diff options
author | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | 2021-04-09 16:43:50 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> | 2021-04-10 00:06:55 -0400 |
commit | e89055f90cff9fb6f565b9374e1ab74f805682fb (patch) | |
tree | 364d0e0c09c1c61b39d4fd657fa515cc033354a5 /libphobos/libdruntime/gcc | |
parent | 3115aba8d856faadaab5c79bc4823a39ebc21bb2 (diff) | |
download | gcc-e89055f90cff9fb6f565b9374e1ab74f805682fb.zip gcc-e89055f90cff9fb6f565b9374e1ab74f805682fb.tar.gz gcc-e89055f90cff9fb6f565b9374e1ab74f805682fb.tar.bz2 |
c++: pack in base-specifier in lambda [PR100006]
Normally cp_parser_base_clause prevents unexpanded packs, but in a lambda
check_for_bare_parameter_packs allows it. Then we weren't finding the
pack when scanning the lambda body.
This doesn't fix a valid variant like
template <class... Ts> void sink (Ts&&...);
template <class... Ts>
void f() {
sink ([] { struct S : Ts { }; }...);
}
int main() {
f<int>();
}
but that's a much bigger project.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/100006
* pt.c (find_parameter_packs_r) [TAG_DEFN]: Look into bases.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/100006
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-variadic13.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'libphobos/libdruntime/gcc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions