aarch64: Don't classify vector pairs as short vectors [PR103094]

In this PR we were wrongly classifying a pair of 8-byte vectors
as a 16-byte “short vector” (in the AAPCS64 sense).  As the
comment in the patch says, this stems from an old condition
in aarch64_short_vector_p that is too loose, but that would
be difficult to tighten now.

We can still do the right thing for the newly-added modes though,
since there are no backwards compatibility concerns there.

Co-authored-by: Tamar Christina <tamar.christina@arm.com>

gcc/
	PR target/103094
	* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_short_vector_p): Return false
	for structure modes, rather than ignoring the type in that case.

gcc/testsuite/
	PR target/103094
	* gcc.target/aarch64/pr103094.c: New test.

2 files changed, 39 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
index f07330c..ff4a808 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
@@ -19299,7 +19299,21 @@ aarch64_short_vector_p (const_tree type,
   else if (GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_INT
 	   || GET_MODE_CLASS (mode) == MODE_VECTOR_FLOAT)
     {
-      /* Rely only on the type, not the mode, when processing SVE types.  */
+      /* The containing "else if" is too loose: it means that we look at TYPE
+	 if the type is a vector type (good), but that we otherwise ignore TYPE
+	 and look only at the mode.  This is wrong because the type describes
+	 the language-level information whereas the mode is purely an internal
+	 GCC concept.  We can therefore reach here for types that are not
+	 vectors in the AAPCS64 sense.
+
+	 We can't "fix" that for the traditional Advanced SIMD vector modes
+	 without breaking backwards compatibility.  However, there's no such
+	 baggage for the structure modes, which were introduced in GCC 12.  */
+      if (aarch64_advsimd_struct_mode_p (mode))
+	return false;
+
+      /* For similar reasons, rely only on the type, not the mode, when
+	 processing SVE types.  */
       if (type && aarch64_some_values_include_pst_objects_p (type))
 	/* Leave later code to report an error if SVE is disabled.  */
 	gcc_assert (!TARGET_SVE || aarch64_sve_mode_p (mode));
@@ -19310,7 +19324,8 @@ aarch64_short_vector_p (const_tree type,
     {
       /* 64-bit and 128-bit vectors should only acquire an SVE mode if
 	 they are being treated as scalable AAPCS64 types.  */
-      gcc_assert (!aarch64_sve_mode_p (mode));
+      gcc_assert (!aarch64_sve_mode_p (mode)
+		  && !aarch64_advsimd_struct_mode_p (mode));
       return true;
     }
   return false;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr103094.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr103094.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..beda99d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/pr103094.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fdump-rtl-expand -w" } */
+
+#include <arm_neon.h>
+
+void foo (uint8x8x2_t cols_01_23, uint8x8x2_t cols_45_67, uint16_t*
+outptr0) {
+  uint16x4x4_t cols_01_23_45_67 = { {
+    vreinterpret_u16_u8(cols_01_23.val[0]),
+    vreinterpret_u16_u8(cols_01_23.val[1]),
+    vreinterpret_u16_u8(cols_45_67.val[0]),
+    vreinterpret_u16_u8(cols_45_67.val[1])
+  } };
+
+  vst4_lane_u16(outptr0, cols_01_23_45_67, 0); }
+
+/* Check that we expand to v0 and v2 from the function arguments.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump {\(reg:V2x8QI \d+ v0 \[ cols_01_23
+\]\)} expand } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump {\(reg:V2x8QI \d+ v2 \[ cols_45_67
+\]\)} expand } } */
+