarray subset operations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.sub"> [lib.valarray.sub]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The standard fails to specify the behavior of valarray::operator[](slice)
and other valarray subset operations when they are passed an "invalid"
@@ -3898,8 +3901,8 @@ object (e.g., slice (2, 1, 1) for a valarray of size 1).
performance, so we don't want to require specific checking. We
need wording to express this decision.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="431"><h3>431.&nbsp;Swapping containers with unequal allocators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Sep 2003</p>
-<p>Clause 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4 says that implementations
+<a name="431"><h3>431.&nbsp;Swapping containers with unequal allocators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Sep 2003</p>
+<p>Clause 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4 says that implementations
are permitted to supply containers that are unable to cope with
allocator instances and that container implementations may assume
that all instances of an allocator type compare equal. We gave
@@ -3945,7 +3948,7 @@ object (e.g., slice (2, 1, 1) for a valarray of size 1).
<p><i>[pre-Sydney: Howard argues for option 3 in n1599.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="434"><h3>434.&nbsp;bitset::to_string() hard to use</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 2003</p>
+<a name="434"><h3>434.&nbsp;bitset::to_string() hard to use</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 2003</p>
<p>
It has been pointed out a number of times that the bitset to_string() member
function template is tedious to use since callers must explicitly specify the
@@ -3985,9 +3988,9 @@ to_string() member function template:</p>
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="438"><h3>438.&nbsp;Ambiguity in the "do the right thing" clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Oct 2003</p>
+<a name="438"><h3>438.&nbsp;Ambiguity in the "do the right thing" clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Oct 2003</p>
-<p>Section 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, paragraphs 9-11, fixed up the problem
+<p>Section 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, paragraphs 9-11, fixed up the problem
noticed with statements like:</p>
<pre>vector&lt;int&gt; v(10, 1);
</pre>
@@ -4183,7 +4186,7 @@ T implicit_cast(const U&amp; u)
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-Replace 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> paragraphs 9 - 11 with:
+Replace 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a> paragraphs 9 - 11 with:
<p>For every sequence defined in this clause and in clause lib.strings:</p>
@@ -4308,10 +4311,10 @@ then the implementation must reject the constructor as A is no longer
implicitly convertible to B.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="444"><h3>444.&nbsp;Bad use of casts in fstream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 2003</p>
+<a name="444"><h3>444.&nbsp;Bad use of casts in fstream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 2003</p>
<p>
-27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a> p1 seems have same problem as exposed in LWG issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a>.
+27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> p1, 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a> p1 seems have same problem as exposed in LWG issue
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -4353,7 +4356,7 @@ implicitly convertible to B.
<hr>
-<a name="445"><h3>445.&nbsp;iterator_traits::reference unspecified for some iterator categories</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Dec 2003</p>
+<a name="445"></a><h3><a name="445">445.&nbsp;iterator_traits::reference unspecified for some iterator categories</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Dec 2003</p>
<p>
The standard places no restrictions at all on the reference type
of input, output, or forward iterators (for forward iterators it
@@ -4446,7 +4449,7 @@ so I've changed the wording to say that those types may be
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, after:</p>
+<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, after:</p>
<blockquote>
be defined as the iterator's difference type, value type and iterator
@@ -4465,7 +4468,7 @@ is, the same type as the type of <tt>*a</tt> and <tt>a-&gt;</tt>,
respectively.
</blockquote>
-<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, change:</p>
+<p>In 24.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.traits"> [lib.iterator.traits]</a>, change:</p>
<blockquote>
In the case of an output iterator, the types
@@ -4486,7 +4489,7 @@ iterator_traits&lt;Iterator&gt;::pointer
may be defined as <tt>void</tt>.
</blockquote>
-<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, change:</p>
+<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, change:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>typename traits::off_type, charT*, charT&amp;&gt;
</pre>
@@ -4505,7 +4508,7 @@ needed to be changed.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="446"><h3>446.&nbsp;Iterator equality between different containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Dec 2003</p>
+<a name="446"><h3>446.&nbsp;Iterator equality between different containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Dec 2003</p>
<p>
What requirements does the standard place on equality comparisons between
iterators that refer to elements of different containers. For example, if
@@ -4529,7 +4532,7 @@ reachability.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="453"><h3>453.&nbsp;basic_stringbuf::seekoff need not always fail for an empty stream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="453"><h3>453.&nbsp;basic_stringbuf::seekoff need not always fail for an empty stream</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
<pre> pos_type basic_stringbuf::seekoff(off_type, ios_base::seekdir,
ios_base::openmode);
</pre>
@@ -4559,7 +4562,7 @@ gptr() or pptr()) is a null pointer and the new offset newoff
is nonzero, the positioning operation fails.
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="454"><h3>454.&nbsp;basic_filebuf::open should accept wchar_t names</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="454"><h3>454.&nbsp;basic_filebuf::open should accept wchar_t names</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
<pre> basic_filebuf *basic_filebuf::open(const char *, ios_base::open_mode);
</pre>
@@ -4631,7 +4634,7 @@ counterargument, which most but not all LWG members accepted, is that
the mapping between narrow files names and files is also
implemenation defined.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="455"><h3>455.&nbsp;cerr::tie() and wcerr::tie() are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="455"><h3>455.&nbsp;cerr::tie() and wcerr::tie() are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
<p>
Both cerr::tie() and wcerr::tie() are obliged to be null at program
startup. This is overspecification and overkill. It is both traditional
@@ -4660,7 +4663,7 @@ Its state is otherwise the same as required for basic_ios&lt;wchar_t&gt;::init
permit, cout and cerr to be tied on startup. Pre-Redmond: Bill will
provide wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="456"><h3>456.&nbsp;Traditional C header files are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="456"><h3>456.&nbsp;Traditional C header files are overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
<p>The C++ Standard effectively requires that the traditional C headers
(of the form &lt;xxx.h&gt;) be defined in terms of the newer C++
@@ -4744,7 +4747,7 @@ declaring C names in headers.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="457"><h3>457.&nbsp;bitset constructor: incorrect number of initialized bits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dag Henriksson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="457"><h3>457.&nbsp;bitset constructor: incorrect number of initialized bits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dag Henriksson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jan 2004</p>
<p>
The constructor from unsigned long says it initializes "the first M
bit positions to the corresponding bit values in val. M is the smaller
@@ -4758,14 +4761,14 @@ uses to hold the value. Thus, the first M bit position above is not
guaranteed to have any corresponding bit values in val.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> paragraph 2, change "M is the smaller of
+<p>In 23.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.cons"> [lib.bitset.cons]</a> paragraph 2, change "M is the smaller of
N and the value CHAR_BIT * sizeof (unsigned long). (249)" to
"<tt>M</tt> is the smaller of <tt>N</tt> and the number of bits in
- the value representation (section 3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.types"> [basic.types]</a>) of <tt>unsigned
+ the value representation (section 3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.types"> [basic.types]</a>) of <tt>unsigned
long</tt>."
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="458"><h3>458.&nbsp;24.1.5 contains unintented limitation for operator-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Daniel Frey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2004</p>
+<a name="458"><h3>458.&nbsp;24.1.5 contains unintented limitation for operator-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Daniel Frey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2004</p>
<p>
In 24.1.5 [lib.random.access.iterators], table 76 the operational
semantics for the expression "r -= n" are defined as "return r += -n".
@@ -4794,7 +4797,7 @@ operational semantics for this column to:
</code>
<hr>
-<a name="459"><h3>459.&nbsp;Requirement for widening in stage 2 is overspecification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Mar 2004</p>
+<a name="459"><h3>459.&nbsp;Requirement for widening in stage 2 is overspecification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Mar 2004</p>
<p>When parsing strings of wide-character digits, the standard
requires the library to widen narrow-character "atoms" and compare
the widened atoms against the characters that are being parsed.
@@ -4838,11 +4841,11 @@ drastic. Existing implementations with the exception of libstdc++
currently already use narrow() so the impact of the change on programs
would presumably be isolated to just a single implementation. Further,
since narrow() is not required to translate alternate wide digit
-representations such as those mentioned in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> to
+representations such as those mentioned in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> to
their narrow equivalents (i.e., the portable source characters '0'
through '9'), the change does not necessarily imply that these
alternate digits would be treated as ordinary digits and accepted as
-part of numbers during parsing. In fact, the requirement in 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p13 forbids narrow() to translate an alternate
+part of numbers during parsing. In fact, the requirement in 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p13 forbids narrow() to translate an alternate
digit character, wc, to an ordinary digit in the basic source
character set unless the expression
(ctype&lt;charT&gt;::is(ctype_base::digit, wc) == true) holds. This in
@@ -4871,7 +4874,7 @@ technique to perform the comparison:</p>
if it the source and destination types are the same</li>
</ol>
<hr>
-<a name="460"><h3>460.&nbsp;Default modes missing from basic_fstream member specifications</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ben Hutchings&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Apr 2004</p>
+<a name="460"></a><h3><a name="460">460.&nbsp;Default modes missing from basic_fstream member specifications</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ben Hutchings&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Apr 2004</p>
<p>
The second parameters of the non-default constructor and of the open
member function for basic_fstream, named "mode", are optional
@@ -4882,21 +4885,21 @@ constructor declaration has the "explicit" function-specifier implying
that it is intended to be callable with one argument.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, change</p>
+<p>In 27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, change</p>
<pre> explicit basic_fstream(const char* s, ios_base::openmode mode);
</pre>
<p>to</p>
<pre> explicit basic_fstream(const char* s,
ios_base::openmode mode = ios_base::in|ios_base::out);
</pre>
-<p>In 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, change</p>
+<p>In 27.8.1.13 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.members"> [lib.fstream.members]</a>, change</p>
<pre> void open(const char*s, ios_base::openmode mode);
</pre>
<p>to</p>
void open(const char*s,
ios_base::openmode mode = ios_base::in|ios_base::out);
<hr>
-<a name="461"><h3>461.&nbsp;time_get hard or impossible to implement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Mar 2004</p>
+<a name="461"></a><h3><a name="461">461.&nbsp;time_get hard or impossible to implement</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Mar 2004</p>
<p>
Template time_get currently contains difficult, if not impossible,
requirements for do_date_order, do_get_time, and do_get_date. All require
@@ -4983,7 +4986,7 @@ on the value returned by date_order() as follows:
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="462"><h3>462.&nbsp;Destroying objects with static storage duration</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.start.term"> [basic.start.term]</a>, 18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Mar 2004</p>
+<a name="462"><h3>462.&nbsp;Destroying objects with static storage duration</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.start.term"> [basic.start.term]</a>, 18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bill Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Mar 2004</p>
<p>
3.6.3 Termination spells out in detail the interleaving of static
destructor calls and calls to functions registered with atexit. To
@@ -5017,7 +5020,7 @@ even if we don't require it.
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="463"><h3>463.&nbsp;auto_ptr usability issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Rani Sharoni&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Dec 2003</p>
+<a name="463"><h3>463.&nbsp;auto_ptr usability issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Rani Sharoni&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Dec 2003</p>
<p>
TC1 CWG DR #84 effectively made the template&lt;class Y&gt; operator auto_ptr&lt;Y&gt;()
@@ -5271,7 +5274,7 @@ from r-value derived to base).
want to fix auto_ptr for C++-0x, or remove it and replace it with
move_ptr and unique_ptr.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="464"><h3>464.&nbsp;Suggestion for new member functions in standard containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thorsten Ottosen&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 May 2004</p>
+<a name="464"><h3>464.&nbsp;Suggestion for new member functions in standard containers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thorsten Ottosen&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 May 2004</p>
<p>To add slightly more convenience to vector&lt;T&gt; and map&lt;Key,T&gt; we should consider to add</p>
<ol>
@@ -5295,14 +5298,14 @@ at() (which will then throw if the vector is empty). </li>
</ul>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, add the following to the <tt>vector</tt>
+<p>In 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>, add the following to the <tt>vector</tt>
synopsis after "element access" and before "modifiers":</p>
<pre> // <i>[lib.vector.data] data access</i>
pointer data();
const_pointer data() const;
</pre>
-<p>Add a new subsection of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>:</p>
+<p>Add a new subsection of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>23.2.4.x <tt>vector</tt> data access</p>
<pre> pointer data();
@@ -5314,13 +5317,13 @@ at() (which will then throw if the vector is empty). </li>
<p><b>Throws:</b> Nothing.</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, add the following to the <tt>map</tt>
+<p>In 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, add the following to the <tt>map</tt>
synopsis immediately after the line for operator[]:</p>
<pre> T&amp; at(const key_type&amp; x);
const T&amp; at(const key_type&amp; x) const;
</pre>
-<p>Add the following to 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a>:</p>
+<p>Add the following to 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre> T&amp; at(const key_type&amp; x);
const T&amp; at(const key_type&amp; x) const;
@@ -5338,11 +5341,11 @@ synopsis immediately after the line for operator[]:</p>
exception type chosen for <tt>at</tt>, <tt>std::out_of_range</tt>,
was chosen to match <tt>vector::at</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="465"><h3>465.&nbsp;Contents of &lt;ciso646&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="465"><h3>465.&nbsp;Contents of &lt;ciso646&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jun 2004</p>
<p>C header &lt;iso646.h&gt; defines macros for some operators, such as
not_eq for !=.</p>
-<p>Section 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> "Headers" says that except as noted in
+<p>Section 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> "Headers" says that except as noted in
clauses 18 through 27, the &lt;cname&gt; C++ header contents are the same
as the C header &lt;name.h&gt;. In particular, table 12 lists
&lt;ciso646&gt; as a C++ header.</p>
@@ -5372,7 +5375,7 @@ or &lt;ciso646&gt; has no effect. </p>
<p><i>[post-Redmond: Steve provided wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="466"><h3>466.&nbsp;basic_string ctor should prevent null pointer error</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Daniel Frey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="466"><h3>466.&nbsp;basic_string ctor should prevent null pointer error</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Daniel Frey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jun 2004</p>
<p>
Today, my colleagues and me wasted a lot of time. After some time, I
found the problem. It could be reduced to the following short example:
@@ -5401,7 +5404,7 @@ ambiguate any other legal ctors.</p>
value is a null pointer), at run time, or both.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="467"><h3>467.&nbsp;char_traits::lt(), compare(), and memcmp()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.char"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.char]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="467"><h3>467.&nbsp;char_traits::lt(), compare(), and memcmp()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.char"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.char]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
<p>
Table 37 describes the requirements on Traits::compare() in terms of
@@ -5441,7 +5444,7 @@ imposed by Table 37 on compare() when char is signed.
Post-Redmond: Martin provided wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="468"><h3>468.&nbsp;unexpected consequences of ios_base::operator void*()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="468"><h3>468.&nbsp;unexpected consequences of ios_base::operator void*()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
<p>The program below is required to compile but when run it typically
produces unexpected results due to the user-defined conversion from
@@ -5493,7 +5496,7 @@ the value need not be valid.
<p><i>[Redmond: 5-4 straw poll in favor of doing this.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="469"><h3>469.&nbsp;vector&lt;bool&gt; ill-formed relational operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="469"><h3>469.&nbsp;vector&lt;bool&gt; ill-formed relational operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Ready">Ready</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
<p>
The overloads of relational operators for vector&lt;bool&gt; specified
@@ -5509,7 +5512,7 @@ Remove all overloads of overloads of relational operators for
vector&lt;bool&gt; from [lib.vector.bool].
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="470"><h3>470.&nbsp;accessing containers from their elements' special functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="470"><h3>470.&nbsp;accessing containers from their elements' special functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
<p>
The standard doesn't prohibit the destructors (or any other special
@@ -5541,7 +5544,7 @@ in some surprising (i.e., undefined) behavior.
<hr>
-<a name="471"><h3>471.&nbsp;result of what() implementation-defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
+<a name="471"><h3>471.&nbsp;result of what() implementation-defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Open">Open</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jun 2004</p>
<p>[lib.exception] specifies the following:</p>
<pre> exception (const exception&amp;) throw();
@@ -5580,12 +5583,12 @@ ctor was called).
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="472"><h3>472.&nbsp;Missing "Returns" clause in std::equal_range</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Prateek R Karandikar&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Feb 1900</p>
+<a name="472"></a><h3><a name="472">472.&nbsp;Missing "Returns" clause in std::equal_range</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#Review">Review</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Prateek R Karandikar&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Feb 1900</p>
<p>
There is no "Returns:" clause for std::equal_range, which returns non-void.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>, change</p>
+<p>In 25.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.equal.range"> [lib.equal.range]</a>, change</p>
<blockquote>
<b>Effects:</b> Finds the largest subrange [i, j)...
</blockquote>
@@ -5594,7 +5597,7 @@ There is no "Returns:" clause for std::equal_range, which returns non-void.
<b>Returns:</b> The largest subrange [i, j)...
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="473"><h3>473.&nbsp;underspecified ctype calls</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype"> [lib.locale.ctype]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Jul 2004</p>
+<a name="473"><h3>473.&nbsp;underspecified ctype calls</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype"> [lib.locale.ctype]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Jul 2004</p>
<p>
Most ctype member functions come in two forms: one that operates
on a single character at a time and another form that operates
@@ -5689,7 +5692,7 @@ p2, with the following text:
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="474"><h3>474.&nbsp;confusing Footnote 297</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Jul 2004</p>
+<a name="474"><h3>474.&nbsp;confusing Footnote 297</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Jul 2004</p>
<p>
I think Footnote 297 is confused. The paragraph it applies to seems
@@ -5702,7 +5705,7 @@ value of widen(c) is otherwise.
I propose to strike the Footnote.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="475"><h3>475.&nbsp;May the function object passed to for_each modify the elements of the iterated sequence?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Stephan T. Lavavej, Jaakko Jarvi&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Jul 2004</p>
+<a name="475"><h3>475.&nbsp;May the function object passed to for_each modify the elements of the iterated sequence?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Stephan T. Lavavej, Jaakko Jarvi&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Jul 2004</p>
<p>
It is not clear whether the function object passed to for_each is allowed to
modify the elements of the sequence being iterated over.
@@ -5761,7 +5764,7 @@ We suggest that the standard be clarified to explicitly allow the function objec
passed to for_each modify its argument.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following sentence to the Effects in 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>:</p>
+<p>Add the following sentence to the Effects in 25.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.foreach"> [lib.alg.foreach]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
"f may apply non-constant functions through the dereferenced iterators
@@ -5770,7 +5773,7 @@ of a mutable iterator (24.1)."
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="476"><h3>476.&nbsp;Forward Iterator implied mutability</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Jul 2004</p>
+<a name="476"><h3>476.&nbsp;Forward Iterator implied mutability</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Jul 2004</p>
<p>24.1/3 says:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -5799,7 +5802,7 @@ relationship between forward iterator and output iterator.
requirements.
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="477"><h3>477.&nbsp;Operator-&gt; for const forward iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Jul 2004</p>
+<a name="477"><h3>477.&nbsp;Operator-&gt; for const forward iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Jul 2004</p>
<p>
The Forward Iterator requirements table contains the following:
</p>
@@ -5829,10 +5832,10 @@ of referenced members. But Paragraph 11 of [lib.iterator.requirements] says:
<p>AFAICT if we need the second line at all, it should read the same
as the first line.</p>
-<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#478">478</a></p>
+<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#478">478</a></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="478"><h3>478.&nbsp;Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r-&gt;m?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Jul 2004</p>
+<a name="478"></a><h3><a name="478">478.&nbsp;Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r-&gt;m?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Jul 2004</p>
<p>
The Forward Iterator requirements table contains the following:
</p>
@@ -5876,10 +5879,10 @@ answer is to change
<p>in paragraph 11 of [lib.iterator.requirements].</p>
-<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#477">477</a></p>
+<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#477">477</a></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="479"><h3>479.&nbsp;Container requirements and placement new</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Herb Sutter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Aug 2004</p>
+<a name="479"><h3>479.&nbsp;Container requirements and placement new</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Herb Sutter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Aug 2004</p>
<p>Nothing in the standard appears to make this program ill-formed:</p>
<pre> struct C {
@@ -5899,7 +5902,7 @@ answer is to change
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="480"></a><h3><a name="480">480.&nbsp;unary_function and binary_function should have protected nonvirtual destructors</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.base"> [lib.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Joe Gottman&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Aug 2004</p>
+<a name="480"><h3>480.&nbsp;unary_function and binary_function should have protected nonvirtual destructors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.base"> [lib.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Joe Gottman&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Aug 2004</p>
<p>The classes std::unary_function and std::binary_function are both
designed to be inherited from but contain no virtual functions. This
makes it too easy for a novice programmer to write code like
@@ -5947,7 +5950,7 @@ nonvirtual destructors.</p>
};
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="481"><h3>481.&nbsp;unique's effects on the range [result, last)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Aug 2004</p>
+<a name="481"><h3>481.&nbsp;unique's effects on the range [result, last)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Aug 2004</p>
<p>
The standard says that unique(first, last) "eliminates all but the
first element from every consecutive group of equal elements" in
@@ -5966,7 +5969,7 @@ last) except that duplicates have been eliminated.
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="482"><h3>482.&nbsp;Swapping pairs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>, 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Sep 2004</p>
+<a name="482"><h3>482.&nbsp;Swapping pairs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>, 25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Sep 2004</p>
<p>(Based on recent comp.std.c++ discussion)</p>
<p>Pair (and tuple) should specialize std::swap to work in terms of
@@ -5975,7 +5978,7 @@ why swapping two objects of type pair&lt;vector&lt;int&gt;,
list&lt;double&gt; &gt; should not take O(1).</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<hr>
-<a name="484"><h3>484.&nbsp;Convertible to T</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Sep 2004</p>
+<a name="484"><h3>484.&nbsp;Convertible to T</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Sep 2004</p>
<p>From comp.std.c++:</p>
<p>
@@ -6017,7 +6020,7 @@ class I expect?</p>
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="485"><h3>485.&nbsp;output iterator insufficently constrained</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Oct 2004</p>
+<a name="485"><h3>485.&nbsp;output iterator insufficently constrained</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Oct 2004</p>
<p>
The note on 24.1.2 Output iterators insufficently limits what can be
performed on output iterators. While it requires that each iterator is
@@ -6059,7 +6062,7 @@ to instead allow something more along the lines of:</p>
are generated. With the exception of '*r++=t', an iterator must always
be assigned to before it is incremented".</p>
<hr>
-<a name="487"><h3>487.&nbsp;Allocator::construct is too limiting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dhruv Matani&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Oct 2004</p>
+<a name="487"><h3>487.&nbsp;Allocator::construct is too limiting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dhruv Matani&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Oct 2004</p>
<p>
The standard's version of allocator::construct(pointer,
const_reference) severely limits what you can construct using this
@@ -6086,7 +6089,7 @@ be called! Doesn't that sound great?
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="488"><h3>488.&nbsp;rotate throws away useful information</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.rotate"> [lib.alg.rotate]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Nov 2004</p>
+<a name="488"><h3>488.&nbsp;rotate throws away useful information</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.rotate"> [lib.alg.rotate]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Nov 2004</p>
<p>
rotate takes 3 iterators: first, middle and last which point into a
sequence, and rearranges the sequence such that the subrange [middle,
@@ -6156,7 +6159,7 @@ a significant benefit to the change.
<p><b>Returns</b>: advance(first, distance(middle, last)).</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="489"><h3>489.&nbsp;std::remove / std::remove_if wrongly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.remove"> [lib.alg.remove]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
+<a name="489"><h3>489.&nbsp;std::remove / std::remove_if wrongly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.remove"> [lib.alg.remove]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
<p>In Section 25.2.7 [lib.alg.remove], paragraphs 1 to 5 describe the
behavior of the mutating sequence operations std::remove and
std::remove_if. However, the wording does not reflect the intended
@@ -6340,7 +6343,7 @@ ISO/IEC 14882:2003.
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="490"><h3>490.&nbsp;std::unique wrongly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
+<a name="490"><h3>490.&nbsp;std::unique wrongly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
<p>In Section 25.2.8 [lib.alg.unique], paragraphs 1 to 3 describe the
behavior of the mutating sequence operation std::unique. However, the
wording does not reflect the intended behavior [Note: See definition of
@@ -6575,7 +6578,7 @@ only possible solution according to current wording.
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="491"><h3>491.&nbsp;std::list&lt;&gt;::unique incorrectly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
+<a name="491"><h3>491.&nbsp;std::list&lt;&gt;::unique incorrectly specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
<p>In Section 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops], paragraphs 19 to 21 describe the
behavior of the std::list&lt;T, Allocator&gt;::unique operation. However, the
current wording is defective for various reasons.</p>
@@ -6760,7 +6763,7 @@ expressions.</p>
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="492"><h3>492.&nbsp;Invalid iterator arithmetic expressions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a>, 24 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterators"> [lib.iterators]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
+<a name="492"><h3>492.&nbsp;Invalid iterator arithmetic expressions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.containers"> [lib.containers]</a>, 24 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterators"> [lib.iterators]</a>, 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Thomas Mang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 2004</p>
<p>Various clauses other than clause 25 make use of iterator arithmetic not
supported by the iterator category in question.
Algorithms in clause 25 are exceptional because of 25 [lib.algorithms],
@@ -6923,7 +6926,7 @@ first".
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="493"><h3>493.&nbsp;Undefined Expression in Input Iterator Note Title</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris Jefferson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Dec 2004</p>
+<a name="493"><h3>493.&nbsp;Undefined Expression in Input Iterator Note Title</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris Jefferson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Dec 2004</p>
<p>1) In 24.1.1/3, the following text is currently present.</p>
<p>"Note: For input iterators, a==b does not imply ++a=++b (Equality does
@@ -6949,7 +6952,7 @@ not guarantee the substitution property or referential transparency).</p>
<p>
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="494"><h3>494.&nbsp;Wrong runtime complexity for associative container's insert and delete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans B os&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Dec 2004</p>
+<a name="494"><h3>494.&nbsp;Wrong runtime complexity for associative container's insert and delete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans B os&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Dec 2004</p>
<p>According to [lib.associative.reqmts] table 69, the runtime comlexity
of insert(p, t) and erase(q) can be done in amortized constant time.</p>
@@ -6990,5 +6993,55 @@ last) and insert(first, last).</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
</p>
+<hr>
+<a name="495"><h3>495.&nbsp;Clause 22 template parameter requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.localization"> [lib.localization]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jan 2005</p>
+<p>It appears that there are no requirements specified for many of the
+template parameters in clause 22. It looks like this issue has never
+come up, except perhaps for Facet.</p>
+
+<p>Clause 22 isn't even listed in 17.3.2.1 [lib.type.descriptions],
+either, which is the wording that allows requirements on template
+parameters to be identified by name.</p>
+
+<p>So one issue is that 17.3.2.1 [lib.type.descriptions] Should be
+changed to cover clause 22. A better change, which will cover us in
+the future, would be to say that it applies to all the library
+clauses. Then if a template gets added to any library clause we are
+covered.</p>
+
+<p>charT, InputIterator, and other names with requirements defined
+elsewhere are fine, assuming the 17.3.2.1 [lib.type.descriptions] fix.
+But there are a few template arguments names which I don't think have
+requirements given elsewhere:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>internT and externT. The fix is to add wording saying that internT
+and externT must meet the same requirements as template arguments
+named charT.</li>
+
+<li>stateT. I'm not sure about this one. There already is some wording,
+but it seems a bit vague.</li>
+
+<li>Intl. [lib.locale.moneypunct.byname] The fix for this one is to
+rename "Intl" to "International". The name is important because other
+text identifies the requirements for the name International but not
+for Intl.</li>
+</ul>
+<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
+<hr>
+<a name="496"><h3>496.&nbsp;Illegal use of "T" in vector&lt;bool&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#New">New</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;richard@ex-parrot.com&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Feb 2005</p>
+<p>
+In the synopsis of the std::vector&lt;bool&gt; specialisation in 23.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.bool"> [lib.vector.bool]</a>,
+the non-template assign() function has the signature</p>
+
+<pre> void assign( size_type n, const T&amp; t );
+</pre>
+
+<p>
+The type, T, is not defined in this context and should be replaced by
+bool or value_type.</p>
+<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
+<p>
+</p>
<p>----- End of document -----</p>
</body></html> \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html
index 467a0e5..1dd1855 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/docs/html/ext/lwg-defects.html
@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
<table>
<tbody><tr>
<td align="left">Doc. no.</td>
-<td align="left">N1754=05-0014</td>
+<td align="left">N1763=05-0023</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Date:</td>
-<td align="left">2005-01-17</td>
+<td align="left">2005-03-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Project:</td>
@@ -17,33 +17,36 @@
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Reply to:</td>
-<td align="left">Matt Austern &lt;austern@apple.com&gt;</td>
+<td align="left">Matt Austern &lt;austern@google.com&gt;</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
-<h1>C++ Standard Library Defect Report List (Revision 34)</h1>
+<h1>C++ Standard Library Defect Report List (Revision 35)</h1>
<p>Reference ISO/IEC IS 14882:1998(E)</p>
<p>Also see:</p>
<ul>
<li>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-toc.html">Table of Contents</a> for all library issues.</li>
<li>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-index.html">Index by Section</a> for all library issues.</li>
<li>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li>
- <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a></li>
- <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-status.html">Index by Status</a> for all library issues.</li>
+ <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a></li>
+ <li><a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a></li>
</ul>
<p>This document contains only library issues which have been closed
by the Library Working Group (LWG) after being found to be defects
- in the standard. That is, issues which have a status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a>. See the
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues closed as non-defects. See the
- <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a> for active issues and more information. The
+ in the standard. That is, issues which have a status of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>, or <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#RR">RR</a>. See the
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html">Library Closed Issues List</a> for issues closed as non-defects. See the
+ <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a> for active issues and more information. The
introductory material in that document also applies to this
document.</p>
<h2>Revision History</h2>
<ul>
+<li>R35:
+2005-03 pre-Lillehammer mailing.
+</li>
<li>R34:
-2005-01 mid-term mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#488">488</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#494">494</a>.
+2005-01 mid-term mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#488">488</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#494">494</a>.
</li>
<li>R33:
2004-11 post-Redmond mailing. Reflections actions taken in Redmond.
@@ -51,27 +54,27 @@
<li>R32:
2004-09 pre-Redmond mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and
new issues received after the 2004-07 mailing. Added
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>.
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#479">479</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#481">481</a>.
</li>
<li>R31:
2004-07 mid-term mailing: reflects new proposed resolutions and
new issues received after the post-Sydney mailing. Added
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>.
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#463">463</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#478">478</a>.
</li>
<li>R30:
Post-Sydney mailing: reflects decisions made at the Sydney meeting.
Voted all "Ready" issues from R29 into the working paper.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#460">460</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#462">462</a>.
</li>
<li>R29:
-Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>.
+Pre-Sydney mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#441">441</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#457">457</a>.
</li>
<li>R28:
Post-Kona mailing: reflects decisions made at the Kona meeting.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#432">432</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#440">440</a>.
</li>
<li>R27:
-Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>.
+Pre-Kona mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#404">404</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#431">431</a>.
</li>
<li>R26:
Post-Oxford mailing: reflects decisions made at the Oxford meeting.
@@ -79,139 +82,139 @@ All issues in Ready status were voted into DR status. All issues in
DR status were voted into WP status.
</li>
<li>R25:
-Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>.
+Pre-Oxford mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#390">390</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#402">402</a>.
</li>
<li>R24:
Post-Santa Cruz mailing: reflects decisions made at the Santa Cruz
-meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were
-moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed
-at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining
-concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording.
+meeting. All Ready issues from R23 with the exception of <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, which has been given a new proposed resolution, were
+moved to DR status. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#383">383</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a>. (Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#387">387</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#389">389</a> were discussed
+at the meeting.) Made progress on issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> have been moved to Ready status, and the only remaining
+concerns with <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> involve wording.
</li>
<li>R23:
-Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>.
+Pre-Santa Cruz mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#367">367</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#382">382</a>.
Moved issues in the TC to TC status.
</li>
<li>R22:
-Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>.
+Post-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#362">362</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#366">366</a>.
</li>
<li>R21:
-Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>.
+Pre-Curaçao mailing. Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#351">351</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#361">361</a>.
</li>
<li>R20:
Post-Redmond mailing; reflects actions taken in Redmond. Added
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#336">336</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a>, of which issues
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#347">347</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#350">350</a> were added since Redmond, hence
not discussed at the meeting.
All Ready issues were moved to DR status, with the exception of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a>, and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
Noteworthy issues discussed at Redmond include
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#202">202</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#270">270</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#254">254</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.
</li>
<li>R19:
Pre-Redmond mailing. Added new issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#335">335</a>.
</li>
<li>R18:
Post-Copenhagen mailing; reflects actions taken in Copenhagen.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed
-new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#317">317</a>, and discussed
+new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>.
Changed status of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#118">118</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#153">153</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#165">165</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#171">171</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#183">183</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#184">184</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#185">185</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#186">186</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#214">214</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#234">234</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#237">237</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#243">243</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#248">248</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#251">251</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#252">252</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#256">256</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#260">260</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#261">261</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#262">262</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#263">263</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#268">268</a>
to DR.
Changed status of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#117">117</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#230">230</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#238">238</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#241">241</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#242">242</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#259">259</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#266">266</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#271">271</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#272">272</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#273">273</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#275">275</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#281">281</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#284">284</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#285">285</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#286">286</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#288">288</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#292">292</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#295">295</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#297">297</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#298">298</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#301">301</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#303">303</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#306">306</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#307">307</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#308">308</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#312">312</a>
to Ready.
Closed issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a>
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#287">287</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#289">289</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#293">293</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#302">302</a> <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#313">313</a>
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#314">314</a>
as NAD.
</li>
<li>R17:
Pre-Copenhagen mailing. Converted issues list to XML. Added proposed
-resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
-Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>.
+resolutions for issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#49">49</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#76">76</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#235">235</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#267">267</a>.
+Added new issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#278">278</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#311">311</a>.
</li>
<li>R16:
post-Toronto mailing; reflects actions taken in Toronto. Added new
-issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it
-appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix
+issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#265">265</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#277">277</a>. Changed status of issues
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#3">3</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#8">8</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#9">9</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#19">19</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#26">26</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#31">31</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#61">61</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#63">63</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#108">108</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#115">115</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#122">122</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#142">142</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#144">144</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#146">146</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#147">147</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#159">159</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#164">164</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#170">170</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#181">181</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#208">208</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#209">209</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#210">210</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#217">217</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#220">220</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#222">222</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#223">223</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#224">224</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> to "DR". Reopened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#23">23</a>. Reopened
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#187">187</a>. Changed issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#2">2</a> and
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD. Fixed a typo in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a>. Fixed
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#70">70</a>: signature should be changed both places it
+appears. Fixed issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#160">160</a>: previous version didn't fix
the bug in enough places.
</li>
<li>R15:
pre-Toronto mailing. Added issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#233">233</a>-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#264">264</a>. Some small HTML formatting
changes so that we pass Weblint tests.
</li>
<li>R14:
post-Tokyo II mailing; reflects committee actions taken in
-Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242)
+Tokyo. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#232">232</a>. (00-0019R1/N1242)
</li>
<li>R13:
-pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>.
+pre-Tokyo II updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#212">212</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a>.
</li>
<li>R12:
-pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution
-of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>.
+pre-Tokyo II mailing: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#199">199</a> to
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#211">211</a>. Added "and paragraph 5" to the proposed resolution
+of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#29">29</a>. Add further rationale to issue
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#178">178</a>.
</li>
<li>R11:
post-Kona mailing: Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions
in Kona (99-0048/N1224). Note changed resolution of issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a>
-to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#196">196</a>
+to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#198">198</a>. Closed issues list split into "defects" and
"closed" documents. Changed the proposed resolution of issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution
-of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#4">4</a> to NAD, and changed the wording of proposed resolution
+of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#38">38</a>.
</li>
<li>R10:
-pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99)
+pre-Kona updated. Added proposed resolutions <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#86">86</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#91">91</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#92">92</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#190">190</a> to
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#195">195</a>. (99-0033/D1209, 14 Oct 99)
</li>
<li>R9:
-pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and
+pre-Kona mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a> to
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#189">189</a>. Issues list split into separate "active" and
"closed" documents. (99-0030/N1206, 25 Aug 99)
</li>
<li>R8:
@@ -219,47 +222,47 @@ post-Dublin mailing. Updated to reflect LWG and full committee actions
in Dublin. (99-0016/N1193, 21 Apr 99)
</li>
<li>R7:
-pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99)
+pre-Dublin updated: Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#130">130</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#131">131</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#132">132</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#133">133</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#134">134</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#135">135</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#136">136</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#137">137</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#139">139</a> (31 Mar 99)
</li>
<li>R6:
-pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>,
-and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99)
+pre-Dublin mailing. Added issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#127">127</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#128">128</a>,
+and <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#129">129</a>. (99-0007/N1194, 22 Feb 99)
</li>
<li>R5:
-update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare
+update issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>; added issues
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#114">114</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#126">126</a>. Format revisions to prepare
for making list public. (30 Dec 98)
</li>
<li>R4:
-post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>,
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several
+post-Santa Cruz II updated: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#110">110</a>,
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#111">111</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#112">112</a>, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#113">113</a> added, several
issues corrected. (22 Oct 98)
</li>
<li>R3:
-post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>
+post-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#94">94</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#109">109</a>
added, many issues updated to reflect LWG consensus (12 Oct 98)
</li>
<li>R2:
-pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added,
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98)
+pre-Santa Cruz II: Issues <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a> to <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#93">93</a> added,
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#17">17</a> updated. (29 Sep 98)
</li>
<li>R1:
-Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code
-format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98)
+Correction to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#55">55</a> resolution, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#60">60</a> code
+format, <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#64">64</a> title. (17 Sep 98)
</li>
</ul>
<h2>Defect Reports</h2>
<hr>
-<a name="1"><h3>1.&nbsp;C library linkage editing oversight</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Nov 1997</p>
+<a name="1"><h3>1.&nbsp;C library linkage editing oversight</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;16 Nov 1997</p>
<p>The change specified in the proposed resolution below did not make
it into the Standard. This change was accepted in principle at the
London meeting, and the exact wording below was accepted at the
Morristown meeting.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a> paragraph 2
+<p>Change 17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a> paragraph 2
from:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -277,7 +280,7 @@ from:</p>
use extern "C++" linkage for this purpose.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="3"><h3>3.&nbsp;Atexit registration during atexit() call is not described</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 1997</p>
+<a name="3"><h3>3.&nbsp;Atexit registration during atexit() call is not described</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.start.term"> [lib.support.start.term]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Dec 1997</p>
<p>We appear not to have covered all the possibilities of
exit processing with respect to
atexit registration. <br>
@@ -396,7 +399,7 @@ committee decides. </p>
<p>See 99-0039/N1215, October 22, 1999, by Stephen D. Clamage for the analysis
supporting to the proposed resolution.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="5"><h3>5.&nbsp;String::compare specification questionable</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jack Reeves&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Dec 1997</p>
+<a name="5"><h3>5.&nbsp;String::compare specification questionable</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jack Reeves&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Dec 1997</p>
<p>At the very end of the basic_string class definition is the signature: int
compare(size_type pos1, size_type n1, const charT* s, size_type n2 = npos) const; In the
following text this is defined as: returns
@@ -416,7 +419,7 @@ something like: str.compare(1, str.size()-1, s, strlen(s)-1); </p>
pos1, size_type n1, const charT* s) const int compare(size_type pos1, size_type n1, const
charT* s, size_type n2) const; each defined in terms of the corresponding constructor. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace the compare signature in 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>
+<p>Replace the compare signature in 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>
(at the very end of the basic_string synopsis) which reads:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -435,7 +438,7 @@ charT* s, size_type n2) const; each defined in terms of the corresponding constr
size_type n2) const;</tt></p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Replace the portion of 21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a>
+<p>Replace the portion of 21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a>
paragraphs 5 and 6 which read:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -474,8 +477,8 @@ becomes const, matching the existing synopsis.</p>
the Standard which must be fixed.&nbsp; The same problem was also
identified in issues 7 (item 5) and 87.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="7"><h3>7.&nbsp;String clause minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.strings"> [lib.strings]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1997</p>
-<p>(1) In 21.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::insert"> [lib.string::insert]</a>, the description of template
+<a name="7"><h3>7.&nbsp;String clause minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.strings"> [lib.strings]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1997</p>
+<p>(1) In 21.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::insert"> [lib.string::insert]</a>, the description of template
&lt;class InputIterator&gt; insert(iterator, InputIterator,
InputIterator) makes no sense. It refers to a member function that
doesn't exist. It also talks about the return value of a void
@@ -496,9 +499,9 @@ possible const charT&amp;. </p>
charT* in the description. Second, given what it says in RETURNS,
leaving out the final argument will always result in an exception
getting thrown. This is paragraphs 5 and 6 of
-21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a></p>
+21.3.6.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::compare"> [lib.string::compare]</a></p>
-<p>(6) In table 37, in section 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>,
+<p>(6) In table 37, in section 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>,
there's a note for X::move(s, p, n). It says "Copies correctly
even where p is in [s, s+n)". This is correct as far as it goes,
but it doesn't go far enough; it should also guarantee that the copy
@@ -543,7 +546,7 @@ with:<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "Copies correctly even where the ranges [p, p+n) and [s,
s+n) overlap."</p>
<hr>
-<a name="8"><h3>8.&nbsp;Locale::global lacks guarantee</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Dec 1997</p>
+<a name="8"><h3>8.&nbsp;Locale::global lacks guarantee</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Dec 1997</p>
<p>It appears there's an important guarantee missing from clause
22. We're told that invoking locale::global(L) sets the C locale if L
has a name. However, we're not told whether or not invoking
@@ -552,7 +555,7 @@ setlocale(s) sets the global C++ locale. </p>
<p>The intent, I think, is that it should not, but I can't find any
such words anywhere. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add a sentence at the end of 22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a>,
+<p>Add a sentence at the end of 22.1.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.statics"> [lib.locale.statics]</a>,
paragraph 2:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -561,7 +564,7 @@ paragraph 2:&nbsp; </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="9"><h3>9.&nbsp;Operator new(0) calls should not yield the same pointer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 Jan 1998</p>
+<a name="9"><h3>9.&nbsp;Operator new(0) calls should not yield the same pointer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 Jan 1998</p>
<p>Scott Meyers, in a comp.std.c++ posting: I just noticed that
section 3.7.3.1 of CD2 seems to allow for the possibility that all
calls to operator new(0) yield the same pointer, an implementation
@@ -615,7 +618,7 @@ list maintainer's note: the IS is the same.]</p>
<p>See 99-0040/N1216, October 22, 1999, by Stephen D. Clamage for the analysis
supporting to the proposed resolution.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="11"><h3>11.&nbsp;Bitset minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Jan 1998</p>
+<a name="11"><h3>11.&nbsp;Bitset minor problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Jan 1998</p>
<p>(1) bitset&lt;&gt;::operator[] is mentioned in the class synopsis (23.3.5), but it is
not documented in 23.3.5.2. </p>
@@ -629,7 +632,7 @@ go in the Effects clause.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>ITEMS 1 AND 2:<br>
<br>
-In the bitset synopsis (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>),
+In the bitset synopsis (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>),
replace the member function <br>
<br>
<tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; reference operator[](size_t pos);<br>
@@ -639,7 +642,7 @@ with the two member functions<br>
<tt>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; bool operator[](size_t pos) const; <br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; reference operator[](size_t pos); <br>
</tt><br>
-Add the following text at the end of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>,
+Add the following text at the end of 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>,
immediately after paragraph 45:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -657,18 +660,18 @@ immediately after paragraph 45:</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG believes Item 3 is not a defect. "Formatted
-input" implies the desired semantics. See 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a>.
+input" implies the desired semantics. See 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a>.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="13"><h3>13.&nbsp;Eos refuses to die</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;William M. Miller&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Mar 1998</p>
+<a name="13"><h3>13.&nbsp;Eos refuses to die</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;William M. Miller&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Mar 1998</p>
<p>In 27.6.1.2.3, there is a reference to "eos", which is
the only one in the whole draft (at least using Acrobat search), so
it's undefined. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, replace "eos" with
+<p>In 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, replace "eos" with
"charT()"</p>
<hr>
-<a name="14"><h3>14.&nbsp;Locale::combine should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="14"><h3>14.&nbsp;Locale::combine should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>locale::combine is the only member function of locale (other than constructors and
destructor) that is not const. There is no reason for it not to be const, and good reasons
why it should have been const. Furthermore, leaving it non-const conflicts with 22.1.1
@@ -680,31 +683,31 @@ function. As constructors are never const, there was no "const" in the interface
which was transformed into member "combine". It should have been added at that
time, but the omission was not noticed. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> and also in 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, add
+<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> and also in 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, add
"const" to the declaration of member combine: </p>
<blockquote>
<pre>template &lt;class Facet&gt; locale combine(const locale&amp; other) const; </pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="15"><h3>15.&nbsp;Locale::name requirement inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="15"><h3>15.&nbsp;Locale::name requirement inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>locale::name() is described as returning a string that can be passed to a locale
constructor, but there is no matching constructor. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, paragraph 5, replace
+<p>In 22.1.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.members"> [lib.locale.members]</a>, paragraph 5, replace
"<tt>locale(name())</tt>" with
"<tt>locale(name().c_str())</tt>".
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="16"><h3>16.&nbsp;Bad ctype_byname&lt;char&gt; decl</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="16"><h3>16.&nbsp;Bad ctype_byname&lt;char&gt; decl</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The new virtual members ctype_byname&lt;char&gt;::do_widen and do_narrow did not get
edited in properly. Instead, the member do_widen appears four times, with wrong argument
lists. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>The correct declarations for the overloaded members
<tt>do_narrow</tt> and <tt>do_widen</tt> should be copied
-from 22.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.special"> [lib.facet.ctype.special]</a>.</p>
+from 22.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.special"> [lib.facet.ctype.special]</a>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="17"><h3>17.&nbsp;Bad bool parsing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="17"><h3>17.&nbsp;Bad bool parsing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>This section describes the process of parsing a text boolean value from the input
stream. It does not say it recognizes either of the sequences "true" or
"false" and returns the corresponding bool value; instead, it says it recognizes
@@ -746,7 +749,7 @@ I believe the correct algorithm is "as if": </p>
when one is a substring of the other. The proposed text below captures the logic of the
code above.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, in the first line of paragraph 14,
+<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, in the first line of paragraph 14,
change "&amp;&amp;" to "&amp;".</p>
<p>Then, replace paragraphs 15 and 16 as follows:</p>
@@ -783,17 +786,17 @@ change "&amp;&amp;" to "&amp;".</p>
<tt>err==str.failbit</tt>. --end example]</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="18"><h3>18.&nbsp;Get(...bool&amp;) omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="18"><h3>18.&nbsp;Get(...bool&amp;) omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In the list of num_get&lt;&gt; non-virtual members on page 22-23, the member
that parses bool values was omitted from the list of definitions of non-virtual
members, though it is listed in the class definition and the corresponding
virtual is listed everywhere appropriate. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add at the beginning of 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>
+<p>Add at the beginning of 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>
another get member for bool&amp;, copied from the entry in
-22.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.num.get"> [lib.locale.num.get]</a>.</p>
+22.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.num.get"> [lib.locale.num.get]</a>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="19"><h3>19.&nbsp;"Noconv" definition too vague</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="19"><h3>19.&nbsp;"Noconv" definition too vague</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>
In the definitions of codecvt&lt;&gt;::do_out and do_in, they are
specified to return noconv if "no conversion is
@@ -803,7 +806,7 @@ normatively what is done with the buffers.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
Change the entry for noconv in the table under paragraph 4 in section
-22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> to read:
+22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> to read:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>noconv</tt>: <tt>internT</tt> and <tt>externT</tt> are the same type,
@@ -817,22 +820,22 @@ Change the entry for noconv in the table under paragraph 4 in section
unchanged, and there are no changes to the values in <tt>[to, to_limit)</tt>.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="20"><h3>20.&nbsp;Thousands_sep returns wrong type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="20"><h3>20.&nbsp;Thousands_sep returns wrong type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The synopsis for numpunct&lt;&gt;::do_thousands_sep, and the
definition of numpunct&lt;&gt;::thousands_sep which calls it, specify
that it returns a value of type char_type. Here it is erroneously
described as returning a "string_type". </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>, above paragraph 2, change
+<p>In 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>, above paragraph 2, change
"string_type" to "char_type". </p>
<hr>
-<a name="21"><h3>21.&nbsp;Codecvt_byname&lt;&gt; instantiations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="21"><h3>21.&nbsp;Codecvt_byname&lt;&gt; instantiations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In the second table in the section, captioned "Required
instantiations", the instantiations for codecvt_byname&lt;&gt;
have been omitted. These are necessary to allow users to construct a
locale by name from facets. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add in 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> to the table captioned
+<p>Add in 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> to the table captioned
"Required instantiations", in the category "ctype"
the lines </p>
@@ -841,7 +844,7 @@ the lines </p>
codecvt_byname&lt;wchar_t,char,mbstate_t&gt; </pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="22"><h3>22.&nbsp;Member open vs. flags</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="22"><h3>22.&nbsp;Member open vs. flags</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The description of basic_istream&lt;&gt;::open leaves unanswered questions about how it
responds to or changes flags in the error status for the stream. A strict reading
indicates that it ignores the bits and does not change them, which confuses users who do
@@ -849,7 +852,7 @@ not expect eofbit and failbit to remain set after a successful open. There are t
reasonable resolutions: 1) status quo 2) fail if fail(), ignore eofbit 3) clear failbit
and eofbit on call to open(). </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, <i>and</i> in 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, under open() effects, add a footnote:
+<p>In 27.8.1.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.members"> [lib.ifstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, <i>and</i> in 27.8.1.10 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.members"> [lib.ofstream.members]</a> paragraph 3, under open() effects, add a footnote:
</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -867,22 +870,22 @@ one case. The resolution of this issue clarifies what the LWG
believes to have been the original intent.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="24"><h3>24.&nbsp;"do_convert" doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="24"><h3>24.&nbsp;"do_convert" doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The description of codecvt&lt;&gt;::do_out and do_in mentions a
symbol "do_convert" which is not defined in the
standard. This is a leftover from an edit, and should be "do_in
and do_out". </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, paragraph 3, change
-"do_convert" to "do_in or do_out". Also, in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, change "do_convert()" to "do_in
+<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, paragraph 3, change
+"do_convert" to "do_in or do_out". Also, in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, change "do_convert()" to "do_in
or do_out". </p>
<hr>
-<a name="25"><h3>25.&nbsp;String operator&lt;&lt; uses width() value wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="25"><h3>25.&nbsp;String operator&lt;&lt; uses width() value wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In the description of operator&lt;&lt; applied to strings, the standard says that uses
the smaller of os.width() and str.size(), to pad "as described in stage 3"
elsewhere; but this is inconsistent, as this allows no possibility of space for padding. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 4 from:<br>
+<p>Change 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 4 from:<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "... where <tt>n</tt> is the smaller of <tt>os.width()</tt> and <tt>str.size()</tt>;
..."<br>
@@ -892,7 +895,7 @@ to: <br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "... where <tt>n</tt> is the larger of <tt>os.width()</tt> and <tt>str.size()</tt>;
..."</p>
<hr>
-<a name="26"><h3>26.&nbsp;Bad sentry example</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="26"><h3>26.&nbsp;Bad sentry example</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In paragraph 6, the code in the example: </p>
<pre> template &lt;class charT, class traits = char_traits&lt;charT&gt; &gt;
@@ -916,7 +919,7 @@ particular, it fails to use traits operators, and specifies incorrect
semantics. (E.g. it specifies skipping over the first character in the
sequence without examining it.) </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove the example above from 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>
+<p>Remove the example above from 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>
paragraph 6.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The originally proposed replacement code for the example was not
@@ -926,13 +929,13 @@ code ran over one page in length and was quite complicated. The LWG
decided that it would be counter-productive to include such a lengthy
example, which might well still contain errors.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="27"></a><h3><a name="27">27.&nbsp;String::erase(range) yields wrong iterator</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="27"><h3>27.&nbsp;String::erase(range) yields wrong iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The string::erase(iterator first, iterator last) is specified to return an element one
place beyond the next element after the last one erased. E.g. for the string
"abcde", erasing the range ['b'..'d') would yield an iterator for element 'e',
while 'd' has not been erased. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>, paragraph 10, change: </p>
+<p>In 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>, paragraph 10, change: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Returns: an iterator which points to the element immediately following _last_ prior to
@@ -946,7 +949,7 @@ while 'd' has not been erased. </p>
other elements being erased. </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="28"><h3>28.&nbsp;Ctype&lt;char&gt;is ambiguous</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="28"><h3>28.&nbsp;Ctype&lt;char&gt;is ambiguous</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The description of the vector form of ctype&lt;char&gt;::is can be interpreted to mean
something very different from what was intended. Paragraph 4 says </p>
@@ -958,22 +961,22 @@ something very different from what was intended. Paragraph 4 says </p>
<p>This is intended to copy the value indexed from table()[] into the place identified in
vec[]. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>, paragraph 4, to read </p>
+<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>, paragraph 4, to read </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Effects: The second form, for all *p in the range [low, high), assigns into vec[p-low]
the value table()[(unsigned char)*p]. </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="29"><h3>29.&nbsp;Ios_base::init doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
-<p>Sections 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> and 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> mention
+<a name="29"><h3>29.&nbsp;Ios_base::init doesn't exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<p>Sections 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> and 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> mention
a function ios_base::init, which is not defined. Probably they mean
-basic_ios&lt;&gt;::init, defined in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>,
+basic_ios&lt;&gt;::init, defined in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>,
paragraph 3. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>[R12: modified to include paragraph 5.]</p>
-<p>In 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 and 5, change </p>
+<p>In 27.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.narrow.stream.objects"> [lib.narrow.stream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 and 5, change </p>
<blockquote>
<p>ios_base::init </p>
@@ -985,27 +988,27 @@ paragraph 3. </p>
<p>basic_ios&lt;char&gt;::init </p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Also, make a similar change in 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> except it
+<p>Also, make a similar change in 27.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.wide.stream.objects"> [lib.wide.stream.objects]</a> except it
should read </p>
<blockquote>
<p>basic_ios&lt;wchar_t&gt;::init </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="30"><h3>30.&nbsp;Wrong header for LC_*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="30"><h3>30.&nbsp;Wrong header for LC_*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Paragraph 2 implies that the C macros LC_CTYPE etc. are defined in &lt;cctype&gt;,
where they are in fact defined elsewhere to appear in &lt;clocale&gt;. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 2, change
+<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 2, change
"&lt;cctype&gt;" to read "&lt;clocale&gt;". </p>
<hr>
-<a name="31"><h3>31.&nbsp;Immutable locale values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="31"><h3>31.&nbsp;Immutable locale values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Paragraph 6, says "An instance of <tt>locale</tt> is
<i>immutable</i>; once a facet reference is obtained from it,
...". This has caused some confusion, because locale variables
are manifestly assignable. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> replace paragraph 6</p>
+<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> replace paragraph 6</p>
<blockquote>
<p>An instance of <tt>locale</tt> is immutable; once a facet
@@ -1022,7 +1025,7 @@ are manifestly assignable. </p>
long as some locale object refers to that facet.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="32"><h3>32.&nbsp;Pbackfail description inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="32"><h3>32.&nbsp;Pbackfail description inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The description of the required state before calling virtual member
basic_streambuf&lt;&gt;::pbackfail requirements is inconsistent with the conditions
described in 27.5.2.2.4 [lib.streambuf.pub.pback] where member sputbackc calls it.
@@ -1036,7 +1039,7 @@ Specifically, the latter says it calls pbackfail if: </p>
<p>It appears that the pbackfail description is wrong. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a>, paragraph 1, change:</p>
+<p>In 27.5.2.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.pback"> [lib.streambuf.virt.pback]</a>, paragraph 1, change:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"<tt>traits::eq(*gptr(),traits::to_char_type( c))</tt>"</p>
@@ -1052,7 +1055,7 @@ Specifically, the latter says it calls pbackfail if: </p>
<p>Note deliberate reordering of arguments for clarity in addition to the correction of
the argument value.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="33"><h3>33.&nbsp;Codecvt&lt;&gt; mentions from_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="33"><h3>33.&nbsp;Codecvt&lt;&gt; mentions from_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In the table defining the results from do_out and do_in, the specification for the
result <i>error</i> says </p>
@@ -1063,19 +1066,19 @@ result <i>error</i> says </p>
<p>but from_type is not defined. This clearly is intended to be an externT for do_in, or
an internT for do_out. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 4, replace the definition
+<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 4, replace the definition
in the table for the case of _error_ with </p>
<blockquote>
<p>encountered a character in <tt>[from,from_end)</tt> that it could not convert. </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="34"><h3>34.&nbsp;True/falsename() not in ctype&lt;&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="34"><h3>34.&nbsp;True/falsename() not in ctype&lt;&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In paragraph 19, Effects:, members truename() and falsename are used from facet
ctype&lt;charT&gt;, but it has no such members. Note that this is also a problem in
22.2.2.1.2, addressed in (4). </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, in the Effects:
+<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, in the Effects:
clause for member put(...., bool), replace the initialization of the
string_type value s as follows: </p>
@@ -1084,12 +1087,12 @@ string_type value s as follows: </p>
string_type s = val ? np.truename() : np.falsename(); </pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="35"><h3>35.&nbsp;No manipulator unitbuf in synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
-<p>In 27.4.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.manip"> [lib.fmtflags.manip]</a>, we have a definition for a manipulator
+<a name="35"><h3>35.&nbsp;No manipulator unitbuf in synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<p>In 27.4.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.manip"> [lib.fmtflags.manip]</a>, we have a definition for a manipulator
named "unitbuf". Unlike other manipulators, it's not listed
in synopsis. Similarly for "nounitbuf". </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add to the synopsis for &lt;ios&gt; in 27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a>, after
+<p>Add to the synopsis for &lt;ios&gt; in 27.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreams.base"> [lib.iostreams.base]</a>, after
the entry for "nouppercase", the prototypes: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1097,7 +1100,7 @@ the entry for "nouppercase", the prototypes: </p>
ios_base&amp; nounitbuf(ios_base&amp; str); </pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="36"><h3>36.&nbsp;Iword &amp; pword storage lifetime omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="36"><h3>36.&nbsp;Iword &amp; pword storage lifetime omitted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In the definitions for ios_base::iword and pword, the lifetime of the storage is
specified badly, so that an implementation which only keeps the last value stored appears
to conform. In particular, it says: </p>
@@ -1107,7 +1110,7 @@ member with a different index ... </p>
<p>This is not idle speculation; at least one implementation was done this way. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a>, in both paragraph 2 and also in
+<p>Add in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a>, in both paragraph 2 and also in
paragraph 4, replace the sentence: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1126,7 +1129,7 @@ paragraph 4, replace the sentence: </p>
<p>substituting "iword" or "pword" as appropriate. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="37"><h3>37.&nbsp;Leftover "global" reference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="37"><h3>37.&nbsp;Leftover "global" reference</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>In the overview of locale semantics, paragraph 4, is the sentence </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1137,14 +1140,14 @@ paragraph 4, replace the sentence: </p>
<p>This is not supported by the definition of use_facet&lt;&gt;, and represents semantics
from an old draft. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>, paragraph 4, delete the parenthesized
+<p>In 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>, paragraph 4, delete the parenthesized
expression </p>
<blockquote>
<p>(or, failing that, in the global locale) </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="38"><h3>38.&nbsp;Facet definition incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="38"><h3>38.&nbsp;Facet definition incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>It has been noticed by Esa Pulkkinen that the definition of
"facet" is incomplete. In particular, a class derived from
another facet, but which does not define a member <i>id</i>, cannot
@@ -1163,7 +1166,7 @@ reads: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Requires: <tt>Facet</tt> is a facet class whose definition
- contains the public static member <tt>id</tt> as defined in 22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a>. </p>
+ contains the public static member <tt>id</tt> as defined in 22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a>. </p>
</blockquote>
<p><i>[
@@ -1174,7 +1177,7 @@ contains (not inherits) the public static member
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="39"><h3>39.&nbsp;istreambuf_iterator&lt;&gt;::operator++(int) definition garbled</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="39"><h3>39.&nbsp;istreambuf_iterator&lt;&gt;::operator++(int) definition garbled</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Following the definition of istreambuf_iterator&lt;&gt;::operator++(int) in paragraph
3, the standard contains three lines of garbage text left over from a previous edit. </p>
@@ -1184,26 +1187,26 @@ sbuf_-&gt;sbumpc();
return(tmp); </pre>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a>, delete the three lines of code at the
+<p>In 24.5.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op++]</a>, delete the three lines of code at the
end of paragraph 3. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="40"><h3>40.&nbsp;Meaningless normative paragraph in examples</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="40"><h3>40.&nbsp;Meaningless normative paragraph in examples</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Paragraph 3 of the locale examples is a description of part of an
implementation technique that has lost its referent, and doesn't mean
anything. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Delete 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 3 which begins "This
+<p>Delete 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 3 which begins "This
initialization/identification system depends...", or (at the
editor's option) replace it with a place-holder to keep the paragraph
numbering the same. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="41"><h3>41.&nbsp;Ios_base needs clear(), exceptions()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
-<p>The description of ios_base::iword() and pword() in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>, say that if they fail, they "set badbit,
+<a name="41"></a><h3><a name="41">41.&nbsp;Ios_base needs clear(), exceptions()</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<p>The description of ios_base::iword() and pword() in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>, say that if they fail, they "set badbit,
which may throw an exception". However, ios_base offers no
interface to set or to test badbit; those interfaces are defined in
basic_ios&lt;&gt;. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change the description in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a> in
+<p>Change the description in 27.4.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.storage"> [lib.ios.base.storage]</a> in
paragraph 2, and also in paragraph 4, as follows. Replace</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1223,7 +1226,7 @@ paragraph 2, and also in paragraph 4, as follows. Replace</p>
setstate(badbit).]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="42"><h3>42.&nbsp;String ctors specify wrong default allocator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="42"><h3>42.&nbsp;String ctors specify wrong default allocator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The basic_string&lt;&gt; copy constructor: </p>
<pre>basic_string(const basic_string&amp; str, size_type pos = 0,
@@ -1239,7 +1242,7 @@ vector) do not have this form of constructor, so it is inconsistent,
and an evident source of confusion, for basic_string&lt;&gt; to have
it, so it might better be removed. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p> In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy
+<p> In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy
constructor as follows: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1248,7 +1251,7 @@ basic_string(const basic_string&amp; str, size_type pos, size_type n = npos,
const Allocator&amp; a = Allocator());</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration
+<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration
as above. Add to paragraph 5, Effects:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1261,7 +1264,7 @@ just an unfortunate design choice.</p>
<p>The LWG considered two other possible resolutions:</p>
-<p>A. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy
+<p>A. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, replace the declaration of the copy
constructor as follows:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1271,7 +1274,7 @@ basic_string(const basic_string&amp; str, size_type pos,
size_type n, const Allocator&amp; a); </pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration
+<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace the copy constructor declaration
as above. Add to paragraph 5, Effects: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1279,7 +1282,7 @@ as above. Add to paragraph 5, Effects: </p>
value <tt>str.get_allocator()</tt>. </p>
</blockquote>
-<p>B. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, and also in 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace
+<p>B. In 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>, and also in 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, replace
the declaration of the copy constructor as follows: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1296,7 +1299,7 @@ Kona: issue editing snafu fixed - the proposed resolution now correctly
reflects the LWG consensus.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="44"><h3>44.&nbsp;Iostreams use operator== on int_type values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="44"><h3>44.&nbsp;Iostreams use operator== on int_type values</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Many of the specifications for iostreams specify that character
values or their int_type equivalents are compared using operators ==
or !=, though in other places traits::eq() or traits::eq_int_type is
@@ -1562,10 +1565,10 @@ change uses of == and != to use the traits members instead. </p>
</ul>
<hr>
-<a name="46"><h3>46.&nbsp;Minor Annex D errors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.str.strstreams"> [depr.str.strstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Brendan Kehoe&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp; 1 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="46"><h3>46.&nbsp;Minor Annex D errors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.str.strstreams"> [depr.str.strstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Brendan Kehoe&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp; 1 Jun 1998</p>
<p>See lib-6522 and edit-814.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change D.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf"> [depr.strstreambuf]</a> (since streambuf is a typedef of
+<p>Change D.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf"> [depr.strstreambuf]</a> (since streambuf is a typedef of
basic_streambuf&lt;char&gt;) from:</p>
<pre> virtual streambuf&lt;char&gt;* setbuf(char* s, streamsize n);</pre>
@@ -1574,7 +1577,7 @@ basic_streambuf&lt;char&gt;) from:</p>
<pre> virtual streambuf* setbuf(char* s, streamsize n);</pre>
-<p>In D.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstream"> [depr.strstream]</a> insert the semicolon now missing after
+<p>In D.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstream"> [depr.strstream]</a> insert the semicolon now missing after
int_type:</p>
<pre> namespace std {
@@ -1586,27 +1589,27 @@ int_type:</p>
typedef typename char_traits&lt;char&gt;::int_type int_type
typedef typename char_traits&lt;char&gt;::pos_type pos_type;</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="47"></a><h3><a name="47">47.&nbsp;Imbue() and getloc() Returns clauses swapped</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="47"><h3>47.&nbsp;Imbue() and getloc() Returns clauses swapped</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
<p>Section 27.4.2.3 specifies how imbue() and getloc() work. That
section has two RETURNS clauses, and they make no sense as
stated. They make perfect sense, though, if you swap them. Am I
correct in thinking that paragraphs 2 and 4 just got mixed up by
accident?</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> swap paragraphs 2 and 4.</p>
+<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> swap paragraphs 2 and 4.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="48"><h3>48.&nbsp;Use of non-existent exception constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="48"><h3>48.&nbsp;Use of non-existent exception constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
<p>27.4.2.1.1, paragraph 2, says that class failure initializes the
base class, exception, with exception(msg). Class exception (see
18.6.1) has no such constructor.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>, paragraph 2, with</p>
+<p>Replace 27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>, paragraph 2, with</p>
<blockquote>
<p>EFFECTS: Constructs an object of class <tt>failure</tt>.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="49"><h3>49.&nbsp;Underspecification of ios_base::sync_with_stdio</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="49"><h3>49.&nbsp;Underspecification of ios_base::sync_with_stdio</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
<p>Two problems</p>
<p>(1) 27.4.2.4 doesn't say what ios_base::sync_with_stdio(f)
@@ -1619,7 +1622,7 @@ synchronized with stdio. Again, of course, I can make some
guesses. (And I'm unhappy about the performance implications of those
guesses, but that's another matter.)</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change the following sentence in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>
+<p>Change the following sentence in 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>
returns clause from:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1635,7 +1638,7 @@ returns clause from:</p>
<tt>false</tt>.</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Add the following immediately after 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>,
+<p>Add the following immediately after 27.4.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.members.static"> [lib.ios.members.static]</a>,
paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -1659,7 +1662,8 @@ character c by</p>
<p>for any sequences of characters; and the effect of pushing
back a character c by</p>
-<pre> ungetc(c, f);
+<pre>
+ ungetc(c, f);
</pre>
<p>is the same as the effect of</p>
@@ -1680,7 +1684,7 @@ of "synchronization"]</i></p>
text was added in the non-normative footnote to say that operations
on the two streams can be mixed arbitrarily.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="50"><h3>50.&nbsp;Copy constructor and assignment operator of ios_base</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="50"><h3>50.&nbsp;Copy constructor and assignment operator of ios_base</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1998</p>
<p>As written, ios_base has a copy constructor and an assignment
operator. (Nothing in the standard says it doesn't have one, and all
classes have copy constructors and assignment operators unless you
@@ -1700,13 +1704,13 @@ that intention would have required a explicit description of the
semantics (e.g. what happens to the iarray and parray stuff).
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>, class ios_base, specify the copy
+<p>In 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>, class ios_base, specify the copy
constructor and operator= members as being private.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG believes the difficulty of specifying correct semantics
outweighs any benefit of allowing ios_base objects to be copyable.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="51"><h3>51.&nbsp;Requirement to not invalidate iterators missing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;David Vandevoorde&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="51"><h3>51.&nbsp;Requirement to not invalidate iterators missing</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;David Vandevoorde&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jun 1998</p>
<p>The std::sort algorithm can in general only sort a given sequence
by moving around values. The list&lt;&gt;::sort() member on the other
hand could move around values or just update internal pointers. Either
@@ -1752,15 +1756,15 @@ proposed resolution below is somewhat updated from CD2-23-011,
particularly the addition of the phrase "or change the values
of"</p>
<hr>
-<a name="52"><h3>52.&nbsp;Small I/O problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jun 1998</p>
-<p>First, 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, table 89. This is pretty obvious:
+<a name="52"><h3>52.&nbsp;Small I/O problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jun 1998</p>
+<p>First, 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, table 89. This is pretty obvious:
it should be titled "basic_ios&lt;&gt;() effects", not
"ios_base() effects". </p>
-<p>[The second item is a duplicate; see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#6">6</a> for
+<p>[The second item is a duplicate; see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#6">6</a> for
resolution.]</p>
-<p>Second, 27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a> table 88 . There are a couple
+<p>Second, 27.4.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.operations"> [lib.fpos.operations]</a> table 88 . There are a couple
different things wrong with it, some of which I've already discussed
with Jerry, but the most obvious mechanical sort of error is that it
uses expressions like P(i) and p(i), without ever defining what sort
@@ -1775,16 +1779,16 @@ streampos arithmetic, but that it wasn't actually supposed to do
anything meaningful except on platforms, like Unix, where genuine
arithmetic is possible.) </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> table 89 title from
+<p>Change 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> table 89 title from
"ios_base() effects" to "basic_ios&lt;&gt;()
effects". </p>
<hr>
-<a name="53"><h3>53.&nbsp;Basic_ios destructor unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="53"><h3>53.&nbsp;Basic_ios destructor unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jun 1998</p>
<p>There's nothing in 27.4.4 saying what basic_ios's destructor does.
The important question is whether basic_ios::~basic_ios() destroys
rdbuf().</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add after 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
+<p>Add after 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>virtual ~basic_ios();</tt></p>
@@ -1793,25 +1797,25 @@ rdbuf().</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG reviewed the additional question of whether or not
<tt>rdbuf(0)</tt> may set <tt>badbit</tt>. The answer is
-clearly yes; it may be set via <tt>clear()</tt>. See 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>, paragraph 6. This issue was reviewed at length
+clearly yes; it may be set via <tt>clear()</tt>. See 27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>, paragraph 6. This issue was reviewed at length
by the LWG, which removed from the original proposed resolution a
footnote which incorrectly said "<tt>rdbuf(0)</tt> does not set
<tt>badbit</tt>".</p>
<hr>
-<a name="54"><h3>54.&nbsp;Basic_streambuf's destructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="54"><h3>54.&nbsp;Basic_streambuf's destructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Jun 1998</p>
<p>The class synopsis for basic_streambuf shows a (virtual)
destructor, but the standard doesn't say what that destructor does. My
assumption is that it does nothing, but the standard should say so
explicitly. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add after 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
+<p>Add after 27.5.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.cons"> [lib.streambuf.cons]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>virtual&nbsp; ~basic_streambuf();</tt></p>
<p><b>Effects</b>: None.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="55"><h3>55.&nbsp;Invalid stream position is undefined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="55"><h3>55.&nbsp;Invalid stream position is undefined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Jun 1998</p>
<p>Several member functions in clause 27 are defined in certain
circumstances to return an "invalid stream position", a term
that is defined nowhere in the standard. Two places (27.5.2.4.2,
@@ -1832,52 +1836,52 @@ should not be changed. Here are the three places where "invalid
stream position" should not be changed:</p>
<blockquote>
- <p>27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br>
- 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br>
- D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 17
+ <p>27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br>
+ 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 14<br>
+ D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 17
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 4, change "Returns an
+<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 4, change "Returns an
object of class pos_type that stores an invalid stream position
(_lib.iostreams.definitions_)" to "Returns
<tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>".
</p>
-<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 6, change "Returns
+<p>In 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 6, change "Returns
an object of class pos_type that stores an invalid stream
position" to "Returns <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>".</p>
-<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "the object
+<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "the object
stores an invalid stream position" to "the return value is
<tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>". </p>
-<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "returns an
+<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 13, change "returns an
invalid stream position (27.4.3)" to "returns
<tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>" </p>
-<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "Otherwise
+<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "Otherwise
returns an invalid stream position (_lib.iostreams.definitions_)"
to "Otherwise returns <tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>"
</p>
-<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "the object
+<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 15, change "the object
stores an invalid stream position" to "the return value is
<tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>" </p>
-<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 18, change "the object
+<p>In D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 18, change "the object
stores an invalid stream position" to "the return value is
<tt>pos_type(off_type(-1))</tt>"</p>
<hr>
-<a name="56"><h3>56.&nbsp;Showmanyc's return type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Jun 1998</p>
+<a name="56"><h3>56.&nbsp;Showmanyc's return type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Jun 1998</p>
<p>The class summary for basic_streambuf&lt;&gt;, in 27.5.2, says that
showmanyc has return type int. However, 27.5.2.4.3 says that its
return type is streamsize. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Change <tt>showmanyc</tt>'s return type in the
-27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> class summary to <tt>streamsize</tt>.</p>
+27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> class summary to <tt>streamsize</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="57"><h3>57.&nbsp;Mistake in char_traits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Jul 1998</p>
+<a name="57"><h3>57.&nbsp;Mistake in char_traits</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 Jul 1998</p>
<p>21.1.3.2, paragraph 3, says "The types streampos and
wstreampos may be different if the implementation supports no shift
encoding in narrow-oriented iostreams but supports one or more shift
@@ -1891,11 +1895,11 @@ to clause 21, we see in 21.1.3.1 and 21.1.3.2 that
char_traits&lt;char&gt;::state_type and
char_traits&lt;wchar_t&gt;::state_type must both be mbstate_t. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove the sentence in 21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a> paragraph 3 which
+<p>Remove the sentence in 21.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t"> [lib.char.traits.specializations.wchar.t]</a> paragraph 3 which
begins "The types streampos and wstreampos may be
different..." . </p>
<hr>
-<a name="59"><h3>59.&nbsp;Ambiguity in specification of gbump</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jul 1998</p>
+<a name="59"><h3>59.&nbsp;Ambiguity in specification of gbump</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jul 1998</p>
<p>27.5.2.3.1 says that basic_streambuf::gbump() "Advances the
next pointer for the input sequence by n." </p>
@@ -1908,7 +1912,7 @@ pbump. </p>
<p>(The "classic" AT&amp;T implementation used the
former interpretation.)</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a> paragraph 4 gbump effects from:</p>
+<p>Change 27.5.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.get.area"> [lib.streambuf.get.area]</a> paragraph 4 gbump effects from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Effects: Advances the next pointer for the input sequence by n.</p>
@@ -1920,10 +1924,10 @@ former interpretation.)</p>
<p>Effects: Adds <tt>n</tt> to the next pointer for the input sequence.</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Make the same change to 27.5.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.put.area"> [lib.streambuf.put.area]</a> paragraph 4 pbump
+<p>Make the same change to 27.5.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.put.area"> [lib.streambuf.put.area]</a> paragraph 4 pbump
effects.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="60"><h3>60.&nbsp;What is a formatted input function?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="60"><h3>60.&nbsp;What is a formatted input function?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Paragraph 1 of 27.6.1.2.1 contains general requirements for all
formatted input functions. Some of the functions defined in section
27.6.1.2 explicitly say that those requirements apply ("Behaves
@@ -1955,16 +1959,16 @@ that the "Common requirements" listed in section 27.6.1.2.1
apply to them. </p>
<p>Additional comments from Dietmar Kühl: It appears to be somewhat
-nonsensical to consider the functions defined in 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> paragraphs 1 to 5 to be "Formatted input
+nonsensical to consider the functions defined in 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a> paragraphs 1 to 5 to be "Formatted input
function" but since these functions are defined in a section
labeled "Formatted input functions" it is unclear to me
whether these operators are considered formatted input functions which
-have to conform to the "common requirements" from 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>: If this is the case, all manipulators, not
+have to conform to the "common requirements" from 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>: If this is the case, all manipulators, not
just <tt>ws</tt>, would skip whitespace unless <tt>noskipws</tt> is
set (... but setting <tt>noskipws</tt> using the manipulator syntax
would also skip whitespace :-)</p> <p>It is not clear which functions
are to be considered unformatted input functions. As written, it seems
-that all functions in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> are unformatted input
+that all functions in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> are unformatted input
functions. However, it does not really make much sense to construct a
sentry object for <tt>gcount()</tt>, <tt>sync()</tt>, ... Also it is
unclear what happens to the <tt>gcount()</tt> if
@@ -2219,7 +2223,7 @@ unformatted output function (as described in 27.6.2.6, paragraph 1)."
by Judy Ward and Matt Austern. This proposed resolution is section
VI of that paper.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="61"><h3>61.&nbsp;Ambiguity in iostreams exception policy</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="61"><h3>61.&nbsp;Ambiguity in iostreams exception policy</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The introduction to the section on unformatted input (27.6.1.3)
says that every unformatted input function catches all exceptions that
were thrown during input, sets badbit, and then conditionally rethrows
@@ -2254,7 +2258,7 @@ parenthetical comment: "(Exceptions thrown from
<p>The LWG looked to two alternative wordings, and choose the proposed
resolution as better standardese.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="62"></a><h3><a name="62">62.&nbsp;<tt>Sync</tt>'s return value</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="62"><h3>62.&nbsp;<tt>Sync</tt>'s return value</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The Effects clause for sync() (27.6.1.3, paragraph 36) says that it
"calls rdbuf()-&gt;pubsync() and, if that function returns -1
... returns traits::eof()." </p>
@@ -2262,11 +2266,11 @@ resolution as better standardese.</p>
<p>That looks suspicious, because traits::eof() is of type
traits::int_type while the return type of sync() is int. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 36, change "returns
+<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 36, change "returns
<tt>traits::eof()</tt>" to "returns <tt>-1</tt>".
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="63"><h3>63.&nbsp;Exception-handling policy for unformatted output</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="63"><h3>63.&nbsp;Exception-handling policy for unformatted output</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Aug 1998</p>
<p>Clause 27 details an exception-handling policy for formatted input,
unformatted input, and formatted output. It says nothing for
unformatted output (27.6.2.6). 27.6.2.6 should either include the same
@@ -2296,12 +2300,12 @@ input, unformatted input, and formatted output.
</p>
<hr>
<a name="64"><h3>64.&nbsp;Exception handling in <tt>basic_istream::operator&gt;&gt;(basic_streambuf*)</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Aug 1998 </p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Aug 1998 </p>
<p>27.6.1.2.3, paragraph 13, is ambiguous. It can be interpreted two
different ways, depending on whether the second sentence is read as an
elaboration of the first. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 13, which begins
+<p>Replace 27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 13, which begins
"If the function inserts no characters ..." with:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2313,14 +2317,14 @@ elaboration of the first. </p>
(27.4.4.3), then the caught exception is rethrown. </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="66"><h3>66.&nbsp;Strstreambuf::setbuf</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="66"><h3>66.&nbsp;Strstreambuf::setbuf</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Aug 1998</p>
<p>D.7.1.3, paragraph 19, says that strstreambuf::setbuf
"Performs an operation that is defined separately for each class
derived from strstreambuf". This is obviously an incorrect
cut-and-paste from basic_streambuf. There are no classes derived from
strstreambuf. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, replace the setbuf effects
+<p>D.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstreambuf.virtuals"> [depr.strstreambuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 19, replace the setbuf effects
clause which currently says "Performs an operation that is
defined separately for each class derived from strstreambuf"
with:</p>
@@ -2330,7 +2334,7 @@ with:</p>
<tt>setbuf(0,0)</tt> has no effect.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="68"><h3>68.&nbsp;Extractors for char* should store null at end</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Jul 1998</p>
+<a name="68"><h3>68.&nbsp;Extractors for char* should store null at end</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Jul 1998</p>
<p>Extractors for char* (27.6.1.2.3) do not store a null character
after the extracted character sequence whereas the unformatted
functions like get() do. Why is this?</p>
@@ -2340,7 +2344,7 @@ glitch. You'll notice that the last item of the list of what stops
extraction doesn't make any sense. It was supposed to be the line that
said a null is stored.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 7, change the last list
+<p>27.6.1.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::extractors"> [lib.istream::extractors]</a>, paragraph 7, change the last list
item from:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2356,7 +2360,7 @@ item from:</p>
extracted.
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="69"><h3>69.&nbsp;Must elements of a vector be contiguous?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Jul 1998</p>
+<a name="69"><h3>69.&nbsp;Must elements of a vector be contiguous?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Jul 1998</p>
<p>The issue is this: Must the elements of a vector be in contiguous memory?</p>
<p>(Please note that this is entirely separate from the question of
@@ -2364,7 +2368,7 @@ whether a vector iterator is required to be a pointer; the answer to
that question is clearly "no," as it would rule out
debugging implementations)</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following text to the end of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>,
+<p>Add the following text to the end of 23.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector"> [lib.vector]</a>,
paragraph 1. </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2381,15 +2385,15 @@ directly defined in the standard. Discussion included:</p>
<ul>
<li>An operational definition similar to the above proposed resolution is
- already used for valarray (26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a>).</li>
+ already used for valarray (26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a>).</li>
<li>There is no need to explicitly consider a user-defined operator&amp;
- because elements must be copyconstructible (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> para 3)
- and copyconstructible (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>) specifies
+ because elements must be copyconstructible (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> para 3)
+ and copyconstructible (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>) specifies
requirements for operator&amp;.</li>
<li>There is no issue of one-past-the-end because of language rules.</li>
</ul>
<hr>
-<a name="70"><h3>70.&nbsp;Uncaught_exception() missing throw() specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;Unknown</p>
+<a name="70"><h3>70.&nbsp;Uncaught_exception() missing throw() specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;Unknown</p>
<p>In article 3E04@pratique.fr, Valentin Bonnard writes: </p>
<p>uncaught_exception() doesn't have a throw specification.</p>
@@ -2400,29 +2404,29 @@ handle exceptions thrown from uncaught_exception() ?</p>
<p>uncaught_exception() is called in exception handling contexts where
exception safety is very important.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 15.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/except.html#except.uncaught"> [except.uncaught]</a>, paragraph 1, 18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, and 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a>, add "throw()" to uncaught_exception().</p>
+<p>In 15.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/except.html#except.uncaught"> [except.uncaught]</a>, paragraph 1, 18.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.exception"> [lib.support.exception]</a>, and 18.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.uncaught"> [lib.uncaught]</a>, add "throw()" to uncaught_exception().</p>
<hr>
-<a name="71"><h3>71.&nbsp;Do_get_monthname synopsis missing argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Aug 1998</p>
+<a name="71"><h3>71.&nbsp;Do_get_monthname synopsis missing argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Aug 1998</p>
<p>The locale facet member <tt>time_get&lt;&gt;::do_get_monthname</tt>
-is described in 22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a> with five arguments,
+is described in 22.2.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.get.virtuals]</a> with five arguments,
consistent with do_get_weekday and with its specified use by member
get_monthname. However, in the synopsis, it is specified instead with
four arguments. The missing argument is the "end" iterator
value.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a>, add an "end" argument to
+<p>In 22.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.get"> [lib.locale.time.get]</a>, add an "end" argument to
the declaration of member do_monthname as follows:</p>
<pre> virtual iter_type do_get_monthname(iter_type s, iter_type end, ios_base&amp;,
ios_base::iostate&amp; err, tm* t) const;</pre>
<hr>
<a name="74"><h3>74.&nbsp;Garbled text for <tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Sep 1998</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Sep 1998</p>
<p>The text of <tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt>'s "Returns"
clause (22.2.1.5.2, paragraph 11) is garbled. It has unbalanced
parentheses and a spurious <b>n</b>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 11 with the
+<p>Replace 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 11 with the
following:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2433,7 +2437,7 @@ following:</p>
mbstate_t&gt;::do_max_length()</tt> returns 1.
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="75"><h3>75.&nbsp;Contradiction in <tt>codecvt::length</tt>'s argument types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp; Matt
+<a name="75"><h3>75.&nbsp;Contradiction in <tt>codecvt::length</tt>'s argument types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp; Matt
Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp; 18 Sep 1998</p>
<p>The class synopses for classes <tt>codecvt&lt;&gt;</tt> (22.2.1.5)
and <tt>codecvt_byname&lt;&gt;</tt> (22.2.1.6) say that the first
@@ -2447,7 +2451,7 @@ synopsis or the summary must be changed. </p>
then we must also add text saying how <tt>do_length</tt> changes its
<tt>stateT</tt> argument. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, and also in 22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>,
+<p>In 22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>, and also in 22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>,
change the <tt>stateT</tt> argument type on both member
<tt>length()</tt> and member <tt>do_length()</tt> from </p>
@@ -2461,7 +2465,7 @@ change the <tt>stateT</tt> argument type on both member
<p><tt>stateT&amp;</tt></p>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, add to the definition for member
+<p>In 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>, add to the definition for member
<tt>do_length</tt> a paragraph:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2471,7 +2475,7 @@ change the <tt>stateT</tt> argument type on both member
<tt>max</tt> elements.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="76"><h3>76.&nbsp;Can a <tt>codecvt</tt> facet always convert one internal character at a time?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="76"><h3>76.&nbsp;Can a <tt>codecvt</tt> facet always convert one internal character at a time?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt"> [lib.locale.codecvt]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Sep 1998</p>
<p>This issue concerns the requirements on classes derived from
<tt>codecvt</tt>, including user-defined classes. What are the
restrictions on the conversion from external characters
@@ -2506,8 +2510,8 @@ sequence of <i>M</i> external characters that maps to a sequence of
subsequence that maps to <i>N-1</i> internal characters.) </p>
<p>Some of the wording in the standard, such as the description of
-<tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt> (22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>,
-paragraph 11) and <tt>basic_filebuf::underflow</tt> (27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 3) suggests that it must always be
+<tt>codecvt::do_max_length</tt> (22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>,
+paragraph 11) and <tt>basic_filebuf::underflow</tt> (27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 3) suggests that it must always be
possible to pick off internal characters one at a time from a sequence
of external characters. However, this is never explicitly stated one
way or the other. </p>
@@ -2520,11 +2524,11 @@ be aware of the assumptions that the library makes. This issue affects
positioning operations on <tt>basic_filebuf</tt>, unbuffered input,
and several of <tt>codecvt</tt>'s member functions. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following text as a new paragraph, following 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
+<p>Add the following text as a new paragraph, following 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>A <tt>codecvt</tt> facet that is used by <tt>basic_filebuf</tt>
-(27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>) must have the property that if</p>
+(27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>) must have the property that if</p>
<pre> do_out(state, from, from_end, from_next, to, to_lim, to_next)
</pre>
would return <tt>ok</tt>, where <tt>from != from_end</tt>, then
@@ -2579,34 +2583,34 @@ return value.]</i></p>
does not expect <tt>basic_filebuf</tt> to be able to use it.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="78"><h3>78.&nbsp;Typo: event_call_back</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="78"><h3>78.&nbsp;Typo: event_call_back</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>typo: event_call_back should be event_callback &nbsp; </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In the 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> synopsis change
+<p>In the 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> synopsis change
"event_call_back" to "event_callback". </p>
<hr>
-<a name="79"><h3>79.&nbsp;Inconsistent declaration of polar()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
-<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> polar is declared as follows:</p>
+<a name="79"><h3>79.&nbsp;Inconsistent declaration of polar()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> polar is declared as follows:</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; complex&lt;T&gt; polar(const T&amp;, const T&amp;); </pre>
-<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> it is declared as follows:</p>
+<p>In 26.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.value.ops"> [lib.complex.value.ops]</a> it is declared as follows:</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; complex&lt;T&gt; polar(const T&amp; rho, const T&amp; theta = 0); </pre>
<p>Thus whether the second parameter is optional is not clear. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> change:</p>
+<p>In 26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a> change:</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; complex&lt;T&gt; polar(const T&amp;, const T&amp;);</pre>
<p>to:</p>
<pre> template&lt;class T&gt; complex&lt;T&gt; polar(const T&amp; rho, const T&amp; theta = 0); </pre>
<hr>
-<a name="80"><h3>80.&nbsp;Global Operators of complex declared twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex"> [lib.complex]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="80"></a><h3><a name="80">80.&nbsp;Global Operators of complex declared twice</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.synopsis"> [lib.complex.synopsis]</a>, 26.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex"> [lib.complex]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>Both 26.2.1 and 26.2.2 contain declarations of global operators for
class complex. This redundancy should be removed.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Reduce redundancy according to the general style of the standard. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="83"><h3>83.&nbsp;String::npos vs. string::max_size()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="83"><h3>83.&nbsp;String::npos vs. string::max_size()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>Many string member functions throw if size is getting or exceeding
npos. However, I wonder why they don't throw if size is getting or
exceeding max_size() instead of npos. May be npos is known at compile
@@ -2614,7 +2618,7 @@ time, while max_size() is known at runtime. However, what happens if
size exceeds max_size() but not npos, then? It seems the standard
lacks some clarifications here.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>After 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 4 ("The functions
+<p>After 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 4 ("The functions
described in this clause...") add a new paragraph:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2625,7 +2629,7 @@ described in this clause...") add a new paragraph:</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG believes length_error is the correct exception to throw.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="86"><h3>86.&nbsp;String constructors don't describe exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="86"><h3>86.&nbsp;String constructors don't describe exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>The constructor from a range:</p>
<pre>template&lt;class InputIterator&gt;
@@ -2636,15 +2640,15 @@ described in this clause...") add a new paragraph:</p>
according to the other constructors if the numbers of characters in
the range equals npos (or exceeds max_size(), see above). </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, Strike throws paragraphs for
+<p>In 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>, Strike throws paragraphs for
constructors which say "Throws: length_error if n ==
npos."</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Throws clauses for length_error if n == npos are no longer needed
because they are subsumed by the general wording added by the
-resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>.</p>
+resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#83">83</a>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="90"><h3>90.&nbsp;Incorrect description of operator &gt;&gt; for strings</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="90"><h3>90.&nbsp;Incorrect description of operator &gt;&gt; for strings</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>The effect of operator &gt;&gt; for strings contain the following item:</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <tt>isspace(c,getloc())</tt> is true for the next available input
@@ -2652,7 +2656,7 @@ character c.</p>
<p>Here <tt>getloc()</tt> has to be replaced by <tt>is.getloc()</tt>. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 1 Effects clause replace:</p>
+<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 1 Effects clause replace:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>isspace(c,getloc())</tt> is true for the next available input character c.</p>
@@ -2664,13 +2668,13 @@ character c.</p>
<p><tt>isspace(c,is.getloc())</tt> is true for the next available input character c.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="91"><h3>91.&nbsp;Description of operator&gt;&gt; and getline() for string&lt;&gt; might cause endless loop</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="91"><h3>91.&nbsp;Description of operator&gt;&gt; and getline() for string&lt;&gt; might cause endless loop</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>Operator &gt;&gt; and getline() for strings read until eof()
in the input stream is true. However, this might never happen, if the
stream can't read anymore without reaching EOF. So shouldn't it be
changed into that it reads until !good() ? </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 1, replace:</p>
+<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 1, replace:</p>
<blockquote>
Effects: Begins by constructing a sentry object k as if k were
constructed by typename basic_istream&lt;charT,traits&gt;::sentry k( is). If
@@ -2682,7 +2686,7 @@ extracted and appended until any of the following occurs:
</blockquote>
<p>with:</p>
<blockquote>
-Effects: Behaves as a formatted input function (27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>). After constructing a sentry object, if the
+Effects: Behaves as a formatted input function (27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>). After constructing a sentry object, if the
sentry converts to true, calls str.erase() and then extracts
characters from is and appends them to str as if by calling
str.append(1,c). If is.width() is greater than zero, the maximum
@@ -2691,7 +2695,7 @@ str.max_size(). Characters are extracted and appended until any of the
following occurs:
</blockquote>
-<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 6, replace</p>
+<p>In 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>, paragraph 6, replace</p>
<blockquote>
Effects: Begins by constructing a sentry object k as if by typename
basic_istream&lt;charT,traits&gt;::sentry k( is, true). If bool( k) is true,
@@ -2701,7 +2705,7 @@ following occurs:
</blockquote>
<p>with:</p>
<blockquote>
-Effects: Behaves as an unformatted input function (27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), except that it does not affect the value returned
+Effects: Behaves as an unformatted input function (27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), except that it does not affect the value returned
by subsequent calls to basic_istream&lt;&gt;::gcount(). After
constructing a sentry object, if the sentry converts to true, calls
str.erase() and then extracts characters from is and appends them to
@@ -2725,7 +2729,7 @@ returning eof or by throwing an exception; there are no other
possibilities. The proposed resolution makes it clear that these two
functions do get characters from a streambuf.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="92"><h3>92.&nbsp;Incomplete Algorithm Requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
+<a name="92"><h3>92.&nbsp;Incomplete Algorithm Requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Sep 1998</p>
<p>The standard does not state, how often a function object is copied,
called, or the order of calls inside an algorithm. This may lead to
surprising/buggy behavior. Consider the following example: </p>
@@ -2774,7 +2778,7 @@ cost it could be avoided (just implement it directly instead of
calling find_if()). </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add a new paragraph following 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> paragraph 8:</p>
+<p>Add a new paragraph following 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> paragraph 8:</p>
<blockquote>
[Note: Unless otherwise specified, algorithms that take function
objects as arguments are permitted to copy those function objects
@@ -2802,7 +2806,7 @@ library book for a detailed discussion.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Kona: Nico will provide wording to the effect that "unless
otherwise specified, the number of copies of and calls to function
objects by algorithms is unspecified".&nbsp; Consider placing in
-25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> after paragraph 9.]</i></p>
+25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> after paragraph 9.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Santa Cruz: The standard doesn't currently guarantee that
functions object won't be copied, and what isn't forbidden is
@@ -2817,8 +2821,8 @@ objects by algorithms is unspecified".&nbsp; Consider placing in
<hr>
-<a name="98"><h3>98.&nbsp;Input iterator requirements are badly written</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
-<p>Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> specifies semantics for
+<a name="98"><h3>98.&nbsp;Input iterator requirements are badly written</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
+<p>Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a> specifies semantics for
<tt>*r++</tt> of:</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp; <tt>{ T tmp = *r; ++r; return tmp; }</tt></p>
@@ -2831,11 +2835,11 @@ This is too specific: we want to allow *r++ to return an lvalue.</p>
suggests that the effects *r++ should precisely replicate the behavior
of this code, including side effects. (Does this mean that *r++
should invoke the copy constructor exactly as many times as the sample
-code above would?) See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#334">334</a> for a similar
+code above would?) See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#334">334</a> for a similar
problem.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-In Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>, change the return type
+In Table 72 in 24.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.input.iterators"> [lib.input.iterators]</a>, change the return type
for <tt>*r++</tt> from <tt>T</tt> to "convertible to T".
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>This issue has two parts: the return type, and the number of times
@@ -2857,7 +2861,7 @@ for <tt>*r++</tt> from <tt>T</tt> to "convertible to T".
of input iterators, we can't impose any requirements in the Input
Iterator requirements table that forward iterators don't satisfy.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="103"><h3>103.&nbsp;set::iterator is required to be modifiable, but this allows modification of keys</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="103"><h3>103.&nbsp;set::iterator is required to be modifiable, but this allows modification of keys</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
<p>Set::iterator is described as implementation-defined with a
reference to the container requirement; the container requirement says
that const_iterator is an iterator pointing to const T and iterator an
@@ -2872,7 +2876,7 @@ const_iterator. Set, for example, has the following: </p>
<p><tt>typedef implementation defined iterator;<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; // See _lib.container.requirements_</tt></p>
-<p>23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> actually requires that iterator type pointing
+<p>23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> actually requires that iterator type pointing
to T (table 65). Disallowing user modification of keys by changing the
standard to require an iterator for associative container to be the
same as const_iterator would be overkill since that will unnecessarily
@@ -2885,7 +2889,7 @@ goes in line with trusting user knows what he is doing. </p>
<p><b>Other Options Evaluated:</b> </p>
-<p>Option A.&nbsp;&nbsp; In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 2, after
+<p>Option A.&nbsp;&nbsp; In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 2, after
first sentence, and before "In addition,...", add one line:
</p>
@@ -2893,7 +2897,7 @@ first sentence, and before "In addition,...", add one line:
<p>Modification of keys shall not change their strict weak ordering. </p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Option B.&nbsp;Add three new sentences to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>:</p>
+<p>Option B.&nbsp;Add three new sentences to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>At the end of paragraph 5: "Keys in an associative container
@@ -2905,7 +2909,7 @@ first sentence, and before "In addition,...", add one line:
type."</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Option C.&nbsp;To 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 3, which
+<p>Option C.&nbsp;To 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>, paragraph 3, which
currently reads:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2928,7 +2932,7 @@ currently reads:</p>
different than it was the previous time k2 was in the container.]</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> at
+<p>Add the following to 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> at
the indicated location:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -2966,7 +2970,7 @@ conversion from <tt>iterator</tt> to <tt>const_iterator</tt>.
<p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG crafted the proposed resolution and rationale.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="106"><h3>106.&nbsp;Numeric library private members are implementation defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="106"><h3>106.&nbsp;Numeric library private members are implementation defined</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
<p>This is the only place in the whole standard where the implementation has to document
something private.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -2975,23 +2979,23 @@ Remove the comment which says "// remainder implementation defined" from:
</p>
<ul>
- <li>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a>
+ <li>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a>
</li>
- <li>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a>
+ <li>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a>
</li>
- <li>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a>
+ <li>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a>
</li>
- <li>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a>
+ <li>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a>
</li>
</ul>
<hr>
-<a name="108"><h3>108.&nbsp;Lifetime of exception::what() return unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="108"><h3>108.&nbsp;Lifetime of exception::what() return unspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;AFNOR&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
<p>In 18.6.1, paragraphs 8-9, the lifetime of the return value of
exception::what() is left unspecified. This issue has implications
with exception safety of exception handling: some exceptions should
not throw bad_alloc.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add to 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> paragraph 9 (exception::what notes
+<p>Add to 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> paragraph 9 (exception::what notes
clause) the sentence:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -3004,7 +3008,7 @@ to set internal state that should affect the contents of the string
returned by <tt>what()</tt>.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="109"><h3>109.&nbsp;Missing binders for non-const sequence elements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.binders"> [lib.binders]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bjarne Stroustrup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="109"><h3>109.&nbsp;Missing binders for non-const sequence elements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.binders"> [lib.binders]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Bjarne Stroustrup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Oct 1998</p>
<p>There are no versions of binders that apply to non-const elements
of a sequence. This makes examples like for_each() using bind2nd() on
@@ -3079,7 +3083,7 @@ public:
<p><b>Howard believes there is a flaw</b> in this resolution.
See c++std-lib-9127. We may need to reopen this issue.</p>
-<p>In 20.3.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.1st"> [lib.binder.1st]</a> in the declaration of binder1st after:</p>
+<p>In 20.3.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.1st"> [lib.binder.1st]</a> in the declaration of binder1st after:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>typename Operation::result_type<br>
&nbsp;operator()(const typename Operation::second_argument_type&amp; x) const;</tt></p>
@@ -3089,7 +3093,7 @@ See c++std-lib-9127. We may need to reopen this issue.</p>
<p><tt>typename Operation::result_type<br>
&nbsp;operator()(typename Operation::second_argument_type&amp; x) const;</tt></p>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 20.3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.2nd"> [lib.binder.2nd]</a> in the declaration of binder2nd after:</p>
+<p>In 20.3.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.binder.2nd"> [lib.binder.2nd]</a> in the declaration of binder2nd after:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>typename Operation::result_type<br>
&nbsp;operator()(const typename Operation::first_argument_type&amp; x) const;</tt></p>
@@ -3110,12 +3114,12 @@ Strap poll: NAD - 0. Accept proposed resolution - 10.
Leave open - 1.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="110"><h3>110.&nbsp;istreambuf_iterator::equal not const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="110"><h3>110.&nbsp;istreambuf_iterator::equal not const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a>, 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 1998</p>
<p>Member istreambuf_iterator&lt;&gt;::equal is not declared
-"const", yet 24.5.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op=="> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op==]</a> says that operator==,
+"const", yet 24.5.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::op=="> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::op==]</a> says that operator==,
which is const, calls it. This is contradictory. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a> and also in 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a>,
+<p>In 24.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator]</a> and also in 24.5.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal"> [lib.istreambuf.iterator::equal]</a>,
replace:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -3128,13 +3132,13 @@ replace:</p>
<pre>bool equal(const istreambuf_iterator&amp; b) const;</pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="112"><h3>112.&nbsp;Minor typo in <tt>ostreambuf_iterator</tt> constructor</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="112"></a><h3><a name="112">112.&nbsp;Minor typo in <tt>ostreambuf_iterator</tt> constructor</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Oct 1998</p>
<p>The <b>requires</b> clause for <tt>ostreambuf_iterator</tt>'s
constructor from an <tt>ostream_type</tt> (24.5.4.1, paragraph 1)
reads "<i>s</i> is not null". However, <i>s</i> is a
reference, and references can't be null. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a>:</p>
+<p>In 24.5.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons"> [lib.ostreambuf.iter.cons]</a>:</p>
<p>Move the current paragraph 1, which reads "Requires: s is not
null.", from the first constructor to the second constructor.</p>
@@ -3146,7 +3150,7 @@ reading:</p>
<p><b>Requires</b>: <tt>s.rdbuf()</tt> is not null.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="114"><h3>114.&nbsp;Placement forms example in error twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Oct 1998</p>
+<a name="114"><h3>114.&nbsp;Placement forms example in error twice</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Oct 1998</p>
<p>Section 18.4.1.3 contains the following example: </p>
<pre>[Example: This can be useful for constructing an object at a known address:
@@ -3164,14 +3168,14 @@ believes the () are correct.]</p>
likely to fail.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Replace the <u> first line of code</u> in the example in
-18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a> with:
+18.4.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.placement"> [lib.new.delete.placement]</a> with:
</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>void* place = operator new(sizeof(Something));</pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="115"><h3>115.&nbsp;Typo in strstream constructors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Nov 1998</p>
+<a name="115"><h3>115.&nbsp;Typo in strstream constructors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Nov 1998</p>
<p>D.7.4.1 strstream constructors paragraph 2 says: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -3188,11 +3192,11 @@ likely to fail.</p>
should be "If mode&amp;app==app", or "mode&amp;app!=0", meaning that
the append bit is set.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In D.7.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ostrstream.cons"> [depr.ostrstream.cons]</a> paragraph 2 and D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a>
+<p>In D.7.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ostrstream.cons"> [depr.ostrstream.cons]</a> paragraph 2 and D.7.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.strstream.cons"> [depr.strstream.cons]</a>
paragraph 2, change the first condition to <tt>(mode&amp;app)==0</tt>
and the second condition to <tt>(mode&amp;app)!=0</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="117"><h3>117.&nbsp;<tt>basic_ostream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_put</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic"> [lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 1998</p>
+<a name="117"><h3>117.&nbsp;<tt>basic_ostream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_put</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic"> [lib.ostream.inserters.arithmetic]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 1998</p>
<p>The <b>effects</b> clause for numeric inserters says that
insertion of a value <tt>x</tt>, whose type is either <tt>bool</tt>,
<tt>short</tt>, <tt>unsigned short</tt>, <tt>int</tt>, <tt>unsigned
@@ -3298,7 +3302,7 @@ complicated, but gives more expected results for hex and octal output
of signed short and signed int. (On a system with 16-bit short, for
example, printing short(-1) in hex format should yield 0xffff.)</p>
<hr>
-<a name="118"><h3>118.&nbsp;<tt>basic_istream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_get</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 1998</p>
+<a name="118"><h3>118.&nbsp;<tt>basic_istream</tt> uses nonexistent <tt>num_get</tt> member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 1998</p>
<p>Formatted input is defined for the types <tt>short</tt>, <tt>unsigned short</tt>, <tt>int</tt>,
<tt>unsigned int</tt>, <tt>long</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, <tt>float</tt>, <tt>double</tt>,
<tt>long double</tt>, <tt>bool</tt>, and <tt>void*</tt>. According to section 27.6.1.2.2,
@@ -3309,7 +3313,7 @@ iostate err = 0;
use_facet&lt; numget &gt;(loc).get(*this, 0, *this, err, val);
setstate(err);</pre>
-<p>According to section 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, however,
+<p>According to section 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, however,
<tt>num_get&lt;&gt;::get()</tt> is only overloaded for the types
<tt>bool</tt>, <tt>long</tt>, <tt>unsigned short</tt>, <tt>unsigned
int</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>,
@@ -3318,7 +3322,7 @@ int</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>, <tt>unsigned long</tt>,
that 27.6.1.2.2 is using a nonexistent function for types
<tt>short</tt> and <tt>int</tt>. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> Arithmetic Extractors, remove the
+<p>In 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> Arithmetic Extractors, remove the
two lines (1st and 3rd) which read:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>operator&gt;&gt;(short&amp; val);
@@ -3355,8 +3359,8 @@ operator&gt;&gt;(int&amp; val);</pre>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: PJP provided the above wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="119"><h3>119.&nbsp;Should virtual functions be allowed to strengthen the exception specification?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
-<p>Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> states: </p>
+<a name="119"></a><h3><a name="119">119.&nbsp;Should virtual functions be allowed to strengthen the exception specification?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
+<p>Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> states: </p>
<p>"An implementation may strengthen the exception-specification
for a function by removing listed exceptions." </p>
@@ -3378,7 +3382,7 @@ public:
// overridden virtual function ios_base::failure::~failure()
};</pre>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> from:</p>
+<p>Change Section 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> from:</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "may strengthen the
exception-specification for a function"</p>
@@ -3388,7 +3392,7 @@ exception-specification for a function"</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "may strengthen the
exception-specification for a non-virtual function". </p>
<hr>
-<a name="120"><h3>120.&nbsp;Can an implementor add specializations?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
+<a name="120"><h3>120.&nbsp;Can an implementor add specializations?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
<p>The original issue asked whether a library implementor could
specialize standard library templates for built-in types. (This was
@@ -3433,7 +3437,7 @@ special: the "undefined behavior" that results from having two
different explicit instantiations might be harmless.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
- <p>Append to 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1: </p>
+ <p>Append to 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1: </p>
<blockquote>
A program may explicitly instantiate any templates in the standard
library only if the declaration depends on the name of a user-defined
@@ -3449,7 +3453,7 @@ different explicit instantiations might be harmless.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In light of the resolution to core issue 259, no normative changes
in the library clauses are necessary. Add the following non-normative
- note to the end of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1:</p>
+ note to the end of 17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a> paragraph 1:</p>
<blockquote>
[<i>Note:</i> A program may explicitly instantiate standard library
templates, even when an explicit instantiation does not depend on
@@ -3488,7 +3492,7 @@ different explicit instantiations might be harmless.</p>
linking. If there are such changes in the future, it may be
appropriate to revisit this issue later.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="122"><h3>122.&nbsp;streambuf/wstreambuf description should not say they are specializations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
+<a name="122"><h3>122.&nbsp;streambuf/wstreambuf description should not say they are specializations</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
<p>Section 27.5.2 describes the streambuf classes this way: </p>
<blockquote>
@@ -3505,27 +3509,27 @@ specialized for the type wchar_t. </p>
<p>It doesn't seem this was intended, since Section 27.5 has them declared as typedefs. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> paragraphs 2 and 3 (the above two
+<p>Remove 27.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf"> [lib.streambuf]</a> paragraphs 2 and 3 (the above two
sentences). </p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The <tt>streambuf</tt> synopsis already has a declaration for the
typedefs and that is sufficient. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="123"><h3>123.&nbsp;Should valarray helper arrays fill functions be const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a>, 26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998 </p>
+<a name="123"><h3>123.&nbsp;Should valarray helper arrays fill functions be const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a>, 26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a>, 26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998 </p>
<p>One of the operator= in the valarray helper arrays is const and one
is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
-26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> is const: </p>
+26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> is const: </p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <tt>void operator=(const valarray&lt;T&gt;&amp;) const;</tt> </p>
-<p>but this one in Section 26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> is not: </p>
+<p>but this one in Section 26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> is not: </p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <tt>void operator=(const T&amp;); </tt></p>
<p>The description of the semantics for these two functions is similar. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> Template class slice_array</p>
+<p>26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> Template class slice_array</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the class template definition for slice_array, replace the member
@@ -3537,7 +3541,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> slice_array fill function</p>
+<p>26.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.fill"> [lib.slice.arr.fill]</a> slice_array fill function</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Change the function declaration</p>
@@ -3548,7 +3552,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> Template class gslice_array</p>
+<p>26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> Template class gslice_array</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the class template definition for gslice_array, replace the member
@@ -3560,7 +3564,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a> gslice_array fill function</p>
+<p>26.3.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.fill"> [lib.gslice.array.fill]</a> gslice_array fill function</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Change the function declaration</p>
@@ -3571,7 +3575,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> Template class mask_array</p>
+<p>26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> Template class mask_array</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the class template definition for mask_array, replace the member
@@ -3583,7 +3587,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a> mask_array fill function</p>
+<p>26.3.8.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.fill"> [lib.mask.array.fill]</a> mask_array fill function</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Change the function declaration</p>
@@ -3594,7 +3598,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> Template class indirect_array</p>
+<p>26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a> Template class indirect_array</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the class template definition for indirect_array, replace the member
@@ -3606,7 +3610,7 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a> indirect_array fill function</p>
+<p>26.3.9.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.fill"> [lib.indirect.array.fill]</a> indirect_array fill function</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Change the function declaration</p>
@@ -3622,32 +3626,32 @@ is not. For example, look at slice_array. This operator= in Section
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>There's no good reason for one version of operator= being const and
-another one not. Because of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, this now
+another one not. Because of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#253">253</a>, this now
matters: these functions are now callable in more circumstances. In
many existing implementations, both versions are already const.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="124"><h3>124.&nbsp;ctype_byname&lt;charT&gt;::do_scan_is &amp; do_scan_not return type should be const charT*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
-<p>In Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>
+<a name="124"><h3>124.&nbsp;ctype_byname&lt;charT&gt;::do_scan_is &amp; do_scan_not return type should be const charT*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
+<p>In Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>
ctype_byname&lt;charT&gt;::do_scan_is() and do_scan_not() are declared
to return a const char* not a const charT*. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> <tt>do_scan_is()</tt> and
+<p>Change Section 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a> <tt>do_scan_is()</tt> and
<tt>do_scan_not()</tt> to return a <tt> const
charT*</tt>. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="125"><h3>125.&nbsp;valarray&lt;T&gt;::operator!() return type is inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
-<p>In Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> valarray&lt;T&gt;::operator!() is
-declared to return a valarray&lt;T&gt;, but in Section 26.3.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.unary"> [lib.valarray.unary]</a> it is declared to return a valarray&lt;bool&gt;. The
+<a name="125"><h3>125.&nbsp;valarray&lt;T&gt;::operator!() return type is inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
+<p>In Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> valarray&lt;T&gt;::operator!() is
+declared to return a valarray&lt;T&gt;, but in Section 26.3.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.unary"> [lib.valarray.unary]</a> it is declared to return a valarray&lt;bool&gt;. The
latter appears to be correct. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change in Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> the declaration of
+<p>Change in Section 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a> the declaration of
<tt>operator!()</tt> so that the return type is
<tt>valarray&lt;bool&gt;</tt>. </p>
<hr>
-<a name="126"><h3>126.&nbsp;typos in Effects clause of ctype::do_narrow()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
+<a name="126"><h3>126.&nbsp;typos in Effects clause of ctype::do_narrow()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 1998</p>
<p>Typos in 22.2.1.1.2 need to be fixed.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In Section 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> change: </p>
+<p>In Section 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> change: </p>
<pre> do_widen(do_narrow(c),0) == c</pre>
@@ -3663,7 +3667,7 @@ latter appears to be correct. </p>
<pre> (is(M,c) || !ctc.is(M, do_narrow(c,dfault)) )</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="127"><h3>127.&nbsp;auto_ptr&lt;&gt; conversion issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Greg Colvin&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Feb 1999</p>
+<a name="127"><h3>127.&nbsp;auto_ptr&lt;&gt; conversion issues</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Greg Colvin&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Feb 1999</p>
<p>There are two problems with the current <tt>auto_ptr</tt> wording
in the standard: </p>
@@ -3700,23 +3704,23 @@ object parameter may be bound to an rvalue [13.3.3.1.4/3]
<p>Tokyo: The LWG removed the following from the proposed resolution:</p>
- <p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, and 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>,
+ <p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, and 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>,
paragraph 2, make the conversion to auto_ptr_ref const:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>template&lt;class Y&gt; operator auto_ptr_ref&lt;Y&gt;() const throw();</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, move
+<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, move
the <tt>auto_ptr_ref</tt> definition to namespace scope.</p>
-<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, add
+<p>In 20.4.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr"> [lib.auto.ptr]</a>, paragraph 2, add
a public assignment operator to the <tt>auto_ptr</tt> definition: </p>
<blockquote>
<pre>auto_ptr&amp; operator=(auto_ptr_ref&lt;X&gt; r) throw();</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>Also add the assignment operator to 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>: </p>
+<p>Also add the assignment operator to 20.4.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.auto.ptr.conv"> [lib.auto.ptr.conv]</a>: </p>
<blockquote>
<pre>auto_ptr&amp; operator=(auto_ptr_ref&lt;X&gt; r) throw()</pre>
@@ -3727,7 +3731,7 @@ a public assignment operator to the <tt>auto_ptr</tt> definition: </p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="129"><h3>129.&nbsp;Need error indication from seekp() and seekg()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, 27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Feb 1999</p>
+<a name="129"><h3>129.&nbsp;Need error indication from seekp() and seekg()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, 27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 Feb 1999</p>
<p>Currently, the standard does not specify how seekg() and seekp()
indicate failure. They are not required to set failbit, and they can't
return an error indication because they must return *this, i.e. the
@@ -3740,8 +3744,8 @@ stream must perform a state-dependent code conversion, etc. </p>
stream state in case of failure.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Add to the Effects: clause of&nbsp; seekg() in
-27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> and to the Effects: clause of seekp() in
-27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a>: </p>
+27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> and to the Effects: clause of seekp() in
+27.6.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.seeks"> [lib.ostream.seeks]</a>: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>In case of failure, the function calls <tt>setstate(failbit)</tt> (which may throw <tt>ios_base::failure</tt>).
@@ -3750,7 +3754,7 @@ stream state in case of failure.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Setting failbit is the usual error reporting mechanism for streams</p>
<hr>
-<a name="132"><h3>132.&nbsp;list::resize description uses random access iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.capacity"> [lib.list.capacity]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
+<a name="132"><h3>132.&nbsp;list::resize description uses random access iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.capacity"> [lib.list.capacity]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
<p>The description reads:</p>
<p>-1- Effects:</p>
@@ -3781,22 +3785,22 @@ stream state in case of failure.</p>
with David Abrahams. They had a discussion and believe there is
no issue of exception safety with the proposed resolution.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="133"><h3>133.&nbsp;map missing get_allocator()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
+<a name="133"><h3>133.&nbsp;map missing get_allocator()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
<p>The title says it all.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Insert in 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2,
+<p>Insert in 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2,
after operator= in the map declaration:</p>
<pre> allocator_type get_allocator() const;</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="134"><h3>134.&nbsp;vector constructors over specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
+<a name="134"><h3>134.&nbsp;vector constructors over specified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
<p>The complexity description says: "It does at most 2N calls to the copy constructor
of T and logN reallocations if they are just input iterators ...".</p>
<p>This appears to be overly restrictive, dictating the precise memory/performance
tradeoff for the implementor.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a>, paragraph 1 to:</p>
+<p>Change 23.2.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.cons"> [lib.vector.cons]</a>, paragraph 1 to:</p>
<p>-1- Complexity: The constructor template &lt;class
InputIterator&gt; vector(InputIterator first, InputIterator last)
@@ -3811,7 +3815,7 @@ order logN reallocations if they are just input iterators.
is greater than or equal to 2.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="136"><h3>136.&nbsp;seekp, seekg setting wrong streams?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
+<a name="136"><h3>136.&nbsp;seekp, seekg setting wrong streams?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Mar 1999</p>
<p>I may be misunderstanding the intent, but should not seekg set only
the input stream and seekp set only the output stream? The description
seems to say that each should set both input and output streams. If
@@ -3872,8 +3876,8 @@ This requirement is a bit weird. There's no similar requirement
for basic_streambuf&lt;&gt;::seekpos, or for basic_filebuf&lt;&gt;::seekoff or
basic_filebuf&lt;&gt;::seekpos.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="137"><h3>137.&nbsp;Do use_facet and has_facet look in the global locale?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Mar 1999</p>
-<p>Section 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> says:</p>
+<a name="137"><h3>137.&nbsp;Do use_facet and has_facet look in the global locale?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Mar 1999</p>
+<p>Section 22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a> says:</p>
<p>-4- In the call to use_facet&lt;Facet&gt;(loc), the type argument
chooses a facet, making available all members of the named type. If
@@ -3883,7 +3887,7 @@ check if a locale implements a particular facet with the template
function has_facet&lt;Facet&gt;(). </p>
<p>This contradicts the specification given in section
-22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a>:
+22.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.global.templates"> [lib.locale.global.templates]</a>:
<br><br>
template &lt;class&nbsp; Facet&gt; const&nbsp; Facet&amp; use_facet(const
locale&amp;&nbsp; loc); <br>
@@ -3900,7 +3904,7 @@ from section 22.1.1. </p>
<p>Needed for consistency with the way locales are handled elsewhere
in the standard.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="139"><h3>139.&nbsp;Optional sequence operation table description unclear</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Mar 1999</p>
+<a name="139"><h3>139.&nbsp;Optional sequence operation table description unclear</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Mar 1999</p>
<p>The sentence introducing the Optional sequence operation table
(23.1.1 paragraph 12) has two problems:</p>
@@ -3923,7 +3927,7 @@ with:</p>
amortized constant time.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="141"><h3>141.&nbsp;basic_string::find_last_of, find_last_not_of say pos instead of xpos</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.of"> [lib.string::find.last.of]</a>, 21.3.6.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.not.of"> [lib.string::find.last.not.of]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Arch Robison&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Apr 1999</p>
+<a name="141"><h3>141.&nbsp;basic_string::find_last_of, find_last_not_of say pos instead of xpos</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.of"> [lib.string::find.last.of]</a>, 21.3.6.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::find.last.not.of"> [lib.string::find.last.not.of]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Arch Robison&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Apr 1999</p>
<p>Sections 21.3.6.4 paragraph 1 and 21.3.6.6 paragraph 1 surely have misprints where they
say:<br>
<br>
@@ -3942,7 +3946,7 @@ proposed resolution.]</i></p>
<tt><br>
</tt>&#8212; <tt>xpos &lt;= pos</tt> and <tt>xpos &lt; size();</tt></p>
<hr>
-<a name="142"><h3>142.&nbsp;lexicographical_compare complexity wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jun 1999</p>
+<a name="142"><h3>142.&nbsp;lexicographical_compare complexity wrong</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jun 1999</p>
<p>The lexicographical_compare complexity is specified as:<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "At most min((last1 - first1), (last2 - first2))
@@ -3955,7 +3959,7 @@ equality you have to check both &lt; and &gt;? Yes, IMO you are
right! (and Matt states this complexity in his book)</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a> complexity to:</p>
+<p>Change 25.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.lex.comparison"> [lib.alg.lex.comparison]</a> complexity to:</p>
<blockquote>
At most <tt>2*min((last1 - first1), (last2 - first2))</tt>
applications of the corresponding comparison.
@@ -3975,7 +3979,7 @@ right! (and Matt states this complexity in his book)</p>
--end example]
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="144"><h3>144.&nbsp;Deque constructor complexity wrong </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.cons"> [lib.deque.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Herb Sutter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 May 1999</p>
+<a name="144"><h3>144.&nbsp;Deque constructor complexity wrong </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.deque.cons"> [lib.deque.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Herb Sutter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 May 1999</p>
<p>In 23.2.1.1 paragraph 6, the deque ctor that takes an iterator range appears
to have complexity requirements which are incorrect, and which contradict the
complexity requirements for insert(). I suspect that the text in question,
@@ -4006,7 +4010,7 @@ typo):</p>
<p>Complexity: Makes last - first calls to the copy constructor of T.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="146"><h3>146.&nbsp;complex&lt;T&gt; Inserter and Extractor need sentries</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 May 1999</p>
+<a name="146"><h3>146.&nbsp;complex&lt;T&gt; Inserter and Extractor need sentries</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 May 1999</p>
<p>The <u> extractor</u> for complex numbers is specified as:&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -4063,7 +4067,7 @@ consistency with the other inserters and extractors in the
library. Regarding the issue of padding in the inserter, I don't know
what the intent was.&nbsp;</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>After 26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a> paragraph 14 (operator&gt;&gt;), add a
+<p>After 26.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.complex.ops"> [lib.complex.ops]</a> paragraph 14 (operator&gt;&gt;), add a
Notes clause:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -4080,7 +4084,7 @@ follows an "all-or-none" rule.</p>
<p>For inserters, the LWG believes there is no defect; the standard is correct
as written.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="147"><h3>147.&nbsp;Library Intro refers to global functions that aren't global</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Lois Goldthwaite&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 Jun 1999</p>
+<a name="147"><h3>147.&nbsp;Library Intro refers to global functions that aren't global</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Lois Goldthwaite&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 Jun 1999</p>
<p>The library had many global functions until 17.4.1.1 [lib.contents]
paragraph 2 was added: </p>
@@ -4143,22 +4147,22 @@ Because operator new and delete are global, the proposed resolution
was changed from "non-member" to "global or non-member.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="148"><h3>148.&nbsp;Functions in the example facet BoolNames should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jeremy Siek&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jun 1999</p>
-<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, the do_truename() and
+<a name="148"><h3>148.&nbsp;Functions in the example facet BoolNames should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jeremy Siek&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jun 1999</p>
+<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, the do_truename() and
do_falsename() functions in the example facet BoolNames should be
const. The functions they are overriding in
numpunct_byname&lt;char&gt; are const. </p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, insert "const" in
+<p>In 22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a> paragraph 13, insert "const" in
two places:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>string do_truename() const { return "Oui Oui!"; }<br>
string do_falsename() const { return "Mais Non!"; }</tt></p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="150"><h3>150.&nbsp;Find_first_of says integer instead of iterator </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt McClure&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jun 1999</p>
+<a name="150"><h3>150.&nbsp;Find_first_of says integer instead of iterator </h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt McClure&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Jun 1999</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p>
+<p>Change 25.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.find.first.of"> [lib.alg.find.first.of]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Returns: The first iterator i in the range [first1, last1) such
@@ -4172,7 +4176,7 @@ that for some <u>integer</u> j in the range [first2, last2) ...</p>
that for some iterator j in the range [first2, last2) ...</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="151"><h3>151.&nbsp;Can't currently clear() empty container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ed Brey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1999</p>
+<a name="151"><h3>151.&nbsp;Can't currently clear() empty container</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ed Brey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jun 1999</p>
<p>For both sequences and associative containers, a.clear() has the
semantics of erase(a.begin(),a.end()), which is undefined for an empty
container since erase(q1,q2) requires that q1 be dereferenceable
@@ -4208,13 +4212,13 @@ iterators or certain kinds of iterators is unnecessary.
<u>into a</u></p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="152"><h3>152.&nbsp;Typo in <tt>scan_is()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="152"><h3>152.&nbsp;Typo in <tt>scan_is()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The semantics of <tt>scan_is()</tt> (paragraphs 4 and 6) is not exactly described
because there is no function <tt>is()</tt> which only takes a character as
argument. Also, in the effects clause (paragraph 3), the semantic is also kept
vague.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> paragraphs 4 and 6, change the returns
+<p>In 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a> paragraphs 4 and 6, change the returns
clause from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"... such that <tt>is(*p)</tt>
@@ -4223,7 +4227,7 @@ would..."</p>
<p>to:&nbsp; "... such that <tt>is(m, *p)</tt>
would...."</p>
<hr>
-<a name="153"><h3>153.&nbsp;Typo in <tt>narrow()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="153"><h3>153.&nbsp;Typo in <tt>narrow()</tt> semantics</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The description of the array version of <tt>narrow()</tt> (in
paragraph 11) is flawed: There is no member <tt>do_narrow()</tt> which
takes only three arguments because in addition to the range a default
@@ -4234,7 +4238,7 @@ two signatures followed by a <b>Returns</b> clause that only addresses
one of them.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change the returns clause in 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>
+<p>Change the returns clause in 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a>
paragraph 10 from:</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Returns: do_widen(low, high, to).</p>
@@ -4242,7 +4246,7 @@ paragraph 10 from:</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Returns: do_widen(c) or do_widen(low, high, to),
respectively.</p>
-<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> paragraph 10 and 11 from:</p>
+<p>Change 22.2.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.ctype.char.members"> [lib.facet.ctype.char.members]</a> paragraph 10 and 11 from:</p>
<pre> char narrow(char c, char /*dfault*/) const;
const char* narrow(const char* low, const char* high,
char /*dfault*/, char* to) const;</pre>
@@ -4264,48 +4268,48 @@ version..." comment above. Perhaps it was a circuitous way of
saying "dfault" needed to be uncommented?]</i></p>
<p><i>[Post-Toronto: the issues list maintainer has merged in the
-proposed resolution from issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#207">207</a>, which addresses the
+proposed resolution from issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#207">207</a>, which addresses the
same paragraphs.]</i></p>
<hr>
<a name="154"><h3>154.&nbsp;Missing <tt>double</tt> specifier for <tt>do_get()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The table in paragraph 7 for the length modifier does not list the length
modifier <tt>l</tt> to be applied if the type is <tt>double</tt>. Thus, the
standard asks the implementation to do undefined things when using <tt>scanf()</tt>
(the missing length modifier for <tt>scanf()</tt> when scanning <tt>double</tt>s
is actually a problem I found quite often in production code, too).</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 7, add a row in the Length
+<p>In 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 7, add a row in the Length
Modifier table to say that for <tt>double</tt> a length modifier
<tt>l</tt> is to be used.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The standard makes an embarrassing beginner's mistake.</p>
<hr>
<a name="155"><h3>155.&nbsp;Typo in naming the class defining the class <tt>Init</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>There are conflicting statements about where the class
-<tt>Init</tt> is defined. According to 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2
-it is defined as <tt>basic_ios::Init</tt>, according to 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> it is defined as <tt>ios_base::Init</tt>.</p>
+<tt>Init</tt> is defined. According to 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2
+it is defined as <tt>basic_ios::Init</tt>, according to 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> it is defined as <tt>ios_base::Init</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 from
+<p>Change 27.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostream.objects"> [lib.iostream.objects]</a> paragraph 2 from
"<tt>basic_ios::Init"</tt> to
"<tt>ios_base::Init"</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Although not strictly wrong, the standard was misleading enough to warrant
the change.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="156"><h3>156.&nbsp;Typo in <tt>imbue()</tt> description</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="156"><h3>156.&nbsp;Typo in <tt>imbue()</tt> description</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>There is a small discrepancy between the declarations of
-<tt>imbue()</tt>: in 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> the argument is passed as
-<tt>locale const&amp;</tt> (correct), in 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> it
+<tt>imbue()</tt>: in 27.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base"> [lib.ios.base]</a> the argument is passed as
+<tt>locale const&amp;</tt> (correct), in 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> it
is passed as <tt>locale const</tt> (wrong).</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> change the <tt>imbue</tt> argument
+<p>In 27.4.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.locales"> [lib.ios.base.locales]</a> change the <tt>imbue</tt> argument
from "<tt>locale const" to "locale
const&amp;".</tt></p>
<hr>
<a name="158"><h3>158.&nbsp;Underspecified semantics for <tt>setbuf()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The default behavior of <tt>setbuf()</tt> is described only for the
situation that <tt>gptr() != 0 &amp;&amp; gptr() != egptr()</tt>:
namely to do nothing. What has to be done in other situations&nbsp;
@@ -4317,11 +4321,11 @@ buffer management of derived classes unless these classes do it
themselves, the default behavior of <tt>setbuf()</tt> should always be
to do nothing.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 3, Default behavior,
+<p>Change 27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>, paragraph 3, Default behavior,
to: "Default behavior: Does nothing. Returns this."</p>
<hr>
<a name="159"><h3>159.&nbsp;Strange use of <tt>underflow()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The description of the meaning of the result of
<tt>showmanyc()</tt> seems to be rather strange: It uses calls to
<tt>underflow()</tt>. Using <tt>underflow()</tt> is strange because
@@ -4329,19 +4333,19 @@ this function only reads the current character but does not extract
it, <tt>uflow()</tt> would extract the current character. This should
be fixed to use <tt>sbumpc()</tt> instead.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a> paragraph 1,
+<p>Change 27.5.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.get"> [lib.streambuf.virt.get]</a> paragraph 1,
<tt>showmanyc()</tt>returns clause, by replacing the word
"supplied" with the words "extracted from the
stream".</p>
<hr>
<a name="160"><h3>160.&nbsp;Typo: Use of non-existing function <tt>exception()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The paragraph 4 refers to the function <tt>exception()</tt> which
is not defined. Probably, the referred function is
<tt>basic_ios&lt;&gt;::exceptions()</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a>, 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 1,
-27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, paragraph 3, and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>,
+<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a>, 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>, paragraph 1,
+27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, paragraph 3, and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>,
paragraph 1, change "<tt>exception()" to
"exceptions()"</tt>.</p>
@@ -4349,12 +4353,12 @@ paragraph 1, change "<tt>exception()" to
is the correct spelling.]</i></p>
<hr>
<a name="161"><h3>161.&nbsp;Typo: <tt>istream_iterator</tt> vs. <tt>istreambuf_iterator</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The note in the second paragraph pretends that the first argument
is an object of type <tt>istream_iterator</tt>. This is wrong: It is
an object of type <tt>istreambuf_iterator</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> from:</p>
+<p>Change 27.6.1.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic"> [lib.istream.formatted.arithmetic]</a> from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The first argument provides an object of the istream_iterator class...</p>
</blockquote>
@@ -4363,8 +4367,8 @@ an object of type <tt>istreambuf_iterator</tt>.</p>
<p>The first argument provides an object of the istreambuf_iterator class...</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="164"><h3>164.&nbsp;do_put() has apparently unused fill argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
-<p>In 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> the do_put() function is specified
+<a name="164"><h3>164.&nbsp;do_put() has apparently unused fill argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
+<p>In 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a> the do_put() function is specified
as taking a fill character as an argument, but the description of the
function does not say whether the character is used at all and, if so,
in which way. The same holds for any format control parameters that
@@ -4374,7 +4378,7 @@ character in any way? In any case, the specification of
time_put.do_put() looks inconsistent to me.<br> <br> Is the
signature of do_put() wrong, or is the effects clause incomplete?</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following note after 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a>
+<p>Add the following note after 22.2.5.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.time.put.virtuals]</a>
paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> [Note: the <tt>fill</tt> argument may be used in the implementation-defined formats, or by derivations. A space character is a reasonable default
@@ -4385,7 +4389,7 @@ paragraph 2:</p>
users need some guidance on what to pass for the <tt>fill</tt>
argument since the standard doesn't say how it's used.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="165"><h3>165.&nbsp;<tt>xsputn()</tt>, <tt>pubsync()</tt> never called by <tt>basic_ostream</tt> members?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="165"><h3>165.&nbsp;<tt>xsputn()</tt>, <tt>pubsync()</tt> never called by <tt>basic_ostream</tt> members?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>Paragraph 2 explicitly states that none of the <tt>basic_ostream</tt>
functions falling into one of the groups "formatted output functions"
and "unformatted output functions" calls any stream buffer function
@@ -4432,7 +4436,7 @@ called from what functions and eg to state specifically that flush()
is allowed to call sync() while other functions are not.]</i></p>
<hr>
<a name="167"><h3>167.&nbsp;Improper use of <tt>traits_type::length()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>Paragraph 4 states that the length is determined using
<tt>traits::length(s)</tt>. Unfortunately, this function is not
defined for example if the character type is <tt>wchar_t</tt> and the
@@ -4441,7 +4445,7 @@ the character type is <tt>char</tt> and the type of <tt>s</tt> is
either <tt>signed char const*</tt> or <tt>unsigned char
const*</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> paragraph 4 from:</p>
+<p>Change 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> paragraph 4 from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Effects: Behaves like an formatted inserter (as described in
lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts) of out. After a sentry object is
@@ -4496,12 +4500,12 @@ traits class for some arbitrary charT type, and we somehow have to
deal with a const char*. There's nothing better to do but fall back
to char_traits&lt;char&gt;</p>
<hr>
-<a name="168"><h3>168.&nbsp;Typo: formatted vs. unformatted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="168"><h3>168.&nbsp;Typo: formatted vs. unformatted</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The first paragraph begins with a descriptions what has to be done
in <i>formatted</i> output functions. Probably this is a typo and the
paragraph really want to describe unformatted output functions...</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 1, the first and last
+<p>In 27.6.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.unformatted"> [lib.ostream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 1, the first and last
sentences, change the word "formatted" to
"unformatted":</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -4510,18 +4514,18 @@ sentences, change the word "formatted" to
function."</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="169"><h3>169.&nbsp;Bad efficiency of <tt>overflow()</tt> mandated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="169"><h3>169.&nbsp;Bad efficiency of <tt>overflow()</tt> mandated</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
<p>Paragraph 8, Notes, of this section seems to mandate an extremely
inefficient way of buffer handling for <tt>basic_stringbuf</tt>,
especially in view of the restriction that <tt>basic_ostream</tt>
-member functions are not allowed to use <tt>xsputn()</tt> (see 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>): For each character to be inserted, a new buffer
+member functions are not allowed to use <tt>xsputn()</tt> (see 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>): For each character to be inserted, a new buffer
is to be created.</p>
<p>Of course, the resolution below requires some handling of
simultaneous input and output since it is no longer possible to update
<tt>egptr()</tt> whenever <tt>epptr()</tt> is changed. A possible
solution is to handle this in <tt>underflow()</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 8, Notes, insert the words
+<p>In 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 8, Notes, insert the words
"at least" as in the following:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>To make a write position available, the function reallocates (or initially
@@ -4531,23 +4535,23 @@ solution is to handle this in <tt>underflow()</tt>.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
<a name="170"><h3>170.&nbsp;Inconsistent definition of <tt>traits_type</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
-<p>The classes <tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>),
-<tt>basic_istringstream</tt> (27.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istringstream"> [lib.istringstream]</a>), and
-<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) are inconsistent
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<p>The classes <tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>),
+<tt>basic_istringstream</tt> (27.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istringstream"> [lib.istringstream]</a>), and
+<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) are inconsistent
in their definition of the type <tt>traits_type</tt>: For
<tt>istringstream</tt>, this type is defined, for the other two it is
not. This should be consistent.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p> <p>To the declarations of
-<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) and
-<tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>) add:</p>
+<tt>basic_ostringstream</tt> (27.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostringstream"> [lib.ostringstream]</a>) and
+<tt>basic_stringstream</tt> (27.7.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringstream"> [lib.stringstream]</a>) add:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>typedef traits traits_type;</pre>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="171"><h3>171.&nbsp;Strange <tt>seekpos()</tt> semantics due to joint position</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
-<p>Overridden virtual functions, seekpos()</p> <p>In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> paragraph 3, it is stated that a joint input and
+<a name="171"><h3>171.&nbsp;Strange <tt>seekpos()</tt> semantics due to joint position</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Jul 1999</p>
+<p>Overridden virtual functions, seekpos()</p> <p>In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> paragraph 3, it is stated that a joint input and
output position is maintained by <tt>basic_filebuf</tt>. Still, the
description of <tt>seekpos()</tt> seems to talk about different file
positions. In particular, it is unclear (at least to me) what is
@@ -4599,17 +4603,17 @@ paragraph 14 from:</p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Dietmar supplied the above wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
<a name="172"><h3>172.&nbsp;Inconsistent types for <tt>basic_istream::ignore()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
-<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> the function
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
+<p>In 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> the function
<tt>ignore()</tt> gets an object of type <tt>streamsize</tt> as first
-argument. However, in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>
+argument. However, in 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>
paragraph 23 the first argument is of type <tt>int.</tt></p>
<p>As far as I can see this is not really a contradiction because
everything is consistent if <tt>streamsize</tt> is typedef to be
<tt>int</tt>. However, this is almost certainly not what was
intended. The same thing happened to <tt>basic_filebuf::setbuf()</tt>,
-as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#173">173</a>.</p>
+as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#173">173</a>.</p>
<p>Darin Adler also
submitted this issue, commenting: Either 27.6.1.1 should be modified
@@ -4617,17 +4621,17 @@ to show a first parameter of type int, or 27.6.1.3 should be modified
to show a first parameter of type streamsize and use
numeric_limits&lt;streamsize&gt;::max.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 23 and 24, change both uses
+<p>In 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a> paragraph 23 and 24, change both uses
of <tt>int</tt> in the description of <tt>ignore()</tt> to
<tt>streamsize</tt>.</p>
<hr>
<a name="173"><h3>173.&nbsp;Inconsistent types for <tt>basic_filebuf::setbuf()</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Greg Comeau, Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
<p>
-In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> the function <tt>setbuf()</tt> gets an
+In 27.8.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf"> [lib.filebuf]</a> the function <tt>setbuf()</tt> gets an
object of type <tt>streamsize</tt> as second argument. However, in
-27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9 the second argument is of type
+27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9 the second argument is of type
<tt>int</tt>.
</p>
@@ -4636,25 +4640,25 @@ As far as I can see this is not really a contradiction because
everything is consistent if <tt>streamsize</tt> is typedef to be
<tt>int</tt>. However, this is almost certainly not what was
intended. The same thing happened to <tt>basic_istream::ignore()</tt>,
-as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#172">172</a>.
+as described in issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#172">172</a>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9, change all uses of
+<p>In 27.8.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.virtuals"> [lib.filebuf.virtuals]</a> paragraph 9, change all uses of
<tt>int</tt> in the description of <tt>setbuf()</tt> to
<tt>streamsize</tt>.</p>
<hr>
<a name="174"><h3>174.&nbsp;Typo: <tt>OFF_T</tt> vs. <tt>POS_T</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
<p>According to paragraph 1 of this section, <tt>streampos</tt> is the
type <tt>OFF_T</tt>, the same type as <tt>streamoff</tt>. However, in
paragraph 6 the <tt>streampos</tt> gets the type <tt>POS_T</tt></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 1 from "<tt>typedef
+<p>Change D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 1 from "<tt>typedef
OFF_T streampos;</tt>" to "<tt>typedef POS_T
streampos;</tt>"</p>
<hr>
-<a name="175"><h3>175.&nbsp;Ambiguity for <tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt> and a few other functions.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="175"><h3>175.&nbsp;Ambiguity for <tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt> and a few other functions.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
<p>According to paragraph 8 of this section, the methods
<tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt>,
<tt>basic_ifstream::open()</tt>, and <tt>basic_ofstream::open</tt>
@@ -4667,23 +4671,23 @@ three cases. However, this generates an ambiguity with the overloaded
version because now the arguments are absolutely identical if the last
argument is not specified.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, remove the default arguments for
+<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, remove the default arguments for
<tt>basic_streambuf::pubseekpos()</tt>,
<tt>basic_ifstream::open()</tt>, and
<tt>basic_ofstream::open().</tt></p>
<hr>
-<a name="176"><h3>176.&nbsp;<tt>exceptions()</tt> in <tt>ios_base</tt>...?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="176"><h3>176.&nbsp;<tt>exceptions()</tt> in <tt>ios_base</tt>...?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 1999</p>
<p>The "overload" for the function <tt>exceptions()</tt> in
paragraph 8 gives the impression that there is another function of
this function defined in class <tt>ios_base</tt>. However, this is not
the case. Thus, it is hard to tell how the semantics (paragraph 9) can
be implemented: "Call the corresponding member function specified
-in clause 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>."</p>
+in clause 27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>."</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, move the declaration of the
+<p>In D.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/future.html#depr.ios.members"> [depr.ios.members]</a> paragraph 8, move the declaration of the
function <tt>exceptions()</tt>into class <tt>basic_ios</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="179"><h3>179.&nbsp;Comparison of const_iterators to iterators doesn't work</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Jul 1998</p>
+<a name="179"><h3>179.&nbsp;Comparison of const_iterators to iterators doesn't work</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Jul 1998</p>
<p>Currently the following will not compile on two well-known standard
library implementations:</p>
@@ -4756,7 +4760,7 @@ return i == ci;
</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Insert this paragraph after 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 7:</p>
+<p>Insert this paragraph after 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 7:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In the expressions</p>
<pre> i == j
@@ -4787,10 +4791,10 @@ the nested types <tt>X::iterator</tt> and <tt>X::const_iterator</tt>,
where <tt>X</tt> is a container. There is no requirement that
<tt>X::reverse_iterator</tt> and <tt>X::const_reverse_iterator</tt>
can be mixed. If mixing them is considered important, that's a
-separate issue. (Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#280">280</a>.)
+separate issue. (Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#280">280</a>.)
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="181"><h3>181.&nbsp;make_pair() unintended behavior</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Aug 1999</p>
+<a name="181"><h3>181.&nbsp;make_pair() unintended behavior</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Aug 1999</p>
<p>The claim has surfaced in Usenet that expressions such as<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <tt>make_pair("abc", 3)</tt><br>
@@ -4801,7 +4805,7 @@ parameter to <tt> const char (&amp;)[4]</tt>, which type is uncopyable.<br>
I doubt anyone intended that behavior...
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 20.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.utility"> [lib.utility]</a>, paragraph 1 change the following
+<p>In 20.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.utility"> [lib.utility]</a>, paragraph 1 change the following
declaration of make_pair():</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>template &lt;class T1, class T2&gt; pair&lt;T1,T2&gt; make_pair(const T1&amp;, const T2&amp;);</pre>
@@ -4810,7 +4814,7 @@ declaration of make_pair():</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>template &lt;class T1, class T2&gt; pair&lt;T1,T2&gt; make_pair(T1, T2);</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p> In 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> paragraph 7 and the line before, change:</p>
+<p> In 20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a> paragraph 7 and the line before, change:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>template &lt;class T1, class T2&gt;
pair&lt;T1, T2&gt; make_pair(const T1&amp; x, const T2&amp; y);</pre>
@@ -4836,10 +4840,10 @@ suggestions, and any efficiency concerns were more than offset by the
advantages of the solution. Two implementors reported that the
proposed resolution passed their test suites.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="182"><h3>182.&nbsp;Ambiguous references to size_t</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Al Stevens&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Aug 1999</p>
+<a name="182"><h3>182.&nbsp;Ambiguous references to size_t</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Al Stevens&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Aug 1999</p>
<p>Many references to <tt> size_t</tt> throughout the document
omit the <tt> std::</tt> namespace qualification.</p> <p>For
-example, 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
+example, 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>&#8212; operator new(size_t)
&#8212; operator new(size_t, const std::nothrow_t&amp;)
@@ -4847,7 +4851,7 @@ example, 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/20
&#8212; operator new[](size_t, const std::nothrow_t&amp;)</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p> In 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2: replace:</p>
+<p> In 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 2: replace:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt> - operator new(size_t)<br>
- operator new(size_t, const std::nothrow_t&amp;)<br>
@@ -4922,7 +4926,7 @@ declaration of template &lt;class charT&gt; class ctype.<br>
<p>The LWG believes correcting names like <tt>size_t</tt> and
<tt>ptrdiff_t</tt> to <tt>std::size_t</tt> and <tt>std::ptrdiff_t</tt>
to be essentially editorial. There there can't be another size_t or
-ptrdiff_t meant anyway because, according to 17.4.3.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.extern.types"> [lib.extern.types]</a>,</p>
+ptrdiff_t meant anyway because, according to 17.4.3.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.extern.types"> [lib.extern.types]</a>,</p>
<blockquote>
For each type T from the Standard C library, the types ::T and std::T
@@ -4936,7 +4940,7 @@ Editor's authority to make this change.</p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Nico Josuttis provided the above wording at the
request of the LWG.]</i></p>
-<p><i>[Toronto: This is tangentially related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>, but only tangentially: the intent of this issue is to
+<p><i>[Toronto: This is tangentially related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>, but only tangentially: the intent of this issue is to
address use of the name <tt>size_t</tt> in contexts outside of
namespace std, such as in the description of <tt>::operator new</tt>.
The proposed changes should be reviewed to make sure they are
@@ -4946,8 +4950,8 @@ correct.]</i></p>
them to be correct.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="183"><h3>183.&nbsp;I/O stream manipulators don't work for wide character streams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Jul 1999</p>
-<p>27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> paragraph 3 says (clause numbering added for
+<a name="183"><h3>183.&nbsp;I/O stream manipulators don't work for wide character streams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Jul 1999</p>
+<p>27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> paragraph 3 says (clause numbering added for
exposition):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Returns: An object s of unspecified type such that if [1] out is an (instance
@@ -4975,7 +4979,7 @@ ostreams.</p>
that the value of the expression is "the same specialization of
basic_ostream as out"&amp;</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace section 27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> except paragraph 1 with the
+<p>Replace section 27.6.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.std.manip"> [lib.std.manip]</a> except paragraph 1 with the
following:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>2- The type designated smanip in each of the following function
@@ -5121,19 +5125,19 @@ in.
<p><i>[Kona: Andy Sawyer and Beman Dawes will work to improve the wording of
the proposed resolution.]</i></p>
-<p><i>[Tokyo - The LWG noted that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> involves
+<p><i>[Tokyo - The LWG noted that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> involves
the same paragraphs.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: The issues list maintainer combined the proposed
-resolution of this issue with the proposed resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> as they both involved the same paragraphs, and were so
+resolution of this issue with the proposed resolution for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#216">216</a> as they both involved the same paragraphs, and were so
intertwined that dealing with them separately appear fraught with
error. The full text was supplied by Bill Plauger; it was cross
checked against changes supplied by Andy Sawyer. It should be further
checked by the LWG.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="184"><h3>184.&nbsp;numeric_limits&lt;bool&gt; wording problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Gabriel Dos Reis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jul 1999</p>
+<a name="184"><h3>184.&nbsp;numeric_limits&lt;bool&gt; wording problems</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Gabriel Dos Reis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Jul 1999</p>
<p>bools are defined by the standard to be of integer types, as per
-3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.fundamental"> [basic.fundamental]</a> paragraph 7. However "integer types"
+3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.fundamental"> [basic.fundamental]</a> paragraph 7. However "integer types"
seems to have a special meaning for the author of 18.2. The net effect
is an unclear and confusing specification for
numeric_limits&lt;bool&gt; as evidenced below.</p>
@@ -5171,7 +5175,7 @@ types with base representation other than 2.</p>
<p>Furthermore, numeric_limits&lt;bool&gt;::is_modulo and
numeric_limits&lt;bool&gt;::is_signed have similar problems.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Append to the end of 18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a>:</p>
+<p>Append to the end of 18.2.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.numeric.special"> [lib.numeric.special]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The specialization for bool shall be provided as follows:</p>
<pre> namespace std {
@@ -5223,8 +5227,8 @@ resolution.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo:&nbsp; At the request of the LWG in Tokyo, Nico
Josuttis provided the above wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="185"><h3>185.&nbsp;Questionable use of term "inline"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;UK Panel&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Jul 1999</p>
-<p>Paragraph 4 of 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> says:</p>
+<a name="185"><h3>185.&nbsp;Questionable use of term "inline"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;UK Panel&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Jul 1999</p>
+<p>Paragraph 4 of 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> says:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;[Example: To negate every element of a: transform(a.begin(), a.end(),
a.begin(), negate&lt;double&gt;()); The corresponding functions will inline
@@ -5249,17 +5253,17 @@ any "inlining" will take place in this case.</p>
<p>Thus the example "mandates" behavior that is explicitly
not required elsewhere.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 1, remove the sentence:</p>
+<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 1, remove the sentence:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>They are important for the effective use of the library.</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>Remove 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 2, which reads:</p>
+<p>Remove 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 2, which reads:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> Using function objects together with function templates
increases the expressive power of the library as well as making the
resulting code much more efficient.</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 4, remove the sentence:</p>
+<p>In 20.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.objects"> [lib.function.objects]</a> paragraph 4, remove the sentence:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The corresponding functions will inline the addition and the
negation.</p>
@@ -5268,8 +5272,8 @@ not required elsewhere.</p>
<p><i>[Kona: The LWG agreed there was a defect.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG crafted the proposed resolution.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="186"><h3>186.&nbsp;bitset::set() second parameter should be bool</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Darin Adler&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Aug 1999</p>
-<p>In section 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>, paragraph 13 defines the
+<a name="186"><h3>186.&nbsp;bitset::set() second parameter should be bool</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Darin Adler&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Aug 1999</p>
+<p>In section 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a>, paragraph 13 defines the
bitset::set operation to take a second parameter of type int. The
function tests whether this value is non-zero to determine whether to
set the bit to true or false. The type of this second parameter should
@@ -5279,7 +5283,7 @@ possible to slice an integer that's larger than an int. This can't
happen with bool, since conversion to bool has the semantic of
translating 0 to false and any non-zero value to true.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a> Para 1 Replace:</p>
+<p>In 23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a> Para 1 Replace:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>bitset&lt;N&gt;&amp; set(size_t pos, int val = true ); </pre>
</blockquote>
@@ -5287,7 +5291,7 @@ translating 0 to false and any non-zero value to true.</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>bitset&lt;N&gt;&amp; set(size_t pos, bool val = true );</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> Para 12(.5) Replace:</p>
+<p>In 23.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.members"> [lib.bitset.members]</a> Para 12(.5) Replace:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>bitset&lt;N&gt;&amp; set(size_t pos, int val = 1 );</pre>
</blockquote>
@@ -5306,7 +5310,7 @@ usually implemented as <tt>inline</tt>, and because it is already
the case that users cannot rely on the type of a pointer to a
nonvirtual member of a standard library class.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="187"><h3>187.&nbsp;iter_swap underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Aug 1999</p>
+<a name="187"><h3>187.&nbsp;iter_swap underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Aug 1999</p>
<p>The description of iter_swap in 25.2.2 paragraph 7,says that it
``exchanges the values'' of the objects to which two iterators
refer.<br> <br> What it doesn't say is whether it does so using swap
@@ -5362,7 +5366,7 @@ much more than exchanging the two iterators' values: it would change
predecessor/successor relationships, possibly moving the iterator from
one list to another. That would surely be inappropriate.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="189"><h3>189.&nbsp;setprecision() not specified correctly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Aug 1999</p>
+<a name="189"><h3>189.&nbsp;setprecision() not specified correctly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Aug 1999</p>
<p>27.4.2.2 paragraph 9 claims that setprecision() sets the precision,
and includes a parenthetical note saying that it is the number of
digits after the decimal point.<br>
@@ -5375,10 +5379,10 @@ point.<br>
I would like the committee to look at the definition carefully and
correct the statement in 27.4.2.2</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove from 27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a>, paragraph 9, the text
+<p>Remove from 27.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fmtflags.state"> [lib.fmtflags.state]</a>, paragraph 9, the text
"(number of digits after the decimal point)".</p>
<hr>
-<a name="193"><h3>193.&nbsp;Heap operations description incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Sep 1999</p>
+<a name="193"><h3>193.&nbsp;Heap operations description incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Sep 1999</p>
<p>25.3.6 [lib.alg.heap.operations] states two key properties of a heap [a,b), the first of them
is<br>
<br>
@@ -5397,7 +5401,7 @@ could not be used for a priority queue as explained in 23.2.3.2.2
priority AND time).</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a> property (1) from:</p>
+<p>Change 25.3.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.heap.operations"> [lib.alg.heap.operations]</a> property (1) from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>(1) *a is the largest element</p>
</blockquote>
@@ -5406,16 +5410,16 @@ priority AND time).</p>
<p>(1) There is no element greater than <tt>*a</tt></p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="195"></a><h3><a name="195">195.&nbsp;Should <tt>basic_istream::sentry</tt>'s constructor ever set eofbit?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Oct 1999</p>
+<a name="195"><h3>195.&nbsp;Should <tt>basic_istream::sentry</tt>'s constructor ever set eofbit?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Oct 1999</p>
<p>Suppose that <tt>is.flags() &amp; ios_base::skipws</tt> is nonzero.
What should <tt>basic_istream&lt;&gt;::sentry</tt>'s constructor do if it
reaches eof while skipping whitespace? 27.6.1.1.2/5 suggests it
should set failbit. Should it set eofbit as well? The standard
doesn't seem to answer that question.</p>
-<p>On the one hand, nothing in 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> says that
+<p>On the one hand, nothing in 27.6.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream::sentry"> [lib.istream::sentry]</a> says that
<tt>basic_istream&lt;&gt;::sentry</tt> should ever set eofbit. On the
-other hand, 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> paragraph 4 says that if
+other hand, 27.6.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream"> [lib.istream]</a> paragraph 4 says that if
extraction from a <tt>streambuf</tt> "returns
<tt>traits::eof()</tt>, then the input function, except as explicitly
noted otherwise, completes its actions and does
@@ -5454,7 +5458,7 @@ returns <tt>traits::eof()</tt>, the function calls
</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="198"><h3>198.&nbsp;Validity of pointers and references unspecified after iterator destruction</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Nov 1999</p>
+<a name="198"><h3>198.&nbsp;Validity of pointers and references unspecified after iterator destruction</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Nov 1999</p>
<p>
Is a pointer or reference obtained from an iterator still valid after
destruction of the iterator?
@@ -5501,14 +5505,14 @@ elements of containers.</p>
<p>The standard itself assumes that pointers and references obtained
from an iterator are still valid after iterator destruction or
-change. The definition of reverse_iterator::operator*(), 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a>, which returns a reference, defines
+change. The definition of reverse_iterator::operator*(), 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a>, which returns a reference, defines
effects:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>Iterator tmp = current;
return *--tmp;</pre>
</blockquote>
-<p>The definition of reverse_iterator::operator-&gt;(), 24.4.1.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opref"> [lib.reverse.iter.opref]</a>, which returns a pointer, defines effects:</p>
+<p>The definition of reverse_iterator::operator-&gt;(), 24.4.1.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.opref"> [lib.reverse.iter.opref]</a>, which returns a pointer, defines effects:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>return &amp;(operator*());</pre>
</blockquote>
@@ -5519,13 +5523,13 @@ explicitly. This will also reduce the chance of user code breaking
unexpectedly when porting to a different standard library
implementation.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add a new paragraph to 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>:</p>
+<p>Add a new paragraph to 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
Destruction of an iterator may invalidate pointers and references
previously obtained from that iterator.
</blockquote>
-<p>Replace paragraph 1 of 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a> with:</p>
+<p>Replace paragraph 1 of 24.4.1.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.op.star"> [lib.reverse.iter.op.star]</a> with:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><b>Effects:</b></p>
@@ -5538,7 +5542,7 @@ previously obtained from that iterator.
[<i>Note:</i> This operation must use an auxiliary member variable,
rather than a temporary variable, to avoid returning a reference that
persists beyond the lifetime of its associated iterator. (See
-24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>.) The name of this member variable is shown for
+24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>.) The name of this member variable is shown for
exposition only. <i>--end note</i>]
</p>
</blockquote>
@@ -5554,7 +5558,7 @@ reformulated yet again to reflect this reality.]</i></p>
assumes its underlying iterator has persistent pointers and
references. Andy Koenig pointed out that it is possible to rewrite
reverse_iterator so that it no longer makes such an assupmption.
-However, this issue is related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>. If we
+However, this issue is related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a>. If we
decide it is intentional that <tt>p[n]</tt> may return by value
instead of reference when <tt>p</tt> is a Random Access Iterator,
other changes in reverse_iterator will be necessary.]</i></p>
@@ -5577,7 +5581,7 @@ Clause 23 should be reviewed to make sure that guarantees for
predefined iterators are as strong as users expect.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="199"><h3>199.&nbsp;What does <tt>allocate(0)</tt> return?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Nov 1999</p>
+<a name="199"><h3>199.&nbsp;What does <tt>allocate(0)</tt> return?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Nov 1999</p>
<p>
Suppose that <tt>A</tt> is a class that conforms to the
Allocator requirements of Table 32, and <tt>a</tt> is an
@@ -5599,7 +5603,7 @@ representation. Since this already implies special case code, it
would be over-specification to mandate the return value.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="200"><h3>200.&nbsp;Forward iterator requirements don't allow constant iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Nov 1999</p>
+<a name="200"><h3>200.&nbsp;Forward iterator requirements don't allow constant iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.forward.iterators"> [lib.forward.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Nov 1999</p>
<p>
In table 74, the return type of the expression <tt>*a</tt> is given
as <tt>T&amp;</tt>, where <tt>T</tt> is the iterator's value type.
@@ -5621,7 +5625,7 @@ otherwise <tt>const U&amp;</tt>".
<p><i>[Tokyo: The LWG believes this is the tip of a larger iceberg;
there are multiple const problems with the STL portion of the library
and that these should be addressed as a single package.&nbsp; Note
-that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#180">180</a> has already been declared NAD Future for
+that issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#180">180</a> has already been declared NAD Future for
that very reason.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Redmond: the LWG thinks this is separable from other constness
@@ -5631,7 +5635,7 @@ modified: the original version only discussed *a. It was pointed out
that we also need to worry about *r++ and a-&gt;m.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="202"><h3>202.&nbsp;unique() effects unclear when predicate not an equivalence relation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Jan 2000</p>
+<a name="202"><h3>202.&nbsp;unique() effects unclear when predicate not an equivalence relation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrew Koenig&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Jan 2000</p>
<p>
What should unique() do if you give it a predicate that is not an
equivalence relation? There are at least two plausible answers:
@@ -5698,7 +5702,7 @@ In fact, the SGI implementation of unique() does neither: It yields 1,
3, 7.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p>
+<p>Change 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p>
<blockquote>
For a nonempty range, eliminates all but the first element from every
consecutive group of equivalent elements referred to by the iterator
@@ -5729,7 +5733,7 @@ require another round of review.]</i></p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG also considered an alternative resolution: change
-25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p>
+25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> paragraph 1 to:</p>
<blockquote>
For a nonempty range, eliminates all but the first element from every
@@ -5752,7 +5756,7 @@ that the behavior of unique() for a non-equivalence relation is
specified. Both resolutions are consistent with the behavior of
existing implementations.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="208"><h3>208.&nbsp;Unnecessary restriction on past-the-end iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Stephen Cleary&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Feb 2000</p>
+<a name="208"><h3>208.&nbsp;Unnecessary restriction on past-the-end iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Stephen Cleary&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Feb 2000</p>
<p>In 24.1 paragraph 5, it is stated ". . . Dereferenceable and
past-the-end values are always non-singular."</p>
<p>This places an unnecessary restriction on past-the-end iterators for
@@ -5764,7 +5768,7 @@ without a "footer" node.</p>
<p>This would have an impact on existing code that expects past-the-end
iterators obtained from different (generic) containers being not equal.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> paragraph 5, the last sentence, from:</p>
+<p>Change 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> paragraph 5, the last sentence, from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dereferenceable and past-the-end values are always non-singular.</p>
</blockquote>
@@ -5778,8 +5782,8 @@ zero-length vectors, null pointers are perfectly reasonable past-the-end
iterators. Null pointers are singular.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="209"></a><h3><a name="209">209.&nbsp;basic_string declarations inconsistent</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Igor Stauder&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Feb 2000</p>
-<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> the basic_string member function
+<a name="209"><h3>209.&nbsp;basic_string declarations inconsistent</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Igor Stauder&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Feb 2000</p>
+<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> the basic_string member function
declarations use a consistent style except for the following functions:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>void push_back(const charT);
@@ -5792,7 +5796,7 @@ not by reference - should be charT or const charT&amp; )<br>
- swap: redundant use of template parameters in argument
basic_string&lt;charT,traits,Allocator&gt;&amp;</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> change the basic_string member
+<p>In Section 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> change the basic_string member
function declarations push_back, assign, and swap to:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>void push_back(charT c);
@@ -5807,8 +5811,8 @@ above. The LWG felt that this was sufficient reason to merit the
change.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="210"><h3>210.&nbsp;distance first and last confused</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Lisa Lippincott&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Feb 2000</p>
-<p>In paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>, it is written:</p>
+<a name="210"><h3>210.&nbsp;distance first and last confused</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Lisa Lippincott&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Feb 2000</p>
+<p>In paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a>, it is written:</p>
<blockquote>
<p> In the description of the algorithms operators + and - are used
for some of the iterator categories for which they do not have to
@@ -5818,14 +5822,14 @@ change.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <tt>return distance(a, b);</tt></p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>On the last line of paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> change
+<p>On the last line of paragraph 9 of section 25 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.algorithms"> [lib.algorithms]</a> change
<tt>"a-b"</tt> to <tt>"b-a".</tt></p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>There are two ways to fix the defect; change the description to b-a
or change the return to distance(b,a). The LWG preferred the
former for consistency.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="211"><h3>211.&nbsp;operator&gt;&gt;(istream&amp;, string&amp;) doesn't set failbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Scott Snyder&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 Feb 2000</p>
+<a name="211"><h3>211.&nbsp;operator&gt;&gt;(istream&amp;, string&amp;) doesn't set failbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Scott Snyder&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 Feb 2000</p>
<p>The description of the stream extraction operator for std::string (section
21.3.7.9 [lib.string.io]) does not contain a requirement that failbit be set in
the case that the operator fails to extract any characters from the input
@@ -5839,12 +5843,12 @@ while (is &gt;&gt; str) ... ;</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>(which tests failbit) is not required to terminate at EOF.</p>
<p>Furthermore, this is inconsistent with other extraction operators,
-which do include this requirement. (See sections 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a> and 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), where this
+which do include this requirement. (See sections 27.6.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted"> [lib.istream.formatted]</a> and 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), where this
requirement is present, either explicitly or implicitly, for the
extraction operators. It is also present explicitly in the description
-of getline (istream&amp;, string&amp;, charT) in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 8.)</p>
+of getline (istream&amp;, string&amp;, charT) in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a> paragraph 8.)</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Insert new paragraph after paragraph 2 in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>:</p>
+<p>Insert new paragraph after paragraph 2 in section 21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If the function extracts no characters, it calls
@@ -5852,13 +5856,13 @@ is.setstate(ios::failbit) which may throw ios_base::failure
(27.4.4.3).</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="212"><h3>212.&nbsp;Empty range behavior unclear for several algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Feb 2000</p>
+<a name="212"><h3>212.&nbsp;Empty range behavior unclear for several algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nico Josuttis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Feb 2000</p>
<p>The standard doesn't specify what min_element() and max_element() shall
return if the range is empty (first equals last). The usual implementations
return last. This problem seems also apply to partition(), stable_partition(),
next_permutation(), and prev_permutation().</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> - Minimum and maximum, paragraphs 7 and
+<p>In 25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a> - Minimum and maximum, paragraphs 7 and
9, append: Returns last if first==last.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG looked in some detail at all of the above mentioned
@@ -5866,7 +5870,7 @@ algorithms, but believes that except for min_element() and
max_element() it is already clear that last is returned if first ==
last.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="214"><h3>214.&nbsp;set::find() missing const overload</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Feb 2000</p>
+<a name="214"><h3>214.&nbsp;set::find() missing const overload</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a>, 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Feb 2000</p>
<p>The specification for the associative container requirements in
Table 69 state that the find member function should "return
iterator; const_iterator for constant a". The map and multimap
@@ -5877,7 +5881,7 @@ and multiset do not, all they have is:</p>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Change the prototypes for find(), lower_bound(), upper_bound(), and
-equal_range() in section 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a> and section 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a> to each have two overloads:</p>
+equal_range() in section 23.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.set"> [lib.set]</a> and section 23.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.multiset"> [lib.multiset]</a> to each have two overloads:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>iterator find(const key_type &amp; x);
const_iterator find(const key_type &amp; x) const;</pre>
@@ -5893,7 +5897,7 @@ pair&lt;const_iterator, const_iterator&gt; equal_range(const key_type &amp; x) c
extending the proposed resolution to lower_bound, upper_bound, and
equal_range.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="217"></a><h3><a name="217">217.&nbsp;Facets example (Classifying Japanese characters) contains errors</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Feb 2000</p>
+<a name="217"><h3>217.&nbsp;Facets example (Classifying Japanese characters) contains errors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facets.examples"> [lib.facets.examples]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Feb 2000</p>
<p>The example in 22.2.8, paragraph 11 contains the following errors:</p>
<p>1) The member function `My::JCtype::is_kanji()' is non-const; the function
must be const in order for it to be callable on a const object (a reference to
@@ -5936,7 +5940,7 @@ declared above.</pre>
return 0;
}</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="220"><h3>220.&nbsp;~ios_base() usage valid?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.cons"> [lib.ios.base.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jonathan Schilling, Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Mar 2000</p>
+<a name="220"></a><h3><a name="220">220.&nbsp;~ios_base() usage valid?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios.base.cons"> [lib.ios.base.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jonathan Schilling, Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Mar 2000</p>
<p>The pre-conditions for the ios_base destructor are described in 27.4.2.7
paragraph 2:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -5978,7 +5982,7 @@ basic_ios::init. If an ios_base object is destroyed before these
initializations have taken place, the behavior is undefined.</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="221"></a><h3><a name="221">221.&nbsp;num_get&lt;&gt;::do_get stage 2 processing broken</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Mar 2000</p>
+<a name="221"><h3>221.&nbsp;num_get&lt;&gt;::do_get stage 2 processing broken</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Mar 2000</p>
<p>Stage 2 processing of numeric conversion is broken.</p>
<p>Table 55 in 22.2.2.1.2 says that when basefield is 0 the integral
@@ -6011,7 +6015,7 @@ This technique has the consequence that alternate representations
of digits will not be recognized. This design decision was made
deliberately, with full knowledge of that limitation.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="222"><h3>222.&nbsp;Are throw clauses necessary if a throw is already implied by the effects clause?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Mar 2000</p>
+<a name="222"><h3>222.&nbsp;Are throw clauses necessary if a throw is already implied by the effects clause?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Mar 2000</p>
<p>Section 21.3.6.8 describes the basic_string::compare function this way:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre>21.3.6.8 - basic_string::compare [lib.string::compare]
@@ -6027,7 +6031,7 @@ int compare(size_type pos1, size_type n1,
</blockquote>
<p>and the constructor that's implicitly called by the above is
defined to throw an out-of-range exception if pos &gt; str.size(). See
-section 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> paragraph 4.</p>
+section 21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a> paragraph 4.</p>
<p>On the other hand, the compare function descriptions themselves don't have
"Throws: " clauses and according to 17.3.1.3, paragraph 3, elements
@@ -6036,7 +6040,7 @@ that do not apply to a function are omitted.</p>
"Effects" clauses correct, or are the "Throws" clauses
missing?</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> paragraph 3, the footnote 148 attached to
+<p>In 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> paragraph 3, the footnote 148 attached to
the sentence "Descriptions of function semantics contain the
following elements (as appropriate):", insert the word
"further" so that the foot note reads:</p>
@@ -6052,10 +6056,10 @@ throw. The inconsistent wording is in a footnote, and thus
non-normative. The proposed resolution from the LWG clarifies the
footnote.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="223"><h3>223.&nbsp;reverse algorithm should use iter_swap rather than swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Mar 2000</p>
+<a name="223"><h3>223.&nbsp;reverse algorithm should use iter_swap rather than swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Mar 2000</p>
<p>Shouldn't the effects say "applies iter_swap to all pairs..."?</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a>, replace:</p>
+<p>In 25.2.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.reverse"> [lib.alg.reverse]</a>, replace:</p>
<blockquote>
Effects: For each non-negative integer i &lt;= (last - first)/2,
applies swap to all pairs of iterators first + i, (last - i) - 1.
@@ -6066,7 +6070,7 @@ footnote.</p>
applies iter_swap to all pairs of iterators first + i, (last - i) - 1.
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="224"><h3>224.&nbsp;clear() complexity for associative containers refers to undefined N</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ed Brey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Mar 2000</p>
+<a name="224"><h3>224.&nbsp;clear() complexity for associative containers refers to undefined N</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ed Brey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Mar 2000</p>
<p>In the associative container requirements table in 23.1.2 paragraph 7,
a.clear() has complexity "log(size()) + N". However, the meaning of N
is not defined.</p>
@@ -6080,7 +6084,7 @@ error: there's no difference between <i>O(N)</i> and <i>O(N +
log(N))</i>. The text in the standard is probably an incorrect
cut-and-paste from the range version of <tt>erase</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="225"><h3>225.&nbsp;std:: algorithms use of other unqualified algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;01 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="225"><h3>225.&nbsp;std:: algorithms use of other unqualified algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;01 Apr 2000</p>
<p>Are algorithms in std:: allowed to use other algorithms without qualification, so functions in
user namespaces might be found through Koenig lookup?</p>
<p>For example, a popular standard library implementation includes this
@@ -6141,12 +6145,12 @@ leading "::" qualification is not required because any namespace
qualification is sufficient to suppress Koenig lookup.]</i></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Add a paragraph and a note at the end of
-17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>:</p>
+17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Unless otherwise specified, no global or non-member function in the
standard library shall use a function from another namespace which is
-found through <i>argument-dependent name lookup</i> (3.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.lookup.koenig"> [basic.lookup.koenig]</a>).</p>
+found through <i>argument-dependent name lookup</i> (3.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.lookup.koenig"> [basic.lookup.koenig]</a>).</p>
<p>[Note: the phrase "unless otherwise specified" is intended to
allow Koenig lookup in cases like that of ostream_iterators:<br>
@@ -6165,9 +6169,9 @@ allow Koenig lookup in cases like that of ostream_iterators:<br>
is as yet unsure if the proposed resolution is the best
solution. Furthermore, the LWG believes that the same problem of
unqualified library names applies to wording in the standard itself,
-and has opened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> accordingly. Any resolution of
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be coordinated with the resolution of
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>.]</i></p>
+and has opened issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a> accordingly. Any resolution of
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be coordinated with the resolution of
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#229">229</a>.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Toronto: The LWG is not sure if this is a defect in the
standard. Most LWG members believe that an implementation of
@@ -6192,10 +6196,10 @@ resolution for this issue is in accordance with Howard's paper.]</i></p>
other namespace. However, this is at worst a clarification. It is
surely right that algorithsm shouldn't pick up random names, that
user-defined names should have no effect unless otherwise specified.
- Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> deals with the question of when it is
+ Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#226">226</a> deals with the question of when it is
appropriate for the standard to explicitly specify otherwise.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="226"><h3>226.&nbsp;User supplied specializations or overloads of namespace std function templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;01 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="226"><h3>226.&nbsp;User supplied specializations or overloads of namespace std function templates</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;01 Apr 2000</p>
<p>The issues are:&nbsp;</p>
<p>1. How can a 3rd party library implementor (lib1) write a version of a standard
algorithm which is specialized to work with his own class template?&nbsp;</p>
@@ -6238,7 +6242,7 @@ eventually be used with lib2. This may seem innocuous at first when applied to
names like swap, but consider more ambiguous names like unique_copy() instead.
It is easy to imagine the user wanting to define these names differently in his
own namespace. A definition with semantics incompatible with the standard
-library could cause serious problems (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>).</p>
+library could cause serious problems (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>).</p>
<p>Why, you may ask, can't we just partially specialize std::swap()? It's
because the language doesn't allow for partial specialization of function
templates. If you write:</p>
@@ -6361,10 +6365,10 @@ resolution is the one proposed by Howard.]</i></p>
(such as iter_swap, swap_ranges, reverse, rotate, and sort) conform
to that concept. The Swappable concept will make it clear that
these algorithms use unqualified lookup for the calls
- to <tt>swap</tt>. Also, in 26.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.transcend"> [lib.valarray.transcend]</a> paragraph 1,
+ to <tt>swap</tt>. Also, in 26.3.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.transcend"> [lib.valarray.transcend]</a> paragraph 1,
state that the valarray transcendentals use unqualified lookup.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="227"><h3>227.&nbsp;std::swap() should require CopyConstructible or DefaultConstructible arguments</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;09 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="227"><h3>227.&nbsp;std::swap() should require CopyConstructible or DefaultConstructible arguments</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.swap"> [lib.alg.swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#TC">TC</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;09 Apr 2000</p>
<p>25.2.2 reads:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt> template&lt;class T&gt; void swap(T&amp; a, T&amp; b);</tt><br>
@@ -6405,9 +6409,9 @@ resolution is the one proposed by Howard.]</i></p>
<p> Requires: Type T is CopyConstructible (20.1.3) and Assignable (23.1)</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="228"><h3>228.&nbsp;Incorrect specification of "..._byname" facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Apr 2000</p>
-<p>The sections 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>, 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a>,
-22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>, 22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a>, 22.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.collate.byname"> [lib.locale.collate.byname]</a>, 22.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.byname"> [lib.locale.time.put.byname]</a>, 22.2.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.byname"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.byname]</a>, and 22.2.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.messages.byname"> [lib.locale.messages.byname]</a> overspecify the
+<a name="228"><h3>228.&nbsp;Incorrect specification of "..._byname" facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Apr 2000</p>
+<p>The sections 22.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname]</a>, 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a>,
+22.2.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.byname"> [lib.locale.codecvt.byname]</a>, 22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a>, 22.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.collate.byname"> [lib.locale.collate.byname]</a>, 22.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.time.put.byname"> [lib.locale.time.put.byname]</a>, 22.2.6.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.byname"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.byname]</a>, and 22.2.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.messages.byname"> [lib.locale.messages.byname]</a> overspecify the
definitions of the "..._byname" classes by listing a bunch
of virtual functions. At the same time, no semantics of these
functions are defined. Real implementations do not define these
@@ -6526,18 +6530,18 @@ specialization it is not virtual.</p>
~messages_byname(); // virtual
};
}</pre>
-<p>Remove section 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a> completely (because in
+<p>Remove section 22.2.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.byname.special"> [lib.locale.ctype.byname.special]</a> completely (because in
this case only those members are defined to be virtual which are
defined to be virtual in 'ctype&lt;cT&gt;'.)</p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Dietmar Kühl submitted this issue at the request of
-the LWG to solve the underlying problems raised by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>.]</i></p>
+the LWG to solve the underlying problems raised by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#138">138</a>.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Copenhagen: proposed resolution was revised slightly, to remove
three last virtual functions from <tt>messages_byname</tt>.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="229"><h3>229.&nbsp;Unqualified references of other library entities</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="229"><h3>229.&nbsp;Unqualified references of other library entities</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Apr 2000</p>
<p>Throughout the library chapters, the descriptions of library entities refer
to other library entities without necessarily qualifying the names.</p>
@@ -6551,7 +6555,7 @@ override any ::std::swap function when Koenig lookup applies.</p>
"::std::" throughout, too many lines in the standard would have to be
adjusted to make that change in a Technical Corrigendum.</p>
-<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>, which addresses qualification of
+<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#182">182</a>, which addresses qualification of
<tt>size_t</tt>, is a special case of this.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -6565,7 +6569,7 @@ adjusted to make that change in a Technical Corrigendum.</p>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Steve Clamage submitted this issue at the request of
the LWG to solve a problem in the standard itself similar to the
-problem within implementations of library identified by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>. Any resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be
+problem within implementations of library identified by issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a>. Any resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#225">225</a> should be
coordinated with the resolution of this issue.]</i></p>
<p><i>[post-Toronto: Howard is undecided about whether it is
@@ -6588,8 +6592,8 @@ issues 225 and 226. In light of that resolution, the proposed
resolution for the current issue makes sense.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="230"><h3>230.&nbsp;Assignable specified without also specifying CopyConstructible</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Apr 2000</p>
-<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> identified an instance (std::swap) where
+<a name="230"><h3>230.&nbsp;Assignable specified without also specifying CopyConstructible</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Apr 2000</p>
+<p>Issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#227">227</a> identified an instance (std::swap) where
Assignable was specified without also specifying
CopyConstructible. The LWG asked that the standard be searched to
determine if the same defect existed elsewhere.</p>
@@ -6597,19 +6601,19 @@ determine if the same defect existed elsewhere.</p>
<p>There are a number of places (see proposed resolution below) where
Assignable is specified without also specifying
CopyConstructible. There are also several cases where both are
-specified. For example, 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p>
+specified. For example, 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 for value_type:
+<p>In 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> table 65 for value_type:
change "T is Assignable" to "T is CopyConstructible and
Assignable"
</p>
-<p>In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> table 69 X::key_type; change
+<p>In 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> table 69 X::key_type; change
"Key is Assignable" to "Key is
CopyConstructible and Assignable"<br>
</p>
-<p>In 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> paragraph 1, change:
+<p>In 24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a> paragraph 1, change:
</p>
<blockquote>
<p> A class or a built-in type X satisfies the requirements of an
@@ -6628,12 +6632,12 @@ Table 73:
</blockquote>
<p><i>[Post-Tokyo: Beman Dawes submitted this issue at the request of
-the LWG. He asks that the 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> and 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a> changes be studied carefully, as it is not clear that
+the LWG. He asks that the 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> and 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a> changes be studied carefully, as it is not clear that
CopyConstructible is really a requirement and may be
overspecification.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Portions of the resolution for issue 230 have been superceded by
-the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#276">276</a>.]</i></p>
+the resolution of issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#276">276</a>.]</i></p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The original proposed resolution also included changes to input
@@ -6643,7 +6647,7 @@ Assignable type was also required to be Copy Constructible, but
decided against this because fill and replace really don't require the
Copy Constructible property.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="231"><h3>231.&nbsp;Precision in iostream?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze, Stephen Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp; 25 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="231"><h3>231.&nbsp;Precision in iostream?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze, Stephen Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp; 25 Apr 2000</p>
<p>What is the following program supposed to output?</p>
<pre>#include &lt;iostream&gt;
@@ -6684,7 +6688,7 @@ etc. Plus, of course, if precision == 0 and flags &amp; floatfield ==
of the anomalies of printf:-).</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-Replace 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 11, with the following
+Replace 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, paragraph 11, with the following
sentence:
</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -6711,7 +6715,7 @@ case.</p>
where precision is 0 and mode is %g.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="232"><h3>232.&nbsp;"depends" poorly defined in 17.4.3.1</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Peter Dimov&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="232"><h3>232.&nbsp;"depends" poorly defined in 17.4.3.1</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.reserved.names"> [lib.reserved.names]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Peter Dimov&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Apr 2000</p>
<p>17.4.3.1/1 uses the term "depends" to limit the set of allowed
specializations of standard templates to those that "depend on a
user-defined name of external linkage."</p>
@@ -6743,24 +6747,24 @@ possible way for a user to come up with a specialization for bitset,
for example, that might not have already been specialized by the
implementor?</p>
-<p><i>[Toronto: this may be related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a>.]</i></p>
+<p><i>[Toronto: this may be related to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#120">120</a>.]</i></p>
<p><i>[post-Toronto: Judy provided the above proposed resolution and
rationale.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="234"><h3>234.&nbsp;Typos in allocator definition</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="234"><h3>234.&nbsp;Typos in allocator definition</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2000</p>
<p>In paragraphs 12 and 13 the effects of <tt>construct()</tt> and
<tt>destruct()</tt> are described as returns but the functions actually
return <tt>void</tt>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Substitute "Returns" by "Effect".</p>
<hr>
-<a name="235"><h3>235.&nbsp;No specification of default ctor for reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="235"><h3>235.&nbsp;No specification of default ctor for reverse_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iterator"> [lib.reverse.iterator]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2000</p>
<p>The declaration of <tt>reverse_iterator</tt> lists a default
constructor. However, no specification is given what this constructor
should do.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
- <p>In section 24.4.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.cons"> [lib.reverse.iter.cons]</a> add the following
+ <p>In section 24.4.1.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.reverse.iter.cons"> [lib.reverse.iter.cons]</a> add the following
paragraph:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><tt>reverse_iterator()</tt></p>
@@ -6773,7 +6777,7 @@ should do.</p>
<p><i>[pre-Copenhagen: Dietmar provide wording for proposed
resolution.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="237"><h3>237.&nbsp;Undefined expression in complexity specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2000</p>
+<a name="237"><h3>237.&nbsp;Undefined expression in complexity specification</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2000</p>
<p>The complexity specification in paragraph 6 says that the complexity
is linear in <tt>first - last</tt>. Even if <tt>operator-()</tt> is
defined on iterators this term is in general undefined because it
@@ -6784,7 +6788,7 @@ would have to be <tt>last - first</tt>.</p>
<p>to become</p>
<blockquote>Linear in <i>distance(first, last)</i>.</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="238"><h3>238.&nbsp;Contradictory results of stringbuf initialization.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.cons"> [lib.stringbuf.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 May 2000</p>
+<a name="238"><h3>238.&nbsp;Contradictory results of stringbuf initialization.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.cons"> [lib.stringbuf.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dietmar Kühl&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 May 2000</p>
<p>In 27.7.1.1 paragraph 4 the results of calling the constructor of
'basic_stringbuf' are said to be <tt>str() == str</tt>. This is fine
that far but consider this code:</p>
@@ -6809,7 +6813,7 @@ defined to be <tt>basic_string&lt;cT&gt;()</tt>.</p>
we fixed it, it would say just the same thing as text that's already
in the standard.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="239"><h3>239.&nbsp;Complexity of unique() and/or unique_copy incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
+<a name="239"><h3>239.&nbsp;Complexity of unique() and/or unique_copy incorrect</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
<p>The complexity of unique and unique_copy are inconsistent with each
other and inconsistent with the implementations.&nbsp; The standard
specifies:</p>
@@ -6836,13 +6840,13 @@ applying the predicate last-first times, especially since it is not
specified to which pair in the sequence the predicate is applied
twice.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change both complexity sections in 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> to:</p>
+<p>Change both complexity sections in 25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a> to:</p>
<blockquote>Complexity: For nonempty ranges, exactly last - first - 1
applications of the corresponding predicate.</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="240"><h3>240.&nbsp;Complexity of adjacent_find() is meaningless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
+<a name="240"><h3>240.&nbsp;Complexity of adjacent_find() is meaningless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
<p>The complexity section of adjacent_find is defective:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -6877,7 +6881,7 @@ not required of predicates because they can have non-const data
members. For this reason, a specification using a binder could only be
an "as-if" specification.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change the complexity section in 25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a> to:</p>
+<p>Change the complexity section in 25.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.adjacent.find"> [lib.alg.adjacent.find]</a> to:</p>
<blockquote>
For a nonempty range, exactly <tt>min((<i>i</i> - <i>first</i>) + 1,
(<i>last</i> - <i>first</i>) - 1)</tt> applications of the
@@ -6889,7 +6893,7 @@ return value.
bound. The LWG preferred an exact count.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="241"><h3>241.&nbsp;Does unique_copy() require CopyConstructible and Assignable?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
+<a name="241"><h3>241.&nbsp;Does unique_copy() require CopyConstructible and Assignable?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.unique"> [lib.alg.unique]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
<p>Some popular implementations of unique_copy() create temporary
copies of values in the input sequence, at least if the input iterator
@@ -6900,7 +6904,7 @@ the value type is CopyConstructible and Assignable.</p>
specify any additional requirements that they impose on any of the
types used by the algorithm. An example of an algorithm that creates
temporary copies and correctly specifies the additional requirements
-is accumulate(), 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p>
+is accumulate(), 26.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.accumulate"> [lib.accumulate]</a>.</p>
<p>Since the specifications of unique() and unique_copy() do not
require CopyConstructible and Assignable of the InputIterator's value
@@ -6943,12 +6947,12 @@ minor as not to require re-review.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="242"></a><h3><a name="242">242.&nbsp;Side effects of function objects</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.transform"> [lib.alg.transform]</a>, 26.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.numeric.ops"> [lib.numeric.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
+<a name="242"><h3>242.&nbsp;Side effects of function objects</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.transform"> [lib.alg.transform]</a>, 26.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.numeric.ops"> [lib.numeric.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Angelika Langer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
<p>The algorithms transform(), accumulate(), inner_product(),
partial_sum(), and adjacent_difference() require that the function
object supplied to them shall not have any side effects.</p>
-<p>The standard defines a side effect in 1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.execution"> [intro.execution]</a> as:</p>
+<p>The standard defines a side effect in 1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.execution"> [intro.execution]</a> as:</p>
<blockquote>-7- Accessing an object designated by a volatile lvalue (basic.lval),
modifying an object, calling a library I/O function, or calling a function
that does any of those operations are all side effects, which are changes
@@ -7121,7 +7125,7 @@ added footnotes pointing out that the use of closed ranges was
intentional.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="243"><h3>243.&nbsp;<tt>get</tt> and <tt>getline</tt> when sentry reports failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
+<a name="243"><h3>243.&nbsp;<tt>get</tt> and <tt>getline</tt> when sentry reports failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;May 15 2000</p>
<p>basic_istream&lt;&gt;::get(), and basic_istream&lt;&gt;::getline(),
are unclear with respect to the behavior and side-effects of the named
functions in case of an error.</p>
@@ -7168,7 +7172,7 @@ had language that made this an unambiguous requirement; those words
were moved to a place where their context made them less clear. See
Jerry Schwarz's message c++std-lib-7618.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="248"><h3>248.&nbsp;time_get fails to set eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.time"> [lib.category.time]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 June 2000</p>
+<a name="248"><h3>248.&nbsp;time_get fails to set eofbit</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.time"> [lib.category.time]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;22 June 2000</p>
<p>There is no requirement that any of time_get member functions set
ios::eofbit when they reach the end iterator while parsing their input.
Since members of both the num_get and money_get facets are required to
@@ -7186,7 +7190,7 @@ member functions, the member sets ios_base::eofbit in err.
because it was more consistent with the way eof is described for other
input facets.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="250"><h3>250.&nbsp;splicing invalidates iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Brian Parker &nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Jul 2000</p>
+<a name="250"><h3>250.&nbsp;splicing invalidates iterators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Brian Parker &nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Jul 2000</p>
<p>
Section 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops] states that
</p>
@@ -7203,14 +7207,14 @@ after <tt>splice</tt>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add a footnote to 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, paragraph 1:</p>
+<p>Add a footnote to 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, paragraph 1:</p>
<blockquote>
-[<i>Footnote:</i> As specified in 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, paragraphs
+[<i>Footnote:</i> As specified in 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, paragraphs
4-5, the semantics described in this clause applies only to the case
where allocators compare equal. --end footnote]
</blockquote>
-<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 4 with:</p>
+<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 4 with:</p>
<blockquote>
Effects: Inserts the contents of x before position and x becomes
empty. Pointers and references to the moved elements of x now refer to
@@ -7219,7 +7223,7 @@ moved elements will continue to refer to their elements, but they now
behave as iterators into *this, not into x.
</blockquote>
-<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 7 with:</p>
+<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 7 with:</p>
<blockquote>
Effects: Inserts an element pointed to by i from list x before
position and removes the element from x. The result is unchanged if
@@ -7229,7 +7233,7 @@ to refer to this same element but as a member of *this. Iterators to *i
behave as iterators into *this, not into x.
</blockquote>
-<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 12 with:</p>
+<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraph 12 with:</p>
<blockquote>
Requires: [first, last) is a valid range in x. The result is
undefined if position is an iterator in the range [first, last).
@@ -7244,10 +7248,10 @@ iterators into *this, not into x.
<p>The original proposed resolution said that iterators and references
would remain "valid". The new proposed resolution clarifies what that
means. Note that this only applies to the case of equal allocators.
-From 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4, the behavior of list when
+From 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> paragraph 4, the behavior of list when
allocators compare nonequal is outside the scope of the standard.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="251"><h3>251.&nbsp;basic_stringbuf missing allocator_type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf"> [lib.stringbuf]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jul 2000</p>
+<a name="251"></a><h3><a name="251">251.&nbsp;basic_stringbuf missing allocator_type</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf"> [lib.stringbuf]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jul 2000</p>
<p>The synopsis for the template class <tt>basic_stringbuf</tt>
doesn't list a typedef for the template parameter
<tt>Allocator</tt>. This makes it impossible to determine the type of
@@ -7261,7 +7265,7 @@ basic_stringstream (27.7.4) the typedef:</p>
<pre> typedef Allocator allocator_type;
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="252"><h3>252.&nbsp;missing casts/C-style casts used in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jul 2000</p>
+<a name="252"><h3>252.&nbsp;missing casts/C-style casts used in iostreams</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;28 Jul 2000</p>
<p>27.7.2.2, p1 uses a C-style cast rather than the more appropriate
const_cast&lt;&gt; in the Returns clause for basic_istringstream&lt;&gt;::rdbuf().
The same C-style cast is being used in 27.7.3.2, p1, D.7.2.2, p1, and
@@ -7296,7 +7300,7 @@ issue is stylistic rather than a matter of correctness.</p>
<p>with</p>
<pre> -2- Returns: const_cast&lt;strstreambuf*&gt;(&amp;sb).</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="253"><h3>253.&nbsp;valarray helper functions are almost entirely useless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.cons"> [lib.valarray.cons]</a>, 26.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.assign"> [lib.valarray.assign]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Robert Klarer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;31 Jul 2000</p>
+<a name="253"><h3>253.&nbsp;valarray helper functions are almost entirely useless</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.cons"> [lib.valarray.cons]</a>, 26.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.assign"> [lib.valarray.assign]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Robert Klarer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;31 Jul 2000</p>
<p>This discussion is adapted from message c++std-lib-7056 posted
November 11, 1999. I don't think that anyone can reasonably claim
that the problem described below is NAD.</p>
@@ -7371,66 +7375,66 @@ classes are almost entirely useless.</p>
<p>slice_array:</p>
<ul>
<li> Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations
- public in the slice_array class template definition in 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> </li>
-<li> remove paragraph 3 of 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a>
+ public in the slice_array class template definition in 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a> </li>
+<li> remove paragraph 3 of 26.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.slice.array"> [lib.template.slice.array]</a>
</li>
-<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a>
+<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a>
</li>
-<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a> to read "This constructor is declared
+<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.cons.slice.arr"> [lib.cons.slice.arr]</a> to read "This constructor is declared
to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li>
-<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a>
+<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a>
</li>
<li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of
- 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
+ 26.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.slice.arr.assign"> [lib.slice.arr.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
</ul>
<p>gslice_array:</p>
<ul>
<li> Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations
- public in the gslice_array class template definition in 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> </li>
-<li> remove the note in paragraph 3 of 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a>
+ public in the gslice_array class template definition in 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a> </li>
+<li> remove the note in paragraph 3 of 26.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.gslice.array"> [lib.template.gslice.array]</a>
</li>
-<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a>
+<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a>
</li>
-<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared
+<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.cons"> [lib.gslice.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared
to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li>
-<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a>
+<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a>
</li>
<li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of
- 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
+ 26.3.7.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.gslice.array.assign"> [lib.gslice.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
</ul>
<p>mask_array:</p>
<ul>
<li> Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations
- public in the mask_array class template definition in 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> </li>
-<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a>
+ public in the mask_array class template definition in 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a> </li>
+<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.mask.array"> [lib.template.mask.array]</a>
</li>
-<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a>
+<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a>
</li>
-<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared
+<li> change paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.cons"> [lib.mask.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is declared
to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li>
-<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a>
+<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a>
</li>
<li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of
- 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
+ 26.3.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.mask.array.assign"> [lib.mask.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
</ul>
<p>indirect_array:</p>
<ul>
<li>Make the copy constructor and copy-assignment operator declarations
- public in the indirect_array class definition in 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a>
+ public in the indirect_array class definition in 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a>
</li>
-<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a>
+<li> remove the note in paragraph 2 of 26.3.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.indirect.array"> [lib.template.indirect.array]</a>
</li>
-<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a>
+<li> remove the copy constructor declaration from 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a>
</li>
-<li> change the descriptive text in 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is
+<li> change the descriptive text in 26.3.9.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.cons"> [lib.indirect.array.cons]</a> to read "This constructor is
declared to be private. This constructor need not be defined."</li>
-<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a>
+<li> remove the first sentence of paragraph 1 of 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a>
</li>
<li> Change the first three words of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of
- 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
+ 26.3.9.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.indirect.array.assign"> [lib.indirect.array.assign]</a> to "These assignment operators have"</li>
</ul>
<p><i>[Proposed resolution was modified in Santa Cruz: explicitly make
copy constructor and copy assignment operators public, instead of
@@ -7447,7 +7451,7 @@ believed we should make the assignment operators public, in addition
to the copy constructors, for reasons of symmetry and user
expectation.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="256"><h3>256.&nbsp;typo in 27.4.4.2, p17: copy_event does not exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Aug 2000</p>
+<a name="256"><h3>256.&nbsp;typo in 27.4.4.2, p17: copy_event does not exist</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Aug 2000</p>
<p>
27.4.4.2, p17 says
</p>
@@ -7466,7 +7470,7 @@ copyfmt_event.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Replace copy_event with copyfmt_event in the named paragraph.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="259"><h3>259.&nbsp;<tt>basic_string::operator[]</tt> and const correctness</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.access"> [lib.string.access]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris Newton &nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2000</p>
+<a name="259"><h3>259.&nbsp;<tt>basic_string::operator[]</tt> and const correctness</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.access"> [lib.string.access]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Chris Newton &nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2000</p>
<p>
<i>Paraphrased from a message that Chris Newton posted to comp.std.c++:</i>
</p>
@@ -7489,8 +7493,8 @@ In section 21.3.4, paragraph 1, change
<i>pos</i>)</tt>".
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="260"><h3>260.&nbsp;Inconsistent return type of <tt>istream_iterator::operator++(int)</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2000</p>
+<a name="260"></a><h3><a name="260">260.&nbsp;Inconsistent return type of <tt>istream_iterator::operator++(int)</tt>
+</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2000</p>
<p>The synopsis of istream_iterator::operator++(int) in 24.5.1 shows
it as returning the iterator by value. 24.5.1.2, p5 shows the same
operator as returning the iterator by reference. That's incorrect
@@ -7506,7 +7510,7 @@ given the Effects clause below (since a temporary is returned). The
<p>(that is, remove the `&amp;').</p>
<hr>
<a name="261"><h3>261.&nbsp;Missing description of <tt>istream_iterator::operator!=</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2000</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.istream.iterator.ops"> [lib.istream.iterator.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2000</p>
<p>
24.5.1, p3 lists the synopsis for
</p>
@@ -7532,7 +7536,7 @@ Add paragraph 7 to the end of section 24.5.1.2 with the following text:
<p>-7- Returns: !(x == y).</p>
<hr>
-<a name="262"><h3>262.&nbsp;Bitmask operator ~ specified incorrectly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;03 Sep 2000</p>
+<a name="262"><h3>262.&nbsp;Bitmask operator ~ specified incorrectly</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;03 Sep 2000</p>
<p>
The ~ operation should be applied after the cast to int_type.
</p>
@@ -7553,7 +7557,7 @@ to:
{ return static_cast&lt; bitmask&gt;(~static_cast&lt;int_type&gt;(X)); }
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="263"><h3>263.&nbsp;Severe restriction on <tt>basic_string</tt> reference counting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Kevlin Henney&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;04 Sep 2000</p>
+<a name="263"><h3>263.&nbsp;Severe restriction on <tt>basic_string</tt> reference counting</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Kevlin Henney&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;04 Sep 2000</p>
<p>
The note in paragraph 6 suggests that the invalidation rules for
references, pointers, and iterators in paragraph 5 permit a reference-
@@ -7623,14 +7627,14 @@ Change the following sentence in 21.3 paragraph 5 from
or rend().
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="264"><h3>264.&nbsp;Associative container <tt>insert(i, j)</tt> complexity requirements are not feasible.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John Potter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Sep 2000</p>
+<a name="264"><h3>264.&nbsp;Associative container <tt>insert(i, j)</tt> complexity requirements are not feasible.</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John Potter&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Sep 2000</p>
<p>
Table 69 requires linear time if [i, j) is sorted. Sorted is necessary but not sufficient.
Consider inserting a sorted range of even integers into a set&lt;int&gt; containing the odd
integers in the same range.
</p>
-<p><i>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#102">102</a></i></p>
+<p><i>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#102">102</a></i></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
In Table 69, in section 23.1.2, change the complexity clause for
@@ -7662,7 +7666,7 @@ inserted is sorted, it's more trouble than it's worth to say that it's
linear in some special cases.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="265"><h3>265.&nbsp;std::pair::pair() effects overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Sep 2000</p>
+<a name="265"><h3>265.&nbsp;std::pair::pair() effects overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.pairs"> [lib.pairs]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;11 Sep 2000</p>
<p>
I don't see any requirements on the types of the elements of the
std::pair container in 20.2.2. From the descriptions of the member
@@ -7699,7 +7703,7 @@ default constructor was written the obvious way. This has been
clarified by core issue 178, and there is no longer any doubt that
the straightforward implementation is correct.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="266"><h3>266.&nbsp;bad_exception::~bad_exception() missing Effects clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Sep 2000</p>
+<a name="266"><h3>266.&nbsp;bad_exception::~bad_exception() missing Effects clause</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Sep 2000</p>
<p>
The synopsis for std::bad_exception lists the function ~bad_exception()
but there is no description of what the function does (the Effects
@@ -7708,10 +7712,10 @@ clause is missing).
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
Remove the destructor from the class synopses of
-<tt>bad_alloc</tt> (18.4.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.alloc"> [lib.bad.alloc]</a>),
-<tt>bad_cast</tt> (18.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.cast"> [lib.bad.cast]</a>),
-<tt>bad_typeid</tt> (18.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.typeid"> [lib.bad.typeid]</a>),
-and <tt>bad_exception</tt> (18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a>).
+<tt>bad_alloc</tt> (18.4.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.alloc"> [lib.bad.alloc]</a>),
+<tt>bad_cast</tt> (18.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.cast"> [lib.bad.cast]</a>),
+<tt>bad_typeid</tt> (18.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.typeid"> [lib.bad.typeid]</a>),
+and <tt>bad_exception</tt> (18.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.bad.exception"> [lib.bad.exception]</a>).
</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>
@@ -7722,7 +7726,7 @@ removing them is more consistent with how exception classes are
described in clause 19.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="268"><h3>268.&nbsp;Typo in locale synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Oct 2000</p>
+<a name="268"><h3>268.&nbsp;Typo in locale synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Oct 2000</p>
<p>The synopsis of the class std::locale in 22.1.1 contains two typos:
the semicolons after the declarations of the default ctor
locale::locale() and the copy ctor locale::locale(const locale&amp;)
@@ -7742,7 +7746,7 @@ are missing.</p>
locale(const locale&amp; other) throw();
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="270"><h3>270.&nbsp;Binary search requirements overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.binary.search"> [lib.alg.binary.search]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Oct 2000</p>
+<a name="270"><h3>270.&nbsp;Binary search requirements overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.binary.search"> [lib.alg.binary.search]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Oct 2000</p>
<p>
Each of the four binary search algorithms (lower_bound, upper_bound,
equal_range, binary_search) has a form that allows the user to pass a
@@ -7992,7 +7996,7 @@ that the upper bound is no earlier than the lower bound, that
the pair returned by equal_range is a valid range, and that the first
part of that pair is the lower bound.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="271"><h3>271.&nbsp;basic_iostream missing typedefs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="271"><h3>271.&nbsp;basic_iostream missing typedefs</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
Class template basic_iostream has no typedefs. The typedefs it
inherits from its base classes can't be used, since (for example)
@@ -8001,7 +8005,7 @@ basic_iostream&lt;T&gt;::traits_type is ambiguous.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Add the following to basic_iostream's class synopsis in
-27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a>, immediately after <tt>public</tt>:</p>
+27.6.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostreamclass"> [lib.iostreamclass]</a>, immediately after <tt>public</tt>:</p>
<pre> // types:
typedef charT char_type;
@@ -8011,7 +8015,7 @@ basic_iostream&lt;T&gt;::traits_type is ambiguous.
typedef traits traits_type;
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="272"><h3>272.&nbsp;Missing parentheses around subexpression</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="272"><h3>272.&nbsp;Missing parentheses around subexpression</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
27.4.4.3, p4 says about the postcondition of the function: If
rdbuf()!=0 then state == rdstate(); otherwise
@@ -8028,7 +8032,7 @@ anything but non-zero.
Add parentheses like so: rdstate()==(state|ios_base::badbit).
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="273"><h3>273.&nbsp;Missing ios_base qualification on members of a dependent class</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="273"><h3>273.&nbsp;Missing ios_base qualification on members of a dependent class</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
<p>27.5.2.4.2, p4, and 27.8.1.6, p2, 27.8.1.7, p3, 27.8.1.9, p2,
27.8.1.10, p3 refer to in and/or out w/o ios_base:: qualification.
That's incorrect since the names are members of a dependent base
@@ -8037,7 +8041,7 @@ class (14.6.2 [temp.dep]) and thus not visible.</p>
<p>Qualify the names with the name of the class of which they are
members, i.e., ios_base.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="274"><h3>274.&nbsp;a missing/impossible allocator requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="274"><h3>274.&nbsp;a missing/impossible allocator requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
I see that table 31 in 20.1.5, p3 allows T in std::allocator&lt;T&gt; to be of
any type. But the synopsis in 20.4.1 calls for allocator&lt;&gt;::address() to
@@ -8092,7 +8096,7 @@ also forbids volatile types and reference types.
excluded from the PR.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="275"><h3>275.&nbsp;Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="275"><h3>275.&nbsp;Wrong type in num_get::get() overloads</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
In 22.2.2.1.1, we have a list of overloads for num_get&lt;&gt;::get().
There are eight overloads, all of which are identical except for the
@@ -8131,7 +8135,7 @@ These two lists are not identical. They should be, since
the arguments it was given.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, change</p>
+<p>In 22.2.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.members"> [lib.facet.num.get.members]</a>, change</p>
<pre> iter_type get(iter_type in, iter_type end, ios_base&amp; str,
ios_base::iostate&amp; err, short&amp; val) const;
</pre>
@@ -8140,10 +8144,10 @@ the arguments it was given.
ios_base::iostate&amp; err, float&amp; val) const;
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="276"><h3>276.&nbsp;Assignable requirement for container value type overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Peter Dimov&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="276"><h3>276.&nbsp;Assignable requirement for container value type overly strict</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Peter Dimov&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
23.1/3 states that the objects stored in a container must be
-Assignable. 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2,
+Assignable. 23.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map"> [lib.map]</a>, paragraph 2,
states that map satisfies all requirements for a container, while in
the same time defining value_type as pair&lt;const Key, T&gt; - a type
that is not Assignable.
@@ -8167,14 +8171,14 @@ general.
<p>
For example, the proposed resolution of active library issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> is to make set::iterator a constant iterator; this
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#103">103</a> is to make set::iterator a constant iterator; this
means that no set operations can exploit the fact that the stored
objects are Assignable.
</p>
<p>
This is related to, but slightly broader than, closed issue
-<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a>.
+<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#140">140</a>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>23.1/3: Strike the trailing part of the sentence:</p>
@@ -8270,7 +8274,7 @@ to forbid such implementations.</p>
<p>Note that the type stored in a standard container must still satisfy
the requirements of the container's allocator; this rules out, for
-example, such types as "const int". See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#274">274</a>
+example, such types as "const int". See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#274">274</a>
for more details.
</p>
@@ -8282,7 +8286,7 @@ implement <tt>vector::push_back</tt> in terms of
<tt>vector::insert</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="278"><h3>278.&nbsp;What does iterator validity mean?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;P.J. Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Nov 2000</p>
+<a name="278"><h3>278.&nbsp;What does iterator validity mean?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;P.J. Plauger&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Nov 2000</p>
<p>
Section 23.2.2.4 [lib.list.ops] states that
</p>
@@ -8301,7 +8305,7 @@ validity.
</p>
<p>
-If we accept the proposed resolution to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>,
+If we accept the proposed resolution to issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#250">250</a>,
then we'd better clarify that a "valid" iterator need no
longer designate an element within the same container as it once did.
We then have to clarify what we mean by invalidating a past-the-end
@@ -8310,7 +8314,7 @@ such an iterator has a different kind of validity. Perhaps we should
introduce separate terms for the two kinds of "validity."
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following text to the end of section 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>,
+<p>Add the following text to the end of section 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>,
after paragraph 5:</p>
<blockquote>
An <i>invalid</i> iterator is an iterator that may be
@@ -8336,10 +8340,10 @@ the wording. Dave provided new wording.]</i></p>
all iterators pointing into the vector. That doesn't necessarily
mean they all become singular.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="281"><h3>281.&nbsp;std::min() and max() requirements overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Dec 2000</p>
+<a name="281"><h3>281.&nbsp;std::min() and max() requirements overly restrictive</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.min.max"> [lib.alg.min.max]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Dec 2000</p>
<p>The requirements in 25.3.7, p1 and 4 call for T to satisfy the
-requirements of <tt>LessThanComparable</tt> (20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>)
-and <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>).
+requirements of <tt>LessThanComparable</tt> (20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>)
+and <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> (20.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.copyconstructible"> [lib.copyconstructible]</a>).
Since the functions take and return their arguments and result by
const reference, I believe the <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> requirement
is unnecessary.
@@ -8348,14 +8352,14 @@ is unnecessary.
<p>Remove the <tt>CopyConstructible</tt> requirement. Specifically, replace
25.3.7, p1 with</p>
<p><b>-1- Requires:</b> Type T is <tt>LessThanComparable</tt>
-(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>).
+(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>).
</p>
<p>and replace 25.3.7, p4 with</p>
<p><b>-4- Requires:</b> Type T is <tt>LessThanComparable</tt>
-(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>).
+(20.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.lessthancomparable"> [lib.lessthancomparable]</a>).
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="282"><h3>282.&nbsp;What types does numpunct grouping refer to?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Dec 2000</p>
+<a name="282"><h3>282.&nbsp;What types does numpunct grouping refer to?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Dec 2000</p>
<p>
Paragraph 16 mistakenly singles out integral types for inserting
thousands_sep() characters. This conflicts with the syntax for floating
@@ -8367,7 +8371,7 @@ point numbers described under 22.2.3.1/2.
<blockquote>
For integral types, punct.thousands_sep() characters are inserted into
the sequence as determined by the value returned by punct.do_grouping()
-using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>.
+using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>.
</blockquote>
<p>To:</p>
@@ -8375,7 +8379,7 @@ using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s
<blockquote>
For arithmetic types, punct.thousands_sep() characters are inserted into
the sequence as determined by the value returned by punct.do_grouping()
-using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>.
+using the method described in 22.2.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals"> [lib.facet.numpunct.virtuals]</a>.
</blockquote>
<p><i>[
@@ -8399,7 +8403,7 @@ standard.
Howard, Bill, Pete, Benjamin, Nathan, Dietmar, Boris, and Martin.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="283"><h3>283.&nbsp;std::replace() requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 2000</p>
+<a name="283"><h3>283.&nbsp;std::replace() requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Dec 2000</p>
<p>
(revision of the further discussion)
There are a number of problems with the requires clauses for the
@@ -8546,18 +8550,18 @@ imposing a greater restriction that what the standard currently says
(which is convertible to bool).
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="284"><h3>284.&nbsp;unportable example in 20.3.7, p6</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Dec 2000</p>
-<p>The example in 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a>, p6 shows how to use the C
+<a name="284"><h3>284.&nbsp;unportable example in 20.3.7, p6</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;26 Dec 2000</p>
+<p>The example in 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a>, p6 shows how to use the C
library function <tt>strcmp()</tt> with the function pointer adapter
<tt>ptr_fun()</tt>. But since it's unspecified whether the C library
functions have <tt>extern "C"</tt> or <tt>extern
-"C++"</tt> linkage [17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a>], and since
+"C++"</tt> linkage [17.4.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.using.linkage"> [lib.using.linkage]</a>], and since
function pointers with different the language linkage specifications
-(7.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/dcl.html#dcl.link"> [dcl.link]</a>) are incompatible, whether this example is
+(7.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/dcl.html#dcl.link"> [dcl.link]</a>) are incompatible, whether this example is
well-formed is unspecified.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a> paragraph 6 from:</p>
+<p>Change 20.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.function.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.function.pointer.adaptors]</a> paragraph 6 from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[<i>Example:</i></p>
<pre> replace_if(v.begin(), v.end(), not1(bind2nd(ptr_fun(strcmp), "C")), "C++");
@@ -8589,9 +8593,9 @@ aren't normative), and changed the sentence after the footnote so that
it corresponds to the new code fragment.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="285"><h3>285.&nbsp;minor editorial errors in fstream ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;31 Dec 2000</p>
-<p>27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a>, p2, 27.8.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.cons"> [lib.ofstream.cons]</a>, p2, and
-27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, p2 say about the effects of each constructor:
+<a name="285"><h3>285.&nbsp;minor editorial errors in fstream ctors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;31 Dec 2000</p>
+<p>27.8.1.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ifstream.cons"> [lib.ifstream.cons]</a>, p2, 27.8.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ofstream.cons"> [lib.ofstream.cons]</a>, p2, and
+27.8.1.12 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstream.cons"> [lib.fstream.cons]</a>, p2 say about the effects of each constructor:
</p>
<p>... If that function returns a null pointer, calls
@@ -8599,7 +8603,7 @@ it corresponds to the new code fragment.]</i></p>
</p>
<p>The parenthetical note doesn't apply since the ctors cannot throw an
-exception due to the requirement in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, p3
+exception due to the requirement in 27.4.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.cons"> [lib.basic.ios.cons]</a>, p3
that <tt>exceptions()</tt> be initialized to <tt>ios_base::goodbit</tt>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -8608,7 +8612,7 @@ Strike the parenthetical note from the Effects clause in each of the
paragraphs mentioned above.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="286"><h3>286.&nbsp;&lt;cstdlib&gt; requirements missing size_t typedef</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Dec 2000</p>
+<a name="286"><h3>286.&nbsp;&lt;cstdlib&gt; requirements missing size_t typedef</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Dec 2000</p>
<p>
The &lt;cstdlib&gt; header file contains prototypes for bsearch and
qsort (C++ Standard section 25.4 paragraphs 3 and 4) and other
@@ -8624,7 +8628,7 @@ the type size_t &lt;cstdlib&gt; to Table 97 (section C.2).
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Since size_t is in &lt;stdlib.h&gt;, it must also be in &lt;cstdlib&gt;.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="288"><h3>288.&nbsp;&lt;cerrno&gt; requirements missing macro EILSEQ</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Dec 2000</p>
+<a name="288"><h3>288.&nbsp;&lt;cerrno&gt; requirements missing macro EILSEQ</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Judy Ward&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;30 Dec 2000</p>
<p>
ISO/IEC 9899:1990/Amendment1:1994 Section 4.3 States: "The list
of macros defined in &lt;errno.h&gt; is adjusted to include a new
@@ -8642,7 +8646,7 @@ Update Table 26 (section 19.3) "Header &lt;cerrno&gt; synopsis"
and Table 95 (section C.2) "Standard Macros" to include EILSEQ.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="291"><h3>291.&nbsp;Underspecification of set algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;03 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="291"><h3>291.&nbsp;Underspecification of set algorithms</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;03 Jan 2001</p>
<p>
The standard library contains four algorithms that compute set
operations on sorted ranges: <tt>set_union</tt>, <tt>set_intersection</tt>,
@@ -8693,7 +8697,7 @@ same way.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.union"> [lib.set.union]</a> paragraph 5:</p>
+<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.union"> [lib.set.union]</a> paragraph 5:</p>
<blockquote>
If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to
each other and [first2, last2) contains <i>n</i> elements that are
@@ -8703,7 +8707,7 @@ from [first1, last1), and the last max(<i>n-m</i>, 0) of them from
[first2, last2), in that order.
</blockquote>
-<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.intersection"> [lib.set.intersection]</a> paragraph 5:</p>
+<p>Add the following to the end of 25.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.intersection"> [lib.set.intersection]</a> paragraph 5:</p>
<blockquote>
If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to each
other and [first2, last2) contains <i>n</i> elements that are
@@ -8711,7 +8715,7 @@ equivalent to them, the first min(<i>m</i>, <i>n</i>) of those
elements from [first1, last1) are copied to the output range.
</blockquote>
-<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.difference"> [lib.set.difference]</a>
+<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.difference"> [lib.set.difference]</a>
paragraph 4:</p>
<blockquote>
If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to each
@@ -8720,7 +8724,7 @@ equivalent to them, the last max(<i>m-n</i>, 0) elements from
[first1, last1) are copied to the output range.
</blockquote>
-<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.symmetric.difference"> [lib.set.symmetric.difference]</a>
+<p>Add a new paragraph, <b>Notes</b>, after 25.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.set.symmetric.difference"> [lib.set.symmetric.difference]</a>
paragraph 4:</p>
<blockquote>
If [first1, last1) contains <i>m</i> elements that are equivalent to
@@ -8743,7 +8747,7 @@ m</i> of these elements from [first2, last2) if <i>m</i> &lt; <i>n</i>.
already in the Standard. For more complicated cases, they describe
the behavior of existing implementations.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="292"><h3>292.&nbsp;effects of a.copyfmt (a)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;05 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="292"><h3>292.&nbsp;effects of a.copyfmt (a)</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.basic.ios.members"> [lib.basic.ios.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;05 Jan 2001</p>
<p>The Effects clause of the member function <tt>copyfmt()</tt> in
27.4.4.2, p15 doesn't consider the case where the left-hand side
argument is identical to the argument on the right-hand side, that is
@@ -8771,7 +8775,7 @@ assigns to the member objects of <tt>*this</tt> the corresponding member
objects of <tt>rhs</tt>, except that...
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="295"><h3>295.&nbsp;Is abs defined in &lt;cmath&gt;?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jens Maurer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="295"><h3>295.&nbsp;Is abs defined in &lt;cmath&gt;?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jens Maurer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Jan 2001</p>
<p>
Table 80 lists the contents of the &lt;cmath&gt; header. It does not
list <tt>abs()</tt>. However, 26.5, paragraph 6, which lists added
@@ -8781,7 +8785,7 @@ of <tt>abs()</tt> should be defined in &lt;cmath&gt;.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
Add <tt>abs</tt> to Table 80. Also, remove the parenthetical list
-of functions "(abs(), div(), rand(), srand())" from 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>,
+of functions "(abs(), div(), rand(), srand())" from 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>,
paragraph 1.
</p>
@@ -8792,9 +8796,9 @@ rid of that vestigial list of functions in paragraph 1.]</i></p>
<p>All this DR does is fix a typo; it's uncontroversial. A
separate question is whether we're doing the right thing in
putting some overloads in &lt;cmath&gt; that we aren't also
-putting in &lt;cstdlib&gt;. That's issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.</p>
+putting in &lt;cstdlib&gt;. That's issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#323">323</a>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="297"><h3>297.&nbsp;const_mem_fun_t&lt;&gt;::argument_type should be const T*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.member.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.member.pointer.adaptors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="297"><h3>297.&nbsp;const_mem_fun_t&lt;&gt;::argument_type should be const T*</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.3.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.member.pointer.adaptors"> [lib.member.pointer.adaptors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Jan 2001</p>
<p>The class templates <tt>const_mem_fun_t</tt> in 20.3.8, p8 and
<tt>const_mem_fun1_t</tt>
in 20.3.8, p9 derive from <tt>unary_function&lt;T*, S&gt;</tt>, and
@@ -8864,7 +8868,7 @@ binary_function&lt;<b>const</b> T*, A, S&gt; {</tt>
<p>This is simply a contradiction: the <tt>argument_type</tt> typedef,
and the argument type itself, are not the same.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="298"><h3>298.&nbsp;::operator delete[] requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John A. Pedretti&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="298"><h3>298.&nbsp;::operator delete[] requirement incorrect/insufficient</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John A. Pedretti&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jan 2001</p>
<p>
The default behavior of <tt>operator delete[]</tt> described in 18.4.1.2, p12 -
namely that for non-null value of <i>ptr</i>, the operator reclaims storage
@@ -8887,7 +8891,7 @@ For a null value of <i><tt>ptr</tt></i> , does nothing.
Any other value of <i><tt>ptr</tt></i> shall be a value returned
earlier by a call to the default <tt>operator new[](std::size_t)</tt>.
[Footnote: The value must not have been invalidated by an intervening
-call to <tt>operator delete[](void*)</tt> (17.4.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.arguments"> [lib.res.on.arguments]</a>).
+call to <tt>operator delete[](void*)</tt> (17.4.3.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.arguments"> [lib.res.on.arguments]</a>).
--- end footnote]
For such a non-null value of <i><tt>ptr</tt></i> , reclaims storage
allocated by the earlier call to the default <tt>operator new[]</tt>.
@@ -8904,7 +8908,7 @@ or <tt>operator delete(<i>ptr</i>, std::nothrow)</tt> respectively.
</blockquote>
<p>and expunge paragraph 13.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="300"><h3>300.&nbsp;list::merge() specification incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John Pedretti&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="300"><h3>300.&nbsp;list::merge() specification incomplete</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;John Pedretti&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jan 2001</p>
<p>
The "Effects" clause for list::merge() (23.2.2.4, p23)
appears to be incomplete: it doesn't cover the case where the argument
@@ -8913,7 +8917,7 @@ note in p24 (below) is that x be empty after the merge which is surely
unintended in this case.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraps 23-25 with:</p>
+<p>In 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, replace paragraps 23-25 with:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
23 Effects: if (&amp;x == this) does nothing; otherwise, merges the two
@@ -8942,7 +8946,7 @@ effects.
</blockquote>
<p><i>[Copenhagen: The original proposed resolution did not fix all of
-the problems in 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, p22-25. Three different
+the problems in 23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, p22-25. Three different
paragraphs (23, 24, 25) describe the effects of <tt>merge</tt>.
Changing p23, without changing the other two, appears to introduce
contradictions. Additionally, "merges the argument list into the
@@ -8951,7 +8955,7 @@ list" is excessively vague.]</i></p>
<p><i>[Post-Curaçao: Robert Klarer provided new wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="301"><h3>301.&nbsp;basic_string template ctor effects clause omits allocator argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="301"><h3>301.&nbsp;basic_string template ctor effects clause omits allocator argument</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.cons"> [lib.string.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Jan 2001</p>
<p>
The effects clause for the basic_string template ctor in 21.3.1, p15
leaves out the third argument of type Allocator. I believe this to be
@@ -8978,7 +8982,7 @@ a mistake.
static_cast&lt;value_type&gt;(end), <b>a</b>)</tt></blockquote>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="303"><h3>303.&nbsp;Bitset input operator underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Feb 2001</p>
+<a name="303"><h3>303.&nbsp;Bitset input operator underspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.5.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.bitset.operators"> [lib.bitset.operators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;5 Feb 2001</p>
<p>
In 23.3.5.3, we are told that <tt>bitset</tt>'s input operator
"Extracts up to <i>N</i> (single-byte) characters from
@@ -9083,7 +9087,7 @@ input. Using <tt>widen</tt> does mean that alternative digit
representations will not be recognized, but this was a known
consequence of the design choice.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="305"><h3>305.&nbsp;Default behavior of codecvt&lt;wchar_t, char, mbstate_t&gt;::length()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Jan 2001</p>
+<a name="305"><h3>305.&nbsp;Default behavior of codecvt&lt;wchar_t, char, mbstate_t&gt;::length()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Jan 2001</p>
<p>22.2.1.5/3 introduces codecvt in part with:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -9195,7 +9199,7 @@ example, and it would rule out a fixed-width encoding of UCS-4.</p>
"shift-JIS" changed to "JIS".]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="306"><h3>306.&nbsp;offsetof macro and non-POD types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Feb 2001</p>
+<a name="306"><h3>306.&nbsp;offsetof macro and non-POD types</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Feb 2001</p>
<p>Spliced together from reflector messages c++std-lib-8294 and -8295:</p>
<p>18.1, paragraph 5, reads: "The macro <tt>offsetof</tt>
@@ -9206,7 +9210,7 @@ that is a static data member or a function member is
undefined."</p>
<p>For the POD requirement, it doesn't say "no diagnostic
-required" or "undefined behavior". I read 1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.compliance"> [intro.compliance]</a>, paragraph 1, to mean that a diagnostic is required.
+required" or "undefined behavior". I read 1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.compliance"> [intro.compliance]</a>, paragraph 1, to mean that a diagnostic is required.
It's not clear whether this requirement was intended. While it's
possible to provide such a diagnostic, the extra complication doesn't
seem to add any value.
@@ -9221,13 +9225,13 @@ members thought that diagnostics should be required whenever
possible.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="307"><h3>307.&nbsp;Lack of reference typedefs in container adaptors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.adaptors"> [lib.container.adaptors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Mar 2001</p>
+<a name="307"><h3>307.&nbsp;Lack of reference typedefs in container adaptors</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.adaptors"> [lib.container.adaptors]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Mar 2001</p>
<p>From reflector message c++std-lib-8330. See also lib-8317.</p>
<p>
-The standard is currently inconsistent in 23.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.priority.queue"> [lib.priority.queue]</a>
-paragraph 1 and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> paragraph 1.
+The standard is currently inconsistent in 23.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.priority.queue"> [lib.priority.queue]</a>
+paragraph 1 and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> paragraph 1.
23.2.3.3/1, for example, says:
</p>
@@ -9253,7 +9257,7 @@ container's reference type.</p>
<p>
I propose 3. This does not preclude option 2 if we choose to do it
-later (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#96">96</a>); the issues are independent. Option
+later (see issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#96">96</a>); the issues are independent. Option
3 offers a small step towards support for proxied containers. This
small step fixes a current contradiction, is easy for vendors to
implement, is already implemented in at least one popular lib, and
@@ -9482,14 +9486,14 @@ and it was deliberately not adopted. Nevertheless, the LWG believes
(straw poll: 10-2) that it is a genuine defect.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="308"><h3>308.&nbsp;Table 82 mentions unrelated headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Mar 2001</p>
+<a name="308"><h3>308.&nbsp;Table 82 mentions unrelated headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Mar 2001</p>
<p>
Table 82 in section 27 mentions the header &lt;cstdlib&gt; for String
-streams (27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a>) and the headers &lt;cstdio&gt; and
-&lt;cwchar&gt; for File streams (27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>). It's not clear
+streams (27.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.string.streams"> [lib.string.streams]</a>) and the headers &lt;cstdio&gt; and
+&lt;cwchar&gt; for File streams (27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>). It's not clear
why these headers are mentioned in this context since they do not
define any of the library entities described by the
-subclauses. According to 17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a>, only such headers
+subclauses. According to 17.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.contents"> [lib.contents]</a>, only such headers
are to be listed in the summary.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -9499,10 +9503,10 @@ Table 82.</p>
<p><i>[Copenhagen: changed the proposed resolution slightly. The
original proposed resolution also said to remove &lt;cstdio&gt; from
Table 82. However, &lt;cstdio&gt; is mentioned several times within
-section 27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>, including 27.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.c.files"> [lib.c.files]</a>.]</i></p>
+section 27.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.file.streams"> [lib.file.streams]</a>, including 27.8.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.c.files"> [lib.c.files]</a>.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="310"><h3>310.&nbsp;Is errno a macro?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, 19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Mar 2001</p>
+<a name="310"></a><h3><a name="310">310.&nbsp;Is errno a macro?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, 19.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-diagnostics.html#lib.errno"> [lib.errno]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Steve Clamage&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Mar 2001</p>
<p>
Exactly how should errno be declared in a conforming C++ header?
</p>
@@ -9589,9 +9593,9 @@ to be a macro.</p>
<p><i>[Curaçao: additional rationale added.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="311"><h3>311.&nbsp;Incorrect wording in basic_ostream class synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Mar 2001</p>
+<a name="311"><h3>311.&nbsp;Incorrect wording in basic_ostream class synopsis</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;21 Mar 2001</p>
-<p>In 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, the synopsis of class basic_ostream says:</p>
+<p>In 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, the synopsis of class basic_ostream says:</p>
<pre> // partial specializationss
template&lt;class traits&gt;
@@ -9606,29 +9610,29 @@ to be a macro.</p>
</ul>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In the synopsis in 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, remove the
+<p>In the synopsis in 27.6.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream"> [lib.ostream]</a>, remove the
<i>// partial specializationss</i> comment. Also remove the same
comment (correctly spelled, but still incorrect) from the synopsis in
-27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>.
+27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a>.
</p>
<p><i>[
-Pre-Redmond: added 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> because of Martin's
+Pre-Redmond: added 27.6.2.5.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.inserters.character"> [lib.ostream.inserters.character]</a> because of Martin's
comment in c++std-lib-8939.
]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="312"><h3>312.&nbsp;Table 27 is missing headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.utilities"> [lib.utilities]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Mar 2001</p>
+<a name="312"><h3>312.&nbsp;Table 27 is missing headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.utilities"> [lib.utilities]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;29 Mar 2001</p>
<p>Table 27 in section 20 lists the header &lt;memory&gt; (only) for
Memory (lib.memory) but neglects to mention the headers
-&lt;cstdlib&gt; and &lt;cstring&gt; that are discussed in 20.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.c.malloc"> [lib.c.malloc]</a>.</p>
+&lt;cstdlib&gt; and &lt;cstring&gt; that are discussed in 20.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.c.malloc"> [lib.c.malloc]</a>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Add &lt;cstdlib&gt; and &lt;cstring&gt; to Table 27, in the same row
as &lt;memory&gt;.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="315"><h3>315.&nbsp;Bad "range" in list::unique complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 May 2001</p>
+<a name="315"><h3>315.&nbsp;Bad "range" in list::unique complexity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;1 May 2001</p>
<p>
-23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, Para 21 describes the complexity of
+23.2.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.ops"> [lib.list.ops]</a>, Para 21 describes the complexity of
list::unique as: "If the range (last - first) is not empty, exactly
(last - first) -1 applications of the corresponding predicate,
otherwise no applications of the predicate)".
@@ -9642,7 +9646,7 @@ otherwise no applications of the predicate)".
Change the "range" from (last - first) to [first, last).
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="316"><h3>316.&nbsp;Vague text in Table 69</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 May 2001</p>
+<a name="316"><h3>316.&nbsp;Vague text in Table 69</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 May 2001</p>
<p>Table 69 says this about a_uniq.insert(t):</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -9662,7 +9666,7 @@ indicates whether the insertion takes place.</p>
takes place...
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="317"><h3>317.&nbsp;Instantiation vs. specialization of facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.localization"> [lib.localization]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 May 2001</p>
+<a name="317"><h3>317.&nbsp;Instantiation vs. specialization of facets</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.localization"> [lib.localization]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;4 May 2001</p>
<p>
The localization section of the standard refers to specializations of
the facet templates as instantiations even though the required facets
@@ -9711,7 +9715,7 @@ describe templates was clarified during the standardization process,
but the wording in clause 22 was never updated to reflect that
change.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="318"><h3>318.&nbsp;Misleading comment in definition of numpunct_byname</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 May 2001</p>
+<a name="318"><h3>318.&nbsp;Misleading comment in definition of numpunct_byname</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct.byname"> [lib.locale.numpunct.byname]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 May 2001</p>
<p>The definition of the numpunct_byname template contains the following
comment:</p>
@@ -9727,14 +9731,14 @@ conceivable that an implementation will not explicitly specialize the
template at all, but simply provide the primary template.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Remove the comment from the text in 22.2.3.2 and from the proposed
-resolution of library issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a>.</p>
+resolution of library issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#228">228</a>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="319"><h3>319.&nbsp;Storage allocation wording confuses "Required behavior", "Requires"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a>, 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 May 2001</p>
-<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Required
+<a name="319"><h3>319.&nbsp;Storage allocation wording confuses "Required behavior", "Requires"</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a>, 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 May 2001</p>
+<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Required
behavior" elements describe "the semantics of a function definition
provided by either the implementation or a C++ program."</p>
-<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Requires"
+<p>The standard specifies 17.3.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.structure.specifications"> [lib.structure.specifications]</a> that "Requires"
elements describe "the preconditions for calling the function."</p>
<p>In the sections noted below, the current wording specifies
@@ -9743,7 +9747,7 @@ should be specified as "Requires".</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> Para 12 Change:</p>
+<p>In 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> Para 12 Change:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Required behavior: accept a value of ptr that is null or that was
returned by an earlier call ...</p>
@@ -9754,7 +9758,7 @@ should be specified as "Requires".</p>
earlier call ...</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> Para 11 Change:</p>
+<p>In 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a> Para 11 Change:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Required behavior: accept a value of ptr that is null or that was
returned by an earlier call ...</p>
@@ -9766,7 +9770,7 @@ should be specified as "Requires".</p>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="320"><h3>320.&nbsp;list::assign overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 May 2001</p>
+<a name="320"><h3>320.&nbsp;list::assign overspecified</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.list.cons"> [lib.list.cons]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Howard Hinnant&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 May 2001</p>
<p>
Section 23.2.2.1, paragraphs 6-8 specify that list assign (both forms) have
the "effects" of a call to erase followed by a call to insert.
@@ -9808,7 +9812,7 @@ Metrowerks and SGI recycle nodes, Dinkumware and Rogue Wave don't.
<p>Effects: Replaces the contents of the list with the range [first, last).</p>
</blockquote>
-<p>In 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, in Table 67 (sequence requirements),
+<p>In 23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>, in Table 67 (sequence requirements),
add two new rows:</p>
<pre> a.assign(i,j) void pre: i,j are not iterators into a.
Replaces elements in a with a copy
@@ -9849,7 +9853,7 @@ with "Replaces the elements of a with a copy of [i, j)."
Changes not deemed serious enough to requre rereview.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="321"><h3>321.&nbsp;Typo in num_get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Kevin Djang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 May 2001</p>
+<a name="321"><h3>321.&nbsp;Typo in num_get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Kevin Djang&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 May 2001</p>
<p>
Section 22.2.2.1.2 at p7 states that "A length specifier is added to
the conversion function, if needed, as indicated in Table 56."
@@ -9864,7 +9868,7 @@ to be "A length modifier is added ..."
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>C uses the term "length modifier". We should be consistent.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="322"><h3>322.&nbsp;iterator and const_iterator should have the same value type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 May 2001</p>
+<a name="322"><h3>322.&nbsp;iterator and const_iterator should have the same value type</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 May 2001</p>
<p>
It's widely assumed that, if X is a container,
iterator_traits&lt;X::iterator&gt;::value_type and
@@ -9876,7 +9880,7 @@ iterator_traits&lt;X::const_iterator&gt;::value_type should be "const
X::value_type".
</p>
-<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a>.</p>
+<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#279">279</a>.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>In Table 65 ("Container Requirements"), change the return type for
X::iterator to "iterator type whose value type is T". Change the
@@ -9896,7 +9900,7 @@ the way that const pointers are handled: the standard already
requires that iterator_traits&lt;const int*&gt;::value_type is int.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="324"><h3>324.&nbsp;Do output iterators have value types?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 June 2001</p>
+<a name="324"><h3>324.&nbsp;Do output iterators have value types?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.output.iterators"> [lib.output.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 June 2001</p>
<p>Table 73 suggests that output iterators have value types. It
requires the expression "*a = t". Additionally, although Table 73
@@ -10014,7 +10018,7 @@ and any language suggesting otherwise is simply a mistake.</p>
<p>A future revision of the standard may wish to revisit this design
decision.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="325"><h3>325.&nbsp;Misleading text in moneypunct&lt;&gt;::do_grouping</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.6.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Jul 2001</p>
+<a name="325"><h3>325.&nbsp;Misleading text in moneypunct&lt;&gt;::do_grouping</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.6.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals"> [lib.locale.moneypunct.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Jul 2001</p>
<p>The Returns clause in 22.2.6.3.2, p3 says about
moneypunct&lt;charT&gt;::do_grouping()
</p>
@@ -10066,7 +10070,7 @@ locale. It is just a reminder that the values are interpreted as small
integers, not ASCII characters.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="327"><h3>327.&nbsp;Typo in time_get facet in table 52</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Tiki Wan&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;06 Jul 2001</p>
+<a name="327"><h3>327.&nbsp;Typo in time_get facet in table 52</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Tiki Wan&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;06 Jul 2001</p>
<p>The <tt>wchar_t</tt> versions of <tt>time_get</tt> and
<tt>time_get_byname</tt> are listed incorrectly in table 52,
required instantiations. In both cases the second template
@@ -10075,7 +10079,7 @@ InputIterator, since these are input facets.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
In table 52, required instantiations, in
-22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, change</p>
+22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, change</p>
<pre> time_get&lt;wchar_t, OutputIterator&gt;
time_get_byname&lt;wchar_t, OutputIterator&gt;
</pre>
@@ -10088,7 +10092,7 @@ In table 52, required instantiations, in
a typo, wchart instead of wchar_t.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="328"><h3>328.&nbsp;Bad sprintf format modifier in money_put&lt;&gt;::do_put()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.6.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.money.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.money.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Jul 2001</p>
+<a name="328"><h3>328.&nbsp;Bad sprintf format modifier in money_put&lt;&gt;::do_put()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.6.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.money.put.virtuals"> [lib.locale.money.put.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Jul 2001</p>
<p>The sprintf format string , "%.01f" (that's the digit one), in the
description of the do_put() member functions of the money_put facet in
22.2.6.2.2, p1 is incorrect. First, the f format specifier is wrong
@@ -10101,11 +10105,11 @@ modifier.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious typo</p>
<hr>
-<a name="329"><h3>329.&nbsp;vector capacity, reserve and reallocation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>, 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Anthony Williams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Jul 2001</p>
+<a name="329"><h3>329.&nbsp;vector capacity, reserve and reallocation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>, 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Anthony Williams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;13 Jul 2001</p>
<p>
There is an apparent contradiction about which circumstances can cause
-a reallocation of a vector in Section 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> and
-section 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>.
+a reallocation of a vector in Section 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> and
+section 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>.
</p>
<p>23.2.4.2p5 says:</p>
@@ -10157,7 +10161,7 @@ than the old capacity, I think the intent is clear.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5 to:</p>
+<p>Change the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5 to:</p>
<blockquote>
Notes: Reallocation invalidates all the references, pointers, and
@@ -10181,12 +10185,12 @@ the argument to the first, the intent was for the second invocation to
have no effect. Wording implying that such cases have an effect on
reallocation guarantees was inadvertant.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="331"><h3>331.&nbsp;bad declaration of destructor for ios_base::failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;PremAnand M. Rao&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Aug 2001</p>
+<a name="331"><h3>331.&nbsp;bad declaration of destructor for ios_base::failure</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;PremAnand M. Rao&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Aug 2001</p>
<p>
-With the change in 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> to state
+With the change in 17.4.4.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.res.on.exception.handling"> [lib.res.on.exception.handling]</a> to state
"An implementation may strengthen the exception-specification for a
non-virtual function by removing listed exceptions."
-(issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#119">119</a>)
+(issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#119">119</a>)
and the following declaration of ~failure() in ios_base::failure
</p>
<pre> namespace std {
@@ -10198,7 +10202,7 @@ and the following declaration of ~failure() in ios_base::failure
};
}
</pre>
-<p>the class failure cannot be implemented since in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> the destructor of class exception has an empty
+<p>the class failure cannot be implemented since in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> the destructor of class exception has an empty
exception specification:</p>
<pre> namespace std {
class exception {
@@ -10215,8 +10219,8 @@ exception specification:</p>
<p>The proposed resolution is consistent with the way that destructors
of other classes derived from <tt>exception</tt> are handled.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="333"></a><h3><a name="333">333.&nbsp;does endl imply synchronization with the device?</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;PremAnand M. Rao&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2001</p>
-<p>A footnote in 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a> states:</p>
+<a name="333"><h3>333.&nbsp;does endl imply synchronization with the device?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;PremAnand M. Rao&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Aug 2001</p>
+<p>A footnote in 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a> states:</p>
<blockquote>
[Footnote: The effect of executing cout &lt;&lt; endl is to insert a
newline character in the output sequence controlled by cout, then
@@ -10241,7 +10245,7 @@ I could not find any other statement that explicitly defined
the behavior one way or the other.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove footnote 300 from section 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a>.</p>
+<p>Remove footnote 300 from section 27.6.2.7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.manip"> [lib.ostream.manip]</a>.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>We already have normative text saying what <tt>endl</tt> does: it
inserts a newline character and calls <tt>flush</tt>. This footnote
@@ -10249,7 +10253,7 @@ is at best redundant, at worst (as this issue says) misleading,
because it appears to make promises about what <tt>flush</tt>
does.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="334"><h3>334.&nbsp;map::operator[] specification forces inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrea Griffini&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="334"><h3>334.&nbsp;map::operator[] specification forces inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andrea Griffini&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;02 Sep 2001</p>
<p>
The current standard describes map::operator[] using a
code example. That code example is however quite
@@ -10326,7 +10330,7 @@ non-conforming.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-Replace 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a> paragraph 1 with
+Replace 23.3.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.map.access"> [lib.map.access]</a> paragraph 1 with
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
@@ -10345,7 +10349,7 @@ value_type(x, T()) into the map.
wording. We may also wish to have a blanket statement somewhere in
clause 17 saying that we do not intend the semantics of sample code
fragments to be interpreted as specifing exactly how many copies are
-made. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#98">98</a> for a similar problem.]</i></p>
+made. See issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#98">98</a> for a similar problem.]</i></p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>
@@ -10357,9 +10361,9 @@ consistent with existing practice.
we are no longer defining <tt>operator[]</tt> in terms of
<tt>insert</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="335"><h3>335.&nbsp;minor issue with char_traits, table 37</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;06 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="335"><h3>335.&nbsp;minor issue with char_traits, table 37</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;06 Sep 2001</p>
<p>
-Table 37, in 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>, descibes char_traits::assign
+Table 37, in 21.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.require"> [lib.char.traits.require]</a>, descibes char_traits::assign
as:
</p>
<pre> X::assign(c,d) assigns c = d.
@@ -10396,10 +10400,10 @@ and char_traits&lt;wchar_t&gt; in 21.1.3.2...)
<pre> X::assign(r,d) assigns r = d
</pre>
<hr>
-<a name="336"></a><h3><a name="336">336.&nbsp;Clause 17 lack of references to deprecated headers</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Detlef Vollmann&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;05 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="336"><h3>336.&nbsp;Clause 17 lack of references to deprecated headers</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.library"> [lib.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Detlef Vollmann&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;05 Sep 2001</p>
<p>From c++std-edit-873:</p>
-<p>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, Table 11. In this table, the header
+<p>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a>, Table 11. In this table, the header
&lt;strstream&gt; is missing.</p>
<p>This shows a general problem: The whole clause 17 refers quite
@@ -10408,47 +10412,47 @@ library (though a deprecated one).</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>To 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Table 11, C++ Library Headers, add
+<p>To 17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Table 11, C++ Library Headers, add
"&lt;strstream&gt;".</p>
<p>In the following places, change "clauses 17 through 27" to "clauses
17 through 27 and Annex D":</p>
<ul>
-<li>1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.refs"> [intro.refs]</a> Normative references/1/footnote 1</li>
-<li>1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/intro.html#intro.defs"> [intro.defs]</a> Definitions/1</li>
-<li>7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/dcl.html#dcl.dcl"> [dcl.dcl]</a> Library introduction/9</li>
-<li>17.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.description"> [lib.description]</a> Method of description (Informative)/1</li>
-<li>17.3.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.character.seq"> [lib.character.seq]</a> Character sequences/1/bullet 2</li>
-<li>17.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.functions.within.classes"> [lib.functions.within.classes]</a> Functions within classes/1</li>
-<li>17.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.objects.within.classes"> [lib.objects.within.classes]</a> Private members/1/(2 places)</li>
-<li>17.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.requirements"> [lib.requirements]</a> Library-wide requirements/1</li>
-<li>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Headers/4</li>
-<li>17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> Replacement functions/1</li>
-<li>17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> Global or non-member functions/2</li>
-<li>17.4.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.protection.within.classes"> [lib.protection.within.classes]</a> Protection within classes/1</li>
+<li>1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.refs"> [intro.refs]</a> Normative references/1/footnote 1</li>
+<li>1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/intro.html#intro.defs"> [intro.defs]</a> Definitions/1</li>
+<li>7 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/dcl.html#dcl.dcl"> [dcl.dcl]</a> Library introduction/9</li>
+<li>17.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.description"> [lib.description]</a> Method of description (Informative)/1</li>
+<li>17.3.2.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.character.seq"> [lib.character.seq]</a> Character sequences/1/bullet 2</li>
+<li>17.3.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.functions.within.classes"> [lib.functions.within.classes]</a> Functions within classes/1</li>
+<li>17.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.objects.within.classes"> [lib.objects.within.classes]</a> Private members/1/(2 places)</li>
+<li>17.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.requirements"> [lib.requirements]</a> Library-wide requirements/1</li>
+<li>17.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.headers"> [lib.headers]</a> Headers/4</li>
+<li>17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> Replacement functions/1</li>
+<li>17.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.global.functions"> [lib.global.functions]</a> Global or non-member functions/2</li>
+<li>17.4.4.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.protection.within.classes"> [lib.protection.within.classes]</a> Protection within classes/1</li>
</ul>
<hr>
-<a name="337"><h3>337.&nbsp;replace_copy_if's template parameter should be InputIterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Detlef Vollmann&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="337"><h3>337.&nbsp;replace_copy_if's template parameter should be InputIterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Detlef Vollmann&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;07 Sep 2001</p>
<p>From c++std-edit-876:</p>
<p>
-In section 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> before p4: The name of the first
+In section 25.2.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.replace"> [lib.alg.replace]</a> before p4: The name of the first
parameter of template replace_copy_if should be "InputIterator"
-instead of "Iterator". According to 17.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.type.descriptions"> [lib.type.descriptions]</a> p1 the
+instead of "Iterator". According to 17.3.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.type.descriptions"> [lib.type.descriptions]</a> p1 the
parameter name conveys real normative meaning.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Change <tt>Iterator</tt> to <tt>InputIterator</tt>.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="338"><h3>338.&nbsp; is whitespace allowed between `-' and a digit?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="338"><h3>338.&nbsp; is whitespace allowed between `-' and a digit?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.categories"> [lib.locale.categories]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Sep 2001</p>
<p>
-From Stage 2 processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, p8 and 9 (the
+From Stage 2 processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>, p8 and 9 (the
original text or the text corrected by the proposed resolution of
-issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>) it seems clear that no whitespace is allowed
-within a number, but 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a>, p2, which gives the
+issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#221">221</a>) it seems clear that no whitespace is allowed
+within a number, but 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a>, p2, which gives the
format for integer and floating point values, says that whitespace is
optional between a plusminus and a sign.
</p>
@@ -10458,10 +10462,10 @@ The text needs to be clarified to either consistently allow or
disallow whitespace between a plusminus and a sign. It might be
worthwhile to consider the fact that the C library stdio facility does
not permit whitespace embedded in numbers and neither does the C or
-C++ core language (the syntax of integer-literals is given in 2.13.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lex.html#lex.icon"> [lex.icon]</a>, that of floating-point-literals in 2.13.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lex.html#lex.fcon"> [lex.fcon]</a> of the C++ standard).
+C++ core language (the syntax of integer-literals is given in 2.13.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lex.html#lex.icon"> [lex.icon]</a>, that of floating-point-literals in 2.13.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lex.html#lex.fcon"> [lex.fcon]</a> of the C++ standard).
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change the first part of 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p>
+<p>Change the first part of 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 from:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
The syntax for number formats is as follows, where <tt>digit</tt>
@@ -10496,16 +10500,16 @@ Integer values have the format:
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
-<p>It's not clear whether the format described in 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 has any normative weight: nothing in the
+<p>It's not clear whether the format described in 22.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.numpunct"> [lib.locale.numpunct]</a> paragraph 2 has any normative weight: nothing in the
standard says how, or whether, it's used. However, there's no reason
for it to differ gratuitously from the very specific description of
-numeric processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>. The proposed
+numeric processing in 22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>. The proposed
resolution removes all mention of "whitespace" from that format.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="339"><h3>339.&nbsp;definition of bitmask type restricted to clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 September 2001</p>
+<a name="339"></a><h3><a name="339">339.&nbsp;definition of bitmask type restricted to clause 27</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a>, 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 September 2001</p>
<p>
-The ctype_category::mask type is declared to be an enum in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a> with p1 then stating that it is a bitmask type, most
-likely referring to the definition of bitmask type in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>, p1. However, the said definition only applies to
+The ctype_category::mask type is declared to be an enum in 22.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.category.ctype"> [lib.category.ctype]</a> with p1 then stating that it is a bitmask type, most
+likely referring to the definition of bitmask type in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>, p1. However, the said definition only applies to
clause 27, making the reference in 22.2.1 somewhat dubious.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -10513,7 +10517,7 @@ clause 27, making the reference in 22.2.1 somewhat dubious.
<blockquote>
Several types defined in clause 27 are bitmask types. Each bitmask type
can be implemented as an enumerated type that overloads certain operators,
- as an integer type, or as a bitset (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>).
+ as an integer type, or as a bitset (23.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.template.bitset"> [lib.template.bitset]</a>).
</blockquote>
<p>to read</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -10553,15 +10557,15 @@ following (note, in particluar, the cross-reference to 17.3.2.1.2 in
}
</pre>
-<p>The type <tt>mask</tt> is a bitmask type (17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>).</p>
+<p>The type <tt>mask</tt> is a bitmask type (17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a>).</p>
</blockquote>
<p><i>[Curaçao: The LWG notes that T above should be bold-italics to be
consistent with the rest of the standard.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="340"><h3>340.&nbsp;interpretation of <tt>has_facet&lt;Facet&gt;(loc)</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="340"></a><h3><a name="340">340.&nbsp;interpretation of <tt>has_facet&lt;Facet&gt;(loc)</tt>
+</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2001</p>
<p>
It's unclear whether 22.1.1.1.1, p3 says that
<tt>has_facet&lt;Facet&gt;(loc)</tt> returns true for any <tt>Facet</tt>
@@ -10608,7 +10612,7 @@ to hold only for specializations of <tt>Facet</tt> from Table 52 on
}.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 3, change
+<p>In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>, paragraph 3, change
"that is a member of a standard category" to "shown in Table 51".</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The facets in Table 52 are an unbounded set. Locales should not be
@@ -10618,7 +10622,7 @@ required to contain an infinite number of facets.</p>
OutputIterator must be supported. Table 51 already contains a
complete list of the ones we need.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="341"><h3>341.&nbsp;Vector reallocation and swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Anthony Williams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Sep 2001</p>
+<a name="341"><h3>341.&nbsp;Vector reallocation and swap</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Anthony Williams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Sep 2001</p>
<p>It is a common idiom to reduce the capacity of a vector by swapping it with
an empty one:</p>
<pre> std::vector&lt;SomeType&gt; vec;
@@ -10627,16 +10631,16 @@ an empty one:</p>
// vec is now empty, with minimal capacity
</pre>
-<p>However, the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>paragraph 5 prevents
+<p>However, the wording of 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a>paragraph 5 prevents
the capacity of a vector being reduced, following a call to
reserve(). This invalidates the idiom, as swap() is thus prevented
-from reducing the capacity. The proposed wording for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-defects.html#329">329</a> does not affect this. Consequently, the example above
+from reducing the capacity. The proposed wording for issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#329">329</a> does not affect this. Consequently, the example above
requires the temporary to be expanded to cater for the contents of
vec, and the contents be copied across. This is a linear-time
operation.</p>
<p>However, the container requirements state that swap must have constant
-complexity (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> note to table 65).</p>
+complexity (23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> note to table 65).</p>
<p>This is an important issue, as reallocation affects the validity of
references and iterators.</p>
@@ -10658,7 +10662,7 @@ pointing to the same element. Consequently iterators and references that
referred to one vector now refer to the other, and vice-versa.</li>
</ol>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add a new paragraph after 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5:</p>
+<p>Add a new paragraph after 23.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.capacity"> [lib.vector.capacity]</a> paragraph 5:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre> void swap(vector&lt;T,Allocator&gt;&amp; x);
</pre>
@@ -10678,16 +10682,16 @@ do pointer twiddling, and that it should exchange all properties of
the two vectors, including their reallocation guarantees.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="345"><h3>345.&nbsp;type tm in &lt;cwchar&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Clark Nelson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Oct 2001</p>
+<a name="345"><h3>345.&nbsp;type tm in &lt;cwchar&gt;</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Clark Nelson&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Oct 2001</p>
<p>
C99, and presumably amendment 1 to C90, specify that &lt;wchar.h&gt;
-declares struct tm as an incomplete type. However, table 48 in 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a> does not mention the type tm as being declared in
+declares struct tm as an incomplete type. However, table 48 in 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a> does not mention the type tm as being declared in
&lt;cwchar&gt;. Is this omission intentional or accidental?
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In section 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a>, add "tm" to table 48.</p>
+<p>In section 21.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.c.strings"> [lib.c.strings]</a>, add "tm" to table 48.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="346"><h3>346.&nbsp;Some iterator member functions should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jeremy Siek&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Oct 2001</p>
+<a name="346"><h3>346.&nbsp;Some iterator member functions should be const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Jeremy Siek&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Oct 2001</p>
<p>Iterator member functions and operators that do not change the state
of the iterator should be defined as const member functions or as
functions that take iterators either by const reference or by
@@ -10699,7 +10703,7 @@ are suggested to make this explicit.</p>
for non-const and a,b for const iterators. The following changes
make this more explicit and also fix a couple problems.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> Change the first section of p9 from
+<p>In 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a> Change the first section of p9 from
"In the following sections, a and b denote values of X..." to
"In the following sections, a and b denote values of type const X...".</p>
@@ -10727,11 +10731,11 @@ make this more explicit and also fix a couple problems.</p>
the same problem appears there.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="347"></a><h3><a name="347">347.&nbsp;locale::category and bitmask requirements</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;P.J. Plauger, Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Oct 2001</p>
+<a name="347"><h3>347.&nbsp;locale::category and bitmask requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;P.J. Plauger, Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Oct 2001</p>
<p>
-In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> paragraph 1, the category members
+In 22.1.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.category"> [lib.locale.category]</a> paragraph 1, the category members
are described as bitmask elements. In fact, the bitmask requirements
-in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> don't seem quite right: <tt>none</tt>
+in 17.3.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.bitmask.types"> [lib.bitmask.types]</a> don't seem quite right: <tt>none</tt>
and <tt>all</tt> are bitmask constants, not bitmask elements.</p>
<p>In particular, the requirements for <tt>none</tt> interact poorly
@@ -10750,7 +10754,7 @@ re-expresses the status quo more clearly, without introducing any
changes beyond resolving the DR.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Replace the first two paragraphs of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p>
+<p>Replace the first two paragraphs of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p>
<blockquote>
<pre> typedef int category;
</pre>
@@ -10794,7 +10798,7 @@ shown in Table 51:
<blockquote>
<p><b>Option 2:</b> <br>
-Replace the first paragraph of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p>
+Replace the first paragraph of 22.1.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.types"> [lib.locale.types]</a> with:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
Valid category values include the enumerated values. In addition, the
@@ -10815,7 +10819,7 @@ of the other enumerated values; implementations may add extra categories.]
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<hr>
-<a name="349"><h3>349.&nbsp;Minor typographical error in ostream_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Oct 2001</p>
+<a name="349"><h3>349.&nbsp;Minor typographical error in ostream_iterator</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Andy Sawyer&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Oct 2001</p>
<p>24.5.2 [lib.ostream.iterator] states:</p>
<pre> [...]
@@ -10828,11 +10832,11 @@ of the other enumerated values; implementations may add extra categories.]
should be of type 'const charT*'.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a>, replace <tt>const char* delim</tt> with
+In 24.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.ostream.iterator"> [lib.ostream.iterator]</a>, replace <tt>const char* delim</tt> with
<tt>const charT* delim</tt>.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="352"><h3>352.&nbsp;missing fpos requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.typedefs"> [lib.char.traits.typedefs]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Dec 2001</p>
+<a name="352"><h3>352.&nbsp;missing fpos requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.char.traits.typedefs"> [lib.char.traits.typedefs]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;2 Dec 2001</p>
<p>
<i>(1)</i>
There are no requirements on the <tt>stateT</tt> template parameter of
@@ -10875,7 +10879,7 @@ template fpos is used only in a very few places, all of which know the
state type already. Unless motivation is provided, the second should
be considered NAD.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="354"><h3>354.&nbsp;Associative container lower/upper bound requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans Aberg&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Dec 2001</p>
+<a name="354"><h3>354.&nbsp;Associative container lower/upper bound requirements</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans Aberg&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Dec 2001</p>
<p>
Discussions in the thread "Associative container lower/upper bound
requirements" on comp.std.c++ suggests that there is a defect in the
@@ -10909,7 +10913,7 @@ the intention (and not possible with the "const" versions).
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change Table 69 of section 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> indicated entries
+<p>Change Table 69 of section 23.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.associative.reqmts"> [lib.associative.reqmts]</a> indicated entries
to:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -10927,7 +10931,7 @@ key greater than k, or a.end() if such an element is not found.
<p><i>[Curaçao: LWG reviewed PR.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="355"><h3>355.&nbsp;Operational semantics for a.back()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Yaroslav Mironov&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jan 2002</p>
+<a name="355"><h3>355.&nbsp;Operational semantics for a.back()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.sequence.reqmts"> [lib.sequence.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Yaroslav Mironov&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jan 2002</p>
<p>Table 68 "Optional Sequence Operations" in 23.1.1/12
specifies operational semantics for "a.back()" as
@@ -10997,7 +11001,7 @@ LWG would like a new issue opened.]</i></p>
<hr>
<a name="358"><h3>358.&nbsp;interpreting <tt>thousands_sep</tt> after a <tt>decimal_point</tt>
-</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Mar 2002</p>
+</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.get.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.get.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Mar 2002</p>
<p>
I don't think <tt>thousands_sep</tt> is being treated correctly after
decimal_point has been seen. Since grouping applies only to the
@@ -11043,7 +11047,7 @@ Change the first sentence of 22.2.2.1.2, p9 from
support for such conventions, we need to do so explicitly.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="359"><h3>359.&nbsp;num_put&lt;&gt;::do_put (..., bool) undocumented</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.members"> [lib.facet.num.put.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Mar 2002</p>
+<a name="359"><h3>359.&nbsp;num_put&lt;&gt;::do_put (..., bool) undocumented</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.2.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.members"> [lib.facet.num.put.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Mar 2002</p>
<p>22.2.2.2.1, p1:</p>
<pre> iter_type put (iter_type out, ios_base&amp; str, char_type fill,
@@ -11089,11 +11093,11 @@ I think the least invasive change to fix it would be something like
the following:
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, just above paragraph 1, remove
+<p>In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, just above paragraph 1, remove
the <tt>bool</tt> overload.</p>
<p>
-In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, p23, make the following changes
+In 22.2.2.2.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.facet.num.put.virtuals"> [lib.facet.num.put.virtuals]</a>, p23, make the following changes
</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -11128,7 +11132,7 @@ This fixes a couple of obvious typos, and also fixes what appears to
be a requirement of gratuitous inefficiency.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="360"><h3>360.&nbsp;locale mandates inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Mar 2002</p>
+<a name="360"><h3>360.&nbsp;locale mandates inefficient implementation</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale"> [lib.locale]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;12 Mar 2002</p>
<p>
22.1.1, p7 (copied below) allows iostream formatters and extractors
to make assumptions about the values returned from facet members.
@@ -11164,7 +11168,7 @@ prevents locale from being implemented efficiently.
<p>This change is reasonable becuase it clarifies the intent of this
part of the standard.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="363"></a><h3><a name="363">363.&nbsp;Missing exception specification in 27.4.2.1.1</a></h3><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown and Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 May 2002</p>
+<a name="363"><h3>363.&nbsp;Missing exception specification in 27.4.2.1.1</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.2.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios::failure"> [lib.ios::failure]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown and Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 May 2002</p>
<p>
The destructor of ios_base::failure should have an empty throw
specification, because the destructor of its base class, exception, is
@@ -11177,9 +11181,9 @@ declared in this way.
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious glitch. This is almost editorial.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="364"><h3>364.&nbsp;Inconsistent wording in 27.5.2.4.2</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown, Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 May 2002</p>
+<a name="364"><h3>364.&nbsp;Inconsistent wording in 27.5.2.4.2</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown, Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 May 2002</p>
<p>
-27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> paragraph 1 is inconsistent with the Effects
+27.5.2.4.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.streambuf.virt.buffer"> [lib.streambuf.virt.buffer]</a> paragraph 1 is inconsistent with the Effects
clause for seekoff.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
@@ -11209,7 +11213,7 @@ for each class derived from basic_streambuf in this clause
the existing wording and what's in the proposed resolution, but the
change may make the intent clearer.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="365"><h3>365.&nbsp;Lack of const-qualification in clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown, Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 May 2002</p>
+<a name="365"><h3>365.&nbsp;Lack of const-qualification in clause 27</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.input.output"> [lib.input.output]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Walter Brown, Marc Paterno&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 May 2002</p>
<p>
Some stream and streambuf member functions are declared non-const,
even thought they appear only to report information rather than to
@@ -11220,7 +11224,7 @@ document N1360 for details and rationale.
<p>The list of member functions under discussion: <tt>in_avail</tt>,
<tt>showmanyc</tt>, <tt>tellg</tt>, <tt>tellp</tt>, <tt>is_open</tt>.</p>
-<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a></p>
+<p>Related issue: <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a></p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>In 27.8.1.5, 27.8.1.7, 27.8.1.8, 27.8.1.10, 27.8.1.11, and 27.8.1.13</p>
@@ -11233,7 +11237,7 @@ document N1360 for details and rationale.
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Of the changes proposed in N1360, the only one that is safe is
changing the filestreams' is_open to const. The LWG believed that
-this was NAD the first time it considered this issue (issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a>), but now thinks otherwise. The corresponding streambuf
+this was NAD the first time it considered this issue (issue <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-closed.html#73">73</a>), but now thinks otherwise. The corresponding streambuf
member function, after all,is already const.</p>
<p>The other proposed changes are less safe, because some streambuf
@@ -11248,8 +11252,8 @@ state exposed by the public interface is unchanged.</p>
way by providing both overloads; this would be a conforming extension.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="370"><h3>370.&nbsp;Minor error in basic_istream::get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Jul 2002</p>
-<p>Defect report for description of basic_istream::get (section 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), paragraph 15. The description for the get function
+<a name="370"><h3>370.&nbsp;Minor error in basic_istream::get</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Jul 2002</p>
+<p>Defect report for description of basic_istream::get (section 27.6.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.unformatted"> [lib.istream.unformatted]</a>), paragraph 15. The description for the get function
with the following signature:</p>
<pre> basic_istream&lt;charT,traits&gt;&amp; get(basic_streambuf&lt;char_type,traits&gt;&amp;
@@ -11279,26 +11283,26 @@ with the following signature:</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious typo.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="373"><h3>373.&nbsp;Are basic_istream and basic_ostream to use (exceptions()&amp;badbit) != 0 ?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Keith Baker&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 2002</p>
+<a name="373"><h3>373.&nbsp;Are basic_istream and basic_ostream to use (exceptions()&amp;badbit) != 0 ?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Keith Baker&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;23 Jul 2002</p>
<p>
-In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>
+In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>
(exception()&amp;badbit) != 0 is used in testing for rethrow, yet
-exception() is the constructor to class std::exception in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> that has no return type. Should member function
-exceptions() found in 27.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios"> [lib.ios]</a> be used instead?
+exception() is the constructor to class std::exception in 18.6.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.exception"> [lib.exception]</a> that has no return type. Should member function
+exceptions() found in 27.4.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ios"> [lib.ios]</a> be used instead?
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, change
+In 27.6.1.2.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.istream.formatted.reqmts]</a> and 27.6.2.5.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts"> [lib.ostream.formatted.reqmts]</a>, change
"(exception()&amp;badbit) != 0" to "(exceptions()&amp;badbit) != 0".
</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious typo.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="375"><h3>375.&nbsp;basic_ios should be ios_base in 27.7.1.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Aug 2002</p>
+<a name="375"><h3>375.&nbsp;basic_ios should be ios_base in 27.7.1.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;14 Aug 2002</p>
<p>
-In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>: Table 90, Table 91, and paragraph
+In Section 27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>: Table 90, Table 91, and paragraph
14 all contain references to "basic_ios::" which should be
"ios_base::".
</p>
@@ -11310,7 +11314,7 @@ paragraph 14 to "ios_base".
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious typo.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="379"><h3>379.&nbsp;nonsensical ctype::do_widen() requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Sep 2002</p>
+<a name="379"><h3>379.&nbsp;nonsensical ctype::do_widen() requirement</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Sep 2002</p>
<p>
The last sentence in 22.2.1.1.2, p11 below doesn't seem to make sense.
</p>
@@ -11338,7 +11342,7 @@ footnote 224.)
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-Replace the last sentence of 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p11 with the
+Replace the last sentence of 22.2.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.ctype.virtuals"> [lib.locale.ctype.virtuals]</a>, p11 with the
following text:
</p>
<pre> For any named ctype category with a ctype&lt;char&gt; facet ctc
@@ -11351,9 +11355,9 @@ following text:
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG believes this is just a typo, and that this is the correct fix.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="380"><h3>380.&nbsp;typos in codecvt tables 53 and 54</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Sep 2002</p>
+<a name="380"><h3>380.&nbsp;typos in codecvt tables 53 and 54</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Sep 2002</p>
<p>
-Tables 53 and 54 in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> are both titled "convert
+Tables 53 and 54 in 22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a> are both titled "convert
result values," when surely "do_in/do_out result values" must have
been intended for Table 53 and "do_unshift result values" for Table
54.
@@ -11378,7 +11382,7 @@ heading Meaning, to "space for more than (to_limit - to) destination
elements was needed to terminate a sequence given the value of state."
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="381"><h3>381.&nbsp;detection of invalid mbstate_t in codecvt</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Sep 2002</p>
+<a name="381"><h3>381.&nbsp;detection of invalid mbstate_t in codecvt</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.2.1.5.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals"> [lib.locale.codecvt.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;6 Sep 2002</p>
<p>
All but one codecvt member functions that take a state_type argument
list as one of their preconditions that the state_type argument have
@@ -11428,7 +11432,7 @@ behavior. Implementations that do choose to detect invalid state
values, or that choose to detect any other kind of error, may return
<b>error</b> as an indication.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="383"><h3>383.&nbsp;Bidirectional iterator assertion typo</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;ysapir (submitted via comp.std.c++)&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Oct 2002</p>
+<a name="383"><h3>383.&nbsp;Bidirectional iterator assertion typo</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.bidirectional.iterators"> [lib.bidirectional.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;ysapir (submitted via comp.std.c++)&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Oct 2002</p>
<p>
Following a discussion on the boost list regarding end iterators and
the possibility of performing operator--() on them, it seems to me
@@ -11440,8 +11444,8 @@ with that discussion.
I have checked this newsgroup, as well as attempted a search of the
Active/Defect/Closed Issues List on the site for the words "s is
derefer" so I believe this has not been proposed before. Furthermore,
-the "Lists by Index" mentions only DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> on section
-24.1.4, and DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> is not related to this issue.
+the "Lists by Index" mentions only DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> on section
+24.1.4, and DR <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#299">299</a> is not related to this issue.
</p>
<p>
@@ -11485,7 +11489,7 @@ Change the guarantee to "postcondition: r is dereferenceable."
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious typo</p>
<hr>
-<a name="389"><h3>389.&nbsp;Const overload of valarray::operator[] returns by value</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Gabriel Dos Reis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Nov 2002</p>
+<a name="389"><h3>389.&nbsp;Const overload of valarray::operator[] returns by value</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Gabriel Dos Reis&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;8 Nov 2002</p>
<p>Consider the following program:</p>
<pre> #include &lt;iostream&gt;
#include &lt;ostream&gt;
@@ -11525,8 +11529,8 @@ integration within programs written in C++. There is no reason why
subscripting an expression of type valarray&lt;T&gt; that is const-qualified
should not return a const T&amp;.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In the class synopsis in 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>, and in
-26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a> just above paragraph 1, change</p>
+<p>In the class synopsis in 26.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.template.valarray"> [lib.template.valarray]</a>, and in
+26.3.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.valarray.access"> [lib.valarray.access]</a> just above paragraph 1, change</p>
<pre> T operator[](size_t const);
</pre>
<p>to</p>
@@ -11543,28 +11547,28 @@ integrated with libraries in other languages, and return by value
defeats that purpose. It is believed that this change will have no
impact on allowable optimizations.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="391"><h3>391.&nbsp;non-member functions specified as const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Dec 2002</p>
+<a name="391"><h3>391.&nbsp;non-member functions specified as const</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Dec 2002</p>
<p>
The specifications of toupper and tolower both specify the functions as
const, althought they are not member functions, and are not specified as
-const in the header file synopsis in section 22.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locales"> [lib.locales]</a>.
+const in the header file synopsis in section 22.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locales"> [lib.locales]</a>.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In 22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a>, remove <tt>const</tt> from the function
+<p>In 22.1.3.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.conversions"> [lib.conversions]</a>, remove <tt>const</tt> from the function
declarations of std::toupper and std::tolower</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Fixes an obvious typo</p>
<hr>
-<a name="395"><h3>395.&nbsp;inconsistencies in the definitions of rand() and random_shuffle()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jan 2003</p>
+<a name="395"><h3>395.&nbsp;inconsistencies in the definitions of rand() and random_shuffle()</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;James Kanze&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 Jan 2003</p>
<p>
-In 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>, the C++ standard refers to the C standard for the
+In 26.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-numerics.html#lib.c.math"> [lib.c.math]</a>, the C++ standard refers to the C standard for the
definition of rand(); in the C standard, it is written that "The
implementation shall behave as if no library function calls the rand
function."
</p>
<p>
-In 25.2.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.random.shuffle"> [lib.alg.random.shuffle]</a>, there is no specification as to
+In 25.2.11 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.random.shuffle"> [lib.alg.random.shuffle]</a>, there is no specification as to
how the two parameter version of the function generates its random
value. I believe that all current implementations in fact call rand()
(in contradiction with the requirement avove); if an implementation does
@@ -11595,9 +11599,9 @@ implementation is permitted to use <tt>rand</tt>.]
problem if the number of elements in the sequence is greater than
RAND_MAX.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="400"><h3>400.&nbsp;redundant type cast in lib.allocator.members</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2003</p>
+<a name="400"><h3>400.&nbsp;redundant type cast in lib.allocator.members</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2003</p>
<p>
-20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> allocator members, contains
+20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> allocator members, contains
the following 3 lines:
</p>
@@ -11617,16 +11621,16 @@ Replace "((T*) p)" with "p".
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>Just a typo, this is really editorial.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="402"><h3>402.&nbsp;wrong new expression in [some_]allocator::construct</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>, &nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2003</p>
+<a name="402"><h3>402.&nbsp;wrong new expression in [some_]allocator::construct</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>, 20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a>, &nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Markus Mauhart&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;27 Feb 2003</p>
<p>
This applies to the new expression that is contained in both par12 of
-20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> and in par2 (table 32) of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>.
+20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> and in par2 (table 32) of 20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a>.
I think this new expression is wrong, involving unintended side
effects.
</p>
-<p>20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> contains the following 3 lines:</p>
+<p>20.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.members"> [lib.allocator.members]</a> contains the following 3 lines:</p>
<pre> 11 Returns: the largest value N for which the call allocate(N,0) might succeed.
void construct(pointer p, const_reference val);
@@ -11634,7 +11638,7 @@ effects.
</pre>
-<p>20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> in table 32 has the following line:</p>
+<p>20.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.allocator.requirements"> [lib.allocator.requirements]</a> in table 32 has the following line:</p>
<pre> a.construct(p,t) Effect: new((void*)p) T(t)
</pre>
@@ -11669,34 +11673,34 @@ probably must think about it.
Replace "new" with "::new" in both cases.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="403"><h3>403.&nbsp;basic_string::swap should not throw exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Mar 2003</p>
+<a name="403"><h3>403.&nbsp;basic_string::swap should not throw exceptions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Beman Dawes&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;25 Mar 2003</p>
<p>
-std::basic_string, 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 2 says that
+std::basic_string, 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 2 says that
basic_string "conforms to the requirements of a Sequence, as specified
in (23.1.1)." The sequence requirements specified in (23.1.1) to not
include any prohibition on swap members throwing exceptions.
</p>
<p>
-Section 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 does limit conditions under
+Section 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 does limit conditions under
which exceptions may be thrown, but applies only to "all container
types defined in this clause" and so excludes basic_string::swap
because it is defined elsewhere.
</p>
<p>
-Eric Niebler points out that 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 5 explicitly
+Eric Niebler points out that 21.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.basic.string"> [lib.basic.string]</a> paragraph 5 explicitly
permits basic_string::swap to invalidates iterators, which is
-disallowed by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10. Thus the standard would
+disallowed by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10. Thus the standard would
be contradictory if it were read or extended to read as having
-basic_string meet 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 requirements.
+basic_string meet 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 requirements.
</p>
<p>
Yet several LWG members have expressed the belief that the original
intent was that basic_string::swap should not throw exceptions as
-specified by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10, and that the standard is
+specified by 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10, and that the standard is
unclear on this issue. The complexity of basic_string::swap is
specified as "constant time", indicating the intent was to avoid
copying (which could cause a bad_alloc or other exception). An
@@ -11706,7 +11710,7 @@ exception-safe code.
<p>
Note: There remains long standing concern over whether or not it is
-possible to reasonably meet the 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 swap
+possible to reasonably meet the 23.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.container.requirements"> [lib.container.requirements]</a> paragraph 10 swap
requirements when allocators are unequal. The specification of
basic_string::swap exception requirements is in no way intended to
address, prejudice, or otherwise impact that concern.
@@ -11718,14 +11722,14 @@ address, prejudice, or otherwise impact that concern.
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a>, add a throws clause:
+In 21.3.5.8 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::swap"> [lib.string::swap]</a>, add a throws clause:
</p>
<p>
Throws: Shall not throw exceptions.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="404"><h3>404.&nbsp;May a replacement allocation function be declared inline?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2003</p>
+<a name="404"><h3>404.&nbsp;May a replacement allocation function be declared inline?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete"> [lib.new.delete]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Apr 2003</p>
<p>
The eight basic dynamic memory allocation functions (single-object
and array versions of ::operator new and ::operator delete, in the
@@ -11736,15 +11740,15 @@ in preference to the implementation's definition.
<p>
Three different parts of the standard mention requirements on
-replacement functions: 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a>
-and 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>, and 3.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/basic.html#basic.stc.dynamic"> [basic.stc.dynamic]</a>.
+replacement functions: 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a>, 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a>
+and 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.array"> [lib.new.delete.array]</a>, and 3.7.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/basic.html#basic.stc.dynamic"> [basic.stc.dynamic]</a>.
</p>
<p>None of these three places say whether a replacement function may
- be declared inline. 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> paragraph 2 specifies a
+ be declared inline. 18.4.1.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.new.delete.single"> [lib.new.delete.single]</a> paragraph 2 specifies a
signature for the replacement function, but that's not enough:
the <tt>inline</tt> specifier is not part of a function's signature.
- One might also reason from 7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/dcl.html#dcl.fct.spec"> [dcl.fct.spec]</a> paragraph 2, which
+ One might also reason from 7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/dcl.html#dcl.fct.spec"> [dcl.fct.spec]</a> paragraph 2, which
requires that "an inline function shall be defined in every
translation unit in which it is used," but this may not be quite
specific enough either. We should either explicitly allow or
@@ -11752,7 +11756,7 @@ and 18.4.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/li
functions.</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-Add a new sentence to the end of 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 3:
+Add a new sentence to the end of 17.4.3.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-intro.html#lib.replacement.functions"> [lib.replacement.functions]</a> paragraph 3:
"The program's definitions shall not be specified as <tt>inline</tt>.
No diagnostic is required."
</p>
@@ -11768,16 +11772,16 @@ Providing this functionality would be difficult in some cases, and is
believed to be of limited value.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="405"><h3>405.&nbsp;qsort and POD</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;08 Apr 2003</p>
+<a name="405"><h3>405.&nbsp;qsort and POD</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Ray Lischner&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;08 Apr 2003</p>
<p>
-Section 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> describes bsearch and qsort, from the C
+Section 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> describes bsearch and qsort, from the C
standard library. Paragraph 4 does not list any restrictions on qsort,
but it should limit the base parameter to point to POD. Presumably,
qsort sorts the array by copying bytes, which requires POD.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> paragraph 4, just after the declarations and
+In 25.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.c.library"> [lib.alg.c.library]</a> paragraph 4, just after the declarations and
before the nonnormative note, add these words: "both of which have the
same behavior as the original declaration. The behavior is undefined
unless the objects in the array pointed to by <i>base</i> are of POD
@@ -11787,9 +11791,9 @@ type."
<p><i>[Something along these lines is clearly necessary. Matt
provided wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="407"><h3>407.&nbsp;Can singular iterators be destroyed?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 June 2003</p>
+<a name="407"><h3>407.&nbsp;Can singular iterators be destroyed?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Nathan Myers&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;3 June 2003</p>
<p>
-Clause 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, paragraph 5, says that the only expression
+Clause 24.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.iterator.requirements"> [lib.iterator.requirements]</a>, paragraph 5, says that the only expression
that is defined for a singular iterator is "an assignment of a
non-singular value to an iterator that holds a singular value". This
means that destroying a singular iterator (e.g. letting an automatic
@@ -11803,16 +11807,16 @@ destroying an iterator that holds a singular value, or the assignment
of a non-singular value to an iterator that holds a singular value."
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="410"><h3>410.&nbsp;Missing semantics for stack and queue comparison operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>, 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans Bos&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Jun 2003</p>
+<a name="410"><h3>410.&nbsp;Missing semantics for stack and queue comparison operators</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>, 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Hans Bos&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Jun 2003</p>
<p>
-Sections 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> list
+Sections 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> and 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a> list
comparison operators (==, !=, &lt;, &lt;=, &gt;, =&gt;) for queue and
-stack. Only the semantics for queue::operator== (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> par2) and queue::operator&lt; (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>
+stack. Only the semantics for queue::operator== (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a> par2) and queue::operator&lt; (23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>
par3) are defined.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Add the following new paragraphs after 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>
+<p>Add the following new paragraphs after 23.2.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.queue"> [lib.queue]</a>
paragraph 3:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -11835,7 +11839,7 @@ par3) are defined.
</blockquote>
-<p>Add the following paragraphs at the end of 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a>:</p>
+<p>Add the following paragraphs at the end of 23.2.3.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.stack"> [lib.stack]</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
@@ -11872,9 +11876,9 @@ par3) are defined.
There isn't any real doubt about what these operators are
supposed to do, but we ought to spell it out.
<hr>
-<a name="411"><h3>411.&nbsp;Wrong names of set member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Daniel Frey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Jul 2003</p>
+<a name="411"><h3>411.&nbsp;Wrong names of set member functions</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Daniel Frey&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;9 Jul 2003</p>
<p>
-25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> paragraph 1 reads:
+25.3.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.set.operations"> [lib.alg.set.operations]</a> paragraph 1 reads:
"The semantics of the set operations are generalized to multisets in a
standard way by defining union() to contain the maximum number of
occurrences of every element, intersection() to contain the minimum, and
@@ -11888,9 +11892,9 @@ set_intersection(), not union() and intersection().
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>Change that sentence to use the correct names.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="412"><h3>412.&nbsp;Typo in 27.4.4.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jul 2003</p>
+<a name="412"><h3>412.&nbsp;Typo in 27.4.4.3</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;10 Jul 2003</p>
<p>
-The Effects clause in 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5 says that the
+The Effects clause in 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5 says that the
function only throws if the respective bits are already set prior to
the function call. That's obviously not the intent. The typo ought to
be corrected and the text reworded as: "If (<i>state</i> &amp;
@@ -11898,7 +11902,7 @@ exceptions()) == 0, returns. ..."
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5, replace "If (rdstate() &amp;
+In 27.4.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.iostate.flags"> [lib.iostate.flags]</a> paragraph 5, replace "If (rdstate() &amp;
exceptions()) == 0" with "If ((state | (rdbuf() ? goodbit : badbit))
&amp; exceptions()) == 0".
</p>
@@ -11910,7 +11914,7 @@ exceptions()) == 0" with "If ((state | (rdbuf() ? goodbit : badbit))
latter, of course. Post-Kona: Martin provided wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="414"><h3>414.&nbsp;Which iterators are invalidated by v.erase()?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Aug 2003</p>
+<a name="414"><h3>414.&nbsp;Which iterators are invalidated by v.erase()?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Matt Austern&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;19 Aug 2003</p>
<p>
Consider the following code fragment:
</p>
@@ -11959,7 +11963,7 @@ techniques.)
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 3, change "Invalidates all the
+In 23.2.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-containers.html#lib.vector.modifiers"> [lib.vector.modifiers]</a> paragraph 3, change "Invalidates all the
iterators and references after the point of the erase" to
"Invalidates iterators and references at or after the point of the
erase".
@@ -11971,7 +11975,7 @@ erase".
and references in parallel, and it would seem counterintuitive to
say that a reference to an erased value remains valid.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="415"><h3>415.&nbsp;behavior of std::ws</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="415"><h3>415.&nbsp;behavior of std::ws</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
According to 27.6.1.4, the ws() manipulator is not required to construct
the sentry object. The manipulator is also not a member function so the
@@ -11984,7 +11988,7 @@ doesn't affect the stream's gcount).
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-Add to 27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a>, immediately before the first sentence
+Add to 27.6.1.4 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.istream.manip"> [lib.istream.manip]</a>, immediately before the first sentence
of paragraph 1, the following text:
</p>
@@ -11999,7 +12003,7 @@ of paragraph 1, the following text:
<p><i>[Post-Kona: Martin provided wording]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="420"><h3>420.&nbsp;is std::FILE a complete type?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="420"><h3>420.&nbsp;is std::FILE a complete type?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
7.19.1, p2, of C99 requires that the FILE type only be declared in
&lt;stdio.h&gt;. None of the (implementation-defined) members of the
@@ -12012,14 +12016,14 @@ it really the intent that FILE be a complete type or is an implementation
allowed to just declare it without providing a full definition?
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>In the first sentence of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> paragraph 2, change
+<p>In the first sentence of 27.8.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fstreams"> [lib.fstreams]</a> paragraph 2, change
"defined" to "declared".</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>We don't want to impose any restrictions beyond what the C standard
already says. We don't want to make anything implementation defined,
because that imposes new requirements in implementations.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="425"><h3>425.&nbsp;return value of std::get_temporary_buffer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="425"><h3>425.&nbsp;return value of std::get_temporary_buffer</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The standard is not clear about the requirements on the value returned from
a call to get_temporary_buffer(0). In particular, it fails to specify whether
@@ -12029,12 +12033,12 @@ malloc). The standard also fails to mention what the required behavior
is when the argument is less than 0.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Change 20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a> paragraph 2 from "...or a pair of 0
+<p>Change 20.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-utilities.html#lib.temporary.buffer"> [lib.temporary.buffer]</a> paragraph 2 from "...or a pair of 0
values if no storage can be obtained" to "...or a pair of 0 values if
no storage can be obtained or if <i>n</i> &lt;= 0."</p>
<p><i>[Kona: Matt provided wording]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="426"><h3>426.&nbsp;search_n(), fill_n(), and generate_n() with negative n</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.search"> [lib.alg.search]</a>, 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a>, 25.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.generate"> [lib.alg.generate]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="426"><h3>426.&nbsp;search_n(), fill_n(), and generate_n() with negative n</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;25.1.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.search"> [lib.alg.search]</a>, 25.2.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.fill"> [lib.alg.fill]</a>, 25.2.6 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-algorithms.html#lib.alg.generate"> [lib.alg.generate]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
The complexity requirements for these function templates are incorrect
(or don't even make sense) for negative n:</p>
@@ -12101,7 +12105,7 @@ or 0 otherwise) assignments.
so). The LWG considered and rejected the alternative of saying that
negative numbers are undefined behavior.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="428"><h3>428.&nbsp;string::erase(iterator) validity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="428"><h3>428.&nbsp;string::erase(iterator) validity</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Sep 2003</p>
<p>
23.1.1, p3 along with Table 67 specify as a prerequisite for a.erase(q)
that q must be a valid dereferenceable iterator into the sequence a.
@@ -12117,7 +12121,7 @@ This may be interepreted as a relaxation of the general requirement,
which is most likely not the intent.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
-<p>Remove 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> paragraph 5.</p>
+<p>Remove 21.3.5.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string::erase"> [lib.string::erase]</a> paragraph 5.</p>
<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG considered two options: changing the string requirements to
match the general container requirements, or just removing the
@@ -12125,7 +12129,7 @@ which is most likely not the intent.
option, on the grounds that duplicating text always risks the
possibility that it might be duplicated incorrectly.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="432"><h3>432.&nbsp;stringbuf::overflow() makes only one write position available</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Christian W Brock&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Sep 2003</p>
+<a name="432"><h3>432.&nbsp;stringbuf::overflow() makes only one write position available</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.7.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.virtuals"> [lib.stringbuf.virtuals]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Christian W Brock&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;24 Sep 2003</p>
<p>27.7.1.3 par 8 says:</p>
<blockquote>
Notes: The function can make a write position available only if
@@ -12340,7 +12344,7 @@ newoff + off to the next pointer xnext .
<blockquote>
<p>
-12- _ If (newoff + off) &lt; 0, or if (newoff + off) refers to an
-uninitialized character (as defined in 27.7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.members"> [lib.stringbuf.members]</a>
+uninitialized character (as defined in 27.7.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.stringbuf.members"> [lib.stringbuf.members]</a>
paragraph 1), the positioning operation fails. Otherwise, the function
assigns xbeg + newoff + off to the next pointer xnext .
</p>
@@ -12396,7 +12400,7 @@ longer allowable since [pbase(), epptr()) may now contain
uninitialized characters. Positioning is only allowable over the
initialized range.</p>
<hr>
-<a name="435"><h3>435.&nbsp;bug in DR 25</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 2003</p>
+<a name="435"><h3>435.&nbsp;bug in DR 25</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;21.3.7.9 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-strings.html#lib.string.io"> [lib.string.io]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 2003</p>
<p>
It has been pointed out that the proposed resolution in DR 25 may not be
@@ -12446,7 +12450,7 @@ iostreams where the operator does truncate).
Benjamin provided wording.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="436"><h3>436.&nbsp;are cv-qualified facet types valid facets?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 2003</p>
+<a name="436"><h3>436.&nbsp;are cv-qualified facet types valid facets?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;22.1.1.1.2 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-locales.html#lib.locale.facet"> [lib.locale.facet]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#WP">WP</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Martin Sebor&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Oct 2003</p>
<p>
Is "const std::ctype&lt;char&gt;" a valid template argument to has_facet, use_facet,
and the locale template ctor? And if so, does it designate the same Facet as
@@ -12469,33 +12473,33 @@ template parameter.</p>
text.]</i></p>
<hr>
-<a name="441"><h3>441.&nbsp;Is fpos::state const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Nov 2003</p>
+<a name="441"><h3>441.&nbsp;Is fpos::state const?</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;17 Nov 2003</p>
<p>
-In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a> fpos&lt;stateT&gt;::state() is declared
-non const, but in section 27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a> it is declared const.
+In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a> fpos&lt;stateT&gt;::state() is declared
+non const, but in section 27.4.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos"> [lib.fpos]</a> it is declared const.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a>, change the declaration of
+In section 27.4.3.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.fpos.members"> [lib.fpos.members]</a>, change the declaration of
<tt>fpos&lt;stateT&gt;::state()</tt> to const.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="442"><h3>442.&nbsp;sentry::operator bool() inconsistent signature</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Nov 2003</p>
+<a name="442"><h3>442.&nbsp;sentry::operator bool() inconsistent signature</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;18 Nov 2003</p>
<p>
-In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, in description part
+In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, in description part
basic_ostream&lt;charT, traits&gt;::sentry::operator bool() is declared
as non const, but in section 27.6.2.3, in synopsis it is declared
const.
</p>
<p><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>
<p>
-In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, change the declaration
+In section 27.6.2.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.ostream::sentry"> [lib.ostream::sentry]</a> paragraph 4, change the declaration
of <tt>sentry::operator bool()</tt> to const.
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="443"><h3>443.&nbsp;filebuf::close() inconsistent use of EOF</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 2003</p>
+<a name="443"><h3>443.&nbsp;filebuf::close() inconsistent use of EOF</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Vincent Leloup&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;20 Nov 2003</p>
<p>
-In section 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> par6, in effects description of
+In section 27.8.1.3 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iostreams.html#lib.filebuf.members"> [lib.filebuf.members]</a> par6, in effects description of
basic_filebuf&lt;charT, traits&gt;::close(), overflow(EOF) is used twice;
should be overflow(traits::eof()).
</p>
@@ -12504,7 +12508,7 @@ should be overflow(traits::eof()).
Change overflow(EOF) to overflow(traits::eof()).
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="448"><h3>448.&nbsp;Random Access Iterators over abstract classes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="448"><h3>448.&nbsp;Random Access Iterators over abstract classes</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;24.1.5 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-iterators.html#lib.random.access.iterators"> [lib.random.access.iterators]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Dave Abrahams&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;7 Jan 2004</p>
<p>
Table 76, the random access iterator requirement table, says that the
return type of a[n] must be "convertible to T". When an iterator's
@@ -12516,7 +12520,7 @@ Surely this isn't an intended restriction?
Change the return type to "convertible to T const&amp;".
</p>
<hr>
-<a name="449"><h3>449.&nbsp;Library Issue 306 Goes Too Far</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Pete Becker&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Jan 2004</p>
+<a name="449"><h3>449.&nbsp;Library Issue 306 Goes Too Far</h3></a><p><b>Section:</b>&nbsp;18.1 <a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lib-support.html#lib.support.types"> [lib.support.types]</a>&nbsp; <b>Status:</b>&nbsp;<a href="http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#DR">DR</a>&nbsp; <b>Submitter:</b>&nbsp;Pete Becker&nbsp; <b>Date:</b>&nbsp;15 Jan 2004</p>
<p>Original text:</p>
<blockquote>
The macro offsetof accepts a restricted set of type arguments in this