diff options
author | Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> | 2018-01-03 11:22:28 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jeff Law <law@gcc.gnu.org> | 2018-01-03 11:22:28 -0700 |
commit | 86aa0691c599e86e966bd1e81e95858a83d5e671 (patch) | |
tree | d956d13e907210786986b283e145f3e97ada7538 /gcc | |
parent | e95e79b628438a978b14c9a0740e0bb8072477e0 (diff) | |
download | gcc-86aa0691c599e86e966bd1e81e95858a83d5e671.zip gcc-86aa0691c599e86e966bd1e81e95858a83d5e671.tar.gz gcc-86aa0691c599e86e966bd1e81e95858a83d5e671.tar.bz2 |
re PR middle-end/83654 (-fstack-clash-protection probes below the stack pointer for VLA with constant size)
PR middle-end/83654
* explow.c (anti_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash): Test a
non-constant residual for zero at runtime and avoid probing in
that case. Reorganize code for trailing problem to mirror handling
of the residual.
PR middle-end/83654
* gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c: New test.
* gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c: New test.
From-SVN: r256182
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/ChangeLog | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/explow.c | 42 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c | 23 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c | 29 |
5 files changed, 91 insertions, 17 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index d95c297..f570eb4 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +2017-01-03 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> + + PR middle-end/83654 + * explow.c (anti_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash): Test a + non-constant residual for zero at runtime and avoid probing in + that case. Reorganize code for trailing problem to mirror handling + of the residual. + 2018-01-03 Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> PR tree-optimization/83501 diff --git a/gcc/explow.c b/gcc/explow.c index b6c5660..042e719 100644 --- a/gcc/explow.c +++ b/gcc/explow.c @@ -1997,11 +1997,27 @@ anti_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash (rtx size) if (residual != CONST0_RTX (Pmode)) { + rtx label = NULL_RTX; + /* RESIDUAL could be zero at runtime and in that case *sp could + hold live data. Furthermore, we do not want to probe into the + red zone. + + Go ahead and just guard the probe at *sp on RESIDUAL != 0 at + runtime if RESIDUAL is not a compile time constant. */ + if (!CONST_INT_P (residual)) + { + label = gen_label_rtx (); + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (residual, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (residual)), + EQ, NULL_RTX, Pmode, 1, label); + } + rtx x = force_reg (Pmode, plus_constant (Pmode, residual, -GET_MODE_SIZE (word_mode))); anti_adjust_stack (residual); emit_stack_probe (gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, x)); emit_insn (gen_blockage ()); + if (!CONST_INT_P (residual)) + emit_label (label); } /* Some targets make optimistic assumptions in their prologues about @@ -2014,28 +2030,20 @@ anti_adjust_stack_and_probe_stack_clash (rtx size) live data. Furthermore, we don't want to probe into the red zone. - Go ahead and just guard a probe at *sp on SIZE != 0 at runtime + Go ahead and just guard the probe at *sp on SIZE != 0 at runtime if SIZE is not a compile time constant. */ - - /* Ideally we would just probe at *sp. However, if SIZE is not - a compile-time constant, but is zero at runtime, then *sp - might hold live data. So probe at *sp if we know that - an allocation was made, otherwise probe into the red zone - which is obviously undesirable. */ - if (CONST_INT_P (size)) - { - emit_stack_probe (stack_pointer_rtx); - emit_insn (gen_blockage ()); - } - else + rtx label = NULL_RTX; + if (!CONST_INT_P (size)) { - rtx label = gen_label_rtx (); + label = gen_label_rtx (); emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (size, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (size)), EQ, NULL_RTX, Pmode, 1, label); - emit_stack_probe (stack_pointer_rtx); - emit_insn (gen_blockage ()); - emit_label (label); } + + emit_stack_probe (stack_pointer_rtx); + emit_insn (gen_blockage ()); + if (!CONST_INT_P (size)) + emit_label (label); } } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 1c21902..7777ee5 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2018-01-03 Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> + + PR middle-end/83654 + * gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c: New test. + * gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c: New test. + 2018-01-03 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com> PR tree-optimization/83501 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6dbff44 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-18.c @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -mtune=generic -fdump-rtl-expand" } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target supports_stack_clash_protection } */ + +int f1 (char *); + +int +f2 (void) +{ + const int size = 4096; + char buffer[size]; + return f1 (buffer); +} + +/* So we want to verify that at expand time that we probed the main + VLA allocation as well as the residuals. Then we want to verify + there was only one probe in the final assembly (implying the + residual probe was optimized away). */ +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "allocation and probing in loop" 1 "expand" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "allocation and probing residuals" 1 "expand" } } */ + +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "or\[ql\]" 1 } } */ + diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b92c126 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/stack-check-19.c @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fstack-clash-protection -mtune=generic -fdump-rtl-expand" } */ +/* { dg-require-effective-target supports_stack_clash_protection } */ + +int f1 (char *); + +int +f2 (const int size) +{ + char buffer[size]; + return f1 (buffer); +} + +/* So we want to verify that at expand time that we probed the main + VLA allocation as well as the residuals. Then we want to verify + there are two probes in the final assembly code. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "allocation and probing in loop" 1 "expand" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "allocation and probing residuals" 1 "expand" } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "or\[ql\]" 2 } } */ + +/* We also want to verify (indirectly) that the residual probe is + guarded. We do that by checking the number of conditional + branches. There should be 3. One that bypasses the probe loop, one + in the probe loop and one that bypasses the residual probe. + + These will all be equality tests. */ +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "(\?:je|jne)" 3 } } */ + + |