diff options
author | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2022-06-03 09:08:41 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2022-06-03 09:08:41 -0400 |
commit | df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562 (patch) | |
tree | 7d9eefc872aebaaafc6c3a8c28cfd0b22fa98d80 /gcc | |
parent | 1982fe2692b6c3b7f969ffc4edac59f9d4359e91 (diff) | |
download | gcc-df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562.zip gcc-df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562.tar.gz gcc-df4f95dbd4764ffc1e8270e5b3c0fd71b6724562.tar.bz2 |
c++: find_template_parameters and PARM_DECLs [PR105797]
As explained in r11-4959-gde6f64f9556ae3, the atom cache assumes two
equivalent expressions (according to cp_tree_equal) must use the same
template parameters (according to find_template_parameters). This
assumption turned out to not hold for TARGET_EXPR, which was addressed
by that commit.
But this assumption apparently doesn't hold for PARM_DECL either:
find_template_parameters walks its DECL_CONTEXT but cp_tree_equal by
default doesn't consider DECL_CONTEXT unless comparing_specializations
is set. Thus in the first testcase below, the atomic constraints of #1
and #2 are equivalent according to cp_tree_equal, but according to
find_template_parameters the former uses T and the latter uses both T
and U (surprisingly).
We could fix this assumption violation by setting comparing_specializations
in the atom_hasher, which would make cp_tree_equal return false for the
two atoms, but that seems overly pessimistic here. Ideally the atoms
should continue being considered equivalent and we instead fix
find_template_paremeters to return just T for #2's atom.
To that end this patch makes for_each_template_parm_r stop walking the
DECL_CONTEXT of a PARM_DECL. This should be safe to do because
tsubst_copy / tsubst_decl only substitutes the TREE_TYPE of a PARM_DECL
and doesn't bother substituting the DECL_CONTEXT, thus the only relevant
template parameters are those used in its type. any_template_parm_r is
currently responsible for walking its TREE_TYPE, but I suppose it now makes
sense for for_each_template_parm_r to do so instead.
In passing this patch also makes for_each_template_parm_r stop walking
the DECL_CONTEXT of a VAR_/FUNCTION_DECL since doing so after walking
DECL_TI_ARGS is redundant, I think.
I experimented with not walking DECL_CONTEXT for CONST_DECL, but the
second testcase below demonstrates it's necessary to walk it.
PR c++/105797
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (for_each_template_parm_r) <case FUNCTION_DECL, VAR_DECL>:
Don't walk DECL_CONTEXT.
<case PARM_DECL>: Likewise. Walk TREE_TYPE.
<case CONST_DECL>: Simplify.
(any_template_parm_r) <case PARM_DECL>: Don't walk TREE_TYPE.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C: New test.
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C: New test.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/cp/pt.cc | 10 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C | 12 |
3 files changed, 33 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc index 836861e..d0c4c98 100644 --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc @@ -10561,11 +10561,14 @@ for_each_template_parm_r (tree *tp, int *walk_subtrees, void *d) case VAR_DECL: if (DECL_LANG_SPECIFIC (t) && DECL_TEMPLATE_INFO (t)) WALK_SUBTREE (DECL_TI_ARGS (t)); - /* Fall through. */ + break; case PARM_DECL: + WALK_SUBTREE (TREE_TYPE (t)); + break; + case CONST_DECL: - if (TREE_CODE (t) == CONST_DECL && DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t)) + if (DECL_TEMPLATE_PARM_P (t)) WALK_SUBTREE (DECL_INITIAL (t)); if (DECL_CONTEXT (t) && pfd->include_nondeduced_p) @@ -10824,9 +10827,6 @@ any_template_parm_r (tree t, void *data) break; case TEMPLATE_PARM_INDEX: - case PARM_DECL: - /* A parameter or constraint variable may also depend on a template - parameter without explicitly naming it. */ WALK_SUBTREE (TREE_TYPE (t)); break; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6683d22 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-decltype4.C @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// PR c++/105797 +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +template<class T> +concept C = requires { T(); }; + +template<class T> +void f(T v) requires C<decltype(v)>; // #1 + +template<class T, class U> +void f(T v) requires C<decltype(v)>; // #2 + +int main() { + f<int, int>(0); + f<int>(0); +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C new file mode 100644 index 0000000..beb30d0 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-memfun3.C @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } } + +template<int I> +struct A { + enum E { e = I }; + static void f() requires (e != 0); +}; + +int main() { + A<1>::f(); + A<0>::f(); // { dg-error "no match" } +} |