aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2022-06-03 09:08:41 -0400
committerPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2022-06-03 09:08:41 -0400
commitdf4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562 (patch)
tree7d9eefc872aebaaafc6c3a8c28cfd0b22fa98d80 /gcc
parent1982fe2692b6c3b7f969ffc4edac59f9d4359e91 (diff)
downloadgcc-df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562.zip
gcc-df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562.tar.gz
gcc-df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562.tar.bz2
c++: find_template_parameters and PARM_DECLs [PR105797]
As explained in r11-4959-gde6f64f9556ae3, the atom cache assumes two equivalent expressions (according to cp_tree_equal) must use the same template parameters (according to find_template_parameters). This assumption turned out to not hold for TARGET_EXPR, which was addressed by that commit. But this assumption apparently doesn't hold for PARM_DECL either: find_template_parameters walks its DECL_CONTEXT but cp_tree_equal by default doesn't consider DECL_CONTEXT unless comparing_specializations is set. Thus in the first testcase below, the atomic constraints of #1 and #2 are equivalent according to cp_tree_equal, but according to find_template_parameters the former uses T and the latter uses both T and U (surprisingly). We could fix this assumption violation by setting comparing_specializations in the atom_hasher, which would make cp_tree_equal return false for the two atoms, but that seems overly pessimistic here. Ideally the atoms should continue being considered equivalent and we instead fix find_template_paremeters to return just T for #2's atom. To that end this patch makes for_each_template_parm_r stop walking the DECL_CONTEXT of a PARM_DECL. This should be safe to do because tsubst_copy / tsubst_decl only substitutes the TREE_TYPE of a PARM_DECL and doesn't bother substituting the DECL_CONTEXT, thus the only relevant template parameters are those used in its type. any_template_parm_r is currently responsible for walking its TREE_TYPE, but I suppose it now makes sense for for_each_template_parm_r to do so instead. In passing this patch also makes for_each_template_parm_r stop walking the DECL_CONTEXT of a VAR_/FUNCTION_DECL since doing so after walking DECL_TI_ARGS is redundant, I think. I experimented with not walking DECL_CONTEXT for CONST_DECL, but the second testcase below demonstrates it's necessary to walk it. PR c++/105797 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * pt.cc (for_each_template_parm_r) <case FUNCTION_DECL, VAR_DECL>: Don't walk DECL_CONTEXT. <case PARM_DECL>: Likewise. Walk TREE_TYPE. <case CONST_DECL>: Simplify. (any_template_parm_r) <case PARM_DECL>: Don't walk TREE_TYPE. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C: New test. * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/pt.cc10
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C16
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C12
3 files changed, 33 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
index 836861e..d0c4c98 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
@@ -10561,11 +10561,14 @@ for_each_template_parm_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *d)
case VAR_DECL:
if (DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (t) && DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (t))
WALK_SUBTREE (DECL_TI_ARGS (t));
- /* Fall through. */
+ break;
case PARM_DECL:
+ WALK_SUBTREE (TREE_TYPE (t));
+ break;
+
case CONST_DECL:
- if (TREE_CODE (t) == CONST_DECL && DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t))
+ if (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t))
WALK_SUBTREE (DECL_INITIAL (t));
if (DECL_CONTEXT (t)
&& pfd->include_nondeduced_p)
@@ -10824,9 +10827,6 @@ any_template_parm_r (tree t, void *data)
break;
case TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX:
- case PARM_DECL:
- /* A parameter or constraint variable may also depend on a template
- parameter without explicitly naming it. */
WALK_SUBTREE (TREE_TYPE (t));
break;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6683d22
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/105797
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<class T>
+concept C = requires { T(); };
+
+template<class T>
+void f(T v) requires C<decltype(v)>; // #1
+
+template<class T, class U>
+void f(T v) requires C<decltype(v)>; // #2
+
+int main() {
+ f<int, int>(0);
+ f<int>(0);
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..beb30d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template<int I>
+struct A {
+ enum E { e = I };
+ static void f() requires (e != 0);
+};
+
+int main() {
+ A<1>::f();
+ A<0>::f(); // { dg-error "no match" }
+}