diff options
author | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> | 2024-11-04 12:29:01 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jakub Jelinek <jakub@gcc.gnu.org> | 2024-11-04 13:17:35 +0100 |
commit | 72b7bbf9d4482fac6bac81508833e407201e0733 (patch) | |
tree | dcf81a7cbbdfed191b0e1265c521ae96a4e2f74b /libio/stdio | |
parent | 377f81a60ba78dde6c59bc40af46ef8ad3569693 (diff) | |
download | gcc-releases/gcc-14.zip gcc-releases/gcc-14.tar.gz gcc-releases/gcc-14.tar.bz2 |
libstdc++: Fix up 117406.cc test [PR117406]releases/gcc-14
Christophe mentioned in bugzilla that the test FAILs on aarch64,
I'm not including <climits> and use INT_MAX.
Apparently during my testing I got it because the test preinclude
-include bits/stdc++.h
and that includes <climits>, dunno why that didn't happen on aarch64.
In any case, either I can add #include <climits>, or because the
test already has #include <limits> I've changed uses of INT_MAX
with std::numeric_limits<int>::max(), that should be the same thing.
But if you prefer
#include <climits>
I can surely add that instead.
2024-11-04 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR libstdc++/117406
* testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/117406.cc: Use
std::numeric_limits<int>::max() instead of INT_MAX.
(cherry picked from commit afcbf4dd27c147eb7d8f84e1a41c021eddec777e)
Diffstat (limited to 'libio/stdio')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions