diff options
| author | Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com> | 2024-07-26 13:02:53 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com> | 2024-07-26 13:02:53 +0100 |
| commit | 29e4e4bdb674118b898d50ce7751c183aa0a44ee (patch) | |
| tree | 3af9b68d2e50229a8a9ac5df80a74266c7596bcc /include/gdb/gdb-index.h | |
| parent | f145f5411609dca5493a6709e8139609b584622f (diff) | |
| download | gcc-29e4e4bdb674118b898d50ce7751c183aa0a44ee.zip gcc-29e4e4bdb674118b898d50ce7751c183aa0a44ee.tar.gz gcc-29e4e4bdb674118b898d50ce7751c183aa0a44ee.tar.bz2 | |
middle-end: check for vector mode before calling get_mask_mode [PR116074]
For historical reasons AArch64 has TI mode vector types but does not consider
TImode a vector mode.
What's happening in the PR is that get_vectype_for_scalar_type is returning
vector(1) TImode for a TImode scalar. This then fails when we call
targetm.vectorize.get_mask_mode (vecmode).exists (&) on the TYPE_MODE.
This checks for vector mode before using the results of
get_vectype_for_scalar_type.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/116074
* tree-vect-patterns.cc (vect_recog_cond_store_pattern): Check vector mode.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/116074
* g++.target/aarch64/pr116074.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'include/gdb/gdb-index.h')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions