diff options
| author | Bob Duff <duff@adacore.com> | 2023-01-13 14:48:46 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Marc Poulhiès <poulhies@adacore.com> | 2023-05-15 11:36:43 +0200 |
| commit | d41df0366e6dfbdc3a5a50577462a9b6689ebbfb (patch) | |
| tree | b5926ac57eda5319d83d36786d3ffc79fe55bf52 /libgcc | |
| parent | 0ec72fa3db193354264d8c092da21f29fd473d88 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-d41df0366e6dfbdc3a5a50577462a9b6689ebbfb.zip gcc-d41df0366e6dfbdc3a5a50577462a9b6689ebbfb.tar.gz gcc-d41df0366e6dfbdc3a5a50577462a9b6689ebbfb.tar.bz2 | |
ada: Use Inline aspect instead of pragma in Einfo.Utils
This package was using the Ada 83 renaming idiom for inlining
Next_Component and other Next_... procedures without inlining the
same-named functions. Using the Inline aspect avoids that sort
of horsing around.
We change all the other pragmas Inline in this package to aspects
as well, which is a more-minor improvement. Fix too-long lines
without wrapping lines.
gcc/ada/
* einfo-utils.ads, einfo-utils.adb: Get rid of the Proc_Next_...
procedures. Use Inline aspect instead of pragma Inline.
Is_Discrete_Or_Fixed_Point_Type did not have pragma Inline, but
now has the aspect; this was probably an oversight
(which illustrates why aspects are better).
Diffstat (limited to 'libgcc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions