aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/libgo
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIan Lance Taylor <ian@gcc.gnu.org>2019-08-17 04:35:37 +0000
committerIan Lance Taylor <ian@gcc.gnu.org>2019-08-17 04:35:37 +0000
commit777c02825229f14cf91c6044827ea42a77ded4a3 (patch)
tree3dd9baeb70c0752889ee56008eb3642fc4d3e76a /libgo
parent7aad42b91897c6b9fa3047efdd8d966a2788c159 (diff)
downloadgcc-777c02825229f14cf91c6044827ea42a77ded4a3.zip
gcc-777c02825229f14cf91c6044827ea42a77ded4a3.tar.gz
gcc-777c02825229f14cf91c6044827ea42a77ded4a3.tar.bz2
runtime: scan write barrier buffer conservatively
In gccgo, we insert the write barriers in the frontend, and so we cannot completely prevent write barriers on stack writes. So it is possible for a bad pointer appearing in the write barrier buffer. When flushing the write barrier, treat it the same as sacnning the stack. In particular, don't mark a pointer if it does not point to an allocated object. We already have similar logic in greyobject. With this, hopefully, we can prevent an unallocated object from being marked completely. Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/gofrontend/+/190599 From-SVN: r274598
Diffstat (limited to 'libgo')
-rw-r--r--libgo/go/runtime/mwbbuf.go9
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/libgo/go/runtime/mwbbuf.go b/libgo/go/runtime/mwbbuf.go
index 4c875ff..a27406e 100644
--- a/libgo/go/runtime/mwbbuf.go
+++ b/libgo/go/runtime/mwbbuf.go
@@ -285,10 +285,17 @@ func wbBufFlush1(_p_ *p) {
// path to reduce the rate of flushes?
continue
}
- obj, span, objIndex := findObject(ptr, 0, 0, false)
+ obj, span, objIndex := findObject(ptr, 0, 0, !usestackmaps)
if obj == 0 {
continue
}
+ if span.isFree(objIndex) {
+ // For gccgo, it is possible that we have a write barrier
+ // writing to unintialized stack memory. So we could see
+ // a bad pointer in the write barrier buffer. Don't mark
+ // it in this case.
+ continue
+ }
// TODO: Consider making two passes where the first
// just prefetches the mark bits.
mbits := span.markBitsForIndex(objIndex)