diff options
| author | Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> | 2018-01-30 09:13:39 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kyrylo Tkachov <ktkachov@gcc.gnu.org> | 2018-01-30 09:13:39 +0000 |
| commit | 502f6447868803d2af85f3d6d09ae50254b25dc6 (patch) | |
| tree | 4b6e5c062ee693e7cea2cbb46d7282880142e76d /gcc | |
| parent | a236a499b395697d570da38590179ef06fc90fa5 (diff) | |
| download | gcc-502f6447868803d2af85f3d6d09ae50254b25dc6.zip gcc-502f6447868803d2af85f3d6d09ae50254b25dc6.tar.gz gcc-502f6447868803d2af85f3d6d09ae50254b25dc6.tar.bz2 | |
[testsuite] XFAIL gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c on non-NEON arm targets
This test fails to optimise away the PLUS reduction in the loop on arm targets when vectorisation
is not enabled due to absence of SIMD instructions.
From reading the logs and the PR I gather that the presence or absence of SIMD affects the passing of this test
on other targets as well, as evidenced by the long list of xfail targets.
This list looks quite unwieldy to me, but here is a patch adding non-NEON arm to that list.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: XFAIL on !arm_neon arm targets.
From-SVN: r257175
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc')
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c | 2 |
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index d158aa2..8e68df6 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2018-01-30 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com> + + * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: XFAIL on !arm_neon arm targets. + 2018-01-30 Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yukhin@gmail.com> PR target/83828 diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c index 7e77a6a..8606969 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c @@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ foo () but the loop reads only one element at a time, and DOM cannot resolve these. The same happens on powerpc depending on the SIMD support available. */ -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail { { alpha*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* nvptx*-*-* } || { { lp64 && { powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* riscv*-*-* } } || aarch64_sve } } } } } */ +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "return 28;" "optimized" { xfail { { alpha*-*-* hppa*64*-*-* nvptx*-*-* } || { { { lp64 && { powerpc*-*-* sparc*-*-* riscv*-*-* } } || aarch64_sve } || { arm*-*-* && { ! arm_neon } } } } } } } */ |