aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>2020-04-14 20:37:12 +0100
committerIain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>2020-04-14 20:44:01 +0100
commita126a1577ffcbf62d97723b35d343bdff014bb40 (patch)
treeb46f6c8e2e85b8ec56e92db98944b333edbd04ac /gcc
parentfa9a57ed91deb57d43fc25891d88867258e06795 (diff)
downloadgcc-a126a1577ffcbf62d97723b35d343bdff014bb40.zip
gcc-a126a1577ffcbf62d97723b35d343bdff014bb40.tar.gz
gcc-a126a1577ffcbf62d97723b35d343bdff014bb40.tar.bz2
coroutines: Fix compile error with symmetric transfers [PR94359]
For symmetric transfers to work with C++20 coroutines, it is currently necessary to tail call the callee coroutine from resume method of the caller coroutine. The current codegen marks these resume calls as "MUST_TAIL_CALL" to indicate that the tail call is required for correctness. Unfortunately, several targets have ABI constraints that prevent an indirect tail-call, which results in the PRs compile error. The change here tests the target sibcall hook for the resume expression and only marks it as requiring a tail call if that's supported. This doesn't fix the underlying problem; that really a solution is needed to allow the tail-calls (or equivalent) to take place - but that will be deferred until next stage 1. gcc/cp/ChangeLog: 2020-04-14 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk> PR c++/94359 * coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Check that the target can support the resume tailcall before mandating it. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-04-14 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk> PR c++/94359 * g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C: Expect a run fail for targets without arbitrary indirect tail-calls.
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/ChangeLog6
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/coroutines.cc22
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog7
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C8
4 files changed, 35 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index e34ef93..4547674 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2020-04-14 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
+
+ PR c++/94359
+ * coroutines.cc (build_actor_fn): Check that the target can
+ support the resume tailcall before mandating it.
+
2020-04-14 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
PR c++/85278
diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
index 5717285..e4ba642 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
@@ -2376,14 +2376,22 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
tree resume = build_call_expr_loc
(loc, builtin_decl_explicit (BUILT_IN_CORO_RESUME), 1, addr);
+ /* In order to support an arbitrary number of coroutine continuations,
+ we must tail call them. However, some targets might not support this
+ for indirect calls, or calls between DSOs.
+ FIXME: see if there's an alternate strategy for such targets. */
/* Now we have the actual call, and we can mark it as a tail. */
CALL_EXPR_TAILCALL (resume) = true;
- /* ... and for optimisation levels 0..1, mark it as requiring a tail-call
- for correctness. It seems that doing this for optimisation levels that
- normally perform tail-calling, confuses the ME (or it would be logical
- to put this on unilaterally). */
- if (optimize < 2)
- CALL_EXPR_MUST_TAIL_CALL (resume) = true;
+ /* Temporarily, switch cfun so that we can use the target hook. */
+ push_struct_function (actor);
+ if (targetm.function_ok_for_sibcall (NULL_TREE, resume))
+ {
+ /* ... and for optimisation levels 0..1, which do not normally tail-
+ -call, mark it as requiring a tail-call for correctness. */
+ if (optimize < 2)
+ CALL_EXPR_MUST_TAIL_CALL (resume) = true;
+ }
+ pop_cfun ();
resume = coro_build_cvt_void_expr_stmt (resume, loc);
add_stmt (resume);
@@ -3951,7 +3959,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
- /* Actor ... */
+ /* Build the actor... */
build_actor_fn (fn_start, coro_frame_type, actor, fnbody, orig, param_uses,
&local_var_uses, param_dtor_list, initial_await, final_await,
body_aw_points.await_number, frame_size);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index c663b25..3a3a1c5 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2020-04-14 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
+
+ PR c++/94359
+ * g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C:
+ Expect a run fail for targets without arbitrary indirect
+ tail-calls.
+
2020-04-14 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
PR c++/93207
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
index 864846e..6f379c8 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/coroutines/torture/symmetric-transfer-00-basic.C
@@ -1,4 +1,10 @@
-// { dg-do run }
+// { dg-do run }
+// See PR94359 - some targets are unable to make general indirect tailcalls
+// for example, between different DSOs.
+// { dg-xfail-run-if "" { hppa*-*-hpux11* } }
+// { dg-xfail-run-if "" { ia64-*-linux-gnu } }
+// { dg-xfail-run-if "" { { lp64 && { powerpc*-linux-gnu } } || { *-*-aix* } } }
+// { dg-xfail-run-if "" { sparc*-*-* } }
#if __has_include(<coroutine>)