diff options
| author | Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> | 2021-10-07 16:21:19 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz> | 2021-10-07 16:21:36 +0200 |
| commit | 1a7d452c092be42a892d00c19561af10f42410b0 (patch) | |
| tree | 1567b220cd7d81038ecf1de08ef8b41dd6b56477 /libjava/testsuite/libjava.compile/Case.java | |
| parent | 2e6e0d86a06389056d0e7fecc99c547420ad787a (diff) | |
| download | gcc-1a7d452c092be42a892d00c19561af10f42410b0.zip gcc-1a7d452c092be42a892d00c19561af10f42410b0.tar.gz gcc-1a7d452c092be42a892d00c19561af10f42410b0.tar.bz2 | |
ipa: Fix ICE when speculating calls from inlined functions (PR 102388)
The code handling various cases which lead to call graph edge
duplication (in order to update reference descriptions used to track
and remove no-longer needed references) has missed one important case.
When edge duplication is an effect of creating a speculative edge for
an indirect edge which carries a constant jump function which had been
created from a pass-through function when the edge caller has was
inlined into one of its callers, the reference description attached to
the function describes an edge higher up in the "inlined" clone tree
and so even the new speculative edge will. Therefore we should not
try to duplicate the reference description itself but rather just bump
the refcount of the existing one.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2021-09-22 Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
PR ipa/102388
* ipa-prop.c (ipa_edge_args_sum_t::duplicate): Also handle the
case when the source reference description corresponds to a
referance taken in a function src->caller is inlined to.
Diffstat (limited to 'libjava/testsuite/libjava.compile/Case.java')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions